Time To Boycott Goodyear

I’m not a fan of boycotts, but Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company has crossed the line with me.

From Fox News:

Earlier this week, President Trump called for a boycott of Goodyear tires after a local news station in Kansas shared a slide of a diversity training presentation captured by an employee.  The slide, reportedly taken from a diversity training session, showed a list of acceptable and unacceptable phrases under Goodyear’s zero-tolerance policy.”  The slide listed “Black Lives Matter” under acceptable phrases, while the Trump slogan “Make America Great Again” and the pro-police slogan “Blue Lives Matter” were listed under unacceptable phrases.

When Goodyear stock sank 6% after the odious diversity training slide was revealed, Goodyear president and CEO Rich Kramer stepped in with an offensive display of corporate double-talk in hopes of limiting the damage:

I deeply regret the impression it has created and want to clarify Goodyear’s position.  First, to be clear, Goodyear does not endorse any political organization, party or candidate.

It may come as news to Mr. Kramer, but Black Lives Matter is a political organization, one that tightly aligns itself not only with one of America’s major political parties, but also with Marxism, an ideology that is anti-American in the most profound meaning of the term.

Kramer continued:

Second, Goodyear strongly supports our law enforcement partners and deeply appreciates all they do to put their lives on the line each and every day for our communities.

I have more news for Mr. Kramer.  A company cannot say with a straight face that it supports law enforcement when it cozies up to a rabid police-hating organization whose members were filmed chanting, “What do we want?  Dead cops!  When do we want it?  Now!”

A local NBC News affiliate in Kansas published an audio recording of the Topeka plant’s diversity training indoctrination, which you can listen to here.

As previously mentioned, I do not like boycotts of U.S. companies.  But unless something is done to strike back at the cancer of sanctimonious political correctness that infects most of corporate America, this great nation is doomed to fall from within to the Marxists in our midst.

Below is the letter I sent to Goodyear via its corporate email form.  Those who would like to send a message of their own can access the form by clicking here and then scrolling down to “Customer Assistance.”

Richard J. Kramer

Chairman, president & CEO

Dear Mr. Kramer:

I’ve traded with the local Goodyear store since 1978, but that longtime relationship has come to a screeching halt.

A training video at the company’s Topeka plant reports that Goodyear employees are permitted to wear apparel supporting Black Lives Matter, but that any form of political expression is prohibited.

For your information, Black Lives Matter IS a political organization, one that is using the noble cause of racial equality as a fig leaf to disguise its radical Marxist ideology.

By giving aid and comfort to a violent organization that teaches black people to hate their country and the police, Goodyear has burned its bridges with me.

Furthermore, I intend to make my position known far and wide via email and social media.

©John Eidson. All rights reserved.

VIDEOS: Hillary Clinton, Malevolent Child

Donald Trump is “denigrating” our “democracy,” said Hillary Clinton in the October 19, 2016 presidential debate, responding to Trump’s statement that he may not accept a possibly fraudulent election’s outcome. Since that election, Clinton has by her own professed standard been doing nothing but denigrating our system — and now she’s at it again.

“Don’t forget, Joe and Kamala can win by three million votes and still lose. Take it from me,” said she during her Wednesday Democratic National Convention speech. “So we need numbers overwhelming, so Trump can’t sneak or steal his way to victory,” she continued (video below).

This has been a recurring Clinton theme. Aside from her many excuses for losing in 2016, as she made herself Stacey Abrams’s archetype, is the implication that she’s the election’s true winner because she captured the popular vote. Spouting this destructive rhetoric makes her worse than just the unstable person Johnson characterizes her as above — it reveals her as a malevolent child.

Something necessary for true civilization is governance by rule of law, part of which is abiding by election outcomes that accord with established and long-accepted laws. Even children instinctively grasp this concept.

As a few readers know, I once was a serious competitive tennis player. After quitting the satellite circuit (tantamount to baseball’s minor leagues), I taught the game for many years, and among my duties was running a children’s “match play” program.

Now, in tennis, you can actually win more games than your opponent but lose the match (example: being defeated 6-0, 6-7, 6-7, which gives you 18 games to the other player’s 14). Never, though, in all my years in the sport, did I ever see even the smallest, most immature child lose under such circumstances and protest, “I really won!” You knew the rules, you accepted the rules, so you accepted an outcome determined under them.

This said, most children are immature, but not malevolently Machiavellian. This brings us back to callow Clinton. “That’s horrifying,” she exclaimed during the aforementioned 2016 debate in response to Trump saying he would “look at it at the time” before revealing whether he’d accept the election’s outcome.

“Let’s be clear about what he is saying and what that means, she continued. “He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position” (video below).

And here is pre-Nov. 8 2016 Clinton further condemning post-Nov.8 2016 Clinton:

Now, it’s no surprise the Democrats despise the Electoral College; after all, Republicans have won the popular vote only once in the last 28 years (G.W. Bush, 2004). It’s okay to propose an amendment to switch to a popular-vote system, too (though I adamantly oppose it), as this is using our republic’s established mechanisms to effect change, lawfully.

But throwing a tantrum and questioning legitimate outcomes is something else entirely. Note that there’s no comparison between Trump’s and Clinton’s attitudes. Trump was warning that vote fraud was a reality and that, for this reason, it might be necessary to sometimes challenge electoral outcomes.

In contrast, Clinton has questioned the 2016 electoral outcome citing imaginary boogeymen (Russia!) and her having won the popular vote.

To equate these perspectives is like supposing that a tennis player who questions a match result because his opponent cheated (i.e., bad line calls) is acting identically to one who questions a result merely because he won more games than his opponent. It’s silly.

In reality, contesting a fraudulent election can strengthen our republic by encouraging the rule of law and attacking the fraud.

Contesting an election won under long established standards undermines our republic by “denigrating” the rule of law and attacking the system itself.

Moreover, the truth is the opposite of Clinton’s claims: While Trump’s Electoral College victory is absolutely legitimate, there is question as to Clinton’s popular vote margin because vote fraud is rampant.

Oh, don’t take my word for it. Just consider what NYC’s then-election commissioner, Democrat Alan Schulkin, revealed on hidden video in 2016. “I think there’s a lot of voter fraud,” he admitted, as he talked about how people are “bussed” around to vote illegally (video below).

This was followed by a Project Veritas sting video showing a Democrat operative named Scott Foval giving advice on committing the fraud, saying it has been going on for 50 years and that it “doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say; we need to win this m****rf****r” (video below. Warning: vulgar language).

It’s not hyperbole to characterize Clinton and other leftists as childish, for such people never matured spiritually, philosophically and morally. The problem is that they can’t be corrected with a spanking, and when they have enough power, well, you might as well then be governed by the malevolent, sociopathic little girl in the Bad Seed.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Gab or Parler (preferably) or Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

A Convention of Socialist Gas Bags

Several hours prior to the Democratic National Convention August 17, 2020, my column was published, detailing my definition of the term Socialist Charlatans. I used it in describing the Democrats. As a former Soviet attorney, living under Socialism half of my life, I knew this same, tired, old, fraudulent Socialism very well and have written about it for thirty-five years. God loves Truth and an incredible demonstration of my words was illustrated by all the speakers on the Democratic National Convention. In front of you was an ongoing parade of Socialist Charlatans, a consortium of LIARS deceiving and misleading you. Read here my column Biden/Harris – No Promised Progressive Utopia, Just More Socialist Lies, August, 17, 2020.

The convention has exposed an incredible transformation within the Party—the messages there were known to me as Socialist rhetoric, Soviet-style, with fraud at its core, in its arrangements, and actions. The speakers didn’t like America: “America is a racist country.” They were presenting a very dark picture of a country in trouble with no solution. Their message of a policy of unity actually promoted disunity. All of them weren’t telling the truth, but lies, distortion, and exaggeration, where the key point is hatred for Trump: “Trump is bad for the country and a decent man, Biden, is the remedy.” Yet, they provided a photo and video of him from ten-fifteen years ago to deceive you. By the way: Putin also hates Trump—this commonality with Democrats is not a coincidence…

How Socialist Charlatans are Lying and Deceiving You

For me the ticket Biden/Harris in itself was a double-fraud where both are helping each other to distort the facts while covering-up for each other. Anyone who has eyes and ears understands very well that due to his mental incapacity Biden cannot be the remedy for America. Actually, America is doing just fine and does not need a ‘remedy’. Many people, including me have an impression that the outside forces are designing and orchestrating the entire show within the Democrat Party, where Joe Biden is definitely a puppet. And a professional MD also has doubts in Biden’s mental acuity:

Dr. Ronny Jackson, the official White House doctor under President Barack Obama, just spoke out to say that “something is not right” mentally with Joe Biden. “I won’t make any particular diagnosis about dementia,” Jackson added. “But what I will say is that something is not right,” he continued, arguing that Biden is getting so bad that he is “not comfortable” with him becoming president. The Political Insider,

‘Something Is Not Right’ With Biden, Obama White House Doctor Claims, by JACK HADFIELD, AUGUST 18, 2020

When an MD with this man’s credentials has doubts in Biden’s mental capacity, it is a Red Flag. Something fishy is going on in the fight for political power in the election 2020. Don’t you think that in this case the knowledge of Socialist mafia, which comprises all Socialist Charlatans is imperative to identify those who are game-playing in the American election of 2020?  The ticket Biden/Harris in itself is a double-fraud “This double-fraud will try to unify all Democrats by fraudulently claiming they can achieve a progressive utopia. The team is Putin’s revenge to America and Republican Party—Putin wants the chaos in America.” There is another term, I introduced which inextricably ties to Socialist Charlatans—America’s Socialist Mafia. As a matter of fact, America’s Socialist Mafia comprises all Socialist Charlatans within the Democrat Party, read here my column Infiltration and Subversion–Communist-Inspired Insurrection!

I was shocked listening Michelle-my-belle in the first day of the Dem. Convention. The former first lady accused President Trump’s White House of operating in “chaos” and without “empathy” as she urged voters to cast their ballots for Joe Biden like their very lives depended on it. Her speech stunned me. Has she seen or heard Biden during last 2-3 years? The man is definitely demonstrates mental incapacity in his speech, let alone in acting rationally and reasonably. Who is behind him actually running the show? The answer is the Deep State through America’s Socialist Mafia and their Socialist Charlatans. Michelle Obama knows it and is terrified that Trump might win. She protects Barack Obama: What our dysfunctional FBI has not exposed today, Trump’s team in the second term will definitely investigate very deeply…

Her accusations of President Trump’s White House of operating in “chaos” and without “empathy” is an arrogant, wide-eyed lie. Her recourse to “empathy” was a decoration of her merciless lies. I am warning you–all Socialist Charlatans speakers on the Dems Convention know that and they all will lie to prevent the end of the Party for Treason and collaboration with Putin’s KGB for several decades. About Trump’s chaos, we all had our personal experiences watching Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, Atlanta, and New York to see how the Dems leadership created this chaos, which brought up violence, arson, looting and killing… It was planned and calculated by the leadership of the Democrat Party in concert with Putin’s KGB. Read my book Socialist Lies From Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders, XLIBRIS, 2016 

Yes, the destruction of American cities was planned as the next stage of a coup against President Trump. It started with the Trump/Dossier, produced by Putin’s KGB, when a dysfunctional FBI and its three Directors wouldn’t recognize the forgery. Then it was the Mueller investigation, with the member inside, who defrauded the FISA Court, we found about him only in August 2020. Then it was a farce of Impeachment, and then Covid-19 from the heart of Communist China. As I’ve stated before, Pelosi’s rush to impeach Trump during the Christmas Season 2019, can be explained today: Pelosi knew that the China virus is on its way to America. American Socialists and Chinese Communists always work together against American Capitalism…

Destruction: The Ideology of Socialism/Communism

Destruction is a core value of the ideology of Socialism/Communism. It is a multi-faceted notion, which was dramatically widened by the ideological war of the 20th century. But first let me give you a definition of the word:

de·struc·tion

/dəˈstrəkSH (ə)n/

Noun

The action or process of causing so much damage to something that it no longer exists or cannot be repaired. Similar: demolish, knocking down, pulling down, levelling,

The action or process of killing or being killed. Similar: annihilation, wiping out, elimination.  A cause of someone’s ruin.

Definition from Oxford language.

This definition of the word destruction has been widely extended and broaden in the ideological war against capitalism during the 20th century, its multi-faceted patterns amplified: We are now in this process. Please, look at the paragraph, preceding this segment: it is an attempted destruction of Trump’s character, personality, his name and his family. It was done with the best traditions of Stalinist Soviet Socialism in the 1930s in Russia, when millions were fraudulently accused, deported, and killed. The crime was repeated by Mao in China–about one hundred thousand people were annihilated. Unprecedented violence was committed and it is not fully reported yet. Read my book: What is Happening to America? The Hidden Truth of Global Destruction, LIBRIS, 2012.

A Global Socialist Spy Ring

Reading the book, you will find hundreds of methods, means and devices aimed at destruction and use to destruct: espionage, sabotage, subversion, disruption, distraction, disinformation, interference, diversion, and so on. When motivation is known, you can project the actions. The recent statement about the sabotage in 1996 we found out in 2020: Trans World Airlines Flight 800 (TWA 800) was a Boeing 747-100 that exploded and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, New York, on July 17, 1996. It took fifteen years to investigate what I wrote in the mentioned book in 1996, knowing the Socialist methods of the sabotage and claiming that it was the KGB’s sabotage…

New York is a Socialist city and a citadel of the KGB. That is the reason the attack of 9/11 happened in 2001 New York. To make long story short, just find the statement of a defector from the Russia, a member of the KGB Mr. Konstantin Preobrazhensky. He founded out that the leader of the Islamist group Attah had a meeting with the agent of the KGB in Prague. This is the Red Flag to Russian connection. The first American Manchurian President Bill Clinton started the destruction of New York, Andrew Cuomo completed it…I lived in New York for thirty years, and despite the difficulties, I loved the ‘Center of the World’. It is heartbreaking to see today how Socialist Charlatans destroy the city and the people living there… New York is an anti-Trump fort—several criminal cases are being investigated against him there.

Don’t be surprised that 30-35 of my latest columns are informing you about the danger of the KGB working within. I use the term KGB, while describing the entire Russian Security Services apparatus. It has established a Global Socialist Spy Ring in the 20th century, which is working quite “successfully” in the 21st century. One example can give you a picture of the gigantic size and significance of the destructive conduct of the KGB. We are still debating whether it was right to go into Iraq and fight there. At the time nobody knew that Prime Minister of Iraq Nouri al-Maliki was a KGB’s agent. He was recruited by the KGB when he lived in Iran. After all, the Clinton administration the FBI and Intel didn’t serve the country well—they didn’t know A Global Socialist Spy Ring…

The second American Manchurian President, Barack Obama was very close to complete destruction of the American Constitutional Republic, started by the first one: Citizen Donald J. Trump has stopped the destruction. But the Obama legacy is so damaging that it will take more than four years to partially repair the country. One of his major “achievements” is making Joe Biden a Socialist Charlatan, but poor Joe doesn’t know that. “Biden is a guided missile” Obama’s associate called him. This part of Obama’s legacy requires a separate presentation.…

My fellow Americans!

Stand up for your country!!

Socialist Charlatans are going to take it from you…

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com and on www.drrichswier.com/author/spipko/

©Simona Pipko. All rights reserved.

The Single, Most-Important Book on Healthcare Today!

It was after World War II.  The United States had just guaranteed the continuation of a free society.  No country could hold a candle to its productivity, its creativity, its strength, or its wealth.

America’s healthcare, too, was unparalleled.  The world’s most advanced surgeries were being performed in the United States. The most sophisticated medications were being developed in the United States.  And the world’s most knowledgeable physicians were being produced in the United States.

But it would only be a matter of time before excessive regulation, corporate manipulations, and government interventions would turn the healthcare system with the brightest future in human history into one burdened with red tape and bureaucratic hurdles.  Under the leadership of leftist progressives, our healthcare system would regress into one unable to produce penicillin within its borders or supply its hospitals with the medications needed to keep the nation’s patients alive.

In The Case for Free Market Healthcare, I explore how we allowed for this unparalleled decline.  I review the interventions we must undertake to reverse this harrowing trend and once again become the unparalleled leader in healthcare.

At a time when one political party is making an argument contrary to the lessons repeatedly learned throughout human history while trying to convince us to give up control of our care to the same political philosophy that has cast out God, destroyed our great cities, and weakened our country, it is imperative that you read this book and share it with your friends.  

Get The Case for Free Market Healthcare today!  Just click here to get started.  Once you review The Case for Free Market Healthcare, there won’t be a leftist who’ll be able to fool you with hollow arguments for a dystopic, government-run healthcare delivery system.  This is the book that will leave your leftist leaning friend or loved one without a valid retort.  Get one for them!

©All rights reserved.

The Difference Donald Trump Has Made

RELATED VIDEO:

Donald Trump is so passionately loved — and fanatically hated — partly because he has changed the course of the United States, both domestically and internationally, for the first time since before World War II. Some believe that he has upset the world order that has prevented a third world war, and risks plunging the world into chaos. Others believe that his presidency heralds a refreshing and much-needed new direction for both the nation and the world, one that, if continued, will make America stronger, safer, and more prosperous, and redound to the benefit of the nation’s genuine allies as well.

Which side is right? History will judge Trump, but actually we can know a great deal about what his place in that history will be right now — by applying the criteria for success left to us by the Founding Fathers. Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster evaluates Trump and every one of his predecessors by those criteria, and in doing so, shows whether Trump’s policies are to be commended and continued, or excoriated as evil and rejected.

“American students are usually taught to remember names and dates, but rarely get asked to critically evaluate past presidents. Here, Spencer does that in a way never-before-seen. A must-read for students — students of history.” — Jack Posobiec, correspondent and host for One America News Network and author of Citizens for Trump: The Inside Story of the People’s Movement to Take Back America

Preorder Rating America’s Presidents here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

What do the Letters in the word Democrat Really Stand For?

The Democrat Party is no long the party of JFK. It is now the party of Lee Harvey Oswald.

Video: Democrats – The Party of ‘Unity’ and ‘Empathy’? When ‘unity’ and ‘empathy’ maim and destroy. 

After watching some of the speakers at the DNC National Convention I began to ask myself: What do Democrats really believe in? I decided to simply link pronouns to each letter of the word DEMOCRAT to try to express their policies, politics, view of American and the world.

What do the letters in the word DEMOCRAT really stand for? Here is my take on the word DEMOCRAT:

D = Decadent, Demagogues, Destroyers, Delusional, Demonic, Demented, Destructive.

E = Emotional, Enivro-Nazis, Elitist, Evil.

M = Maternalistic, Materialistic, Maim, Mad, Mean, Mayhem, Hate MAGA.

O = Outraged, Outrageous, Oh My God, OMG.

C = Crazy, Cantankerous, Communist.

R = Remove “Under God” from the Pledge of Alliegance, Ranting, Rioters, Raving Mad, UnReasonable.

A = Antifa, Angry, Agitated, Anti-American, Anti-Anyone who disagrees with them, Abortionists.

T = Terrible, Taunting, Trotskyites, Terrorists.

If you would like to add your own pronouns and thoughts please do in the comment section of this article.


Please CLICK HERE to read my series of columns titled:

‘DECADENT DEMOCRATS.’


WATCH THIS VIDEO ANALYSIS OF THE DEMOCRAT NATIONAL CONVENTION:

©All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

TED CRUZ: Will Democrats Defend The Police? I Wouldn’t Count On It

‘All Cops Are Bastards’: BLM Protesters Swarm NYPD Union President Pat Lynch’s House

Alyssa Milano, Robert De Niro And Hundreds Of Stars Sign California Police Reform Letter

Portland Rioter Arrested After Allegedly Striking Federal Officer With A Baseball Bat

Report: Chicago Police Arrest Woman Who Posted Her Looting Video To Facebook

George Washington’s Admonition to America

On Thursday night, August 13, 2020, the statue-topplers tore down another statue of the father of our country, just after they defaced it. This statue of George Washington stood in Grand Park near Los Angeles City Hall since 1933. The war on America as founded continues unabated.

A couple of months ago, political cartoonist Michael Ramirez had a brilliant piece showing a statue of George Washington with this description:

  • Father of our country
  • First president of the United States
  • Defeated one of the most powerful nations in the world.

On the other side of the drawing was a caricature of a woke social justice warrior. His name was “Imah Luzer.” And his achievements were also listed:

  • Scored 300 on XBOX
  • Won participation trophy
  • Created safe space
  • Lives with parents.

The Imah Luzer character holds a rope, lassoed around the bronze likeness of Washington, which he is about to yank down. Today it seems that many of those who have accomplished nothing positive are trying to tear down reminders of those who have accomplished great things, including heroes of the past. To borrow a phrase (from a different context) from Pulitzer-winning historian Barbara Tuchman, this is “a barbarian’s gestures of anger against civilized things.”

Washington is a genuine hero, but some today are making him into a villain. The reason, of course, is slavery.

George Washington grew up as a gentleman farmer in colonial Virginia and was a fourth generation slave-owner. But by the end of his life, he had decided slavery was immoral and so, at his death, he freed his slaves and made provision for them. But there is no atonement to the Left. There is no forgiveness of sins. Because George Washington owned slaves, he is unforgiveable to these woke social justice warriors.

Nonetheless, there are many warnings that George Washington made that I think modern Americans could learn from, including these mobs of woke social justice warriors.

First of all, there is the matter of gratitude to God. The “woke” mob seems to operate from a sense of entitlement. The world owes them everything. Washington operated from a Christian perspective, where he asked for God’s help at virtually every turn and where he thanked the Lord for His help.

Washington marveled at how many times God helped the American cause. In 1778, he wrote to one of his military leaders, “The hand of Providence has been so conspicuous in all this, that he must be worse than an infidel that lacks faith, and more than wicked, that has not gratitude enough to acknowledge his obligations.” That is, obligations of gratitude.

Today, instead of gratitude, we see a whole generation of ingrates. No wonder they disrespect the flag and kneel in protest against the National Anthem. To them, being an American is more of a curse than a blessing.

But George Washington experienced repeatedly what he believed was the hand of Providence in helping his ragtag army of ill-fed farmers and merchants as they faced what was the strongest army and navy on earth at that time.

He said in his First Inaugural Address that our first obligation was to thank the Lord that we even became a nation. “No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the People of the United States. Every step, by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation, seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency.” Without God’s help, we would not have been able to create this government.

And what is this government? Washington puts it this way: It is a government instituted by “the People of the United States” themselves. If we don’t like things as is, we are free to change them.

In his Farewell Address, Washington warns that we should do everything to protect “religion and morality,” which he calls twin pillars of human happiness. He also warns against letting political factions rule the day.

But I think probably the greatest single admonition from our first president comes from his Circular to the States, written in June 1783.

Washington ended this letter to the governors of the 13 states with a prayer that we would all learn to imitate “the Divine Author of our Blessed Religion,” meaning Jesus. And he says that without imitating Jesus, we can never hope to be a happy nation.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen America in a more miserable state than it is at present, with all the riots in the streets and strangers hurting (in some cases, killing) strangers.

Are we imitating Jesus? Far from it. Are we a happy nation? Far from it.

We would do well to learn from George Washington, rather than to desecrate his memory.

©Jerry Newcombe. All rights reserved.

File Under Factitious

I found The Book of Trees, by Leanne Lieberman, to be an unusual reading experience.  I was struck by  its inauthenticity, as the author clearly had a list of grievances and concocted a story line to convey them.  Her intent was to disparage and delegitimize Israel as a nation and the Jews as a people – indeed to challenge their very existence – revealing her opinion through Mia.


Mia is the 17-year-old daughter of unwed parents in Canada.  Her mother is an irreligious, Jewish, Bohemian-type remnant of the 1960s; her father, an atheist, lapsed Catholic, and a travelling musician who was often absent.  She is lonely, in need of spiritual grounding.  Alluding to her Jewish grandmother, she responded to a Jewish outreach poster and accepted a scholarship to study in Israel with a friend, Aviva Blume, for the summer between high school and university.

From the first day that she can run off on her own, Mia finds beauty in the endless desert and in the mosque on the Temple Mount and the Armenian church within the Old City.  She disparages all else – Mrs. Blume, who hosted Mia’s first Shabbat dinner in Canada, as “frumpy”; Mr. Blume, as “fat and middle-aged,” although Mia was touched by the evening and the traditional love song.  In Israel, she finds the tourists “dorky,” the Kotel “just a stone wall,” and the wigs worn by orthodox women for modesty weirded me out.”  The young man in class is cute, but “geeky.”  The teacher’s kerchief is “ugly and classes about the laws of kashruth (Jewish religious laws of the suitability of food) are “ridiculous” and “disappointing.”  She is often dizzy, her head aches from clenching her teeth, and she was “nauseated” during prayers.  However, she finds the non-Jewish American guitarist, Andrew, attractive, and she makes a feeble attempt at limiting her association.  The author’s opinions about Judaism and Jews have become obvious.

She takes her first bus trip with Aviva into the Judean Desert, its name derived from Judah, one of the sons of the Jewish Patriarch, Jacob, also known as Israel, but the author has obvious reasons for overlooking the connection.  Also ignored are the 3,000 years of recorded Jewish history on this land, including verified accounts of kings, prophets, characters that define the people, their artifacts and values, preferring to imagine credibility for Arabs who have no historical ties whatsoever.

Mia criticizes a grove of neatly spaced trees that had been planted by the Jewish National Fund (JNF), saying they looked unnatural, lacking the undergrowth of a northern forest. “It felt dead, like a tree graveyard.” She belittles the monument that commemorates the soldiers who took the hill in the 1948 War of Independence, battling five Arab armies that attacked the new sovereign state.  Aviva suggests that the trees were probably planted over what had been an Arab village, to which Mia responds, “I guess they were determined to keep their homeland,” again endorsing the Muslim story line.

Rather than fact-check prior to writing, Lieberman recently reviewed her own book for credibility; book sales are weak, perhaps due to her tenacious bias. Mia cries for trees she imagines have been planted over Arab villages, but not for the Israelis murdered by those Arab villagers, or for diners killed, crippled or blinded by a jihadi’s explosive belt; or for the homes and playgrounds and thousands of agricultural acreage and wildlife preserves burned to cinders by their youths’ incendiary balloons.  She repeats the Palestinian lie of Israeli oppression, and accuses Israel of apartheid, the charges never substantiated.  During the pandemic, the Palestinian Authority continues to prioritize payments to convicted terrorists and their families over their people’s well-being. Even though Israel’s economy has suffered and people have died, the Jewish state continues to send aid to the PA and Gaza.

Muslim citizens enjoy more rights in Israel than they do under Islamic rule.  The 20th century is packed with Arab raids, terrorism, massacres, revolts, numerous wars, intifadas, and suicide bombings worldwide.    Azzam Pasha, secretary-general of the Arab League, declared of Israel on May 15, 1948, “This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades.”  Islam has been the cause of mass slaughter, devastation and annihilation since its inception and responsible for the more than 37,483 deadly attacks, worldwide (to 8/18/20), since 9/11.  They have never declared a desire for peace as Lieberman suggests. and have never enacted laws to abolish slavery or grant individual freedoms. The Book of Trees is a mission in deception for the Palestinian narrative, and it is time to drop the legend of indigenous Palestinians.

The 600,000 – 750,000 Arabs who left Israel according to their own armies’ commands were part of the displaced masses from the Arab-initiated war, and should have been welcomed back to Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.  Egypt is 36:1 the size of Israel, Iraq 15.7:1, Syria 6.6:1, and Jordan 3.2:1, and the Naqba is the betrayal by their own.  Lieberman’s hope that Israel will welcome their avowed enemy and descendants is a wish for Israel’s annihilation.  She does not advocate that the 850,000 displaced Jews be permitted to return to the Islamic countries from which they fled at the same time.  Yasser Arafat declared that a Palestinian state would be Jew-free, yet the author and others expect Israel to be overwhelmed by their enemy.

From her new lover, Andrew, Mia learns that the Palestinians are “a poor native people who have been uprooted,” and that they want clean water and good schools – basic human rights.  She does not know that Israel supplies large amounts of water from its own provisions to Palestinians and Jordan because this desert country has become a world leader of water conservation and desalination, overcoming almost insurmountable obstacles, while Hamas-controlled Gazans refuse to cooperate to improve their lot, and use the water as a political issue.  Similarly, Mia seems not to know that Palestinians refused every opportunity to create their own country on land offered by the UN and Israel, and unaware that their children are raised to be murderous jihadis.  And how is “good schools” defined when they teach hate against Israel and all Jews, and how to behead their perceived enemy.  After the Arabs lost their War of 1967, they still declared, NO peace with Israel, NO recognition of Israel, and NO negotiation with Israel.

Mia learns about the checkpoints, but not of their effectiveness at apprehending terrorists before they can gain entry into Israel and discharge their explosive devices among the citizens.  Lieberman describes the West Bank as a third-world country, with no infrastructure, their economy in ruins, but appears to be unaware that their more-than-generous funding (among the world’s largest per-capita aid recipients) gets funneled to Palestinian officials, for armaments against Israel and for mothers of jihadi martyrs.  Funds earmarked for cement for housing are instead used to construct miles of terror tunnels, and the elite reside in grandeur. 

Andrew tells Mia that he volunteers to teach music and tutor English at a Palestinian school, and he rebuilds Arab homes razed by the Israeli military.  Once again, Lieberman withholds why these homes have been destroyed.  Some were built as illegal acts of defiance by the United Nations against Israeli law; others were erected by nomadic tribes on land that lacked infrastructure and  deemed unsuitable for housing (Israel offers to move Bedouins!); and still others were intentionally demolished as reprisal for the families of murderous martyrs.

Upon seeing the Kotel, the remaining Western Wall of the ancient Jewish Temple and Jewry’s holiest shrine (built in 2nd century BCE, destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE), Mia criticizes their prayer customs of thousands of years.  (Doubtful that she would be this respectful with other religions.)  Lieberman uses Andrew to remind the reader once again, that the Palestinians were “violently” expelled in 1948, their trees and groves destroyed, the innocents killed or imprisoned by the Israeli army.  (Read Arab accounts here)   Lieberman’s choices of informational sources are no different than if she had contacted Josef Goebbels for data about the Holocaust.

Despite the attempts to discredit and delegitimize Israel, the truth is known.  Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, an Arab Muslim leader, told the Peel Commission in 1937: “There is no such country as Palestine!  Palestine is a term the Zionists invented.  (TK – The Romans invented the term as an affront to the Jews.)  There is no Palestine in the Bible.  Our country was for centuries part of Syria.”  In 1946, Arab-American historian Philip Hitti testified before the 1946 Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry:  “There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not,” – meaning that there had never been a nation bearing this name.

Syrian President Hafez Assad told Yasser Arafat, “Palestine is an integral part of Syria,” and Prince Hassan of the Jordanian National Assembly said, on February 2, 1970, “Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine.”

PLO executive committee member, Zahir Muhsein, said, “The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel.”  in short, its only purpose is to oppose Zionism and this is one of many war tactics.

Of the numerous Muslim-majority states worldwide, they may all have begun as small parcels of land,  no-go zones within cities that expand by force under Islamic rule, but an independent Arab Palestine has never existed – not under Ottoman rule or British rule, not under the United Nations Partition Plan, and not under Jordanian or Egyptian rule.  For now, it remains a myth based on deception, and Lieberman’s book for vulnerable children and young adults a sad symptom of our times.

©Tabitha Korol. All rights reserved.

K.W. Miller Congressional Committee (FL-18) Issues Legal Notice to TC Palm Newspaper for Printing False and Defamatory Information

STUART, Fla./PRNewswire/ — KW Miller, the high profile Conservative Republican Congressional Candidate running for office in Florida’s 18th Congressional District issues legal notice to TC Palm and demands prompt retraction of false and defamatory statements.

The KW Miller Congressional Committee has given TC Palm management twenty-four (24) hours to retract their false and defamatory statements about Mr. Miller. The printed statements are a blatant attempt to disparage Mr. Miller and torturously interfere with a Federal Congressional Campaign by TC Palm management and will not be tolerated.

The KW Miller Congressional Committee makes clear the following facts:

  • KW Miller is a Registered Republican voter;

  • KW Miller does not race bait. Mr. Miller’s Congressional Twitter account was hacked and when discovered by the external media team, security measures were put in place;

  • KW Miller does not engage in “Conspiracy Theories.” Mr. Miller is well known for his dedication to stopping the criminal syndicates running “Child Sex Trafficking” and “Pedophilia” in the USA. Over 300,000 children are sex trafficked annually in the USA alone.

  • KW Miller ran a large-scale Sting Operation on Twitter with a sophisticated International Media team to expose the criminal activities that to go unabated on numerous social media platforms; https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/conservative-congressional-candidate-conducts-massive-sting-operation-on-leftist-run-media-companies-protecting-pedophiles-301109114.html

  • KW Miller founded the Florida Military Veterans Support Group. They are focused on protecting our military veterans and senior citizens suffering from chronic intractable pain (CIP) and preventing suicide. https://www.facebook.com/ProtectingOurVeterans/

  • KW Miller is a senior international energy and infrastructure executive. He is focused on many issues in Florida’s 18th District and Nationally, including and most importantly the Water Quality, Environmental Issues, Healthcare, Veteran Suicide and Human Trafficking, among many others.

About KW Miller

KW Miller is a true Conservative and a Registered Republican Voter. Florida 18th Congressional District is a critical “Pivot” district in the swing State of Florida. KW is on the November General Election ballot because he has the support of both Independent and Republican voters. The Oath of Office to Defend the Constitution are not flexible, nor open to interpretation. It is time for a true Conservative Republican KW Miller to represent the 18th District in Congress.

©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: The Secret of the News Media

Regardless of your party affiliation, everyone seems to be on edge regarding the upcoming November elections. When you add on top of this the concern over the COVID-19 virus, and the violence and looting in our cities, the country is getting worn out, depressed, and frankly, very angry. This is all by design as the news media knows how to pull the strings of the people.

Let me preface my remarks by describing my participation in the 2016 election when I followed the press corps to several Trump Rallies in my state. One of the first things I learned was how immoral these people were and how they gladly sacrificed honest reporting for the almighty dollar.

Ever since the United States went to a 24/7 news cycle in 1980, the reporting of news media has been manipulated by executives for competitive purposes, and this goes for ALL media outlets, be it television, newspaper, radio, magazine, etc. Fewer and fewer reporters are allowed to produce honest copy, most must follow the guidelines as prescribed by their bosses. To illustrate, before all of the Trump Rallies I attended, those members of the press who produced written copy had finished their work PRIOR to Mr. Trump taking the podium. The next day, I would read their copy, and realized it had nothing whatsoever to do with what was actually said during the rally, making the reporting completely fallacious and nonsensical. It was just plain wrong.

It was at this time I learned the news media was in the business of making money, big money. Naively, I had believed reporters tried to report fairly and accurately, but this is simply not so. To make money, they have to create an audience following, and there is nothing better than to create intrigue a la “sensationalism.” Let me give you an example, if the press reported an incumbent will likely win re-election and the challenger will be easily defeated, there would be no intrigue, and consequently, no audience interest and no income. However, if it is reported the underdog will likely upset the incumbent, than the press creates intrigue, resulting in a bigger audience and makes more money on advertising, regardless if it is true or not. Not surprising, all of the news media is in on this, be it CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and just about everyone else. Creating intrigue results in big bucks. It is therefore in their best interest to do so, and to Hell with honesty and accuracy, it just gets in the way. Hence, the proliferation of “Fake News.”

Closely related to this are the polls, which are also geared to creating intrigue. Again, they will have little to sell if the incumbent is winning. Not surprising, no two polls follow precisely the same criteria and input gathering techniques (people to be selected to be interviewed). As such, they produce different results which is why I refer to them as mixing apples with oranges. Let us also not forget, Secretary Hillary Clinton possessed a double-digit lead going into the election. The same phenomenon is happening again. This explains why the political parties and campaigns do their own polling. In other words, they recognize the major polls are flawed and useless, which is why they rely on their own polling people. The point is, anyone who has complete faith in the political polls is a sucker and should avoid Aqueduct.

So, who should John Q. Public trust for news and polling? Nobody but themselves. I would suggest you watch current events, speeches, and other live events on television (Thank God for C-SPAN), and leave the spin behind you. You may also want to lookup voting results through your local board of elections (which is what I do).

Just remember, the news media’s business is not honest journalism, it is about making a buck, and to do so, they have to play the public as sheep. Sorry, but it is true.

So, for you Nervous Nellies out there, take a chill pill and relax. If you are really concerned with the outcome of the November elections, report for campaign duty. Otherwise, just turn off the network news and do your own homework.

Therefore, the lesson today is simple, “Do not believe half of what you read or hear.” Then again, you might want to make it 75%.

Keep the Faith!

P.S. – Also, I have a NEW book, “Before You Vote: Know How Your Government Works”, What American youth should know about government, available in Printed, PDF and eBook form. This is the perfect gift for youth!

EDITORS NOTE: This Bryce is Right podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Brilliant Trump Puts Himself On All Postage Stamps, Forcing Democrats To Push For Abolishing USPS

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Sources are reporting that Trump has dealt a killer blow in his ongoing war against his sworn enemy, the U.S. Post Office. In a move of sheer, mind-blowing brilliance, Trump directed the Post Office to put his face on every single stamp, forcing the Democrats to reverse course and abolish the institution once and for all.

The new stamp, dubbed “The Trump-Stamp,” to be used on all pieces of mail features a smiling Donald Trump, with the caption “GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER.”

Don Lemon broke the news in a tearful address to the nation last night. “Our democracy is over,” he said. “It doesn’t exist anymore. I will never send another piece of mail ever again, and neither should you or else you’re a racist.”

Antifa and BLM responded by marching on local post offices and burning them down. Enthusiastic Trump supporters quickly bought up all the stamps. They are now selling for $3,000 apiece online.

RELATED POLITICAL SATIRE:

Trump Drives Around Playing Mailbox Baseball In Latest Voter Suppression Scheme

Hardcore Trump Supporter Destroys His Own Mailbox

Kamala Harris Proposes Housing Plan Where Everybody Gets Free 10’x10′ Room And Three Meals A Day

State Hailed As Progressive Hub Of Technological Innovation Can’t Figure Out How To Keep The Lights On

Democratic Convention Viewer Wishing They Would Just Get To The Part About All The Free Stuff

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire from The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: WHITE HOUSE SIEGE! Leftist group pledges revolution.

A leftist group is vowing to place the White House under siege.

The 50-day protest, starting on Sept. 17, is being promoted by a revolutionary group called “Adbusters.”

Though claiming to want nonviolent protest, the group’s website provides questionable suggestions on what to bring to the protest: “Stuff your backpack with the tools of nonviolent revolution, and bring intelligence to match your enthusiasm.”

Their manifesto includes a doctrine called “The Metamemetic Insurrection” — all about winning the culture war with funny internet photos, also known as memes.

“This is the Meme War that will decide our fate. And to win this war, we must re-examine all assumptions, all rules, all habits of mind that have delivered us to this perilous moment,” it says.

They oppose the re-election of President Trump — accusing him in this promo video of desiring a dictatorship — pledging their goal to prevent his victory: “By now it’s clear that Trump and his sycophants will do anything to prevent Joe Biden from taking office. … We will not let Donald Trump steal the election!”

Earlier in the week Attorney General William Barr, a faithful Catholic, warned of the dangers of communist groups like Adbusters: “What they do is they hijack these demonstrations and they provoke violence.”

Leftist radicals — agitating to take down the Trump administration — are demonstrating they are not afraid of using groups like Adbusters to provoke their revolution, turning a figurative siege into a literal one.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Democrats Continue Lies About So-Called Muslim Ban

As I have reported innumerable times recently at RRW, thousands of Muslims continue to enter the US from all over the world.  There is no Muslim ban.

But, the Democrats are never hindered by the facts as John Binder points out about last nights Democrat infomercial (a.k.a. 2020 presidential convention).

By the way, I’m busy these days prepping and generally getting stuff in order (if you know what I mean), and so I only plan to post when I see something that I find interesting.  Consider this my August recess.

From Breitbart:

Fact Check: The Travel Ban Is Neither a ‘Muslim Ban,’ Nor Unconstitutional

CLAIM: President Donald Trump’s travel ban was a “Muslim ban” and was unconstitutional.

VERDICT: False. The travel ban was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Actress Tracee Ellis Ross, who moderated the second evening of the Democrat National Convention (DNC), claimed that President Trump’s travel ban was unconstitutional She introduced former Acting U.S. Attorney General Sally Yates, whom she said “refused to defend an unconstitutional travel ban and paid for it with her job.”

Yates herself then described it as a “shameful and unlawful Muslim travel ban.”

In reality, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in Trump v. Hawaii that the president has extraordinarily broad discretion under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) to exclude aliens when he believes doing so is in the nation’s interests.

[….]

In Senate testimony in May 2017, Yates admitted that she had been motivated partly by “policy” considerations, which were not hers to make, and that she based her view of the ban not on the executive order but Trump’s previous statements. She even admitted that she had overruled the Office of Legal Counsel, which had confirmed the order’s constitutionality.

Yates was simply wrong about the Constitution and the law. She was a political actor seeking to create controversy; she could have resigned in protest, but instead forced the administration to fire her to create a sense of being victimized.

More here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

MAINE: Democratic Senate Hopeful Repeatedly Killed ‘Racist’ Bills to Outlaw Female Genital Mutilation

My latest in PJ Media:

The most revolting news item of the week comes from Maine, where, according to the Washington Free Beacon, “Democratic Senate candidate Sara Gideon repeatedly killed bills to outlaw female genital mutilation during her tenure as the speaker of the Maine House of Representatives.” In amassing this shameful record, Sara Gideon has become Exhibit A of everything that is wrong about identity politics, the Democratic Party, and the Left in general.

The Free Beacon notes that Gideon’s determination to enable the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) is abundantly established. She “leveraged her leadership position in the Democrat-controlled legislature to kill two separate bills that would have criminalized the practice of severing the clitoris of infant girls and sewing their vaginas shut.”

Why on earth would Gideon do something as heinous as this? The answer is simple and predictable: “Under Gideon’s leadership, Maine Democrats argued that the bill was racist toward the state’s large immigrant community from Somalia, a country where the practice is ‘nearly universal’ according to the United Nations.”

It’s racist to outlaw FGM? Well, of course it is, because Sara Gideon needs the votes of Maine’s rapidly growing Somali community, and that’s as far as her moral calculus goes. The Free Beacon notes that “Gideon’s efforts have helped make Maine one of only 12 states that have not banned female genital mutilation,” and that “such a legacy threatens to complicate her cultivated image as a champion of women’s rights, one built on her consistent support for abortion access and the #MeToo movement,” but Gideon has shown in opposing efforts to criminalize FGM that she doesn’t really care about women’s rights at all. She poses as a women’s rights advocate when seeking donations from well-heeled Leftists, but she likely knows that those same Leftist donors won’t be concerned in the least about her wanting to allow for the preservation of a time-hallowed Somali cultural practice. After all, any other course of action would be “ethnocentric” and “Islamophobic,” right?

There is much more. Read the rest here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Turkey: Ruling party discussing annulment of law combating violence against women

Muslim cleric: When women obey Islamic law, ‘the Jews will be disappeared and Jerusalem be ready for a new conquest’

Delaware: Hamas-linked CAIR sues state detention center over safety-related hijab prohibition

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Democracy versus a Republic — Do You Know the Difference?

I originally wrote this piece in March 2019 as a means to find out how many people knew the difference between a democracy and a republic. I was shocked by how many didn’t. Then again, maybe I shouldn’t have been surprised as this simple concept is not taught in classrooms anymore. Yet this is something important to understand, particularly as we go into the upcoming November elections. As such, I decided to rerun it herein and included it in my latest book, “BEFORE YOU VOTE: KNOW HOW YOUR GOVERNMENT WORKS.” Enjoy!


One of my pet peeves involving politics is when people misstate our form of government. Normally, I would claim this as the fault of uneducated young people, but many politicians, members of the press, as well as grown-ups are also guilty of this faux pas. No, we most definitely do not live in a “democracy,” but a “constitutional republic” instead, as does most of the governments in the world.

In its truest sense, democracy means “Rule by the People,” meaning a system of government whereby the populace votes directly on each and every issue. When you consider the voluminous number of bills and candidates to be voted upon, this is simply not feasible, regardless if we had the most sophisticated computer software to do so. Time should be allotted to deliberate on each piece of legislation and, to do so, would require citizens to devote most of their time to such study, and not tend to their own business.

This is why we elect politicians, to represent our interests so the populace doesn’t have to vote on every bill, large or small, and explains why we refer to this as a “representative democracy,” aka “republic.” Here, the elected representatives are governed by a rule of law, such as a constitution, which defines the structure and responsibility of executive, legislative, and judicial tasks. Consequently, we call this form of government a “constitutional republic,” which is a more accurate description of our government than “democracy.” It should also be noted that under this form of government, the head of state is not a monarch, such as a King or Queen, which lends itself more to being a “monarchy” as opposed to a free-standing “republic.”

Every now and then, we hear a politician or member of the media proclaim, “This (or that) is a threat to our democracy.” This tells me they haven’t a clue as to what they are talking about. Instead, they should have said, “This is a threat to our republic.” Alas though, they do not.

The Democrats also have a problem with the name, particularly when they refer to themselves as the “Democratic” party. This too is incorrect. However, it is often difficult to describe the party, audibly or in writing, without making this common mistake. The term “Democracy” is so imbued in our culture, the Democrats try capitalizing on it to confuse the public, portraying the word “republic” as a constitutional threat to the country. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Interesting, Democrats today do not practice Democracy within their own party, but rather act as a Republic instead.

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is now the largest socialist organization in the United States and aside from their far-left agenda, it is difficult to discern if they truly embrace democracy or a constitutional republic, I suspect the former.

Another commonly misunderstood area is the concept of the Electoral College in presidential elections, which is indirectly tied to the concept of “republic” as opposed to “democracy” by electing electorates (representatives) as opposed to a popular vote. By doing so, it provides parity between the interests of rural and metropolitan America. Frankly, the Electoral College is a testament to the sheer genius of our founding fathers as it encourages everyone to vote, not just large metropolitan areas.

The Left believes the Electoral College is a threat to democracy, and it is reported as such by the press. In reality, they are correct as the College is intended to be used in a republic, not a democracy.

So, in a nutshell, No, we do not live in a democracy, in the truest sense of the word. We live in a “constitutional Republic” and it is important all citizens understand the differences.

The Constitution defines our government in Article IV, Section 4:

“The United States shall guarantee, to every State in this Union, a republican form of government…”

Following the writing of the U.S. Constitution, a woman approached Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the delegates and authors, and asked, “Well, Doctor, what have we got — a republic or a monarchy?” He coyly replied, “A republic — if you can keep it.”

Keep the Faith!

P.S. – Also, I have a NEW book, “Before You Vote: Know How Your Government Works”, What American youth should know about government, available in Printed, PDF and eBook form. This is the perfect gift for youth!

EDITORS NOTE: This Bryce is Right podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.