Biden Regime Demanded Facebook Ban Humor

“The Biden administration was working every possible angle to keep people alive”

First Amendment? What First Amendment?

The Biden administration’s internet censorship regime seemed to have a special hatred for humor. Maybe that’s because its boss is a walking joke.

We have learned that the administration unconstitutionally pressured internet platforms to remove a video mocking Jill Biden and a Twitter account impersonating Biden’s granddaughter.

Facebook reported Biden officials demanding that humor be banned if it made jokes about the vaccine.

“There is likely a significant gap between what the WH would like us to remove and what we are comfortable removing,” the Facebook vice president said.

As one example, the executive listed the White House’s desire that the company take action against humorous or satirical content that suggested the vaccines aren’t safe.

“The WH has previously indicated that it thinks humor should be removed if it is premised on the vaccine having side effects, so we expect it would similarly want to see humor about vaccine hesitancy removed,” the vice president wrote.

The future must not belong to those who mock the prophet Fauci.

Ponder for a moment that the Biden regime was pushing past what a billionaire leftist kid and a former liberal British politician from a country where censorship is routine were comfortable with.

“I can’t see Mark in a million years being comfortable with removing that—and I wouldn’t recommend it,” Clegg wrote in a subsequent email, an apparent reference to CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Democrats are doubling down on “We had to ban comedy or everyone would die”.

“In 2021, in the darkest days of the pandemic, of course the Biden administration was working every possible angle to keep people alive,” a spokesman for Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee said in a statement.

If banning humor didn’t work, the Democrats were going to keep us alive by abolishing the Constitution and sending everyone to labor camps. Every possible angle had to be explored to keep everyone alive and under the watch of guard towers at every moment of the day until the time came to turn them into mulch.

Whether or not that’s humor, the Biden administration’s Office of Comedy and Censorship will have to decide.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Oklahoma Governor Signs ‘Women’s Bill Of Rights’ Defining ‘Female’ And ‘Mother’

Republican Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt has signed a bill into law which defines the words “female” and “mother” in order to “bring clarity, certainty, and uniformity” to state laws.

The bill’s sponsor, state Sen. Jessica Garvin, told the Daily Caller in January that the bill would protect women from men invading their single-sex spaces.

“There are states where there have been men who have been incarcerated, and then they decided to identify as female. That has obviously been problematic because it turns out some of these men have sexually abused women while incarcerated,” Garvin said.

The bill stipulates that biological men cannot receive government grants meant for women and prohibits men from using female restrooms, prisons, rape shelters, locker rooms and other spaces.

The bill defines the word “mother” as, “the female parent of a child or children.” The word “woman” is defined as, “a natural person who is female.”

“The state, any political subdivision, or any state agency or department including but not limited to public school districts that collects vital statistics for the purpose of gathering accurate public health, crime, economic or other data shall identify any natural person who is part of the collected data as either male or female as defined in Section 62 of Title 25 of the Oklahoma Statutes,” the bill continues.

Republican Senator Cyndi Hyde-Smith of Mississippi introduced a Women’s Bill of Rights in February 2023, after a similar resolution failed in May 2022. The bill would define “mother,” “woman,” “sex,” along the same lines as Oklahoma’s bill.

“One of the many problems with these radical notions to redefine male and female is that they end up doing more harm than good,” Hyde-Smith said. “Our resolution simply affirms the biological differences between males and females under federal law, ensuring that womanhood is not erased by the ‘woke’ left’s reckless attempts to be inclusive.”

AUTHOR

SARAH WEAVER

Social issues reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Teacher Says She Was Fired For Attending Drag Show. Pastor From School Cites ‘Godly Rule

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

How to Fix the FBI

Excellent article from the Heritage Foundation below by Steven Bradbury.

However, the FBI might not be fixable — it may require firing them all or cutting funding to zero and then starting all over again.

How to Fix the FBI

By Steven Bradbury • Distinguished Fellow, Executive Vice President’s Office

The FBI’s chilling record of politicized abuses and the executive branch’s continuing misuse of federal intelligence authorities to target the exercise of free speech and other constitutional rights of Americans gives Congress clear and compelling grounds for enacting forceful reforms, starting with the FBI. In fact, the time is ripe for Congress to consider a complete reconstruction of the FBI, defining the scope of its jurisdiction, refocusing its mission on traditional law enforcement, and putting it under effective control. Short of that comprehensive reform, Congress must, at the very least, put in place the minimum set of proposed reforms outlined in this paper, and reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act’s Section 702 offers a perfect vehicle for doing so.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. The executive branch’s misuse of federal intelligence authorities gives Congress clear and compelling grounds for enacting forceful reforms, starting with the FBI.
  2. Congress should define the scope of the FBI’s jurisdiction, refocus its mission on traditional law enforcement, and put it under effective control.
  3. At the very least, Congress must adopt a minimum set of critical reforms necessary to safeguard America’s freedoms.

The liberty of the American people is under threat from politicized national security agencies, exemplified by the abuses of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Congress must act to restrain and reform the FBI and mitigate this threat to our cherished freedoms.

There is good reason to rethink the entire idea of the FBI at a fundamental level—to start over from scratch and reconstruct the Bureau in a new form, one refocused on its core law enforcement responsibilities, brought under effective control and oversight, and subject to the structural restraints needed to protect the constitutional rights of Americans.

After laying out the need for fundamental reform, this paper describes the general elements that would be involved in rebuilding the FBI and offers options for Congress’s consideration. We at The Heritage Foundation stand ready to assist with the foundational research and analytical work needed to flesh out the components of a serious plan for the Bureau’s reconstruction.

Whether or not Congress decides to advance a comprehensive package for reimagining the FBI, there still remains an urgent imperative for Congress to act without delay to end the weaponization of the FBI and the misuse of intelligence authorities. We describe below the minimum set of reforms we believe must be enacted. The push this year for legislation reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) provides a useful opportunity for congressional action. Any reauthorization of Section 702 must include meaningful reforms.

Read More.

©2023. Royal A. Brown III. All rights reserved.

Lawmakers Urge DoD and DOJ Leaders to send Bowe Bergdahl to Trial Again

Traitor Bergdahl should be tried again and not let off on a technicality. He is still a traitor.

Letting him off, restoring his rank and back pay and giving him an Honorable Discharge would be an absolute travesty of justice.

Five military veterans — Reps. Mike Waltz, R-Fla.; Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas; Jake Ellzey, R-Texas; Ryan Zinke, R-Mont.; and Guy Reschenthaler, R-Pa. — sent a letter to both Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding “an immediate review of options for a new trial” for Bergdahl, calling it a matter of fairness and justice.

Lawmakers urge defense leaders to send Bowe Bergdahl to trial again

A group of Republican lawmakers is pushing Defense Department leaders to retry Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for desertion after his conviction was thrown out by a federal judge last week.

Five military veterans — Reps. Mike Waltz, R-Fla.; Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas; Jake Ellzey, R-Texas; Ryan Zinke, R-Mont.; and Guy Reschenthaler, R-Pa. — sent a letter to both Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding “an immediate review of options for a new trial” for Bergdahl, calling it a matter of fairness and justice.

Bergdahl pled guilty to desertion in 2017, but his conviction was thrown out in July on a technicality. He’d left his military base in Afghanistan in 2009. He was captured by the Taliban and held captive for nearly five years. Hundreds of troops spent thousands of man hours looking for the missing soldier, and military officials said several were wounded in enemy attacks.

“Bergdahl’s actions endangered and potentially got his comrades killed,” the GOP lawmakers wrote. “This outcome dishonors those who served and died alongside Bergdahl, and by omission condoning such behavior, puts the lives of future American soldiers in peril.”

Read more.

©2023. Royal A. Brown III. All rights reserved.

Energy Industry Fears White House Will Declare COVID-Like ‘Climate Emergency’

 

They promoted lie after lie on Covid and got away with murder, literally. Why wouldn’t work for the fetish hoax on climate?

“Every single prediction they’ve ever made has been wrong… They still haven’t, after 30 years, shown us that human emissions of CO2 drive global warming.”

Energy Industry Fears White House Will Declare COVID-Like ‘Climate Emergency’

By Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times, July 30, 2023:

Some energy industry groups are expressing concern that the White House will declare a COVID-19-like emergency—but for the climate instead.”They’re leaning to that direction,” U.S. Oil and Gas Association President Tim Stewart told Just the News in an article published on July 30. “If you grant the president’s emergency powers to declare a climate emergency, it’s just like COVID.”

An emergency declaration on the climate could give the president “vast and unchecked authority to shut down everything from communications to infrastructure,” said Mr. Stewart, who has been a critic of the Biden administration.

Infrastructure around water and electricity could be affected by such a decision, he said.

“They can literally do exactly what they did in COVID,” Mr. Stewart said. “If you disagree with the climate emergency, [speech] can be shut down. We really need to be paying attention to that because that power could be extended indefinitely until the ‘climate emergency’ is over. Who knows how long that would last.”

The White House press office didn’t respond by press time to a request by The Epoch Times for comment about whether the administration might be preparing such a declaration.

President Joe Biden and other administration officials have said that the United States and the world are in the midst of a “climate crisis” and have used language describing it as an emergency. So far, Mr. Biden has stopped short of declaring an emergency, although some Democrats and environmental groups have pushed the idea.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

New CDC Director Announces ANNUAL COVID Shot, To Be Finalized in September

New Facebook Files reveal lengths WH was willing to go to try to control COVID narrative on social media

RELATED VIDEO: Crimes Against Humanity have been committed. Millions harmed & killed by failed public health response.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How To Create Conspiracy Theories By Victor Davis Hanson

In another powerful article VDH brings attention to, among other things, how the Democrat leftocracy has focused on the January 6th riot at the Capitol where the only person killed was an unarmed woman illegally attempting to enter a corridor through a door with broken glass panels as opposed to the months of murder, mayhem and destruction by the Marxist, anti-American, anti-black conservative, anti-Semitic and anti-white Black Lives Matter activists along with their confederates in the equally anarchic and violent Antifa mobocracy during the summer of 2020.

How To Create Conspiracy Theories

By: Victor Davis Hanson, July 24, 2023:

It is easy to birth conspiracy theories.

All that is required is chronic government stonewalling of reasonable requests for transparency. Then add in high officials serially lying under oath, along with the blatantly unequal application of the law. Institutionalize arguments from authority of politicians and bureaucrats who refuse to adjudicate arguments empirically.

Include the weaponization of investigatory and intelligence bureaucracies. Finish with the transformation of an obsequious media into a mouthpiece of the state. And presto, you end up with a skeptical, cynical public that learns to believe the very opposite from what it is told by elites.

January 6th

Curiously. some conservative politicians, media and politicos often remark of their surprise that so many of the Trump base insists that the January 6 riot at the Capitol was in part a federally driven conspiracy, or perhaps just a mere “demonstration” gone awry.

But whether true or not, why would some not believe that—given the efforts of the state to hide and warp facts?

Consider what drives rational people to embrace supposed “conspiracy” theories around the so-called “insurrection?”

One reason, of course, is that there was evidence of FBI informants present on January 6. Do not take the word of conservatives for such suppositions.

Instead, remember what award-winning New York Times’s reporter and keen follower of right-wing political activity, Matthew Rosenberg said of January 6, albeit in an ambush interview conducted by Project Veritas:

The left’s overreaction — the left’s reaction to it in some places was so over the top. They were making it too big a deal … that gave the opening for lunatics in the right to be like, ‘Oh, well, nothing happened here. It was just a peaceful bunch of tourists,’ you know, and it’s like, but nobody wants to hear that.”

Rosenberg then remarked that he spotted numerous FBI informants among the crowd milling around the Capitol. Or as he put it, “There were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.” Cannot the FBI refute such allegations?

Apparently not. Given such speculation, one would expect that FBI Director Christopher Wray might at least categorically deny such inflammatory accusations.

Yet in congressional testimony when asked whether the FBI had inserted informants among the protestors, sphinxlike Wray merely shrugged, “So I really need to be careful here talking about where we have or have not used confidential human sources.”

Then there is the mysterious case of Ray Epps, initially sought by FBI “as a person of interest” for allegedly inciting demonstrators to break the law and enter the Capitol.

But then oddly Epps was de facto exempted for some 30 months from arrest—even as hundreds who urged no such action were indicted and convicted of “illegal parading” or unlawfully “demonstrating in front of the Capitol”—misdemeanors that ended up resulting in felony-type sentencing.

In one video clip, as Epps attempts to gin up the stationary crowd to move illegally into the Capitol, he is met with “conspiratorial” accusations from skeptical bystanders calling out: “Fed! Fed! Fed!”

Epps filed suit against Fox News for defamation on grounds that anchor Tucker Carlson had tied him to efforts to incite January 6 violence. Yet then suddenly Epps announced that he believes he will soon be charged, after all, by the government for his role in the January 6 protests.

If true, such an arrest was long anticipated, since Epps is caught on tape, unambiguously, on more than one occasion, urging demonstrators to enter the Capitol unlawfully (e.g., “We need to go to the Capitol”).

If one would like to hatch an Epps conspiracy theory, then one could do no better than quoting another Ray Epps braggadocious claim that he had texted to his nephew: “I orchestrated it.”

It did not help the Left’s construction of a January 6 “insurrection” theory that it serially misled the country about the actual loss of life. At first, Democrats insisted, falsely, that Officer Sicknick’s tragic death was due to protestor violence. Yet an autopsy revealed that he died a day later from a stroke.

Then Democrat leaders pivoted to claim that any law enforcement officer present on January 6, who for any reason subsequently committed suicide, was to be counted a victim of protestor violence.

All the while, the media kept largely quiet about the fact that the only unambiguously violent death that day was that of military veteran Ashli Babbitt. She was unarmed as she was shot unlawfully entering the Capitol through a broken window.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FACT CHECK: Does Zelensky Respect ‘Religious Liberty’ in Ukraine?

An edited clip of former Vice President Mike Pence seemingly telling Tucker Carlson that decaying American cities are “not my concern” instantly went viral, but Pence’s most controversial statements at the Family Leader Summit, about Ukraine’s respect for “religious liberty,” have passed without comment.

The moment came when Carlson asked if the former vice president, who made a return visit to Ukraine in June, had pressed President Volodymyr Zelensky about his “treatment of Christians within Ukraine.” Pence replied, “I raised [the issue] with the leader of the Orthodox Church when I was visiting Kyiv and asked him about concerns about religious liberty. He assured me that the Zelensky government in Ukraine was respecting religious liberty.” (You can watch the exchange here.)

Pence’s answer seems definitive, but those who cherish religious liberty need to identify its verbal sleight-of-hand: Pence met with the “leader of the Orthodox Church” whom Zelensky’s discriminatory policies benefit, not the Christians they harm.

Is Zelensky’s government “respecting religious liberty” in Ukraine? Let’s examine the facts.

Which “Leader of the Orthodox Church” Is Which?

Two major churches in Ukraine call themselves Orthodox. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), the historic body founded in 989 A.D., has perhaps 10,000 churches. The Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), a coalition of breakaway parishes and formerly unrecognizedgroups which the Patriarch of Constantinople declared autocephalous in January 2019, has an estimated 7,000 parishes. Pence met with Metropolitan Epiphaniy of the OCU, whose news service announced the meeting at the famous golden-domed sanctuary. Metropolitan Onufriy of the UOC would likely have given Pence a difference assessment about the Ukrainian government’s respect for “religious liberty.”

Zelensky Discriminates against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church

During his exchange with Pence, Carlson noted, “The Zelensky government has raided convents, arrested priests, has effectively banned a denomination — a Christian denomination, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, within Ukraine — has persecuted Christians.” That nearly echoes the words of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, which reports that from February through the end of April, Zelensky’s “[g]overnment and local authorities took several measures targeting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).” Government agents “searched places of worship and other UOC facilities, issued notices of suspicions against clergymen, and placed several of them under house arrest.” Since the beginning of the conflict, seven regional councils have banned all “activities of the UOC,” overstepping their legal authority.

Ukraine’s Parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, has introduced numerous bills to redistribute church property from the disfavored UOC to the favored OCU, some with Zelensky’s personal approval:

  • Draft law No. 8221 — which bears the Orwellian title, “On ensuring strengthening of national security in the sphere of freedom of conscience and activities of religious organizations” — would forbid any church from using the title “Orthodox” unless it is (in the words of the state news agency, UKRINFORM) “subordinated to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine” (OCU);
  • Bill No. 7403 strips the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) of its tax-exempt status;
  • Draft Resolution No. 8012 transfers the historic monastic properties of the Kyiv Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavra — a sacred site in Orthodox history — from UOC to the OCU; and
  • Draft law No. 8262 bars the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) from using state property.

Some UOC parishes have had their property “transferred” to the jurisdiction of the OCU by people who do not belong to the parish. “[V]illagers who are not parishioners of the UOC church organize a meeting of the territorial community. At such meetings, they simply declare: We are Orthodox, and we believe that there will be only an OCU in our community,” reports the independent weekly newspaper Fakty i Kommentarii.

Zelensky’s government revoked the citizenship of 13 UOC clerics near the first of the year.

In a smaller act of aggression, earlier this month the Rada amended the state labor code to change the date of Christmas, which the UOC traditionally celebrated on January 7 due to its use of the Julian Calendar, to December 25, the revised date the OCU allowed last fall and formally adopted this spring. Since 2017, the government had recognized both dates for Christmas; now, in theory, an observer of the traditional date might not be able to get the day off work to attend church. The bill — personally introduced by President Zelensky— also changed two other national holidays associated with religious feasts to the OCU’s date: the Protection of the Mother of God (to October 1 from October 14) and the Baptism of Rus, considered independence day (July 15 from the 28).

Evicting Monks Quietly, so Tucker Carlson Won’t Report It

The most visible sign of the Zelenskygovernment’s dispute with the UOC is the historic Kyiv Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavra. Zelenskyofficials placed the monastery’s abbot, Metropolitan Pavel, under house arrest from April 1 until June 29; he presently resides in the Lukyanivska pre-trial detention center, which Radio Liberty described as “infamous for its terrible conditions, with detainees enduring cold, crowding, and crumbling walls.”

The government originally aimed to evict the monks from the historic monastery by March 29, less than three weeks after the March 10 announcement. Although the eviction order remains tied up in court, Ukrainian government authorities began sealing buildings at the monastery. Eventually, monks and a large number of faithful Christians protected some of the property, but not before the National Reserve sealed buildings 68, 69, 70, 71, and 115. Officials have not sealed any additional buildings since July 6, and the official who oversees the National Reserve, Oleksandr Tkachenko, resigned two weeks later.

High-ranking officials in Zelensky’s party have acknowledged that seizing possession of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra could be complicated, since then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych extended the UOC’s lease for another 49 years on July 17, 2003 — 20 years ago this month. But the deputy leader of Zelensky’s Servant of the People faction in parliament, Yevgenia Kravchuk, believes the government will get the historic monastery in its clutches gradually, particularly since “the majority of the deputies” in the Ukrainian government support Zelensky’s proposal. For now, she wants the government to bide its time.

“It is very important not to show physical aggression. All this can create a false picture of some religious oppression. Then various foreign conservative journalists, such as Tucker Carlson, believe me, will do a separate report on it,” Kravchuk warned. Then American voters “can start asking their congressmen, referring to the so-called religious persecution in Ukraine.”

Religious Liberty ‘an Invalid Argument’: Zelensky’s Deputy

“Some say: ‘Let’s not interfere in religious matters.’ But this, it seems to me, is now an invalid argument,” said Zelensky’s deputy, Kravchuk. Some Ukrainian Orthodox Church priests and faithful are “not yet ready to fully transition to OCU,” but “[w]e have to go through it.”

What is behind this drive to dispossess the Ukrainian Orthodox Church? “The main thing is the political leadership of President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has repeatedly stated that Ukraine needs spiritual independence,” said Kravchuk. Indeed, Zelenskygave a speech last December 1 promising to create “spiritual independence. We will never allow anyone to build an empire inside the Ukrainian soul.”

Some officials have already paid the price for resisting religious discrimination. Olena Bohdan led Zelensky’s State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), which oversees the government’s religious policies — until her findings contradicted the state line that the UOC was aligned with Moscow. Bohdan combed through UOC church documents and concluded that the UOC had removed everything establishing its “subordination and dependence” upon Moscow. Zelenskythen fired her. Bohdan told Radio Liberty she lost her job because, while she tried to act “from the standpoint of constitutional principles,” she was pressured “to find a way to disband the UOC.”

Is the UOC Controlled by Russia?

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church severed ties with the Russian Orthodox Church over the invasion of Ukraine, which it wholeheartedly opposed. “War is the worst sin in the world. It forces us to look at another person not as an image of God, but as an enemy to be killed. Therefore, there is no excuse for those who start wars,” said Metropolitan Onufriy. The church has taken concrete steps to underscore its independence from Russian church authorities and, as noted, Bohdan documented the UOC’s separation from the Patriarchate of Moscow.

The Zelensky government justified expelling UOC monks from the historic monastery on the grounds that the monks secretly aid Russia — but Zelensky’s “proof” of UOC’s Russian collusion underwhelms. Last November 22, National Police pilfered through monks’ private quarters, searched 350 monastery buildings and visitors’ quarters, checked the identities of 850 people on the grounds, and administered polygraphs to 50 people (including some monks). They found a few thousand rubles (1,000 rubles is worth $11 U.S.) and a handful of pamphlets containing sermons by the Patriarch of Moscow Kirill, possibly brought by pilgrims from Russia. (Imagine if Americans visited the monastery, and the government busted the monks because they found dollar bills and a book by Billy Graham.) They also claim someone overheard one of the monks singing a song that discussed “awakening the Russian world” (Russkiy mir), a concept akin to Manifest Destiny — but Bohdan said the lyrics were so ambiguous, they may have asked “for Russia to wake up and stop its armed offensive on Ukraine.” The UOC has condemned the Russkiy mir notion, as Met. Onufriy declared, “We do not build any ‘Russian world;’ we build God’s world.”

Things became more heated after a missile fell on Transfiguration Cathedral in Odessa. “The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has had nothing in common with your understanding for a very long time,” UOC Archbishop Viktor Bykov of Artsyz wrote to Moscow Patriarch Kirill, likening him to an abusive father. “We condemn this maniacal aggression of the Russian Federation against our independent country.”

Yet even the most anti-Russian clerics agree Zelensky’s government tramples on their unalienable rights. A group of more than 300 UOC priests who support autocephaly condemned “Russia’s Satanic aggression against Ukraine,” while slighting the Zelensky government’s “flagrant violations of the rights and freedoms of the citizens of Ukraine who are the clergy and believers of the UOC.”

Ukrainian Government Demanding UOC Cease to be Orthodox?

Zelensky’s government is pressuring the UOC to take a step that could effectively eliminate it from the communion of the Orthodox Church. After Bohdan’s ouster, DESS demanded the UOC cut all ties with Moscow by declaring itself autocephalous; on July 25, officials reiterated their demand for the “the complete and unconditional rupture” of communion. Typically, other national Orthodox churches grant autocephaly to a church body; it is not asserted unilaterally. And there are never two autocephalous churches in the same territory. If the UOC declares independence, it could lose communion with all other Orthodox churches, a necessary element of Orthodox ecclesiology. Meanwhile, the churches associated with Constantinople maintain communion with the OCU, effectively rendering it the nation’s only Orthodox body.

Eastern Europe has Little Sense of ‘Religious Liberty’

Though the concept of religious liberty has patristic roots, it arose in the West from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 — a treaty that had no impact on Eastern Europe. The entire region has varying degrees of toleration for church authorities. Thus, none of this should suggest Russia would impose Western-style conscience rights in Ukraine beyond those respected in Russia today. Authorities say Russian troops have destroyed hundreds of Ukrainian churches, tortured evangelical pastors, and repressed the OCU and sects such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Ukrainian Christians have seen the government expropriate and redistribute their property for decades. After decades of trying to eradicate all religion, in 1946 Soviet authorities tried to liquidate Ukraine’s Byzantine Catholic parishes — former Eastern Orthodox churches that submitted to papal authority in 1596 after Catholic Poland conquered the nation — by closing or transferring its remaining 4,119 churches and chapels to the Orthodox Church. The communists did this throughout the USSR, because the official Orthodox hierarchy at the time reported to or belonged to the KGB. The UOC’s reaction to the invasion shows those days have ended. Drawing on his history of persecution, the current leader of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk, has said no Ukrainian “should be persecuted for belonging to some church structure.”

The Verdict

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s government has pressured Ukrainian Orthodox Church clergy and laity to affiliate with the OCU, raided UOC monasteries, attempted to evict monks on flimsy evidence, interfered with the internal operations of a church, legally impeded traditional Orthodox Christian observances, and openly favored one faction over another.

Mike Pence met with the benefactor of Zelensky’s religious discrimination, who told him everything’s fine. That statement drew less attention than a “gotcha” moment during the Family Leader Summit, but it should be more concerning for those who value religious liberty, or truth.

Unfortunately, this assurance is false.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Trucking Giant Shuts Down After 99 Years, 30,000 Could Lose Their Jobs

Yellow, one of the largest and oldest U.S. trucking companies, shut down Sunday after succumbing to substantial debt and a lengthy standoff with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), according to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

The 99-year-old company had more than 12,000 trucks moving freight across the country for Walmart, Amazon and many other small businesses that relied on their Less-Than-Truckload or LTL shipping model, the WSJ reported. Under the LTL model, customers can transport any amount of freight to allow for smaller loads. Yellow employed approximately 30,000 people, including 22,000 IBT employees. Its collapse would be the biggest in the U.S. trucking industry in terms of revenue and jobs, according to the outlet.

Yellow’s financial hardships have compounded this year as shipping demand declined and sent rates falling. Its cash holdings fell to around $100 million in June from $235 million in December, according to the WSJ.

Yellow was about $1.5 billion in debt as of March, including about $729.2 million owed to the federal government, according to Fortune. In 2020, under the Trump administration, the Treasury Department gave Yellow a $700 million pandemic-era loan as part of the COVID-19 rescue plan, citing reasons of national security, the WSJ reported.

A special congressional oversight report recently concluded that the U.S Treasury “made missteps” in their decision to give Yellow the loan, adding that Yellow’s “precarious financial position at the time of the loan, and continued struggles, expose taxpayers to a significant risk of loss.”

The company is preparing to file for bankruptcy and is discussing selling off all or parts of the business, according to the outlet.

AUTHOR

ALYSSA RINELLI

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: UPS Avoids Major Strike In New Deal With Union

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WILLIAM F. B. O’REILLY: The GOP’s 2024 Presidential Field Needs To Be Cleared. It Should Begin With Ron DeSantis.

The current storyline on the 2024 GOP presidential primary goes something like this: Former President Donald Trump is the prohibitive favorite; Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis had a chance but blew it, and everyone else in the race is an also-ran — former Vice President Mike Pence, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

There are other candidates in the mix, of course, like well-spoken tech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy — this cycle’s Andrew Yang — but the names above, including Ramaswamy’s, are the ones that have qualified for the Aug. 23 debate in Milwaukee  so far, the first of the 2024 GOP primary.

Political narratives aren’t worth much this far out from an election, but two things strike this observer as particularly true. Donald Trump is, indeed, the overwhelming primary favorite. Poll after poll makes that obvious. And Ron DeSantis has effectively blown it.

The Titan of Tallahassee looked beautiful on paper — Yale, Harvard Law, lieutenant commander U.S. Navy (JAG), stint in Congress, governor of the third most populous state in the union, one growing by leaps and bounds at that —  but his personality got in the way. DeSantis mimicked Trump’s populist brashness, but without the hints of humor that make Trump palatable to around three quarters of Republicans.

DeSantis’s super-public war with Disney, the largest private employer in the Sunshine State, refusal to speak with mainstream reporters, and ham-handed attacks on legitimate woke targets left him looking a bit jerky, even to voters sympathetic to his goals. DeSantis’ habit of using government to punish political enemies has also hurt him with small-government conservatives. It’s tough to come back from that.

None of this would be a problem if Republicans didn’t want to win the White House, hold their majority in Congress and recapture the Senate. But they very much do, and that’s where uncertainty about Trump takes hold. Three quarters of Republicans like him because Democrats hate him, but that’s not a recipe for a general election victory.

With Trump as the GOP standard bearer, Republicans lost all three legislative branches as well as hundreds of state and local races across America. That’s hardly a confidence booster, despite a struggling and deeply unpopular President Joe Biden in the Oval Office. Myriad state and federal indictments against Trump won’t help in a general election, even as they’re insistently labeled by Trump acolytes as fruit of a poisoned government tree.

Trump’s 2016 primary win demonstrated the power of the plurality in multi-candidate races, and that’s what realist Republicans are noodling on about now. How do we shrink this field and avoid a 2016 repeat? (Read: How do we stop The Donald?)

A graceful exit by DeSantis would be a good start. DeSantis, who currently holds 18% of the primary vote, according to the Real Clear Politics polling average, appears to be in a virtual freefall. He had double that support just a few months ago, and seems incapable of changing direction.

By freeing up DeSantis’s share of the non-Trump vote, other candidates, like, say, Tim Scott, who should have broad general election appeal, would have a chance to pick up a chunk of GOP voters, and possibly momentum over time.

Trump supporters will tell the rest of us that we’re dreaming, and they’re probably right. Trump is a political locomotive that blows through all obstacles on the track. Even handcuffs might not stop him from moving forward.

But as he advances, Republican hopes for the House and Senate are retreating.

This all feels very familiar.

AUTHOR

WILLIAM F. B. O’REILLY

William F. B. O’Reilly is a Republican strategist from New York.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump’s Second Term: The First 24 Hours

‘It’s Not Close’: ABC Panelist Says Trump More Popular With Republicans Than Biden Is With Democrats

STAR PARKER: Chris Christie Is Making The Case Against Trump, But Does He Have A Case For Himself?

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Devon Archer told House Oversight Joe and Hunter Biden spoke ‘more than 20 times’ about business, rep says

President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden spoke “more than 20 times about their business deals,” Hunter Biden’s former business associate Devon Archer said Monday before the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene told the Daily Caller.

“The biggest significant thing that has come out so far is that we now have proof that Joe Biden lied. He’s been telling everyone for years now that he knows nothing about Hunter Biden’s business deals, that he’s never talked to his son about it. Well, this morning Devon Archer confirmed for all of us that that is not true,” Greene said in an interview with the Caller.

“He told us in his transcribed interview that he heard Hunter Biden speak to Joe Biden more than 20 times about their business deals. Not about anything else, but about the business deals,” the House Oversight member added.

The president famously said in 2019 that he had never spoken to his son about business.

Archer met with the lawmakers behind closed doors on Monday and the transcripts have yet to be released. The former business associate worked with Hunter Biden at Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC, and was subpoenaed by Republicans to testify as a part of their investigation into the Biden family’s foreign business dealings.

Democratic New York Rep. Dan Goldman told reporters during the testimony’s break that Archer said, “Hunter would put his father on speakerphone with whomever was at dinner and there wasn’t any indication that he had any idea who was at dinner.”

Greene rebuked Goldman’s account of the interview.

“Dan Goldman came out during the break and tried to put a big spin on it. Physically sweating while he’s talking about, ‘Oh, they talked about weather — that’s not what Devon Archer said. Devon Archer said he heard them talk more than 20 times about Hunter’s business deals,” Greene said.

Archer did say that the “Bidens were in the business of influence peddling. And while influence peddling is not necessarily a crime… it is definitely very bad when it’s influence peddling involving the vice president of the United States,” Greene added.

The White House and Goldman did not immediately respond to an inquiry from the Caller.

AUTHOR

DIANA GLEBOVA

White House correspondent.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hunter Biden Warned Devon Archer About Potential FARA Violations Right Before Taking Burisma Board Seat, Emails Show

Devon Archer Testimony: Joe Biden 𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐃, Was on Hunter’s Business Calls “20+ Times,” “In The Actual Business of Influence Peddling”

Devon Archer Confirms Joe Biden Was Called ‘My Guy’ By Hunter Biden

White House Says Joe Biden Was ‘Not In Business‘ With Hunter After Explosive Text Message Testimony

‘It’s Odd’: DOJ Reportedly Working Overtime To Send Key Hunter Biden Witness [Devon Archer] To Prison

Here Are Five Questions Republicans Could Ask Hunter Biden’s Business Partner Under Oath

DOJ Backs Down From Attempt To Jail Key Hunter Biden Witness Before House Testimony After Republican Claim of Obstruction

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Ticking Time Bomb: China Infects American Infrastructure With Malware To Disrupt U.S. Military

Meanwhile the Democrat ruling party is obsessed with ….. transitioning your kids to the opposite sex and instructing them on depraved sexual acts.

We’ve lost the war before its begun.

‘A Ticking Time Bomb’: China Infects American Infrastructure With Malware To Disrupt U.S. Military

By: Ryan Saavedra • DailyWire.com • Jul 30, 2023:

U.S. officials are aggressively searching for malware that they say hackers from China have implanted into American infrastructure to disrupt U.S. military operations in the event that the communist nation launches an attack on Taiwan.

Officials said that the malicious computer code, which penetrated U.S. systems well over a year ago but was only detected by Microsoft in May, was especially troubling because its purpose was not traditional spying, i.e., information gathering. Microsoft and the U.S. government both said the malware came from China.

The malware was hidden “deep inside the networks controlling power grids, communications systems and water supplies that feed military bases in the United States and around the world,” The New York Times reported. It infected systems that impact not only the U.S. military but also U.S. citizens and the economy.

Officials said that while the effort to destroy the malware has been underway for months, they still don’t know how widespread it is.

Officials say there were two possible goals when China infected utility infrastructure that “serve both civilian populations and nearby military bases,” the Times reported. The malware has not been detected in classified systems.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Senate Democrats Block Oversight Office to Monitor Billions in US Aid for Ukraine

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Regime Wants to ‘Persuade’ Americans by Censoring Them

“The government must be allowed to seek to persuade people of its views”

In response to efforts to stop the government from censoring the speech of people it opposes, the censors keep arguing that they have the free speech right to censor. Here’s how I originally described it.

When Judge Terry Doughty issued an injunction in Missouri v. Biden that banned the government from “specifically flagging content or posts on social-media platforms and/or forwarding such to social-media companies urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner for removal, deletion, suppression”, all hell broke loose.

Laurence Tribe, a lefty constitutional law professor, co-authored an op-ed complaining that the injunction “seems to maintain that the government cannot even politely ask companies not to publish verifiable misinformation.”

“The First Amendment certainly doesn’t prevent them from merely asking,” Tribe contends, and preventing the government from doing so “would turn the Constitution’s protection of free expression in an open society into an obstacle course for some of the most valuable exchanges of information and ideas we can imagine.” The most valuable exchanges of ideas apparently involve asking social media monopolies to take down content mocking the president.

The Biden administration has doubled down on Tribe’s argument that it has the right to “persuade” companies to censor.

In a filing Tuesday evening with the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the administration argued that a lower court judge’s July 4 decision was overly broad and would hurt the government’s ability to fight misinformation on platforms in a crisis.

“The government cannot punish people for expressing different views,” lawyers for U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration wrote. “But there is a categorical, well-settled distinction between persuasion and coercion. The government must be allowed to seek to persuade people of its views, even where those views are the subject of controversy.”

If the government wants to persuade people of anything, it should speak to them. Talking behind their backs to monopolies with vast censorship powers and then ‘persuading’ them to use those powers to censor its opponents is a violation of the First Amendment.

Persuasion is Biden giving a speech. Coercion is Biden officials telling companies what materials should be taken down. However it’s worded, it amounts to the government coordinating on removing speech against the will of the speaker.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Blinken Gets Subpoenaed as Military Officers Testify There Was No Afghanistan Withdrawal Plan

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WATCH REP. TROY NEHLS: Border Judo! President Bill Clinton Testifies Against DHS Secretary Mayorkas

Congressman Troy Nehls represents the 22nd Congressional District of Texas in the U.S. House of Representatives. Texas’ 22nd Congressional District includes portions of Fort Bend, Brazoria, and Harris counties.

Prior to his election to Congress, Troy served his district for nearly 30 years in law enforcement and served our country 21 years in the U.S. Army Reserve.

WATCH: Border Judo! President Bill Clinton Testifies Against DHS Secretary Mayorkas

At the age of 19, Troy enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve. He deployed on combat tours to Iraq and Afghanistan, among other places. After 21 years of service, he retired with the rank of Major and as the recipient of two Bronze Star medals.

Back home, Troy continued his service through law enforcement, a multi-generational tradition for his family. In 1994, Troy began his law enforcement service with Fort Bend ISD. He spent the next twenty-six years serving Fort Bend County in various law enforcement roles.

From 2004 to 2012, he served two terms as the elected Constable for Ft. Bend County Pct. 4. After two successful terms as Constable, Troy was elected as Fort Bend County Sheriff in 2012. In 2016, Troy was re-elected and completed his second term in December 2020.

Troy was officially sworn in as Congressman for Texas’ 22nd District on January 3rd, 2021. Troy received his bachelor’s degree from Liberty University and his master’s degree from the University of Houston Downtown. He resides in Richmond with his wife, Jill, daughters, Jenna, Cambry, and Tori, and their four dogs Archer, Buddy, Boo, and Lulu. They worship at Faith United Methodist in Richmond.

RELATED VIDEO: Congresswoman Victoria Kulheyko Spartz destroys smirking DHS Sec. Mayorkas in the U.S. Congress!

EDITORS NOTE: This Defend the Border column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

General Mike Flynn: ‘If people don’t repurpose their lives now, we might lose this country…’

Former National Security Advisor and Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn (Ret.) wrote the below comments.


By Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn (Ret.)

China’s ambitions include becoming the world’s superpower. They are the number one trading partner with almost 80% of the world, and China’s principal military partner is Russia. So, when we speak on the war in Europe and how we’re ready to spend hundreds of billions of dollars, and we debate the potential for nuclear warfare, we’re not just up against Putin, we’re up against China and Russia.

We are looking at a war in Europe that could easily evolve into WWIII, and you must ask yourself why. Why is America fighting for a country that we don’t have a vital national security interest in? If anything, NATO is violating the Budapest Accords formed after the Cold War which, among other key issues, ended further expansion of NATO to the frontiers of Russia.

We are also moving towards an economic war between global alliances. I believe there are another ten countries, one of whom is France, which may be joining the powerful BRICS alliance. The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) alone represent about 47% of the world’s population and by adding these additional ten, that’s approximately 75% of the world’s population uniting with China. These countries have large economic relationships and capacity, and in the future could work together in a military alliance—that could be devastating to the United States.

The Chinese and Russians have had a long-standing economic and military relationship. We’ve recently seen Xi Jinping visit Russia and strengthen particularly, their military alliance. As things stand now, just as the United States provides tanks to the Ukraine, China is providing military hardware and other necessary resources to Russia. And escalation and prolongation of war is never good.

We’re now seeing the White House send slightly over 3,000 reservists to Europe to build up our U.S. forces. 3,000 may not seem like a large number but look at the types of people they are sending: logistics, intelligence, and human resource specialists. This tells me a lot because these are the types of people that are going to go and begin to
prepare to potentially bring in larger forces.

This incrementalism happened in Vietnam. The American people were generally behind the war in Vietnam initially until they saw what was really happening and how many American soldiers were being sent to die in Vietnam. The attitude of the country changed dramatically, and yet it took another 6-7 years to extract ourselves out of that war. A war that eventually cost 55,000 Killed in Action and many thousands more wounded.

Ukraine is not going to be Vietnam. If we start putting combat forces into Ukraine, we’re going to see numbers that we haven’t seen since WWII in terms of casualties, that’s the real potential.

So why is Ukraine so important? Well, it’s a hub for human trafficking, narcotics trafficking, and weapons trafficking. Also, Victoria Nuland from the US State Department testified in front of Congress that there are many US BIO labs in Ukraine. And there is a lot of other money flowing into this country, all making you wonder, where is the money going?

Republican conservative senators and many members of the house of representatives continue to support this war. While at home, we have a 30-40 trillion-dollar debt, we have an invasion of our southern border, skyrocketing crime rates and we have people dying in our streets from fentanyl, which is produced and shipped in from China. So, we have our
own battlefield here in America due to a total lack of moral authority and leadership.

Our country right now, is not at the precipice looking over the edge of the cliff, we’re in the valley of the shadow of death. We have given in and given up the moral high round to what I truly believe is a communist takeover, a Marxist left takeover of our country through the various institutions within our country including and up to the White
House.

One of the last bastions of culture that would have to be taken over is our military via the destruction of trust from the people of our country, and that is well on its way to happening. An erosion of the bond between the American people and its military began with our retreat from Afghanistan and it continues as drag queens perform on our Navy aircraft carriers.

From a cultural perspective, an attack on our military would focus on new recruits, by tearing at the fabric of society to make it so people don’t want to sign up. The second phase would entail going after current retention. Attacking soldiers with a MAGA bumper sticker or removing those who decided against the Covid-19 shot.

We used to say that you recruit the soldier, but you retain the family for a lifelong soldier. But now, Biden’s Army secretary is discouraging potential recruits who are coming from military families, explaining that she plans to draw in people who have no real connection to the military. This is crazy talk, but from a military perspective, it’s
dangerous and an attempt to break trust in our military, which is known for its integrity, sacrifices, and simply being the one institution remaining that was apolitical left in the federal government.

I pray that as we go forward, the American people will fight to retake the moral high ground and stand up for our faith, families, and communities. We do this through local action, which will have a national impact. If people don’t repurpose their lives now, we might lose this country.

©2023. Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn (Ret.). All rights reserved.

CALIFORNIA: Transgender Double-Murderer Who Killed His Two Babies Will Get Taxpayer-Funded BREAST IMPLANTS

YOUR taxpayer dollars. Time for pitchforks and torches.

A man who has been convicted of killing two of his infant children and hiding their plastic-wrapped bodies in storage units in Arkansas and Arizona was sentenced to death but Gavin Newsom halted the death penalty in the state and Hann was allowed to move into the general population and is now reportedly awaiting a tax-payer subsidized breast augmentation.

Jessica Marie Hann is said to be awaiting a tax-payer funded breast implant procedure.

Transgender double-murderer who killed both her babies and stuffed body of one in plastic container ‘will receive taxpayer-funded BREAST IMPLANTS after being transferred to California women’s prison’

Jessica Marie Hann, born Jason Michael Hann, was sentenced to death in 2014 for the murders of her daughter Montana and son Jason
The decomposed remains of the two children had been discovered inside separate storage units in Arkansas and Arizona in 2002
Hann is now said to be awaiting breast augmentation surgery after being taken off death row and placed in a women’s prison.

By Joe Hutchison For Dailymail.Com, July 29, 2023 |

A transgender murderer who killed both her babies and stuffed one of their bodies into a Tupperware container is to receive tax payer funded breast implants.

Jessica Marie Hann, born Jason Michael Hann, was sentenced to death in 2014 for murdering her 10 week old daughter Montana and her two month old son Jason in 2001 and 1999.

Hann was convicted over the killing of the two children after authorities discovered their decomposed bodies in storage units in Arkansas and Arizona.

Reduxx reported that Hann was originally held on death row at San Quentin following his trial but was transferred to Central California Women’s Facility after she began to identify as a women.

After California Governor Gavin Newsom ordered a halt to the death penalty in the state, Hann was allowed to move into the general population and is now reportedly awaiting a tax-payer subsidized breast augmentation, according to the outlet.
Jessica Marie Hann, pictured here, is said to be awaiting a tax-payer funded breast implant procedure

Jessica Marie Hann, pictured here, is said to be awaiting a tax-payer funded breast implant procedure
Hann was transferred to Central California Women’s Facility, pictured here, after she began to identify as a women

Hann was transferred to Central California Women’s Facility, pictured here, after she began to identify as a women.

In February of 2002, the badly decomposed remains of Montana were found in a Tupperware container after being abandoned in a storage facility in Arkansas four months earlier.

Mann and her partner Krissy Werntz had been living in a trailer at the time and kept Montana’s remains underneath their bed.

The two then rented a storage unit to store their trailer, which was then sold at auction after the rent went unpaid.

The buyer of the unit then found Montana’s remains while emptying the contents of the container.

Court documents say her hand was visible and her head was completely encased in several layers of duct tape.

An autopsy of Montana found she had suffered fractures to her skull which had been caused by ‘severe blunt force’.

Her left tibia had also been fractured, with the Arkansas medical examiner saying that it was caused by bending or twisting her leg as ‘if you wanted to break a pencil’.

This discovery led police on a nationwide search for her parents and traced the license plate of the trailer to Hann.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLEs:

Trans Terror: California School Board Leader Receives Death Threats over Trans Parental Notification Policy

Islamic Iran is engulfed by sex tape scandal: Senior regime official is suspended after video is leaked ‘showing him having sex with a man’

RELATED VIDEOS:

A drag queen “gives birth” in a explicit performance during a “family-friendly” Drag Queen Show

Drag Queen Tells It Like It Is: Drag Queen Shows are Not for Kids!

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.