VIRGINIA: Afghan Muslim refugee convicted of sexually assaulting 3-year old girl at Quantico Marine base

/in , , , , , , /by

Note that Afghans arrived at “Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, Aug. 27, 2021. The Department of Defense, through U.S. Northern Command, and in support of the Department of State and Department of Homeland Security,” provided “transportation, temporary housing, medical screening, and general support for up to 50,000 Afghan evacuees at suitable facilities, in permanent or temporary structures, as quickly as possible.”

“According to court papers, Tariq tried to explain through interpreters that his conduct was acceptable in his culture.” He’s right, but Westerners who fear the “Islamophobia” label avoid discussion of this.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that `Aisha remained with the Prophet  for nine years (ie till his death). (Sahih Bukari 5134)

This leads to the acceptance of child marriage in the Muslim world and the justification of acts of pedophilia. Of course, not every Muslim ascribes to such acts, but since this is encoded in the Sharia, it cannot be rejected or reformed.

The West has now flung its doors open to masses of unvetted migrants from Afghanistan and other countries where such behavior (and much more, including misogyny, Islamic supremacy, Jew-hatred, the persecution of Christians, etc.) is acceptable.

Afghan refugee convicted of sexually assaulting 3-year-old girl at Quantico

Associated Press, January 24, 2022:

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A federal jury has convicted an Afghan refugee of sexually assaulting a 3-year-old girl at Quantico Marine Corps Base where he was housed.

[Mohammed] Tariq was arrested in September at Camp Upshur in Quantico after Marines observed him fondling the girl, who was not related to him, above her clothes on her private parts.

According to court papers, [Mohammed] Tariq tried to explain through interpreters that his conduct was acceptable in his culture. Efforts to have his statements suppressed were rejected by the judge.

Tariq, who was brought to Virginia after working alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan… [Emphasis added]

COLUMN BY

CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

RELATED ARTICLES:

France awards Order of Merit to mayor accused of using taxpayer money to fund jihad propaganda in schools

Germany: Public broadcaster again making propaganda for the hijab

Germany: Muslim who cofounded group with local Islamic State leader will not be deported

Turkey’s Foreign Minister threatens Greece: ‘They are sponsoring terrorists, they will pay a heavy price’

Germany: Muslim ‘refugee’ douses three female government workers with gasoline, threatens to light them on fire

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

OSHA Pulls Private Vaccine Mandate After Supreme Court Loss

/in , , , , , , , , /by

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will withdraw a rule mandating that private businesses with more than 100 employees require that they be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing against the virus.

OSHA will formally withdraw the rule on Wednesday, according to a document published Tuesday in an advanced version of the Federal Register. The rule, announced in November by President Joe Biden, was immediately challenged by several states and private companies, and the Supreme Court issued a stay on Jan. 13 while federal appeals courts consider its legality.

“After evaluating the Court’s decision, OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard,” the agency wrote in the Register.

The OSHA announcement was first reported by Bloomberg Law.

When he announced the rule, Biden argued that it would reduce the spread of COVID-19 by increasing the number of Americans who received vaccinations against the virus. Vaccines are less effective at reducing the spread of the newly-dominant Omicron variant, although they are still effective at preventing hospitalization and death.

“Some of the biggest companies are already requiring this,” Biden said in defending the rule. “United Airlines, Disney, Tyson food and even Fox News.”

However, OSHA suspended the rule’s enforcement in November, after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay. It never went back into effect.

Other portions of the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate plan have also been held up. A federal judge in Texas issued an injunction on Friday preventing the government from mandating that all federal employees and contractors receive COVID-19 vaccines. The judge, Jeffrey Brown, ruled that Biden could not issue such a mandate “with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress.”

Several lower court judges also blocked the federal government’s vaccine mandate for healthcare workers whose employers receive Medicare and Medicaid funds. However, the Supreme Court ruled that that mandate can remain in effect while its legality is debated at lower courts.

COLUMN BY

MICHAEL GINSBERG

Congressional reporter.

RELATED DATA: VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports: 1,053,828 Reports Through January 14, 2022

RELATED ARTICLE: Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s Vaccine-Or-Testing Rule For Businesses, Allows Healthcare Worker Mandate To Move Forward

RELATED VIDEO: Dr. Peter McCullough: Top 5 Key Points About Covid-19.

Biden Administration Quietly Burdened Americans with $201 Billion in Hidden Taxes Last Year, Report Finds

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Biden has also imposed 131 million hours of new annual paperwork on Americans.

President Biden campaigned on moderation and a “return to normal.” Yet, on the regulatory front, the Biden administration has been far more aggressive than previous administrations—both Republican and Democratic. At least, that’s the finding of a new report from the center-right American Action Forum (AAF).

Analysts Dan Goldbeck and Dan Bosch reviewed President Biden’s first year in charge. They found that through regulatory actions and executive orders, this administration imposed more than $201 billion in regulatory costs—and 131 million hours of new annual paperwork on Americans.

That’s nearly 40 times more costs imposed than during President Trump’s first year. Yet in perhaps a more apt comparison of presidents from the same party, the report finds that Biden’s regulatory expenses are even three times greater than those incurred during Obama’s first year.

Why are Biden’s regulatory costs skyrocketing? Well, AAF notes that the massive increase under Biden was largely fueled by one uber-expensive regulation regarding greenhouse gas emission standards for automobiles. This example highlights why Americans should care about all of this. After all, aren’t regulations just imposed on businesses?

Not so fast.

While the paperwork might officially regulate General Motors, it is customers who ultimately bear much of this multi-billion-dollar burden via higher prices. In pursuing its “green” agenda via regulatory fiat, the Biden administration is imposing hidden/indirect taxes on American families.

Yet, as AAF’s data show, this isn’t a unique aspect of Joe Biden’s presidency. While it ebbs and flows under different presidents, the regulatory state continues to grow and expand. Americans should be well aware that these incursions come with direct costs for them even if their tax bill doesn’t go up on paper.

When we overlook these costs because the surface-level burden falls on businesses, we fall victim to a common fallacy and fail to properly scrutinize the actions of our government.

This error is what Henry Hazlitt dubbed “the fallacy of overlooking secondary consequences.” In Economics in One Lesson, he rightly decried “the persistent tendency of men to see only the immediate effects of a given policy, or its effects only on a special group, and to neglect to inquire what the long-run effects of that policy will be not only on that special group but on all groups.”

So, yes, it’s understandable that the latest regulations added to the Federal Register might not naturally grab the attention of most Americans. But we should all still care about the unseen burden the federal government imposes on the public with each new rule, regulation, and dictate its bureaucrats come up with.

COLUMN BY

Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

/in , , , , , , /by

“At this point, there is simply no question. The COVID shots are an abysmal failure in every way possible. Again and again, data analyses from around the world show a negative correlation between ‘vaccination’ rates and worsening infection rates and other health trends.” – Dr. Joseph Mercola, The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

Here’s an overview of the report The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots an analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola:

British data show the COVID shots are an abysmal failure, as COVID infection rates in the U.K. are higher among the “fully vaccinated” in all adult cohorts.

Infection rates are also rising faster among the fully vaxxed than in unvaccinated cohorts of all ages. All in all, these data prove that vaccine passports and mandates are completely pointless.

Data from Scotland show more of the same. Double-jabbed Scots are more likely to be admitted to the hospital for COVID than unvaccinated. Since Omicron became dominant,
COVID case rates are also lower among the unvaccinated than among the single-double- and even triple-jabbed

Internationally, journalists are now starting to try to switch the narrative away from cases, hospitalizations and deaths by pointing out how unreliable these data are. What they don’t admit is that “dangerous misinformants” have highlighted these problems for two years already.

Omicron is blowing huge holes in the pandemic narrative, as it predominantly affects the vaxxed, thus proving mandates and vaccine passports are irrational and useless.

The Scotland Herald by Helen McArdle ,

“Case rates have been lower in unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland.”

Click here to read the full report: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

CLICK HERE: To view Vaxx failures in 2 graphs from four countries.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Hospital Takes Dying Patient Off Heart Transplant List Because He’s Unvaccinated

RELATED VIDEO: Dr. David Wiseman: The vaxx contained more than we’re told, and does more than they said

RELATED TWEET:

VIDEO: Fatigue Identified as Major Side Effect of COVID Over-regulation

/in , , , , , , , /by

Thousands of Americans gathered yesterday in Washington, D.C. to protest the federal government’s increasingly unreasonable COVID mandates. One year into President Joe Biden’s term, he has done the opposite of his promise to “shut down the virus, not the country.” Fatigue is a common symptom of COVID-19, but it’s a universal symptom of the ridiculous mask and vaccine mandates that have long outlived their prudence and propriety. As other countries prepare to move on with their lives, President Biden insists that Americans must remain in a prison of our own making.

Strangely, it’s Europe that is leading the way to freedom this time. On Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told the House of Commons that all the country’s COVID restrictions would end this upcoming Thursday. “We must learn to live with COVID in the same way we live with the flu,” added the health secretary. “They have realized that all of these policies that are aimed at slowing the spread of COVID have failed,” said Stanford Professor of Medicine Jay Bhattacharya on “Washington Watch.” COVID “spreads very rapidly despite our best efforts to keep people apart.” Citizens in Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal will once again have the freedom to make their own health decisions. For once, here’s a European trend the U.S. needs to imitate.

Nothing could be further from the contemplation of Biden’s mandarins. Biden failed to excite confidence when challenged in a rare press conference to explain the definition of “fully vaccinated.” Officially, two doses is considered sufficient, but some administration officials advise three doses. Biden sidestepped the question and replied, “every time I speak of it, I say, if you’ve been vaccinated, get your booster shot.” Bhattacharya explained he can’t easily answer that question because it has become “more than just a medical question.” Many cities and states have imposed vaccine mandates for employment and for patronizing restaurants, museums, and libraries. These “essentially make people that are not fully vaccinated second-class citizens,” he said. If the administration redefines “fully vaccinated” to include a booster shot, they create a huge number of second-class citizens with “the snap of a finger.” So it’s a calculation about how much tyrannical invasion of their daily lives the American people are willing to accept.

Underlying Americans’ skepticism of Biden’s vaccine push is the vaccine’s waning effectiveness — both over time and against new variants. “The protection that the booster provides against Omicron is less than the protection that it provided against Delta,” said Bhattacharya. A newly released CDC study from May to November found natural immunity outperforming vaccination alone “by early October,” even before the Omicron variant. It’s not just one study, said Bhattacharya. “The scientific evidence on this is absolutely overwhelming.” Yet the less effective the vaccine becomes, the more President Biden seeks to punish those who resist it.

“Tell people about the scientific evidence. Don’t use it to manipulate people,” Bhattacharya said. “Public trust, once lost, is almost impossible to get back. And public health relies on public trust.” Yet our public health agencies seem to prefer imitating the legacy media in crying “wolf” for a short-sighted advantage.

Meanwhile, “much of Europe is opening up,” said Bhattacharya. “The U.K. is leading the way. There’s no reason the United States shouldn’t be.” Vaccine and mask mandates are far greater violations of personal freedom than a tax on tea. “The right thing is to protect vulnerable people while letting people who are at low risk… just go on with their lives,” he said. The federal government insists people stop living to avoid dying, but that is a false choice Americans should reject.

RELATED ARTICLES:

EXCELSIOR! NY State Supreme Court judge STRIKES DOWN governor’s mask mandate

FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots 

DoD whistle-blowers on vaccines – 500% increase in miscarriages, 300% increase in cancer, 1000% increase in neurological

Natural immunity was more effective than vaccines alone against delta variant, CDC study shows

Missouri AG sues over 30 school districts for enforcing mask mandates

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Florida Governor DeSantis is Right on the Costs of Illegal Immigration

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Illegal immigration “consumes taxpayer money and burdens governmental services.”

We are very concerned about the influx of illegal aliens into the United State and especially to the state of Florida. The costs to Floridian is staggering and harms legal Florida residents dramatically.

In the article Cost of Illegal immigration: Record $135 billion average $8,075 for each illegal, $25,000 in New York the Federation for American Immigration Reform reported:

A continually growing population of illegal aliens, along with the federal government’s ineffective efforts to secure our borders, present significant national security and public safety threats to the United States. They also have a severely negative impact on the nation’s taxpayers at the local, state, and national levels. Illegal immigration costs Americans billions of dollars each year. Illegal aliens are net consumers of taxpayer-funded services and the limited taxes paid by some segments of the illegal alien population are, in no way, significant enough to offset the growing financial burdens imposed on U.S. taxpayers by massive numbers of uninvited guests.

[ … ]

At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens, and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens. That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and a total of $115,894,597,664. The total cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling. In 2013, FAIR estimated the total cost to be approximately $113 billion. So, in under four years, the cost has risen nearly $3 billion. This is a disturbing and unsustainable trend. The sections below will break down and further explain these numbers at the federal, state, and local levels.

Jason Richwine wrote “DeSantis is right about the cost of illegal immigration,” outlining the staggering costs to Florida:

“DeSantis is right to be concerned. Although illegal immigration poses many challenges, the increase in state expenditures is perhaps the most immediate one.

In a recent report for the Center for Immigration Studies, I calculated that Florida spent approximately $2 billion in 2019 on major health and education programs for the nearly 800,000 immigrants who lived in the state illegally before the recent surge.

[ … ]

Of course, assessing the impact of illegal immigration is not simply an accounting exercise. An uncontrolled border has legal, political, and cultural effects that go beyond dollars and cents.

Whatever one thinks of the way the U.S. selects legal immigrants, the process does at least follow the laws passed by Congress. Illegal immigration, by contrast, flouts those laws.”

By far the largest state expenditure on the U.S.- and foreign-born children of immigrants who came illegally is public schooling, which the state must provide regardless of a student’s immigration status.

Extrapolating from Florida’s per-pupil expenditures, educating the children of illegal immigrants cost state taxpayers $1.6 billion in 2019. This figure likely understates the true cost, as it does not reflect the special language training that children of people who came illegally disproportionately require.

Jason Richwine wars:

When President Biden opted to erode security at the border, he also eroded the right of Americans to decide who can and cannot enter their country. Until democratic control over immigration policy is restored, Floridians – and, indeed, all Americans – will continue to pay the price.

COLUMN BY

Jason Richwine

Jason Richwine is a resident scholar at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: White House defends release of migrants into US after apprehension at border

POLL: 60% of Americans Would Vote FOR ANYONE but Biden if Election Held Today

/in , , , , , , /by

My takeaway – 40% (and I think that is inflated) of America is mentally ill.

Poll finds 60 percent would vote against Biden if election was held now

By: Mark Moore, NY Post, January 23, 2022:

Six in 10 Americans would vote for someone other than President Biden if the 2024 presidential election was held today — a rate higher than his predecessors Barack Obama and Donald Trump, according to a poll released Sunday.

Asked if the election were held today, 60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else, compared to 36 percent who said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect Biden, the survey by Fox News shows.

Fifty-two percent said they would vote for someone other than Trump if it were February 2020, and 51 percent said they would select somebody other than Obama if it were August 2011.

The survey also shows the deep dissatisfaction Americans feel for Biden’s handling of the economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, border security and foreign policy.
Joe Biden.
Only 36 percent said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect President Biden.
Rick Loomis/Getty Images

The president’s job disapproval rating is at 52 percent, a slight rise from last month, but a 9 percentage point increase from April, while his approval rating is trending in the opposite direction — from a high of 56 percent in June to 47 percent in this poll.

Asked about Biden’s handling of the economy, 58 percent to 41 percent disapprove. When it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic, 52 percent to 46 percent disapprove; 59 percent to 37 percent disapprove of his handling of border security; and 54 percent to 41 percent disapprove of his handling of foreign policy.
2024 poll.
60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else other than President Biden in 2024.
Fox News

As bad as Biden’s approval ratings are, Vice President Kamala Harris’ are worse.

The survey found that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of the job she is doing, and only 43 percent approve.

In June, her approval rating was at 50 percent and her disapproval rating was 47 percent.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ approval ratings are even worse than President Biden’s.

But the overall discontent with the Biden administration doesn’t translate into a significant advantage for congressional Republicans in the 2022 midterm elections.

Forty-four percent said they would vote for the Republican candidate if the election were held today, compared to 43 percent who would go with the Democratic candidate.

Republicans get high marks from voters on their ability to deal with taxes, the federal budget deficit, immigration, crime, and the economy, while Democrats get good grades on climate change, racism, health care, the pandemic and education.
Barack Obama.

Some 51 percent said they would select somebody other than former President Barack Obama if it were August 2011.

But most Americans — 85 percent — said their top concern was inflation and higher prices, above all other issues.

Concerns over high crime came came in second with 81 percent, followed by political divisions at 78 percent, the coronavirus pandemic at 72 percent, North Korean missile tests at 68 percent, the standoff between Ukraine and Russia at 62 percent, migrants at the southern border at 59 percent, voter suppression at 58 percent and voter fraud at 53 percent.

Forty-three percent of Americans believe inflation and high prices will still be plaguing the nation for “more than a year,” while 44 percent think coronavirus will continue to be a major issue for “more than a year.”
Donald Trump.

The poll shows 48 percent blame the federal government’s policies for inflation. Forty-two percent say it’s the result of coronavirus and 9 percent blame both equally.

The poll surveyed 1,001 registered voters between Jan. 16-19.

It has a plus/minus 3 percentage points margin of error.

RELATED ARTICLES:

WATCH Mike Pompeo: There Is One Primary Reason That Putin Is Acting Aggressive During Biden Admin

China flies dozens of warplanes near Taiwan

Republican Rep: We Might ‘Begin To See’ China Invade Taiwan ‘After The Olympics’

China Joins Russian In Ukraine Crisis, As Biden May Deploy Troops To The Area Tensions Dramatically Escalate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

DoD whistle-blowers on vaccines – 500% increase in miscarriages, 300% increase in cancer, 1000% increase in neurological

/in , , , , , , , /by

Watch the medical panel on COVID that @OANN broadcast live.

Note: Senator Johnson’s remarks begin at the 30:00 minute mark.

Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide an expansive perspective on the global pandemic.

RELATED ARTICLES:

3-year-old girl dies of heart attack one day after taking COVID vaccine

FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

RELATED TWEETS:

RELATED ARTICLE: Fauci warns, ‘We may need fourth booster’, He proclaims, ‘More pain and suffering’ for areas not fully vaccinated.

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

DOW CRASHING: Down More Than 800 Points in 7th Straight Down Day

/in , , , , /by

Stocks head for worst month since March 2020.

The Democrats are plunging Americans into poverty, wiping out our savings concurrent with staggering inflation. Once people have nothing left to lose, the country will descend into violence and revolution which I suspect is exactly what the Democrats want in order to impose emergency legislation to abolish constitutional protections and pave the way for dictatorship. Just like the Nazis used the Reichstag fire.

Dow falls more than 800 points in 7th straight down day as stocks head for worst month since March 2020

By: CNBC, Jan 23 2022:

U.S. stocks fell Monday following the S&P 500′s worst week since March 2020, as investors awaited more corporate earnings results and a key policy decision from the Federal Reserve.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost about 830 points, or 2.4%, falling for a seventh straight day. At its lows of the day, the blue-chip index lost about 1,115 points. The S&P 500 shed 2.9%. The benchmark is down more than 11% from its intraday high. The Nasdaq Composite declined 3.3%, falling deeper into correction territory.

The market action Monday followed a brutal week on Wall Street in the face of mixed company earnings and worries about rising interest rates.

Monday’s pullback put the S&P 500 down more than 10% this month, on pace for its worst monthly decline since March 2020 and worst January performance ever. The Dow was also headed for its biggest one-month loss since March 2020, falling nearly 8%. The Nasdaq, meanwhile, has dropped about 15% in January and is on pace for its worst month since October 2008 — when it plunged 17.7%.

The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), known on Wall Street as the market’s “fear gauge,” hit its highest level since November 2020, surpassing the 38 level at its intraday highs.

The fourth-quarter earnings season has been a mixed bag. While more than 74% of S&P 500 companies that have reported results have topped Wall Street estimates, a couple of key firms let down investors last week, including Goldman Sachs and Netflix.

“What had initially been a stimulus withdrawal-driven decline morphed last week to include earnings jitters,” Adam Crisafulli, founder of Vital Knowledge, said in a note. “So investors are now worried not just about the multiple placed on earnings, but the EPS (earnings-per-share) forecasts themselves.”

Investors are anticipating a slew of high-stakes earnings reports from mega-cap tech companies this week. Microsoft fell 3.7%, Apple lost 3.2% and Tesla pulled back 7% ahead of the quarterly reports.

Only 8 stocks in the S&P 500 traded in positive territory Monday.

Riskier assets are selling off this year as investors brace for the Fed to tighten monetary policy. Bitcoin dropped more than 8% over the weekend, wiping out nearly half of its value at its record high reached in November. The price fell another roughly 4% Monday morning below $34,000, before making up losses.

Investors are eyeing the Fed’s policy meeting, which wraps up on Wednesday. Market participants will be looking for any signals on how much the central bank will raise interest rates this year and when it will start.

The Federal Open Market Committee, which sets interest rates, meets with expectations that it won’t act at this meeting but will tee up the first of multiple rate hikes starting in March. In addition, the Fed is expected to wrap up its monthly asset purchase program that same month.

At his post-meeting news conference, Chairman Jerome Powell also could signal when the Fed will start to unwind its mammoth balance sheet.

Goldman Sachs said over the weekend that it sees risks rising that the Fed could enact even more than the four quarter-percentage-point hikes that the market has priced in for this year. The firm also said the Fed might start running off the nearly $9 trillion in assets it is holding in July.
Stock picks and investing trends from CNBC Pro:

Jeremy Grantham says the end of ‘bubble extravaganza’ is coming, calls for stocks to drop 45%

JPMorgan says hydrogen use is set to boom and picks its top stocks to cash in

Failed market rally signals more trouble ahead for stocks…

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Biden’s handlers are withholding a ‘secret agreement’ with Iran from Congress

/in , , , , , /by

Desperate to pursue a policy of appeasement at all costs.

Biden Admin Withholds Secret Iran Agreement From Congress

by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, January 23, 2022:

The Biden administration is withholding a “secret agreement” with Iran from Congress as negotiations over a revamped nuclear deal continue in Vienna, according to two Republican lawmakers.

Reports emerged late Friday that Russia proposed an interim nuclear deal to Iran with the knowledge of U.S. officials. The deal would reportedly lift some sanctions on Iran in exchange for a limited set of restrictions on the country’s nuclear program. Russia offered the deal to Iran on the sidelines of ongoing negotiations in Vienna, according to NBC News, which first reported on the document. Tehran is said to have rejected the interim deal, saying that it prefers a large-scale agreement that will provide it with billions in cash windfalls. Republican lawmakers say details of the agreement are being kept from Congress.

“Russia sent a secret agreement to Iran,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), lead Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Washington Free Beacon on Friday during a press call. “Russia is trying to take the lead now in the negotiations with Iran. This is a secret agreement. We haven’t seen it.”

The existence of this document indicates that the United States and international partners are eyeing an alternative interim agreement with Iran as efforts to ink a revamped version of the 2015 accord stall due to Iran’s increasingly hardline stance. Republicans in Congress say that, during the past year, the Biden administration has ignored requests for briefings on the status of talks and what a new deal will look like. The Free Beacon first reported last week that the Biden administration is obstructing more than a dozen congressional investigations into the negotiations and sanctions relief.

The Biden administration is required to present any new deal to Congress before it is signed due to a 2015 law, the Iran Nuclear Deal Review Act, that was passed after the Obama administration skirted congressional oversight to sign the original accord.

“Reports that the Biden administration is working with the Russians on a secret nuclear agreement with Iran are doubly concerning,” Rep. Mike Gallagher (R., Wis.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, told the Free Beacon. “First, they create a conflict of interest with Russia as we are trying to prevent an invasion of Ukraine. Second, preemptive sanctions relief, and failure to transmit an interim agreement to Congress, would violate the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act. The administration needs to end their simultaneous surrender to Russia and Iran before it’s too late.”…

If a new deal with the United States is reached, Iran will see all economic sanctions imposed on it by the Trump administration removed. This includes sanctions on Iran’s oil sector, a key source of cash for the regime.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran-Backed Houthi Terrorists Attack United Arab Emirates

Hamas-linked CAIR demands resignation of Defense Secretary over botched Kabul strike

Germany: Afghan Muslim migrant tries to kill woman because ‘women shouldn’t work,’ says ‘I sent her to paradise’

Switzerland: Crosses to disappear from nation’s largest cemetery because they upset ‘other religions’

UK: Muslim Conservative MP accuses Tory government of firing her for her ‘Muslimness’

‘Palestinian’ Muslim who killed teen: According to Islam ‘it is permitted for me to kill someone who took my lands’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Tell the NCAA Only Biological Women Can Compete in Women’s Sports

/in , , , , , /by

Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.

To see this alert in your internet browser and share this article click here.

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy allows males who undergo testosterone suppression to compete athletically as females.  However, studies show that testosterone suppression does NOT make a level playing field for men to compete against women.

The New York Post reports:

Michael Phelps: NCAA’s Lia Thomas issue shows need for level playing field.

Thomas, a transgender swimmer on the women’s team at the University of Pennsylvania, competed for three years as a male. NCAA bylaws permit transgender athletes to compete as women if they have undergone testosterone suppression for a year.

Thomas has been demolishing female competition. There is a chance she could not only win national championships, but compete for all-time NCAA records set by Olympic gold medalists Missy Franklin and Katie Ledecky.

None of Thomas’ teammates have spoken on the record about their opinion on the matter, though some have chosen to do so anonymously to voice their concerns.

“She compares herself to Jackie Robinson. She said she is like the Jackie Robinson of trans sports,” one of Thomas’ teammates told the Washington Examiner last week. “She laughs about it and mocks the situation. Instead of caring or showing that she cares about what she’s doing or what she’s doing to her teammates, she’s not sympathetic or empathetic at all. Lia never addressed our team. She never asked if it was OK. She never asked how we felt. She never tried to explain how she feels. She never has said anything to us as a group. She never addressed anything.”

Policy allowing males to compete athletically as females based on testosterone suppression does not change men into women nor make men physically equal to women.

The National Institute of Health reports:

The muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed.  

report that the performance gap between males and females becomes significant at puberty and often amounts to 10-50% depending on sport. The performance gap is more pronounced in sporting activities relying on muscle mass and explosive strength, particularly in the upper body. Longitudinal studies examining the effects of testosterone suppression on muscle mass and strength in transgender women consistently show very modest changes, where the loss of lean body mass, muscle area and strength typically amounts to approximately 5% after 12 months of treatment. Thus, the muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed. Sports organizations should consider this evidence when reassessing current policies regarding participation of transgender women in the female category of sport.

The Guardian reports:

Trans women retain 12% edge in tests two years after transitioning, study finds:

A groundbreaking new study on transgender athletes has found trans women retain a 12% advantage in running tests even after taking hormones for two years to suppress their testosterone. The results, researchers suggest, indicate the current International Olympic Committee guidelines may give trans women an “unfair competitive advantage” over biological women.

The research, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, found that before starting their hormone treatment trans women performed 31% more push-ups and 15% more sit-ups in one minute on average than a biological women younger than 30 in the air force – and ran 1.5 miles 21% faster.

Yet after suppressing their testosterone for two years – a year longer than IOC guidelines – they were still 12% faster on average than biological females.

The trans women also retained a 10% advantage in push-ups and a 6% advantage in sit-ups for the first two years after taking hormones, before their advantage disappeared. But the researchers say they “may underestimate the advantage in strength that trans women have over cis women … because trans women will have a higher power output than cis women when performing an equivalent number of push-ups”.

Male athletes pretending to be females are demoralizing girls and ruining women’s sports.  Woke leftists demand that a made up, unnatural, unscientific identity that allegedly makes up .58 percent of the population should be allowed to destroy decades of sports competition by real women who make up 50.52 percent of the population.  This unfairness is grossly disproportional against women.  Testosterone suppression simply cannot restore fairness and safety by having men compete against women.

The leaders of our colleges have been the guardians and custodians of science and history for centuries.  Science and history have supported the sexual differences of male and female for hundreds of years.  Tragically, collegiate leaders succumbed to LGBTQ harassment and wokeness by allowing males to compete athletically against females.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female athletic sports categories.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.

Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.

For Contact information click here.

RELATED VIDEO: Trans Runner Beats 14k Women in London Marathon

EDITORS NOTE: This Florida Family Association column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Here’s PROOF That Reducing ‘Transwomen’s’ Testosterone Levels Does Not Eliminate Their Edge Over Real Women in Sports

/in , , , , , , , /by

As most know, there’s a contentious debate over whether it’s fair to let men who claim they’re female compete in women’s sports. It’s a debate driven more by emotion than reason, as so many things are.

If a fellow claiming female status trounces woman athletes in a fairly high profile competition — as University of Pennsylvania swimmer “Lia” Thomas (birth name “Will”) did recently — the story makes headlines and raises ire; if such a man falters, as Thomas did quite suspiciously and conveniently even more recently, the story disappears. And each side in the debate often claims vindication based on the most recent result. Yet there is a way to definitively and irrefutably (within the realm of reason) prove that one side is correct.

Sports governing bodies will generally say that a man claiming a Made-up Sexual Status (MUSS or, to use the misnomer, “transgender identity”) may compete with women if he reduces his testosterone levels to the normal female range and maintains this hormonal profile for a certain period of time, perhaps a year, prior to competition. This standard is based on the presupposition that current and recent levels of testosterone — the main male sex hormone and a “naturally occurring steroid” (performance enhancing substance) — constitute the only factor determining whether a man enjoys an athletic advantage.

Now, the number of MUSS men competing in women’s sports is perhaps too small to provide a scientifically meaningful set of data with which to test this hypothesis. Yet it still can be tested because there actually is a trove of data on the relative athletic performances of males and females with identical hormonal profiles. These people are called children.

As MedPage Today wrote last July reporting on a study, “Between the ages of 6 and 10, youths saw similar testosterone levels regardless of sex.” (Prepubescent boys and girls also both have low levels of estrogen.) Consequently, if the MUSS agenda testosterone-suppression theory is correct, young lads should not surpass their female age-mates in sports. But what do the data say?

Examining 10-and-under national records in the aforementioned Thomas’s sport, swimming, reveals that in every case but one, the boys’ individual times are faster. Admittedly, the gap is generally quite narrow at such ages — especially in swimming, which may have the smallest intersex performance disparity of any “physical” sport (e.g., not auto racing or target shooting). But it’s consistently there.

Some may point out here that the average age at which boys enter puberty is now 10 (yes, really; the age has been dropping) and that this may confuse the matter a bit. Yet reviewing eight-and-under swimming records, in this case from the Southern Arizona Aquatic Association, reveals a similar picture: The boys’ individual records are faster in every instance.

The story is the same with 10-and-under and 8-and-under track and field records, though the gap is somewhat greater. Despite prepubescent boys and girls having the same testosterone levels, the boys’ records are better without exception.

Prepubescent boys also have something interesting in common with MUSS men who’ve suppressed their testosterone production: Their bodies once produced high levels of the hormone — in young lads’ case in the womb — but do so no longer. But there’s a difference, too: A MUSS man might have lived with corresponding female-range testosterone levels for a year or less.

Eight-year-old boy athletes have lived with those levels for eight years.

Yet they still outperform their eight-year-old female counterparts. They obviously enjoy advantages either, A, relating to permanent changes induced by earlier testosterone exposure (pelvis width, etc.); and/or, B, relating to less well known qualities bestowed by the male genotype (XY).

Given this, is it even remotely reasonable claiming that grown, low-T MUSS men don’t have an athletic advantage over their female counterparts?

There’s still more to consider. Relative to the two groups’ respective female counterparts, prepubescent boys lack some advantages that MUSS men enjoy and have some disadvantages MUSS men don’t. For example, not having experienced male adolescence — including exposure to high testosterone levels for those many years — they never developed the associated musculature and skeletal size, the latter of which changes not a whit with testosterone reduction. Moreover, since girls enter puberty approximately two years earlier and thus begin developing sooner, boys are generally shorter and slightly lighter than they are by middle childhood’s end.

Nonetheless, there’s still an athletic performance gap between the two groups, favoring the boys.

Given this, does it not follow that an intersex sports performance gap favoring MUSS men over women would not only exist, but be even greater?

Conclusion: Testosterone suppression surely does rob a male athlete of much of his sex-bestowed advantage. Yet it’s clear that it doesn’t rob him of all such advantages.

None of this will matter to emotion-driven people so in thrall to the sexual devolutionary agenda that rationality will seem risible. But to those who’ll yield to reason, it closes the case on the question of MUSS men in women’s sports perhaps as well as Columbo ever could.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on MeWe or Parler, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

Dr. Robert Malone, Knight in Shining Armor or Controlled Opposition?

/in , , , , , , /by

“The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves.” –  Vladimir Lenin

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.” –  Thomas Paine

“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.” –  Thomas Jefferson

“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” – Albert Einstein

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.” –  Hannah Arendt

“Controlled opposition” is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries, and America is no different.  We have plenty of them; they are widely employed in every arena of society, they even run organizations claiming to be constitutional conservatives and too often they fool most of the electorate.

Not since 1860 has America been so polarized as it is today.  Back in the 1950s, it was mere nuance that separated the Left from the Right.  Everybody loved Mom, baseball, apple pie, babies and the flag.  Not so much anymore.

Countless physicians, scientists, PhDs and journalists have exposed the menacing and murderous COVID jabs and risked their licenses, their livelihoods and their families to save the lives of their patients and fellow citizens.  One of those brave warriors, is Dr. Peter McCullough who has openly stated that the C-19 virus is a bioweapon and the “vaccines” represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

The majority of physicians are following the NIH, CDC and FDA protocols and protecting themselves rather than their patients.  Physicians and scientists who abide by the Hippocratic oath and medical freedom are against the experimental mandated jabs, but there are some who are seemingly playing both sides of the fence.

Watch this Dec. 18, 2021 12-minute Bitchute video on mass psychosis by Dr. Malone, and his Jan. 14, 2022 five-minute YouTube video on “Fear Porn.”

Both of these videos are professionally done and tell the truth as we know it.  Yet, they smack of political ads as though the doctor is seeking a particular office.

Dr. Robert Malone

Doctors Robert and Jill Malone live in Madison, VA – just outside of Charlottesville. They own Cielo Azure Lusitanos, a specialized Lusitano horse breeding farm.  These handsome equines are truly magnificent creatures.  The good doctor’s brilliant career has given them a life of luxury and pleasure.

Dr. Malone and mRNA

Dr. Malone, an American virologist and immunologist is a man on a mission who appeared virtually out of nowhere and has taken center stage with countless interviews.  His name has become a household word as a knight in shining armor out to save the world.  But is he?

On his website, twitter and linked In, Dr. Malone credits himself with being the inventor of the mRNA “vaccines,” but Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman, along with Moderna founder Derrick Rossi, are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA inoculations.  The price paid by both BioNTech and Moderna to license the University of Pennsylvania patent on the modified mRNA base by Kati Karikó and Drew Weissman was $75 million.

It all started when Malone was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).  In 1989, Malone published a paper titled “Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection.”  While this paper is an example of his important contribution to the then-emerging field, it does not make him the inventor of mRNA jabs.

Malone’s research may have been important, but scientific breakthroughs don’t always boast a sole “inventor.” Many scientists are responsible for the technology.  Dr. Malone did not invent the mRNA “vaccines,” but instead the “vaccine technology platform.”

Malone’s Curriculum Vitae

The 17-page curriculum vitae of Dr. Malone tells the story of his many achievements, but the big story is that it shows he is more knowledgeable than anyone else about COVID, the medical industry and government.  He understands the bioweapon and spike protein inside and out.  Please view his history.

Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Robert Malone for three hours.  If you haven’t listened to it, I’d urge you to take the time, even if you do it piecemeal.  Following is a portion of how Dr. Malone described himself to Rogan within the first eight minutes.

“For the last, I guess, about 20 years I’ve been focused on actually doing stuff, regulatory affairs, clinical development, getting necessary training, etc., completed a fellowship at Harvard University Medical School as a global clinical scholar to round out my CV. I’ve run over 100 clinical trials, mostly in the vaccine space, but also in drug repurposing.

“I’ve been involved in every major outbreak since AIDS; this is kind of what I do.  I’ve won literally billions of dollars in federal grants and contracts. I’m often brought in by National Institutes of Health to serve as a study section chair for awarding $80 to $120 million dollar contracts in vaccines and biodefense.

“I’ve spent countless hours at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings. I have multiple friends at the CDC and I work closely with the defense threat reduction agency and it’s one of my favorite clients, teaming partners. I work with the chem biodefense group; there’s other branches but this is not the branch that funded the Wuhan Labs; that’s another branch of Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

“I’ve got many friends in the intelligence community so I’m kind of a pretty deep insider in terms of the government. (He has bragged about his deep intel connections.) I know Tony Fauci personally; I’ve dealt with him my whole career. Then we had this particular outbreak, and I was tip of the spear on bringing the Ebola vaccine forward that we now call the Merck Ebola vaccine.  I’m the one that got Merck involved.”  (The emblem/seal for the United States Special Command is literally the “tip of the spear.”)

Early in his career, Dr. Malone created the technology platform that is now the basis of the company called INOVIO Pharmaceuticals.  He stated on the Rogan interview that INOVIO used pulsed electrical fields and they have one of the DNA vaccines for Covid.  When 9/11 happened, the investors pulled back and he went to work for a company called Dynport Vaccine Company. They had the prime systems contract as government speak for all the biodefense products for the Department of Defense (DOD) for advanced development which is to say clinical trials through licensure.

Dr. Malone also claims that early on he took two C-19 jabs and has had terrible adverse effects from it.  However, with all the knowledge he had about this inoculation, I have to wonder if he really took it.

Salk Polio Vaccine

Malone scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories as well as spending time in 1989 at Salk working on mRNA vaccines, gene therapy, transient gene therapy and as a drug (the latter two terms coined by Dr. Malone).

The Salk polio vaccine comes in two types: the Salk vaccine, made with a killed virus and the Sabin vaccine, made with a live but weakened, or attenuated, virus.  By 1959, the Salk vaccine had covered 90 countries.  In 1961, Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine came into use.

America’s first polio vaccine led to a growing vaccine crisis.  Cutter and Wyeth’s polio vaccine was reported to have paralyzed and killed several children. It was soon discovered that some lots of Salk polio vaccine made by Cutter and Wyeth had not been properly inactivated, allowing live poliovirus into more than 100,000 doses of vaccine.  (Sound familiar?)

Between 1954 and 1963, close to 98 million Americans received polio vaccinations contaminated with a carcinogenic monkey virus, known as Simian Virus 40 (SV-40). The vaccine caused cancers not only in those who received the vaccine, but it is genetically passed to offspring.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals was the first worldwide leader in the production of the Salk polio vaccine.  The French drug giant has been convinced of the messenger RNA technology’s promise.

There is a tangled history of mRNA “Vaccines.”  Researchers at the human-genetic-therapies division of the pharmaceutical firm Shire in Lexington, Massachusetts, reasoned that unmodified mRNA could yield a product that was just as effective if the right ‘cap’ structures were added and all impurities were removed. They continued to advance the technology at Translate Bio in Cambridge, to which Shire later sold its mRNA portfolio.  The 2022 Moderna and Pfizer forecasts are $30 billion and $56 billion respectively.

In August 2021, Sanofi announced plans to acquire Translate for $3.2 billion.  US government grants and money distributed by the White House’s Operation Warp Speed to accelerate the development, manufacture and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines were $11 billion. Several recipients failed to come up with the goods by 2021, including Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline.  Blackrock, owned and run by Democrat Larry Fink, has ownership of 377,284,263 shares of GlaxoSmithKline.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals is listed on page 31 of The Horrible History of Big Pharma and tells why we cannot leave pharmaceutical companies in the driving seat of the Covid-19 response.

Ebola

Dr. Malone worked with the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the initial set up of the licensing deal of the Ebola vaccine to Merck & Co. Inc. Pharmaceuticals.

According to Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), currently there are no licensed vaccines to prevent Ebola virus disease. However, multiple investigational Ebola vaccines have been tested in numerous clinical trials around the world. NIAID has supported the development of various candidates, including the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine developed by Merck. This candidate has been administered to people at risk of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and was previously tested in NIAID-supported clinical trials in West Africa.  Link

Variants/Ebola, China and the DOD

In an interview, Dr. Malone stated, “In my experience, the DOD people who have been involved in this all the way through, are not comfortable with what’s going on and they have been very clear and straightforward to me when I’ve spoken to them, including the colonel who was in charge of the “operation warp speed” project for Moderna.  He called me months ago, set up a zoom, and was very, very plainspoken with me about what he observed.”

Dr. Malone knows the DOD people and spends a lot of time with them and I would bet the DOD knows exactly what is going on in China right now regarding news of a newer variant related to Ebola. Is there a hemorrhagic fever virus going on there or not?  I would guess both Malone and the DOD already know especially since Malone worked with WHO regarding Merck vaccines for Ebola which he brought to fruition.  He has bragged about his deep connection to the intelligence community.

That alone should give anyone pause.

In early January 2022, Dr. Malone was on Steve Bannon’s War Room where he warned of a new disease spreading across Communist China that appears to be an “Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever” super virus caused by mutations arising from mass vaccinations.  “The truth is this (Sars-CoV-2) is not an extremely lethal virus. This is nowhere near Ebola,” Malone commented.

Malone also mentions the fact that Steve Bannon is exposing what is going on in China and whatever the pathogen is, not only is it on the doorstep of Beijing, but three large cities have been shut down because of it threatening the Olympic games.  Listen here to radio host Jeff Rense interview a scientist regarding Dr. Malone and Ebola.

Here comes a new epidemic of fear, the very psychosis that keeps people and school children in their worthless masks.

Malone said, “The governments, together with the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, have performed a series of war game studies over the last 20 years.  They have gotten increasingly sophisticated in those war game studies, but they’ve kind of been biased towards authoritarian outcomes in all these studies, and they brought in other countries for training in how these war games should be run and how they should respond to the threat of a pandemic.

“The number one thing is that they’ve all had some poor assumptions that the pandemic threat agent is extremely lethal.”

Surely, they knew COVID was a very treatable virus, but they used fear and the hospital protocols to engineer a deadly outcome worldwide, especially in America. Only their lethal COVID jabs would save the people!  Until then, they let us die.  Money, depopulation and totalitarian control were the ultimate objectives.

This was all planned and the stakeholders know what is going to happen before they even roll it out.  Yes, planned and executed on the American populace as well as worldwide and for over 20 years.

The CCP COVID Pandemic was predicted over a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation.

Their intention was clear: to use the opportunity of the scenario or crisis to shape a “better future” or transform the world into their likeness – a New World Order global totalitarian dictatorship. The Lock Step scenario is described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” and is based on a pandemic of a virus (an influenza strain) which infects nearly 20% of the world population and kills 8 million people in 7 months. 

People were growing weary and hateful about masks, so the snakeholders decided to lift that requirement.  Yet, fear has paralyzed rational thinking.  The psychosis of fear is now so embedded that any new variant leads the masses to once again don their face diapers and keep their distance from others.

Vax the Vulnerable

Those who have listened to Dr. Malone believe him to be a saint when he tells people not to allow their children to be jabbed with this “vaccine.”

On Malone’s website, he states his mission, “My mission is to ensure vaccine safety, make sure that children are protected, stop and/or limit the vaccine mandates, to identify and teach about lifesaving treatments for COVID-19 and other pandemics. My goal is to save lives.”

However, that hasn’t stopped him from continually repeating that “the most vulnerable” should be injected.

And why did he tweet the following only six months ago? Surveillance, tracing and testing?  Really Dr. Malone?  Those statements match the NIH, CDC and FDA.

In an October 2021 interview, while in Hawaii, Dr. Malone said, “The breakthroughs on the Delta virus continue to evolve.  It’s fascinating that we’re seeing the Delta virus moving into the population and it will move through Hawaii. There’s no question that it will.  It’s strange that it’s moving from the south into the heavily vaccinated northern states.  The people who are ending up in the hospital once again are the elderly and high-risk populations.  The CDC info that was leaked to the Washington Post a month ago shows that the current vaccines are leaky, that there’s no way they can stop the spread of Delta virus.  The only way that it can even be slowed is with as much vaccination as possible and use of masks.”

What Malone just stated is the party line, the exact line of the stakeholders!

In a previous article, I mentioned Steve Bannon’s November 26th show, where Peter Navarro stated, “There has to be an end immediately to the universal vax policy.  It’s very clear and Dr. Malone can talk about the science of this, and that we are running the risk of creating vaccine resistant mutations. They are proliferating. That could wind up doing great harm to people around the world who, ironically, are vaccinated.  That policy is not working.  The Malone/Navarro doctrine is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable targets. Always remember that we are not really vaccinating people, that is not a vaccination.”

In their Washington Times article of January 12, 2022, Peter Navarro and Dr. Robert Malone are still pushing this vax for the “most vulnerable.”  Who are they…the elderly, often referred to as “useless eaters” by the proponents of depopulation and genocide?  They are the ones most likely to die from this gene therapy jab that attacks the immune system and destroys the ability of the T-cells to fight future invaders.

The most vulnerable Americans are living too long and they’re a drain on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. They are also the last generation, mostly baby boomers, who were taught our Constitution and what this country went through to gain her independence and truly become the greatest nation of freedom and liberty.

Depopulation is the goal under UN Agenda 21/30, but the desire to rid our land of the Baby Boomers and replace them with illegal aliens is the ultimate goal and Robert Malone is apparently all for it.  Illegal aliens are allegedly given Ivermectin when they cross the border and are not required to be “vaccinated.”

Conclusion

You may want to listen again to the two Malone videos in the opening salvos of this article.  Will Dr. Malone be chosen for a particular position?  Will he replace Anthony Fauci?  Will he be a presidential advisor? Is he truly the knight in shining armor or is he “controlled opposition?”

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.  Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  Matthew 7:15-17

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

The Truth About Liberal Policies

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Many thanks to Laser List member Jeff Walyus for this fantastic rhetorical approach.  I have found it enormously helpful on many occasions.

The truth about liberal policies is that they hurt people.  Let’s look at just the latest examples.

The New York Times made an astounding admission in November. Democrats run the show in Illinois, California, and New York, and have for decades, but blue states are doing worse than red states in many key respects: lack of affordable housing, disparities in education funding, rising economic inequality – all things liberals and Democrats profess to care about and for which they claim to have all the answers.  The New York Times was brutal in its assessment of blue state results:

… blue states are the problem.  Blue states are where the housing crisis is located.  Blue states are where the disparities in education funding are the most dramatic.  Blue states are the places where tens of thousands of homeless people are living on the streets.  Blue states are the places where economic inequality is increasing most quickly in this country.  This is not a problem of not doing well enough.  It is a situation where blue states are the problem.

Let’s take a closer look at one of those blue states, Washington, out on the Left Coast.  America’s schools are following in the footsteps of Seattle to indoctrinate students on racial equity. But Seattle’s efforts to teach racial equity and ethnic studies have been marked by animus, lies, and worsening results.  Academic achievement as measured by state test scores went down after instruction on “power and oppression” was emphasized over math in 2018.  Pass rates for whites and blacks both dropped.  The response of the schools?  More ethnic studies and less math.  Despite having equity programs for decades, Seattle schools had one of the worst black-white student achievement gaps in the nation, as of 2017.  Liberal policies did not make things better.  They made them worse.

Another admission comes from a liberal book author who worked on progressive causes in San Francisco.  Like other west coast cities, San Francisco adopted policies that enabled homelessness, drug dealing, and crime.  All the problems he set about to solve got worse, instead.  He pins the blame on the liberal mindset that labels people victims and makes excuses for their destructive behavior.  San Francisco is where Walgreens closed 15 stores because shoplifting there is so bad and the penalties for it have been reduced.  Do you suppose the people who walked to those stores for their prescriptions are better off now?

Liberals have pushed Child Tax Credits, food stamps, and super-sized Obamacare subsidies, but a recent report shows people can make more from these programs than from work.  These programs disincentivize work and allow people to stay home and not return to the work force.  Maybe, if you’re a Democrat politician, you like the idea of making people more dependent on government and, thus, on you.  But any normal person can see this is not a healthy development and it’s unsustainable.

Democrats want to massively increase federal spending on transportation which they view as systemically racist.  But more mass transit and fewer cars will hurt the poor.  A study found that cars provide urban households with better access to jobs and economic opportunities than other forms of transportation.  Cars reduce neighborhood poverty exposure by 3 to 4 percent.

Liberals love the teachers unions, but collective bargaining agreements for teachers produce worse outcomes for students, especially minority students.  Liberals also love rent control, but it’s well-known rent control produces housing shortages because it destroys the incentive to build new housing.

Rising homelessness.  Out-of-control shoplifting.  Worse educational outcomes.  Fewer economic opportunities.  Not only do liberal policies not work, they actually hurt people.  In their impulse to make a perfect world and end all human suffering, liberals end up making things worse.  This is why you should not support them, no matter how good they make things sound.  They might be good at dazzling rhetoric, but they’re terrible at good governance.  Which would you rather have?

Visit The Daily Skirmish

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Liberal Media Group Creates pro-Biden ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Ad and We Can’t Stop Laughing

/in , , , , , /by

“Laughter is the sun that drives winter from the human face.” – Victor Hugo

It’s time for a little laughter given the bleak winter of 2022 and the Biden presidency. What we didn’t expect is that a liberal media group would bring that laughter to us. Call it “sun in spades”, or for our French speaking readers soleil à la pelle, no pun intended.

MeidasTouch is a liberal PAC that was founded in March of 2020 by Ben, Brett and Jordan Meiselas with the purpose of stopping the reelection of Donald J. Trump.

MeidasTouch’s slogan is “Because Truth Is Golden.” Ironic isn’t it.

MeidasTouch decided to do a political ad favoring Biden and titled it “Let’s Go Brandon.” Watch:

The problem, after you stopped laughing while watching the ad, is that Biden and his administration have either failed in getting their agenda passed, e.g. Green New Deal, federalizing elections, or have failed to accomplish their agenda when passed, e.g. the Infrastructure Bill which does little for infrastructure and is biased in its funding to blue over red states like Florida.

in an article titled “Okay This Is Beyond NUTS, This Pro-Biden Ad Might be the WORST Ad Ever” wrote:

Yes, the claims it makes are, without exception, dumb and baseless. And yes, it looks absolutely horrific; as Ben Dreyfuss put it on Twitter, “This ad looks like it was made on their phone at 3am by someone drunk in an Uber on their way home.” Bingo.

Those facts are bad enough and would make the ad well worth laughing at. But, even more ridiculously and hilariously, someone thought that bringing up the “Brandon” thing in a pro-Biden ad was a good idea!

Yeah, that’s right. They used “Brandon” as an acronym to try to list out Brandon’s accomplishments, none of with are actually real and almost all of which aren’t exactly the issues Americans care about.

We all know that the symbol of the Democrat Party is a jackass, which is funny enough. But MeidasTouch using Let’s Go Brandon in a pro-Biden political ad takes the proverbial cake.

We agree with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi who said, “The highest state is laughter.” We are definitely in a high state of laughter. If you want another laugh just watch as liberal media personalities slam Biden’s bureaucracy on COVID-19:

Dumb ass best describes MeidasTouch’s ad.

What do you think? Please leave your comments below.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

FACT CHECK: Aol.’s Absurd Article ‘4 things Biden got right in a bumpy first year’

Biden family received $31 million from Chinese officials with links to China’s Ministry of State Security