The Many Defects of Systemic Racism Theory

Yesterday, I told you how schools are lowering educational standards in the name of fighting systemic racism.  Today, I delve more deeply into systemic racism as a theory.

As I wrote 11 years ago,

“The bootstrapping quotient in structural racism advocacy is very high.  The fewer overt racist acts there are, the more systemic and subtle racism exists.  Denying you are racist means you are racist. When you don’t see yourself as manifesting racial problems, you are.  You can have racism without racists.  Color-blind thinking is racist. Unequal outcomes are intrinsically racist.  Disparities are ipso facto proof of racism, even when no proof of motive can be shown.  Refusing to acknowledge the existence of structural racism means the problem is worse than ever.  The fact that many people of color have succeeded in this country proves nothing and is to be ignored.  People of color who disagree with the Liberal-Left line on race, or who are not fixated on racial justice issues like their civil rights masters, suffer from internalized oppression.  Structural racism advocates must think that, if they sprinkle enough fairy dust, people will start to believe them.”

Unfortunately, people did start to believe them.  But there are several more reasons why that belief is misplaced.

First, systemic racism theory breaches the principle of individual responsibility.  We are no longer talking about proving discrimination or seeking justice in individual civil rights cases.  It dispenses with the need to prove racism as the cause of an act or disparity.  Instead, systemic racism indicts society as a whole without any proof.  It is original sin that need never be proven and can never be removed and, thus, its demands are never-ending.  But great mischief begins when you breach the principle of individual responsibility.  Like a liberal friend of mine once put it, ‘you want reparations, OK, but just wait for the counterclaim against all blacks for making inner cities unlivable.’  You might protest most blacks have nothing to do with inner city conditions and I will answer: you reap what you sow.  That’s what happens when you breach the principle of individual responsibility and trade, instead, in guilt by association.  Whites alive today had nothing to do with slavery or the Jim Crow laws that followed yet, under systemic racism theory, they are guilty by association, anyway.  To which I say what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.  Careful what you wish for.  The counterclaims are coming.

Second, systemic racism theory is coercive.  All disparities are racial at root, so public policy must be changed to coerce total equality of outcomes with respect to income, education, healthcare, and all other social indicators.  This is what the new-fangled word ‘equity’ really means.  Racial quotas for suburbs in the Obama administration.  Racial quotas for COVID treatments in the Biden administration.   Racial quotas so too many Asians don’t get into Harvard.  ‘Equity’ means forced equality of outcomes, not opportunity, and it’s pretty ugly.  Wrong direction.

Third, to the professional advocates, systemic racism is just a business.  A pretty good business, at that, if the net worth of race activist Ibram X. Kendi is any guide.  Start preaching the gospel of systemic racism, get some training gigs, and you, too, can become a millionaire.  Systemic racism theory pays and it pays very well.

Fourth, systemic racism theory is just a game; it’s not for real.  Eleven years ago I wrote, “The Left is misusing race under the banner of ‘systemic racism’ as a weapon to advance its collectivist, redistributionist agenda.”  I will add, today, that systemic racism theory is just club.  The Left will beat people over the head with it as long as the Left thinks it’s getting somewhere with it.  If it stops working, the Left will drop that club and pick up another club.  That’s what the Left does.  The issue is never the issue; the issue is always beating you over the head until you comply with their demands.

Finally, systemic racism theory is reductionist.  It purports to explain everything.  It explains disparities in housing, education, and healthcare.  It explains the tax code.  It explains the road system.  It even explains why blacks don’t enjoy the great outdoors.  It purports to explain everything, and therefore explains nothing.   It reduces all of life, the entire universe, and the totality of the human condition down to one narrow factor – race.  It’s just a model and, like every other model, it fails to capture large pieces of reality.  Like every other model, it ignores other important factors and considerations.  Maybe some people don’t do well in life because of the bad choices they make.  There’s that pesky individual responsibility thing, again.

I was taught mostly by Marxists in college.   Just about every course had great heapings of Marxist class analysis in it – the bourgeoisie this, the proletariat that.  It explained all disparities.  It divided the world into oppressors and oppressed.  It became ubiquitous and was applied across the board.  Class analysis explained everything, according to my Marxist professors.  Systemic racism is the modern-day American equivalent of Marxist class analysis.  It explains all disparities.  It divides the world into oppressors and oppressed.    It has become ubiquitous and is being applied across the board.  It is invoked to explain everything, and therefore explains nothing.

Systemic racism theory is just as myopic and limiting as Marxist class analysis was.  Lenin couldn’t figure out why workers were patriotic and would fight for their own countries instead of uniting across borders for world revolution.  Marxist class analysis fails to account for workers who own stock.  Systemic racism theorists can’t explain why so many black people succeed as professionals, paid athletes, CEOs of Fortune 500 corporations, musicians, entertainers, corporate empire builders, etc. in what is supposed to be such a horrible rotten racist country where all whites are supposed to be oppressors and all blacks are supposed to be victims.  This failure to explain most of reality is what will eventually toss systemic racism into the dustbin of history, just like Marxist class analysis before it.  Systemic racism theory has become predictable and by rote.

Therefore, just like Marxist class analysis before it, systemic racism theory has committed the ultimate sin: it’s boring.

Visit The Daily Skirmish

Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Bridge Collapses In Pittsburgh Before Biden Is Set To Visit To Talk About Infrastructure

A bridge in Pittsburgh collapsed Friday morning hours before President Joe Biden is set to visit the city to give remarks about infrastructure.

Pittsburgh Public Safety confirmed the bridge collapse, tweeting a photo of the snow-covered structure and warning residents of “a strong smell of natural gas in the area.”

The president heads to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Friday to visit Carnegie Mellon University’s Mill 19, a research and development hub incorporated into the bipartisan infrastructure plan passed in 2021. 

Biden will then give remarks “on strengthening the nation’s supply chains, revitalizing American manufacturing, creating good-paying, union jobs, and building a better America, including through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law” at Mill 19, according to the White House schedule.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki tweeted that Biden was made aware of the bridge collapse. “Our team is in touch with state and local officials on the ground as they continue to gather information about the cause of the collapse,” she said.

“@Potus is grateful to the first responders who rushed to assist the drivers who were on the bridge at the time. The President will proceed with trip planned for today and will stay in touch with officials on the ground about additional assistance we can provide,” Psaki added.

Pennsylvania has 3,353 bridges in poor condition, the second-highest in the country, according to ABC News. Pittsburgh Public Safety added in a tweet that there will be a news conference about the bridge’s collapse.

COLUMN BY

SHELBY TALCOTT

Senior White House correspondent. Follow Shelby on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Truly Historic’: Biden Takes Victory Lap During Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill Signing Ceremony

Biden’s Infrastructure Bill Fleeces Floridians in Favor of Blue States

Does Biden’s $1.2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill Include a Mileage Tax?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Disadvantaged Populations Receiving Excessive Vaccinations for Money

*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


Project Veritas released Part 2 of our series today featuring homeless and lower-income populations receiving excessive vaccinations for the financial incentive of a $100 gift card.

Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:

  • Project Veritas investigated the practices of DocGo/Ambulnz screeners in the field and obtained undercover footage of employees giving advice on how to circumvent rules to obtain gift cards in exchange for excessive vaccinations.
  • In one instance, an administrator for DocGo/Ambulnz describes how “flipping the names and the date of birth” allows for people to bypass safeguards in the system intended to flag multiple vaccinations.
  • In another instance an RN for DocGo/Ambulnz advises an undercover journalist for Project Veritas to “try something somewhere else where it’s not the same company.”
  • DocGo/Ambulnz employees were also captured on undercover recordings giving anecdotal testimony about how gift cards they distribute are sometimes missing money: “It was in the system that the money was already removed. We’re giving out blank cards.”

You can watch the video by here.

It is an outrage that taxpayer funds are being misused in this way.

Especially concerning is the potential that DocGo/Ambulnz employees appear to be enabling people to commit fraudulent acts by seemingly instructing them on how to get away with receiving a gift card for a vaccination.

Project Veritas will get to the bottom of this. Stay tuned…

EDITORS NOTE: This Project Veritas video report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WATCH: Donald Trump Calls Himself ‘45th AND 47th President’ of the USA

Bravo. God willing. #Trump2024!

WATCH NOW: Donald Trump Calls Himself ‘45th AND 47th President’ of the USA

By The First, January 26, 2022

Donald Trump teased another run for the White House while playing golf with supporters this week; declaring himself the “45th and 47th President.”

The former Commander-in-Chief made his remarks on a video that went viral on social media Wednesday. It remains unclear when the footage was filmed.

“Now on the tee, the 45th president of the United States,” states the narrator.

“The 45th and 47th,” Trump insisted with a grin.

Watch the revealing moment above.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump advisers hit Republicans trying to ease China tariffs

Soros District Attorney Found GUILTY on 141 Counts

WATCH: “If it gets out … the government is betraying the American people.”

Three Biden Iran Negotiators Resign Because Biden “Too Soft”: Report

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Doctor’s Organization Has Treated Over 150,000 COVID-19 Patients With 99.99 Percent Survival ‘Early Treatment Works, Period’

This while Biden and the Democrats make access to effective treatment inaccessible. It’s a crime against humanity.

Doctor’s Organization Has Treated Over 150,000 COVID-19 Patients With 99.99 Percent Survival

‘Early Treatment Works, Period’

By Meiling Lee, The Epoch Times, January 27, 2022

A doctor who has been offering free telehealth services to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic says that early treatment for COVID-19 works, claiming that he has a 99.99 percent survival rate.

“We have a team of volunteer free doctors that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us,” Dr. Ben Marble, the founder of myfreedoctor.com, an online medical consultation service, said at a roundtable discussion hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Jan. 24.

He added, “We deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99 percent survival rate. So, I believe myfreedoctor.com, the free volunteered doctors have settled the science on this—early treatment works, period!”

Marble was answering Johnson’s question about what people can do if they or their loved ones have COVID-19.

People can visit the website myfreedoctor.com, create an account, and fill out a patient intake form if the doctors are accepting new patients for that day. One of the doctors will then reach out in less than 24 hours. With a huge demand for their services, the physicians say they can only “accept a certain number of patients each day.”

Marble says that he and his small team of volunteer doctors prescribe [Dr. Peter] McCullough’s treatment protocol, which consists of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, and other low-cost generic drugs. They also prescribe vitamins D and C, and zinc.

McCullough, a cardiologist, and epidemiologist, along with several physicians put together an early treatment protocol to provide outpatient care for COVID-19 patients. Their paper was published in The American Journal of Medicine in August 2020.

Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist and the President at the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, says that the public is not aware that there are doctors across the country who will provide telehealth and early treatment for COVID-19.

“On our website, we have a button, which says find a provider. We’ve tried to collect as many telehealth providers that treat all states in the country,” Kory said.

“We are trying to let that message be known because that message is being suppressed that this disease is treatable,” he added.

Kory also claims that there is corruption at the federal level in suppressing early treatment with repurposed cheap drugs and their availability and that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been “captured by the pharmaceutical industry.”

“The corruption is because they don’t want you to use off-label, repurposed generic medicines. It does not provide profit to the system,” Kory said, adding that, “you know what’s going on in this country right now, is that the CDC has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry.”

“They sent out a memo in August of 2021, they sent out a similar memo back in the spring 2020, telling the nation’s physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the CDC for comment.

Early treatments were and continue to be discouraged by the CDC, whose guidance since the beginning of the pandemic up until January 2022, only focused on people self-quarantining for 14 days, keeping hydrated, taking analgesics, and only seeking hospital care when they can’t breathe or turn blue. They also warned people to not take any medications not approved for COVID-19.

“People have been seriously harmed and even died after taking products not approved for use to treat or prevent COVID-19, even products approved or prescribed for other uses,” the CDC wrote on its potential treatments webpage.

The weblink provided for the alleged harmful product was related to a March 2020 health alert warning of a serious health effect from ingesting non-pharmaceutical chloroquine phosphate used to clean fish tanks. This alert came after an Arizona man and his wife took the non-pharmaceutical drug in an attempt to self-medicate for COVID-19.

For the past two years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has only authorized limited early outpatient treatments for COVID-19 that include monoclonal antibodies for high-risk patients and antiviral pills from Merck and Pfizer. However, the FDA on Jan. 24 announced it was limiting the use of Eli Lilly and Regeneron monoclonal antibodies only to patients “likely to have been infected with or exposed to a variant that is susceptible to these treatments.”

Johnson held the roundtable discussion to offer a different perspective on the response to the pandemic, including on “the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”

The discussion panel consisted of renowned health experts and scientists that included McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Paul Marik.

According to a press release, Johnson also invited over a dozen prominent figures involved in developing, promoting, and leading the pandemic response, including the CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky and White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Jeffrey Zients. All of the individuals declined to attend the forum.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

The COVID-19 Storyline is the Greatest Scam in World History — The Truth is This is a ‘Pandemic of the Vaccinated’

Vaccinated 20-Year-old Model Claire Bridges Develops Myocarditis, Suffers Heart Attack and Has Both Legs Amputated

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Unilever fires 1,500 workers, splits ice-cream from food division after boycott of Jews

Evil does not prosper.

Unilever fires 1,500 workers, splits ice-cream from food division

January 27, 2022 / JNS) The multinational firm Unilever, which owns Ben & Jerry’s, announced on Tuesday that in the wake of severe losses, it will fire 1,500 workers around the world and split off its ice-cream division from its food division.

The move follows Ben & Jerry’s decision to break its contract with its Israeli licensee, who refused to stop selling the company’s ice-cream in Judea and Samaria.

The U.S. states of New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Colorado and Arizona have decided to remove investments from their pension funds in Unilever because the company was found to violate anti-BDS laws that passed in those states.

“Unilever continues to run away from its responsibility as a parent company,” said Avi Zinger, director-general of Ben & Jerry’s Israel, the Israeli licensee. “Instead of taking responsibility and canceling the boycott, Unilever prefers to put its head in the sand and ignore the fact that it is solely in charge of all the companies it owns, including Ben & Jerry’s worldwide.”

Zinger said that Ben & Jerry’s Israel would continue to struggle against the banning of sales in eastern Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria and will use all tools at its disposal to persuade Unilever to assume the necessary responsibility.
Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicate by email and never miss our top stories

Last week, it was reported that Unilever’s stock plunged 20.7% in the six months since it informed Zinger that his contract was ending.

This amounts to a $26 billion loss, according to Channel 12 News, which first reported on the story. Losses were reportedly due to numerous factors, including a failure to reach profit targets.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Husband Accuses Iranian Dissident of Islamophobia

Rep. Ilhan Omar keeps throwing a nonstop pity party for herself as the bigot who constantly claims to be the victim.

Omar is actually powerful and privileged and has risen to a position of power in the country she makes no secret of hating.

Meanwhile, Masih Alinejad is an actual dissident. Alinejad lives in exile and has been a courageous activist against the Islamist regime, encouraging protests, boycotts, and celebrating women who refuse to bow to mandatory hijabs. Her family members have been arrested and Iran’s regime plotted to kidnap her.

And here’s Rep. Omar’s (current) husband accusing her of Islamophobia for an op-ed warning that Omar’s Islamophobia bill “might be creating precedents that could undermine our freedom to speak out.”

“So this lady doesn’t want to combat Islamophobia because she doesn’t like Muslims. Understood!” Tim Mynett, the political consultant currently playing the role of Omar’s husband, tweeted.

As Hillel Neuer of UN Watch pointed out, “Ilhan Omar’s husband just accused journalist Masih Alinejad of not liking Muslims—even though she was born a Muslim in Iran, and in the editorial (which he seems not to have read) mentions her hijab-wearing mother among “many relatives who are pious Muslims I love and respect.”

But the one thing that Omar and her gang know how to do is falsely accuse people of Islamophobia. This entire exchange proves Alienjad’s point.

Omar and her ilk can’t be trusted not to use false accusations of Islamophobia to silence critics and just anyone who disagrees.

COLUMN BY

RELATED ARTICLES:

DC imam: Texas synagogue hostage crisis was ‘arranged by the Zionists’ to give Muslims ‘a bad name’

Three American Iran Nuke Deal negotiators quit talks over weak stance of Biden administration

RELATED VIDEO: Robert Spencer on OAN on the Fallout from Afghanistan

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Hunt for the ‘Gay Gene’ Continues

A recent Australian study revives interest in a largely discredited theory.


When it was released in 2011, Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” was the hottest song of the year, topping the charts in 25 countries. It became a gay anthem, with its message that “No matter gay, straight, or bi’, lesbian, transgender life / I’m on the right track, baby”.

That was more than a decade ago.

Whatever has happened to the notion that gays and lesbians are “born this way”, that their sexual orientation is not a matter of choice, but of genetic hard-wiring? The biological model of homosexuality has gone very quiet lately.

There could be a few reasons.

First, with the legalisation of same-sex marriage around the world, homosexuality has been normalised; discrimination has been banned. Just as the debate over the origin of Covid-19 has faded into the background as the disease becomes endemic, endless disputations over an endemic psychological condition seem less urgent.

Second, the transgender movement is sucking the oxygen out of the debate over a biological origin for homosexuality. The whole idea of fluidity is that gender is a choice: you can be whoever or whatever you want to be. Arguing in favour of a fixed sexual orientation has become old-fogeyish.

Third, a major investigation of the question in the leading journal Science in 2019 found that there was no single “gay gene” — which had been the holy grail of this research for decades. The question was still open, according to the researchers, but it appeared that the genetic component to homosexuality was very small. “Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many,” they wrote. It was the ultimate bad hair day for biological explanations.

Fourth, the search for a biological explanation was a double-edged sword. If a gay gene did exist, it could be detected with rapidly improving testing technology for embryos. Parents might abort a potentially gay offspring. Better not to know at all.

Nowadays, the only place where the biological explanation survives and thrives may be in legislature chambers when “gay conversion therapy” is outlawed. “The consensus in the medical community is ‘yes, we are born that way’,” as one Californian radio station put it. “We can’t change who we are, and we shouldn’t even try.”

But it’s hard to argue that we can’t change unless sexual orientation is genetic. So the hunt for a genetic basis goes on.

The latest development is an article by Australian researchers which appeared a few days ago in The Journal of Sex Research, a leading peer-reviewed academic journal. They used population data from The Netherlands to contend that “having a greater number of older brothers increases the probability of a person entering a same-sex union at some point in their lives”.

In effect, they are proposing, not a genetic cause, but a hormonal one. “This effect has been attributed to a mother’s immune reaction to proteins produced by a male foetus,” they wrote. “The proteins enter the mother’s bloodstream and trigger the production of antibodies that influence the sexual development of subsequent children. These maternal antibodies accumulate over successive pregnancies with male foetuses, which means men with more older brothers are more likely to experience same-sex sexual attraction.”

It’s an ingenious hypothesis – and one that has been proposed before. It’s called the fraternal birth order effect.

What the Australian researchers contribute to the debate is statistical, not medical or genetic. The hormonal explanation is entirely speculative. They found a correlation between the number of older brothers Dutch men born between 1940 and 1990 had and whether they entered a same-sex marriage or civil partnership.

The authors insist that a biological explanation is still important so that gays and lesbians will be fully accepted in society. “People who view sexual orientation as a product of biological factors (such as hormones or genetics) are more likely to support sexual minorities and their civil rights, compared to those who view it as a product of social factors or individual choice,” they write.

MercatorNet asked Dr Paul Sullins, an American sociologist who has written extensively about homosexuality, for a quick assessment of the Australian study. He responded that: “even if the fraternal birth order idea unexpectedly found convincing evidence, it would only explain part of the genetic basis of a minority of male homosexuals. It would not, by itself, re-establish the discarded hypothesis that homosexuality is largely or wholly innate.” Furthermore, he told MercatorNet:

“The idea it embodies is one of a number of early speculations about a possible genetic basis for homosexuality, which included cousin genetics, childhood gender nonconformity, different proposed ‘gay genes’ or genome sequences, lack of exposure to certain hormones in utero, finger length, and other notions long on creativity and hopeful credulity but short on evidence.

“Virtually all of these ideas are dismissed today outside a few true believers in one or more of them due to the advance of solid twin and GWAS [genome-wide association study] evidence showing pretty conclusively that a) the genetic basis for homosexuality is small compared to environmental contributions and b) what genetic association there is is diffuse, unrelated to any particular discoverable cause.”

It remains to be seen if the Australian study will make a splash. The authors allude to a 2006 Danish study which was also based on population-level data. It found no association between homosexuality and fraternal birth order. In fact, it apparently found the opposite: straight men had a greater number of older siblings. “Heterosexual marriage was significantly linked to having young parents, small age differences between parents, stable parental relationships, large sibships, and late birth order,” the Danish authors wrote.

The hunt for the gay gene continues. Slowly.

COLUMN BY

Michael Cook

Michael Cook is the editor of MercatorNet. More by Michael Cook

RELATED ARTICLE: We live in a culture of decadent mercy

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Governor DeSantis’ Ad ‘Freedom over Fauci Flip Flops’ goes viral

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has released a new ad that shows how Dr. Fauci flip flops. The ad also makes the case that lockdowns and mandates are ineffective at best and dangerous at worse.

Watch: Gov. Ron DeSantis Shows Dr. Fauci Flip-Flops in EPIC Ad.

The video has a graphic at the end of the Freedom over Fauci Flip Flops using the phrase “Fauci Can Pound Sand.”

“To pound sand” is an American invention that first appeared in print back in 1857 meaning “to engage in a pointless, menial task”  according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Example, “If he told them to pound sand, they would pound sand, and think that it was the finest thing in the world.” Literally pounding sand (like with a shovel) is indeed a pointless chore; the sand does not really compress or adhere to itself, so the result is largely indistinguishable from the starting point.

This use of the phrase “pounding sand” is on-point is Fauci wants us all to pound sand via meaningless tasks like: lockdowns, vaxx mandates, vaccine passports, booster shots, etc.

This has lead to cartoons on Fauci’s Flip Flops. Click here to see on of these Wuhan Flu Flip Flop Cartoons.

Let the flip flop war begin in the name of freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Choose freedom over Fauci. Give me liberty or give me Fauci.

Governor DeSantis is running for re-election in 2022. Team DeSantis posted the below tweet.

This video has driven the left looney, literally. The left, rather than taking the high ground by defending Fauci and Biden’s mandates, Democrats have decided to make their own flip flops with “F**K DESANTIS” on the bottoms.

This is typical for Democrats, don’t address and defend the issues, just attack the messenger.

Now that’s ironic. Rather than going high, as Michele Obama said, the left is going low with its prerogative slogan. What does that tell you?

DeSantis 2022 and beyond.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: 58,000+ Truckers Join MASSIVE Convoy to Protest and Defy Mandates – This Would Wreck Supply Chain

RELATED TWEETS:

The Unrealistic Myth of Carbon Neutrality

“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy


Carbon neutrality is a state of net-zero carbon dioxide emissions. The term net zero means achieving a balance between the carbon emitted into the atmosphere, and the carbon removed from it. This balance – or net zero – will happen when the amount of carbon we add to the atmosphere is no more than the amount removed.

Proponents of carbon neutrality believe it can be achieved by: 1.) balancing emissions of carbon dioxide with its removal or 2.) by eliminating all carbon emissions from society.

FACT: Carbon is the most common element in the human body, making up 18% of the body by mass. Its role is mostly structural, forming the “backbone” of many organic molecules.

In an article titled “What Does Carbon Do for Human Bodies?” Glenn Singer reported:

Cellular respiration is a process through which the body releases energy stored in glucose, which is a compound composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. That energy is used to produce adenosine triphosphate, or ADP, which scientists call the “energy currency” of the cell. During respiration, the body oxidizes glucose and energy is released. The oxygen in the compound is reduced to water, while the carbon atoms in the glucose are released as carbon dioxide.

[ … ]

Scientists estimate that a human being breathes about 20,000 times a day, thanks to the components of the respiratory system — the nose, throat, windpipe, voice box and lungs. The air that people breathe consists of several gases, with oxygen most important for cell growth and energy. Carbon dioxide, a waste gas, is produced when carbon is mixed with oxygen during cellular metabolism.

[ … ]

A carbon-based substance, activated charcoal — very fine particles — can be a life-saver. It is a highly porous substance, able to bind many harmful substances, and often is used in hospital emergency rooms to treat drug overdoses and chemical poisonings.

So, humans are biologically carbon dioxide producers by just breathing in and out. So, what does this mean for those who want to eliminate all carbon emissions from society? Do they want to kill all humans to reach carbon neutrality?

The Biden administration, “Aims at 50-52 Percent Reduction in U.S. Greenhouse Gas Pollution from 2005 Levels in 2030.

According to the EPA Greenhouse gases are:

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) Carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere through burning fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil), solid waste, trees and other biological materials, and also as a result of certain chemical reactions (e.g., manufacture of cement).
  • Methane (CH4) Methane is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil.
  • Nitrous oxide (N2O) Nitrous oxide is emitted during agricultural, land use, industrial activities, combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste, as well as during treatment of wastewater.
  • Fluorinated gases [A]re emitted from a variety of industrial processes.

Therefore, according to the EPA, in order to reduce greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52% we must: stop using all fossil fuels, stop making cement, stop transporting coal, natural gas and oil, stop growing crops and raising cattle, pigs, chickens, etc., stop industrial activities, stop treating waste water and finally end all industrial processes.

Carbon Neutrality is a Myth

The truth is that mankind cannot become carbon neutral without hurting mankind itself.

To understand this let’s look at the state of California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). According to the RPS website:

The Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) is one of California’s key programs for advancing renewable energy. The program sets continuously escalating renewable energy procurement requirements for the state’s load-serving entities. Generation must be procured from RPS-certified facilities. The California Energy Commission verifies RPS claims.

According to the RPS’ Regulations Specifying Enforcement Procedures for the Renewables the definition of “Procure” means:

to acquire electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, either directly from the eligible renewable energy resource or from a third party, through executed contracts or ownership agreements.

Paige Lambermont in an article titled “California Will Continue to Reap the Blackouts It Sows” reported:

It doesn’t take an engineer to see the worrying trend towards electrical deficit brewing over the horizon as blackouts already hamper the state.

One major cause of the rise in usage of wind and solar power in California is the state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) which requires that by 2030 all “electric load-serving entities” procure 60 percent of their electricity from renewables, and that by 2045 that share becomes 100 percent. Because of this requirement, utilities use far more of these intermittent resources, resources that although “greener” are less reliable, than they otherwise would. To compensate, California cycles their baseload resources up and down as the sun ceases to shine or the wind ceases to blow, making blackouts more likely.

[ … ]

California imported nearly one-third of its electricity from other states in 2018. This is all fine and good when neighboring states have power to spare, but when they don’t their own capacity needs are fulfilled first.

Lambermont concluded with this warning,

If actions are not immediately taken to both keep current reliable baseload capacity, and remove legal limitations on the construction of new ones, both nuclear and natural gas, then California’s current power predicament may become a regular occurrence.

Without a major tidal shift in California energy policy, this problem is not currently destined to right itself.

The Bottom Line

Amazon aims for total carbon neutrality. Apple aims for total carbon neutrality. FedEx plans to replace its entire gas and diesel powered delivery trucks and replace them with electric powered vehicles.  In 2030 Mercedes committed to selling EVs exclusively “where the market allows.” Porsche aims to be totally carbon neutral. In 2025 Jaguar will become an all electric brand. Honda is planning to sell only electric vehicles in America. In 2027 Alfa Romeo plans on selling only electric vehicles in China, Europe and the U.S. In 2035. General Motors pledged to sell only electric vehicles unless “the market demands otherwise” and aims for its global products and operations to be carbon neutral. Mercedes aims to be carbon neutral in 2039. And finally, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi Motors, Subaru, Toyota and the Volkswagen Group aim for total carbon neutrality by 2050.

Do you see where this is all going? 

If you want to destroy an economy, eliminate jobs, stop heating homes, stop manufacturing cars, trucks, and SUVs that use gasoline or diesel fuels, stop flying planes that use jet fuel, stop manufacturing, end farming, stop getting clean water, and all of those related industries, then just go carbon neutral.

Stopping the use of power plants using coal, natural gas and oil will literally shut down America. Our nation will become worse than a third world country, we would return to the stone age before mankind discovered fire.

QUESTION: Is this idea of carbon neutrality good for you and me or bad for you and me?

ANSWER: NO! Carbon neutrality is about government making decisions that are best left up to individual consumers.

We will let you make the decision on that. We just provide the facts and truth behind carbon neutrality.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Angel Families: Mayorkas, Biden Criminally Aiding Illegal Aliens

Angel Families, whose loved ones have been killed by illegal aliens, have released a statement slamming Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and decrepit President Joe Biden — declaring them criminal accomplices to illegal immigration.

In a speech last week, the open-borders enthusiast Mayorkas stated that Biden’s national immigration agenda centered around “justice and equity” for illegal aliens with the administration’s so-called “sanctuary country” orders shielding most illegal aliens from arrest and deportation.

Angel Families with Advocates for Victims of Illegal Alien Crime (AVIAC) blasted Mayorkas and Biden in response. “No one is or should be above the law,” the statement read:

When it comes to the 15-30 million individuals who entered the country illegally, refused to leave when their visa expired or were denied asylum, and disappeared into the country, they are considered by the president, every Democratic legislator (and some Republicans) most of the media and many state and local governors and state legislators and particularly DHS Secretary Mayorkas to be above the law…

But since the start of the Biden administration, even those who have committed additional crimes are protected. DHS Secretary Mayorkas made it very clear that being here illegally is not a crime…

The truth is that this administration and Mayorkas, in particular, decided to open the borders and possibly even worse to protect those who have already committed crimes. As of this writing, DHS has refused to release the statistics on internal enforcement deportations. Spoiler Alert: They will be atrocious.

The Angel Families add that they have “called for [Mayorkas’s] resignation, firing, and impeachment” as they consider the DHS chief and Biden “criminals as well.”

“Those who protect [Mayorkas], and his policies shouldn’t be held above the law either,” they rightly conclude.


Alejandro Mayorkas

13 Known Connections

No More Immigration Raids at “Protected Areas” & “Sensitive Locations”

In an October 12, 2021 memo issued to the Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS) and Customs & Border Protection (CBP) agencies, Mayorkas announced that the DHS would now end all mass immigration-enforcement operations at worksites in the United States. Asserting that such operations should target employers of illegal migrants, rather than the migrants themselves, Mayorkas wrote: “The deployment of mass worksite operations, sometimes resulting in the simultaneous arrest of hundreds of workers, was not focused on the most pernicious aspect of our country’s unauthorized employment challenge: exploitative employers. These highly visible operations misallocated enforcement resources while chilling, and even serving as a tool of retaliation for, worker cooperation in workplace standards investigations.”

In an October 27, 2021 memo, Mayorkas ordered immigration officers to likewise refrain from arresting any illegal aliens at additional “protected areas” and “sensitive locations” like food banks, homeless shelters, churches, hospitals, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, school bus stops, and places where disaster or emergency relief is provided. “When we conduct an enforcement action—whether it is an arrest, search, service of a subpoena, or other action—we need to consider many factors, including the location in which we are conducting the action and its impact on other people and broader societal interests,” Mayorkas told immigration officers in the memo. “For example, if we take an action at an emergency shelter, it is possible that noncitizens, including children, will be hesitant to visit the shelter and receive needed food and water, urgent medical attention, or other humanitarian care.”

In response to Mayorkas’ memo, Federation for American Immigration Reform president Dan Stein said in a statement: “The [ICE] agency still exists, but it has been stripped of all of its functions with regard to the enforcement of immigration laws. Nearly all illegal aliens are already off-limits to enforcement due to a Sep. 30 memo, and as a result of Mayorkas’ ‘expanded and non-exhaustive list of protected areas,’ where ICE agents are [not] permitted to do their work, the secretary has essentially nullified an entire body of constitutionally enacted laws.”

To learn more about Alejandro Mayorkas, click here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Deliberate Treachery of Lower Standards

I have a niece who, when she was six, said, “Mommy, those people have low standards.”  If she were still six these days, she’d be really upset because, everywhere you turn, people are trying to lower standards.

A Minnesota middle school abolished failing grades.  No more “F’s” because they are systemically racist.  However, I submit to you that coddling students is not the best way to prepare for them the school of hard knocks.  But the idea is picking up steam, especially in California.

The Arlington County School Board in Virginia wants to abolish the grading of homework because minority students supposedly don’t have the resources to complete their assignments.  Which doesn’t make any sense, because Arlington hands out free laptops to students.  Moreover, it didn’t take a lot of resources for the math class to succeed in the movie ‘Stand and Deliver’ which was based on a true story.  All it took was a dedicated teacher with a vision and students willing to try.  Arlington’s move is based on “implicit bias” theory which, although it snookered Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, is a house of cards when you start looking into it.  It all started with a science experiment showing white people have infinitesimally delayed reaction times when shown pictures of black people in distress.  From that slender reed, the entire cottage industry of implicit bias theory was born.  How stupid is that.  It’s never been shown that association tests like this can predict real-world behavior.

Turning to higher education, accrediting bodies for medical schools have proclaimed that “individualism and meritocracy” are “malignant narratives” that “create harm” and, proclaimed further that race has “no genetic or scientific basis.”  The proclamations were made in the interest of “advancing health equity”.  Critics warn the new approach will turn doctors into unqualified quacks who will miss diagnoses and not order tests because they mistakenly believe racial differences play no role in susceptibility to certain diseases.

Classics majors at Princeton will no longer have to be proficient in Latin and Greek to graduate.  The argument is not that the languages have become superfluous.  Instead, the argument is that lowering the standard would undo systemic racism and promote equity.  Not to be left out, the English Department at Rutgers just emancipated students from traditional English grammar.  The Department made the move in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and out of the belief dumbing down grammar standards is the “way to contribute to the eradication of systemic inequities facing black, indigenous, and people of color.”

I can’t think of anything more racist than telling people they’re too stupid to succeed because they’re a certain color.

Moreover, I can’t take all this talk about how lowering education standards supposedly helps minorities seriously.  This is because I know there are government documents laying out a deliberate plan to dumb down America.  There are people who are trying to make Americans stupid compliant sheep and wards of the state run by wannabe masters of the universe.  It’s all laid out in a book by the woman who found the documents.  The book is entitled “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” and the author is Charlotte Iserbyt who worked in the federal Department of Education where she found the documents.

How are lower standards good for anybody?  Anyone with any sense can see they’re not.  If a six-year-old can see it, why can’t you?

I’ll have more to say about the phony systemic racism narrative tomorrow.

Visit The Daily Skirmish

Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: REPORT: Student outcomes and earnings in higher education policy – American Enterprise Institute

SISSY WATCH USA: Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines

While you’re reading our Sissy Watch USA column we thought you might like to listen to Tiny Tim singing Tiptoe Through The Tulips, for fun.


After writing our column “America’s Sissy Problem” we decided to take the next step and identify influential sissies in America.

Our first Sissy Watch USA winner is John “Scott” Kirby.

John Scott Kirby is an American executive currently serving as CEO of United Airlines. He previously served as President of US Airways and American Airlines, as well as President of United Airlines from 2016 to 2020, when he was promoted as CEO.

Holly Hegeman, wrote in PlaneBuzz this about Scott Kirby:

More Scary Photos: Guess Who

It’s clearly a year for major Halloween cross-dressing on the part of airline execs.

Can you guess who these two lovelies are? Yes, that’s right. The Captain and Tennille. Kind of. Sort of.

All I have to say is that US Airways’ President Scott Kirby makes one ugly woman. (The Captain? That’s SVP of Corporate Culture, HR, Dog Catching and whatever else her title includes — Elise Eberwein.)

I guess Love Will Keep Them Together. (Anyone for a little Muskrat Love?)  Nice legs Scott.

Click here to see Scott Kirby in drag.

But Scott Kirby isn’t the only airline executive who cross-dresses. Holly Hegeman, wrote in PlaneBuzz about Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly. Gary Kelly was our first runner up for Sissy Watch.

It’s Halloween. BOO!

For at least two airlines — that means it is time to get scary.

Especially for some of the airlines’ top executives.

Friday over on Denton Drive here in Dallas, it appears that Southwest Airlines‘ former Chairman and CEO Herb Kelleher decided to go with the Willie Nelson/Biker combo look, while current Chairman, President and CEO Gary Kelly pranced down the Yellow Brick Road as Dorothy.

I don’t know what it is with Gary and his cross-dressing tendencies, but ever since he turned out as Edna Turnblad a couple of years ago — we’re almost afraid to look. (Last year Gary and two associates were attired as ZZ Top.) Early betting this year had Gary dressing as Julia Child.

But here’s the one that got me. Anyone know who that is?

That’s US Airways’ COO Robert Isom. I tell you what — that boy has the Barry Gibb thing going, doesn’t he? I hear he hit some pretty high notes Friday as well — as the US Airways’ executive team, aka the Bee Gees, entertained airline employees at the airline’s headquarters in Tempe.

Gotta love that hair.

Click here to view the image of Gary Kelly, CEO of Southwest Airlines cross-dressed as Dorothy

It seems that Scott is not only into cross-dressing he’s also all-in on vaxx mandates.

In a Fox News article titled “United Airlines pilot says she’s blocked from finding job or accessing 401k for refusing vaccine reported:

United Airlines captain who is on unpaid leave for not complying with her company’s vaccine mandate says she has been locked out of her 401(k) and is prohibited from finding another job.

“I am out on unpaid leave. I am prohibited from getting another job. I’m prohibited from accessing my 401(k). I have no medical benefits, and I’m leading the charge in this fight, so my days are consumed,” United pilot Sherry Walker, co-founder of Airline Employees 4 Health Freedom, told the Daily Signal while attending the “Defeat the Mandates” march in Washington, D.C., on Sunday.

Under Scott, United Airlines has also gone woke. Watch as Tucker Carlson sounds off on United Airlines latest ‘gender, racial’ quota:

The Bottom Line

Sissy Watch USA is dedicated to exposing the sissies among us. We will expose pederast priests, bishops, cardinals, pedophile politicians, corporate CEOs and of course cross dressers. We will include sissyfied actors, actresses, athletes, media and social media icons and of course Mr. Sissy himself Barack Hussein Obama, and his minion Joe Biden.

Why are we doing this? Because someone has too. 

Our role is to present the facts and let our readers make up their own minds.

If you have a sissy you would like us to highlight please leave the information in the comments section below.

Thanks for reading our inaugural Sissy Watch USA column.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

26-Year-Old Convicted Trans Child Molester Sentenced to Two Years in Female Juvenile Facility

Apple Bows to Wokeness, Releases ‘Pregnant Man’ Emojis

“Increased Immigration Flows” Under Biden Cause Record-Breaking Court Backlog

The Biden administration’s controversial open border policies are slamming the overwhelmed U.S. Immigration Court system, creating the largest backlog of cases in history. A new report issued by Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) reveals that the backlog is “growing faster than ever, burying judges in an avalanche of cases.” At the end of December pending cases reached a shocking 1,596,193, according to government figures obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). To put things in perspective, researchers point out that if every person with a pending immigration case gathered, it would surpass the population of Philadelphia, the nation’s sixth-largest city. Migrants with open cases will wait nearly five years for a court decision determining their status in the U.S.

While the system has seen backlogs under past administrations of both political parties, it has never experienced anything this dire. In fact, the TRAC report states that “a disturbing new trend has emerged during the Biden administration that demands attention: since the start of the Biden administration, the growth of the backlog has been accelerating at a breakneck pace.” For instance, at the start of the George W. Bush administration, the backlog stood at 149,338 and it grew “substantially” under Barack Obama. The problem “only accelerated” under Donald Trump but nothing compares to Biden. In recent months the rate of backlogs in the nation’s Immigration Court system has “exploded,” the TRAC report states, supporting the assessment with government data. Between October and December 2021, the quarterly growth in the number of pending Immigration Court cases shattered records.

In that short period, the backlog increased by nearly 140,000 cases, the government records obtained by TRAC show. “Even during the most dramatic growth in pending cases during the Trump administration, the largest 3-month increase in the backlog only once approached 100,000 in the June-August 2019 period,” the report says. The backlog fluctuated up and down in the following year until it skyrocketed in the last few months of 2021 under Biden. Researchers call it a “dramatic acceleration in the growth of the backlog.” The alarming government figures suggest that Immigration Courts “are entering a worrying new era of even more crushing caseloads— all the more concerning since no attempt at a solution has yet been able to reverse the avalanche of cases that Immigration Judges now face,” the TRAC report states.

The COVID-19 pandemic has played a role in the crisis because it caused a partial court shutdown, but researchers found that the key problem is the “recent deluge of new cases filed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).” Immigration enforcement has been limited dramatically under the Biden administration, which has also issued a policy to allow more new immigrants into the U.S., thus the unprecedented and expanding backlog. The dramatic increase in court cases began around June and will inevitably get worse if the administration does not make changes. “If the current pace during the first quarter of FY 2022 of newly arriving Notices to Appear (NTAs) continues, the Court will receive 800,000 new cases – at least 300,000 more than the annual total the Court has ever received during its existence,” TRAC estimates.

The U.S. Immigration Court system operates under the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), which functions under the attorney general. There are 60 immigration courts throughout the nation and around 580 judges that conduct removal hearings or determine if a migrant can remain in the U.S. In its 2022 budget submission to Congress, the DOJ requests $891,190,000 for the EOIR. In the document, the agency lists “increased immigration flows,” particularly family units, unaccompanied alien children and putative asylum seekers from Central America, among the EOIR’s biggest external challenges.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Misdiagnosing COVID: Where Biden and the Media Got It Wrong

The U.S. Supreme Court dropped the hammer on the president’s vaccine mandate almost two weeks ago, but the administration must have had a hard time saying goodbye. It took 12 full days, but OSHA, the government’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, finally got around to shutting down the private employer “jabs for jobs” rule it never had the grounds to write. A defeated Biden formally withdrew his “emergency temporary standard” this week — which, as it turns out, was never an emergency, but thanks to the justices, it sure was temporary.

If only America could take back the other 365 days of bad COVID policy, Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.) said on “Washington Watch.” “We all talked at the beginning about ‘follow the science.’ The sad thing is… with this particular administration… it’s become political science rather than real science.” And, like a lot of Americans, Murphy is upset that our country is now paying for it. As part of the GOP Doctors Caucus in the House, he sent a letter to the head of NIH, Acting Director Lawrence Tabak, about the dangerous side effects of the administration’s far-Left policies.

The group of almost 20 members asked for specific data from the agency on the “adverse reactions” of the COVID lockdowns. As the collection of doctors points out, the government’s decision took a mental and physical toll on children (not to mention setting American students back scholastically). It held cardiac and cancer patients hostage while they waited for the care they needed during the elective surgery stoppage. Then, there were psychological effects of closing businesses and firing people based on their vaccination status. Our country witnessed a rise in domestic violence — and, as we all saw, violence in general.

“Let’s see how many years of life lost we had because of our actions of COVID,” Murphy argued. “Let’s look at the lockdowns. Let’s look at people being kept away from families, their churches, their friends, and the depression that ensued, subsequent substitutes that ensued [like drug abuse]… I want to help restore faith in medicine to the American public,” he said. “I also want real answers… In my opinion, I think we should have had a much more selective approach of helping those who are at high risk rather than just a shotgun approach to everybody.”

In his mind and the rest of the caucus, we owe it to the American people to stop and think about the “short- and long-term ramifications of this administration’s restrictive, repressive, and often damaging COVID-19 policies.” So much of what’s been done in the last two years as part of the government’s virus response would fall in the category of abnormal. But unfortunately, what we’re not hearing in the media is a discussion of what went right, what went wrong, and what needs to be the done as we address future pandemics.

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) is doing his best to correct that, hosting a special event this past Monday called “COVID-19: A Second Opinion.” Bringing together the best doctors, the discussion centered around ways the public had been misled. They covered a lot of ground — from vaccine mandates to comorbidities of the virus — and, not surprisingly, they got very little attention from the liberal media. “They can’t afford to be proven wrong,” the senator said Tuesday on “Washington Watch.”

“Eight hundred eighty-nine thousand Americans have perished in COVID, and of course, we’ve been listening collectively to a group of public health officials — many of [whom] don’t practice medicine. Few, if any, of them have ever treated a COVID patient. And so, what I tried to do is provide the American public with [the truth] coming from doctors who have actually had the courage and compassion to treat thousands of COVID patients. They expose themselves to the virus. They’ve treated patients successfully using cheap, generic, widely available drugs that have been around for decades with an incredibly strong safety profile… And that’s really not who the legacy media has listened to.”

All the Biden administration wants to do is send people home afraid, he argued. Force them to isolate and maybe take some Tylenol. And just pray you don’t get really sick. “They are the ones who suppress this [information], who have kept people from accessing early treatment… So this is a travesty that has occurred. I hope Americans start waking up.”

RELATED ARTICLE: NY Nurse recordings reveal possible botched administration of COVID Vaccine on Children

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.