VIDEO: Act For America Power
Bill salutes the number one organization in America that is taking on Islamic oppression.
The Good and the Bad: A Tale of Two Women Veterans
Two women veterans have been in the headlines. One was a U.S. Air Force veteran the other was a veteran of the Israeli Defense Forces. These two women veterans provide a stark juxtaposition of good versus evil. One is a movie star, the other a traitor. Their names are Gal Gadot and Reality Winner.
THE BAD
Reality Winner mug shot.
Reality Winner’s name is an oxymoron. Winner is a loser. Winner served in the U.S. Air Force and as an employee of the federal contractor Pluribus International since February, 2017. Winner had a top-secret clearance. NewsMax reports:
Reality Winner, the 25-year-old federal contractor charged with leaking top secret information to the media, has a long social media trail of liberal political posts and is a supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Winner also hates President Donald Trump, once posting that the president is a “piece of s***” over his moves to stop protests against the Dakota Access pipeline. Her social media posts have included #notmypresident as well as calls to #resist over Trump’s environmental policies as well as DAPL.
Winner also is a former Air Force linguist who speaks Middle East languages Pashto, Farsi and Dari, her mother, Billie Winner-Davis, told The Guardian.
[ … ]
According to The Daily Caller, Winner is a supporter of Sanders, I-Vt., who describes himself as a “democratic socialist.” He failed in his attempt to win the Democratic presidential nomination against Hillary Clinton, but amassed a loyal group of supporters.
Winner also backed liberal causes such as the Women’s March and backed the Muslim civil rights group, the Islamic Society of North America, the Caller reported.
THE GOOD
Gal Gadot.
Gal Gadot is a winner in real life and on the silver screen. She is an Israeli citizen, former Miss Israel and served honorably in the Israeli Defense Forces. Gadot is a real woman. SOFREP News reports:
After Wonder Woman’s box office success, a number of stories surfaced about the movie’s lead actress who, despite expertly carrying her own blockbuster feature film, was a relative unknown to American audiences before she first donned the bullet-proof bracelets. Gal Gadot, many soon learned, isn’t just a badass on screen – like all Israeli citizens, she also spent time serving in the military.
Aside from serving as Miss Israel in the 2004 Miss Universe pageant, Gadot also represented her country as a combat trainer for two years is the Israeli Defense Force. According to Gadot herself, the soldiers she trained were fans of hers well before she started her career on the big screen.
Feminists have embraced the bad and hate the good.
In a Chicago Tribune op-ed titled Run, Wonder Woman! The feminists are after you! Heather Wilhelm writes:
I can’t help but think that if Wonder Woman were dropped into our prosperous yet angst-filled 21st century, she might find something infinitely more baffling than smothering, multilayered skirts. I’m talking, of course, about today’s weird brand of obsessive, woe-is-me “feminism.”
[ … ]
Speaking of modern feminism melting brains, how else can we explain the media hysteria over the miracle of a female movie lead? “I wasn’t directing a woman,” Patty Jenkins, the film’s director, explained to The New York Times. “I was just directing a hero.” Boy, oh boy, did the press miss that memo. Google the words “wonder woman” and “representation” and you’re in for a long, painful read — and a rather bizarre one, too, if you’ve watched any movies over the past five years.
In a her column Yes, I’m a Feminist. Yes, I Enjoyed “Wonder Woman” Eileen L. Wittig writes:
I’ll be honest: I went to see Wonder Woman with zero expectations. I was aware that some extreme feminists were already angry about it because she doesn’t have hairy armpits or something, but all I wanted was a couple hours of entertainment.
[ … ]
But that was as far as my feminism took it. I wasn’t at the movie to critique her look, I was there to critique her character.
[ … ]
I do care about how Diana managed to walk that thin, thin line between literally being a weapon, and having empathy.
I care that she saw an unknown life and saved it, because she could, and because she cared.
I care that she was moved to tears when she heard about the suffering of millions of people she’d never even met, and then took that sorrow and turned it into motivation to save the rest.
I care that she was willing to sacrifice her own future life of peace among her family to save strangers.
As a man I am a big fan of Marvel’s Captain America. He is a man of principle who fought the Nazis in WWII. DC Comics Wonder Woman is a woman of principle who fought the Kaiser and evil during WWI, the war to end all wars.
The only difference is Captain America wears red, white and blue. While the original TV version of Wonder Woman wore red, white and blue, the DC Comics version is politically correct.
I enjoyed both Captain America, the first Avenger and Wonder Woman. I recommend both to our readers.
RELATED ARTICLES:
Tunisia Is Latest Arab Country To Ban ‘Wonder Woman’ Over Gal Gadot
Ramallah theater said to ban ‘Wonder Woman’ – Times of Israel
Qatar – the end of the road?
Analysis: The Saudis and their Arab allies have had enough of Qatar and its media proxy al Jazeera’s behavior. They intend to win this fight.
The Emirate of Qatar is a peninsula that juts out from Saudi Arabia into the Persian Gulf. The only overland route out of Qatar is by way of Saudi Arabia and if that route is blocked, the only way to reach Qatar or leave it is by air or sea. However, flights to and from Qatar pass over Saudi air space part of the time and ships from or to Qatar have to pass through Saudi territorial waters. This means that Saudi Arabia can in effect declare a total blockade on Qatar if it so desires. It has never done so before, but it began the process on June 5th.
In addition to a blockade, the Saudis, joined by the United Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt, Libya, Mauritius, the Philippines and the Maldives, cut off diplomatic and consular relations with Qatar. Egypt, Libya and the Emirates declared that they would ban Qatari plans and ships from their air space and territorial waters. In 2014, these countries took much milder steps in order to punish Qatar, cancelling them once Qatar agreed to accept the dictates of the Umma and signed the Riyadh agreement along with the rest of the Arab nations.
The reasons provided by the countries involved for the unprecedented severity of the current steps against Qatar included: “Qatar aids the Muslim Brotherhood and other terror organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, ISIS and Jebhat al-Nusrah” and “The Emir of Qatar has declared that Iran is a good nation” as well as “Qatar destabilizes our regime,” as well as ” Qatar provides hiding places and shelter to Muslim Brotherhood leaders who fled there from Egypt,” and “Qatar is giving aid to the Houthi rebels (read Shiites) in Yemen.”
Another and most subtle reason, whose source is a Kuwaiti commentator, appears on al Jazeera‘s site: “Qatar refused to meet Trump’s financial demands.” This odd remark relates to a rumor on Facebook and other social network sites claiming that before Trump agreed to come to the Riyadh Arab League Conference, he demanded the Gulf Emirates purchase US arms in the legendary sum of one and a half trillion dollars, to be divided among Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Emirates. The three agreed, but Qatar pulled out at the last minute, causing the Emirates to follow suit, and leaving the Saudis holding the bill demanded by Trump. The falling through of this deal, the largest in history, may have been the reason for Trump’s noticeably grim face in Riyadh.
Claiming that Qatar causes the destabilization of regimes is a veiled hint referring to al Jazeera which broadcasts from Qatar. Every since it began broadcasting in 1996 from the capital city of Qatar, Doha, al Jazeera has infuriated Arab rulers because it constantly carries out a media Jihad against them also aimed at others such as Israel, the US, the West and Western culture. The channel also promotes and supports the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots such as Hamas, al Qaeda and the Northern Branch of the Islamic Movement in Israel headed by Sheikh Raad Salah. Al Jazeera‘s media strategy is determined by Qatar’s Emir and is carried out down to the last detail by its very professional leading broadcaster and editorial policy setter, Jamal Rian, a Palestinian born in Tul Karem in 1953, who moved to Jordan where he was active in the Muslim Brotherhood until expelled by King Hussein.
Every so often other Arab regimes, chief among them Egypt under Mubarak, attempted to close down al Jazeera‘s offices in their countries after overly harsh criticism was aimed at the ruling government, only to reopen them when al Jazeera simply stepped up its attacks
The general feeling is that any government official – or anyone at all – who opposes a ruling regime (and there is no shortage of these people in any Arab country) leaks embarrassing information to al Jazeera all the time, so that the channel is always poised to expose the information when the time is ripe and especially if the now-cornered victim has been unfriendly to it and to Islamists. The thought of this happening is enough to paralyze every Arab leader who would like to clamp down on al Jazeera in his country.
Every time a conflict erupts between Israel and Hamas, al Jazeera comes out in favor of the terrorist organization because of Qatar’s support of it. Hamas leader Haled Mashaal, makes his home in Qatar and the Qatari Emir is the only Arab leader so far to visit Hamas-ruled Gaza. The Emir has give billions to Hamas, enabling the organization to develop its terror infrastructure.
Qatar has budgeted half a billion dollars to “buy” organizations such as UNESCO (whose next head will, unsurprisingly, be from Qatar), as well as media, academic and government figures to advance the goal of removing Jerusalem from Israeli hands. Al Jazeera runs a well publicized and organized campaign in order to ensure this outcome. This is the face of media jihad.
Saudi Arabia has never allowed al Jazeera‘s reporters to work from within the country, but does allow them to cover special events once in a while, mainly the Hajj. The Saudis know exactly what the Emir had up his sleeve when he founded a media network that would rule over Arab monarchs by means of recording their slip-ups, taking advantage of the Arab obsession with avoiding public humiliation by broadcasting from a satellite that can reach every house in the Arab world with no way of blocking it.
The last reports are that the Saudis blocked access to the al Jazeera internet site from their territory. It is harder to block al Jazeera‘s satellite channel reception legally and it can still be accessed throughout the monarchy. Arab media attribute the blockage to declarations supportive of Hamas and Hezbollah made by the Emir of Qatar after Trump’s speech in Riyadh in which the US president included Hamas and Hezbollah in his list of terror organization, equating them with al Qaeda and ISIS.
Sorry, but I do not buy that story. Declarations about third parties (Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah) are ordinarily not the reason a public dispute erupts between Iranian monarchs. In my opinion, the reason for blocking the al Jazeera site in Saudi Arabia is a photograph posted on the al Jazeera site while Trump was in Riyadh.
This photo shows King Suleiman of Saudi Arabia awarding the Gold Decoration, the highest honor of the Saudi monarchy, to Donald Trump, but that is not the reason it was posted on al Jazeera. The reason has to do with the woman appearing in it and standing between Suleiman and Trump. I do not know what her name is, but she accompanied Trump during his entire stay in Riyadh standing just behind him and carrying a briefcase. Perhaps she is an interpreter. She is carrying a briefcase filled with important documents that have to be with Trump all the time in one picture as he, of course, would not be seen carrying a briefcase and standing be
What is interesting about this woman is that she spent the entire time in the royal palace with her hair uncovered, like Melania Trump, the First Lady, did, even though women with uncovered hair are not to be seen in Saudi Arabia. In the palace, women are also not allowed to b e seen in the company of men. Al Jazeera posted this photo intentionally, in order to embarrass the king who granted Trump an award even though he was accompanied by women who, like those in the picture, who do not cover their hair. That photo of the king was the last straw and the Saudis blocked al Jazeera.
Qatar is now under great pressure. The nations that broke off relations with Qatar have stopped recognizing the Qatari Rial as a viable currency and have confiscated all the Qatari Rials in their banks. As a result, Qatar cannot purchase goods with its own currency and must use its foreign currency reserves. The supermarket shelves in Qatar have been emptied by residents hoarding food for fear that the blockade will not allow food to be imported. Long lines of cars can be seen trying to leave for Saudi Arabia to escape being shut up in the besieged, wayward country.
Qatar is trying to get the US to help improve the situation. The largest American air force base in the Gulf is located in Qatar and it is from there that the attacks on ISIS are generated. Qatar also hosts the US Navy Fifth Fleet as well as the Central Command and Control of US forces in that part of the world. Qatari media stress the US concern about the siege that the Saudis have put on Qatar.
As part of its efforts to enlist US aid, Qatar has begun a counterattack: Qatar media have publicized that the U.A.E. ambassador, Yousef Al Otaiba , said on US election eve: “What star could make Donald Trump the president?” This is intended to cause a rift between the US and the Gulf Emirates, but will certainly not improve Qatar’s own relations with the Emirates.
Meanwhile, the Saudis and the Emirates have ejected Qatar from the coalition fighting the Houthis in Yemen, and there are rumors that they will also remove Qatar from the Council for Cooperation in the Gulf. The Saudis could suspend Qatar’s membership in the Arab League and other organizations if this dispute continues, raising the pressure on the Emir’s al-Thani clan.
The next few days will decide Qatar’s future. There is a distinct possibility that the foreign ministers of Qatar and the Arab nations taking part in the boycott against it will meet in some neutral spot, perhaps Kuwait, Qatar will give in and new rules will be set by Arab leaders, that is by King Suleiman, to keep Qatar in line. They would include: toning down al Jazeera and perhaps even switching its managerial staff, ending the support for the Muslim Brotherhood and other terror organizations, ending cooperation with Iran and above all, listening to what the Saudi “Big Brother” says about issues, especially those having to do with financial dealings with the US. Once the conditions for Qatari surrender are agreed upon, we can expect the ministers to meet the press, publicize a declaration on the end of the intra-family dispute, shake hands before the cameras and smile – until the next crisis.
There is, however, another scenario: Qatar does not give in, the Saudis and its allies invade, their armies eject the Emir and Mufti of Qatar, and also Jamal Rian, the guiding brain behind Al Jazeera’s policies. They would then appoint a new Emir from the ruling family, one who knows how to behave, one who listens to the Saudis. No one except for Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas would oppose this solution, and the soft-spoken condemnations will not succeed in hiding the world’s joy and sighs of relief if the Saudis actually carry out that plan.
EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in Arutz Sheva, translated by Rochel Sylvetsky, Op-ed editor and senior consultant Israelnationalnews.com.
Was Mohammed a ‘True Muslim’?
Follower of Mohammed.
In the wake of every terrorist act there is the same argument. The voices-in-the-wilderness right will say, insofar as they’re not muzzled with hate-speech laws, that Islam is the problem. In contrast, a leftist drumbeat of media and mainstream politicos will assert that the Muslim terrorists aren’t really “Muslim” terrorists, that they’ve perverted the faith. As to the truth, it’s as with any other debate over a thing’s true meaning (e.g., the Constitution): it only makes sense to look for answers in original sources.
This brings us to a simple question: Was Mohammed a true Muslim?
It’s a rhetorical question, of course. As Islam’s founder — the religion was born of revelations he supposedly had in the early seventh century — Mohammed was the very first Muslim. Moreover, since Muslims view him as “The Perfect Man,” the ultimate role model, he’s not just the truest Muslim but the yardstick by which other Muslims may measure themselves.
So what was Mohammed’s “perfection”? He was a warlord who launched approximately 30 military campaigns, many of which he led himself. He was a caravan raider (a bandit) and captured, traded in and owned slaves (by the way, will liberals suggest slave-owning Mohammed be diminished, as they’ve done with our founders?). He ordered massacres, used torture and had dissidents assassinated. In 627 AD, he beheaded more than 600 men and boys of the Qurayza tribe in Medina, Arabia, thus wiping it off the map. He also was a polygamist and made it lawful for masters to have sexual relations with their female captives.
So, clearly, if today’s Islamic jihadists aren’t true Muslims, neither was Mohammed. But since we know the Perfect Man was the truest of Muslims, then…well, you can finish the sentence.
Yet when analyzing Muslim motivations, the influence of Mohammed’s character is generally subordinated to that of Islamic teachings (most of which come from Mohammed). And even here, people generally make the mistake of focusing only on the Koran, unaware it’s a mere 16 percent of the Islamic canon. The majority of it comprises the Hadiths and Sira.
This is noteworthy because while 9 percent of the Koran is devoted to jihad and political violence, 21 percent of the Hadiths is and a whopping 67 percent of the Sira is devoted to it, according to Bill Warner, Director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam. This is why Turkish journalist Uzay Bulut wrote in 2015 that “violence and domination” are “deeply rooted…and sanctioned with promises of rewards” in Islam, and, consequently, “fundamentalists will always find people to excite and people to persecute.”
The distribution of violent injunctions in these books helps explain something else. A German study involving 45,000 teens found that while increasing religiosity made Christian youth less violent, increasing religiosity made Muslim youth more violent.
This makes sense. A nominal Catholic may know a few verses from the Bible, but only a devout one scours it and, in addition, will read his catechism. Likewise, a casual Muslim may know a little bit from the Koran.
A serious one will soak it all in and delve into the Hadiths and Sira as well — and be exposed to all the violent injunctions therein.
Even more to the point here, however, these two sets of works together comprise the majority of the Sunnah, which is, as Islaamnet.com explains, “The legal way or ways, orders, acts of worship and statements of the Prophet, that are ideals and models to be followed by Muslims” (emphasis added). It is all about Mohammed’s words and deeds.
The significance of this cannot be overemphasized. Virtues (and vices) are caught more than they’re taught; actions speak louder than words. Thus are Christians more likely to ask “What would Jesus do?” than “What does the Bible say?” Thus are they more likely to counsel “Reflect Christ” than “Reflect Matthew 22:37.” Oh, the Bible is wonderful, and Matthew 22:37 is one of its most memorable parts. But examples are more powerful than instructions.
Muslims’ role model, their “Perfect Man,” is very different from Jesus in type of influence but not in degree of influence. As Warner points out, “The Koran says 91 different times that Mohammed’s is the perfect pattern of life. It is much more important to know Mohammed than the Koran.” Thus is “Mohammed” (and its spelling variants) the world’s most common male name, belonging to approximately 150 million men and boys. And there’s a reason why pious Muslims write “PBUH” (“Peace be unto him”) after his name and why they’ll riot if he’s portrayed in a cartoon. He is, in a sense, the human face of Allah.
Islaamnet.com makes this clear, writing that “when Allaah says: ‘Whosoever obeys the Messenger [Mohammed], has indeed obeyed Allaah’ (Surah An-Nisa 4:80), it should be clear that one has obeyed Allaah by obeying the Messenger.”
Islaamnet also informs that Allah commanded, “‘It is not fitting for a believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decreed by Allaah and His Messenger to have any choice in the matter. If anyone disobeys Allaah and His Messenger he is clearly astray’ (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:36).”
This Messenger is, again, that warlord, bandit, mass murderer, employer of torture, polygamist and slaver trader and master. Worse still, it’s not that Muslims always rationalize away or attempt to whitewash this history. The truly devout ones may consider these actions — when directed toward non-Muslims — to be “good” because the actions have been sanctioned by their perceived author of right and wrong, Allah, and his messenger.
So people sometimes talk about “reforming” Islam, but this would require reforming Mohammed himself. How? You cannot resurrect him and have him live his life over.
Among the founders of extant major or quasi-major religions/philosophical systems — Lao Tzu, Confucius, Buddha, etc. — Mohammed stands alone, being a tyrant-cum-teacher. Of course, he doesn’t stand alone in history; Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane and many others paved similar bloody paths. As with them, he was largely a man of his time and place. But to more than a billion people, he’s also the perfect man even in our time and place.
And that’s the point. After all, if someone told you Attila the Hun was the perfect man and his role model, would you turn your back on that person?
Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com
RESULTS: 420 of 439 companies (96%) stop advertising on Huffington Post
Florida Family Association’s communications with advertisers informs them about the fake news of Islamophobia pushed by the Huffingtonpost.com and the harm to public safety that it can influence. While we are opposing a media outlet’s propaganda we are also educating corporate officials on who the players are and why they should not do business with them.
The Florida Family Association office has communicated with four hundred thirty nine (439) companies since April 2016 regarding their advertising at Huffingtonpost.com as of May 31, 2017.
- A total of four hundred twenty (420) companies stopped advertising. Ninety six percent (96%) f the companies did not advertise again after receiving emails from the Florida Family Association office or after receiving emails from thousands of people in response to Florida Family Association’s online campaigns. The names of the Companies that Have Not Advertised Again and Companies that Continue to Advertise are listed at the bottom of this article.
- Four hundred one (401) companies stopped advertising after receiving communications from the Florida Family Association office.
- Nineteen (19) companies stopped advertising after being profiled in an online campaign at Floridafamily.org.
- Nineteen (19) companies continued to advertise.
The following chart shows the progress of this campaign.
| Number of | Percentage of | |||
| Companies | companies that | companies that | Number of companies | |
| Contacted | stopped advertising | stopped advertising | that kept advertising | |
| September | 211 | 150 | 71% | 61 |
| October | 231 | 190 | 82% | 41 |
| November | 270 | 237 | 87% | 33 |
| December | 310 | 281 | 91% | 29 |
| January | 323 | 298 | 92% | 25 |
| February | 372 | 351 | 94% | 22 |
| March | 398 | 369 | 93% | 29 |
| April | 422 | 400 | 95% | 22 |
| May | 439 | 420 | 96% | 19 |
Why is it important to urge companies to stop advertising at Huffingtonpost.com?
• Islamophobia propaganda is the top tool Islamists use to influence Americans to ignore advancement of Sharia doctrine in the United States. Unfortunately, it intimidates people to the point of stifling free speech in a manner that hurts public safety. Labeling people or groups as Islamophobes is intended to influence them to stop criticizing Islam. Fear of being branded an Islamophobe played a role in suppressing communications that may have had different results for the lives of 63 people in San Bernardino and Orlando.
- One article wrongfully places the blame on Christians and Jews in a manner that creates contempt for Christianity and Judaism.
- The reports published by the news media do influence the political positions of the public. Huffingtonpost.com is one of the largest liberal progressive media outlets in America.
- Florida Family Association’s opposition campaign educates hundreds of officials at American companies about the harm caused by erroneous Islamophobia propaganda. The thousands of emails that company officials receive reveal that there are many Americans who find Islamophobia propaganda deceitful, harmful and offensive.
Fourteen examples of Huffington Post’s Islamist propaganda articles are posted at the bottom ofthis article.
In many cases, Florida Family Association is the only organizations in the country that is deploying email campaigns to confront Corporate America regarding Islamist issues. We are able to do this because we do not rely on web advertising dollars or contributions from Corporate America to fund our operations. Instead, our operations depend totally on donations from individuals. This makes us independent and free to address issues involving any company.
Your support makes it possible for us to take on these tough issues. If you would like to support Florida Family Association’s efforts with a gift please click here.
VIDEO: Remembering the ISIS attack at Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, FL on 6/12/2016
Muslim Omar Mateen, who killed dozens of people inside the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla., on Sunday, June 12, 2016. (MySpace via AP)
Milo Yiannopoulos speaks on the ISIS Terrorist attack at the gay nightclub Pulse in Orlando, FL.
‘Milo’ as he’s known to his cult gives a frank and honest assessment of the ISIS inspired terrorist attack in Orlando, FL.
Milo names the enemy who did this attack, their Islamic ideological motivations, without all the politically correct filters that defines our media today.
Milo is a gay conservative whose views are causing concern in the primarily liberal Democratic leaning gay community. Milo’s message is resonating with a large number of conservative and liberal gays who are shifting their support to conservative politicians and Donald Trump.
Sit down and enjoy one of the most impassioned warnings to America you will ever hear.
VIDEO: Dr. Sharifa Alkhateeb in 2009 states the goal of Muslim Education is to make America Muslim
Sharifa Alkhateeb
Below is a C-SPAN video from 1989 taken at a conference hosted by the Islamic Society of North America featuring Sharifa Alkhateeb, a Muslim educator. In the video Alkhateeb shares the ultimate goal of Muslim education in America.
Alkhateeb states the objective of Muslim education in America is to make all of America Muslim.
According to Discover the Networks:
The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) was established in July 1981 by U.S-based members of the Muslim Brotherhood who also had a background as leaders of the Muslim Students Association (MSA). As author and terrorism expert Steven Emerson puts it, ISNA “grew out of the Muslim Students Association, which … was founded by Brotherhood members.” Indeed, Muslim Brothers would dominate ISNA’s leadership throughout its early years, when the Society was highly dependent upon Saudi funding. ISNA’s founding mission was “to advance the cause of Islam and serve Muslims in North America so as to enable them to adopt Islam as a complete way of life.”
On October 29, 2016 the Independent Sentinel reported:
Sharifa Alkhateeb was a friend of Huma Abedin’s and Hillary Clinton’s but she died of cancer in 2004. She referred to herself as a feminist and was an advocate for establishing Muslim culture in America and making America Muslim. She encouraged other Muslims to have patience setting up “our own Islam systems” and to think of all Americans as potential Muslims.
An active member of the Muslim Students Association in the 1960s, she last served as president of the North American Council for Muslim Women in northern Virginia. Both organizations are tied to Hamas.
[ … ]
She worked with US Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to allegedly forge ties with other religious communities.
Alkhateeb was born and reared in the United States by immigrant parents–her father is from Yemen and her mother is from Czechoslovakia.
Hillary invited her to the White House in 1999 for a NARA conference when she was first lady. The event was organized by Huma Abedin.
During her address, Hillary said: “Sharifa Alkhateeb of the North American Council for Muslim Women has been largely responsible for working with the White House staff in bringing us here. As many of you may know, Sharifa was the chair of the Muslim Caucus in Beijing in 1995. And she is also a great friend to me and to my staff for many, many occasions when we call upon her for advice and counsel. And I am pleased that once again she could be so helpful, both on her own behalf and on behalf of the Council in helping us out.”
Muslim education has become standardized in public school textbooks, in America’s college and university departments of Middle East studies. Alkhateeb’s vision is bearing fruit today as American children are being indoctrinated to embrace Islam and become followers of Mohammed.
RELATED ARTICLE: Complaint Filed Against Pro-Islam Policy Of San Diego School Board
EDITORS NOTE: Hat tip to Anthony Küster for sending us this video clip.
God is Alive in Cuba!
Catholic Church located in the Plaza de San Francisco in Havana, Cuba.
I wrote a column titled My Visit to Cuba — An American in Havana about my recent trip to Havana, Cuba.
As a Catholic I was most interested in the state of the Catholic Church in Cuba. While walking and riding a taxi in Havana I noticed dozens of Catholic Churches within walking distance of the Capitol building. While the Capitol building was under renovation, the Catholic Churches, in general, were in a sad state of disrepair on the outside but remained beautiful if not magnificent on the inside. Is this a message from God? Is God alive in Cuba?
Before the June 26th, 1953 Revolution 85% of Cubans were Catholics. Since then the work of the Catholic Church has been replaced by the Communist government. But the Communist government is continually failing its people, so who has stepped into the breach to fill the needs of the most needy, the followers of Jesus.
The God of Abraham and His Son Jesus, have been battling Cuba’s Communist Party for over 50 years.
During my visit to Cuba I noticed many women wearing necklaces with either a Crucifix or a wooden cross. The people still believe, it is their belief that keeps them alive and living with hope. They have the faith that God is testing them and His word and grace will protect them, no matter what they suffer thru in His name.
The Atlantic’s Jason Berry in a September 2015 article titled How the Catholic Church Survived in Cuba wrote:
More than five decades ago, Fidel Castro’s revolution triggered the sweeping seizure of Catholic Church properties in Cuba.
In one expropriation, someone decapitated the statue of Santo Tomás de Villanueva outside the chapel of the Havana university named for the saint. As the Cuban regime turned Villanueva into a trade school, the headless statue became an eerie symbol for a church shorn of influence. Graffiti scarred the walls of the decaying chapel.
“The Villanueva statue has been headless since 1963,” said Archbishop Thomas Wenski of Miami, who has steered aid to the Cuban Church for years. But the larger body of the Roman Catholic Church in Cuba has endured and, recently, grown stronger, despite the combination of careless neglect and open hostility it has suffered under communism.
Berry noted, “Across the island [of Cuba], bishops, priests, nuns, and lay workers operate Cuba’s de-facto social safety net, which the cash-strapped government, whose revolution was founded on egalitarian principles, cannot deliver for all disabled, elderly, and impoverished Cubans.”
The Sarasota Baptist Church located in Sarasota, Florida is doing its part to bring God back into a godless Cuba. Christians strongly believe in Acts 1:8 which reads:
But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.
In order to “be my witnesses…to the ends of the earth” the Sarasota Baptist Church sent a mission to Cuba from April 29th to May 6th, 2017. Another Baptist Church, First Sarasota has made it their mission to establish a seminary and now has 60 Baptist congregations in Cuba.
God is not dead in Cuba. Visit a Catholic Church in Cuba to understand.
Pictures taken of the Catholic Church in the Plaza de San Francisco in Havana, Cuba.
First 50 Syrian families head home to ‘safe zone’ in Syria….
….And, it has nothing to do with any Trump Administration plans. Other actors have stepped in to begin to make it happen and as the story tells us, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees had no comment.
Before critics jump in, it should be none of our business if these families want to put their lives in the hands of Hezbollah, it is not our role (or the UN’s!) to play the papa and tell them where to live and what to do with their lives (which is a large part of the psychology that drives refugee resettlement—the ‘we know what’s good for you’ mentality!).
From Lebanon’s Daily Star (hat tip: Joanne)
BEIRUT: Dozens of refugee families returned to Aasal al-Ward in southern Syria after leaving the Lebanese border town of Arsal over the weekend as part of a deal brokered by Hezbollah and Syrian rebel factions.
Photo accompanying Daily Star story.
The Lebanese Army said in a statement that 30 civilian vehicles carrying an estimated 50 families departed from the northern Lebanese town in the early hours of Saturday and a military escort accompanied them until the last military checkpoint.
According to the Army statement, the move was undertaken in response to a “keen interest of the families” to return to their homeland. Hezbollah’s Al-Manar TV circulated a video Sunday depicting the Syrian families celebrating their return to their hometown.
Local media estimated that 50 families chose to leave Lebanon for Syria Saturday. A total of 500 families are expected to relocate following negotiations earlier this year to establish small safe zones for civilians in the Qalamoun region, brokered by Hezbollah.
A security source in the town of Arsal told The Daily Star Saturday that the return of dozens of displaced families was the result of behind-the-scenes negotiations between Hezbollah and the Syrian regime on one hand, and armed factions present in the area on the other.
[….]
The United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR, had no comment when contacted Sunday evening.
There is more, but you may have to subscribe to get it.
Truth be told, most ‘refugees’ just want to go home and that should be our number one goal—to get them there—not move them around the world like pieces on a chessboard.
RELATED ARTICLES:
Buffalo, NY refugee contractors jumping for joy as refugee arrivals pick up
Two cases of refugees beating family members: no one told me it was against the law in the west
Airbnb partners with refugee contracting agency to put-up refugees worldwide
Idaho refugee sexual assault case: boys get probation
After initial disappointment, Ohio resettlement agency getting excited for higher refugee influx
Americas LOST Generations
As millions of Americans scratch their heads trying to make sense of anything they see going on in America today, the answer may be easier than they think. Truth will set us free, but no one said it would be fun or politically correct. To be very clear, when I say “lost,” I mean unsalvageable.
America is more ideologically divided than at any point in history and the two opposing ideologies are entrenched in their positions, unable to change or even communicate with each other. Contrary to popular theory, facts are not subjective. But the facts also have very little to do with individual ideological beliefs.
It is undeniable that at all times in history, the state of our government is a mirror image of the country at large. But it is a mirror image of those born 25-50 years earlier, the group in political and private power at any given time. Generational datelines can shift slightly one direction or another, but the datelines offered here are as close to reality as it gets.
Much has been written about America’s “Greatest Generation,” those born between 1901-1924. The Greatest Generation is a term made popular by journalist Tom Brokaw to describe the generation who grew up in the United States during the deprivation of the Great Depression, and then went on to fight in World Wars, as well as those whose productivity within the war’s home front made a decisive material contribution to the war effort, for which the generation is also termed the G.I. Generation.
The Greatest Generation was not born great… They were raised to be great and forced to become great under pressure as a result of socio-economic conditions and global conflicts of their time. They grew up in tough circumstances and were forced to become tough as a result.
Unfortunately, now we must discuss America’s “Lost Generations,” those born between 1963-1993, today, ages 24-54. Before discussing the majority in this group, I must state for the record that there are exceptions to every general rule. Not every American born during this period is “ideologically lost.”
In this case, the exception to the rule pertains to those who were born and raised in a traditional family home, with both parents engaged in the parenting process and almost without exception, raised with some form of moral code and sense of fundamental decency. However, this is a minority within this age group due to the increasing divorce rate and two income households, the latch-key era, wherein children were often raised by the community rather than their parents.
American conservatives tend to be those born sometime prior to 1963, before the 60s peaceniks started giving birth to their generation. The era of free sex, drugs and rock-n-roll produced the “lost generations” that no sane individual can understand or communicate with today. Within the broader group born between 1963-1993 – we find the “millennials,” born 1983-1993, now age 23-33.
Rather than further discussing exceptions to the rule, we should look much closer at the lost generation-and-a-half (1963-1993) responsible for all of the insanity we see in our country and around the globe today.
THE FIRST LOST GENERATION
The first lost generation in America are those born between 1963-1983. These are the children of the 60s revolutionaries who saw America as a horrible imperialist conqueror of nations, a popularized view which began with the anti-war campaign in opposition to U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. That view was perpetuated well beyond Vietnam and persists within this generation still today in a popularized objection to the use of military or law enforcement actions anywhere, for any reason.
The children raised by anti-American revolutionaries are today’s revolutionaries responsible for violent and destructive acts across the country, wherein they believe that rioting is a form of protected free speech, even as they violently work to silence the free speech of their ideological opposition groups.
The mind-bending that this generation was subjected to growing up now manifests itself in increasingly violent anti-American revolts against all things fundamentally American.
The vast majority of this generation exhibits a psychological condition known as transmarginal inhibition (TMI). Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov is well-known for his acclaimed studies in animal behavior and dog training. But his much more critical work was in his similar study of human behavior and conditioning, or conditioning, which he proved to be identical in nature to that of basic animal behavior.
Pavlov identified the three stages of transmarginal inhibition –
Stage 1 – equivalent phase: when the response matches the stimuli, which is considered the
normal baseline behavior.
Stage 2 – paradoxical phase: associated with quantity reversal, occurs when small stimuli receive major responses and major stimuli elicit small responses.
Stage 3- the final stage – ultra-paradoxical: the final stage, associated with quality reversal in which negative stimulation results in positive responses and vice versa.
“The significance of the paradoxical phase is not limited to pathological states such as those previously observed, and it is highly probable that it plays a part in normal men too, who often are apt to be much more influenced by words than by actual facts of surrounding reality.” – Ivan Pavlov
“Pavlov demonstrated that when Transmarginal Inhibition began to take over a dog, a condition similar to hysteria in a human manifested. The applications of these findings to human psychology suggest that for a “conversion” to be effective, it is necessary to work on the subject’s emotions until s/he reaches an abnormal condition of fear, anger or exaltation. If such a state is maintained or intensified by any of various means, hysteria is the result. In a state of hysteria, a human being is abnormally suggestible and influences in the environment can cause one set of behavior patterns to be replaced by another without any need for persuasive indoctrination. In states of fear and excitement, normally sensible human beings will accept the most wildly improbably suggestions.” (SOURCE)
In essence, this conditioning turns the subject’s world upside-down. As we watch college kids act out in violence as they call for peace – act in racist fashion while protesting racism – destroy property while complaining about trashing the planet and behaving like fascists while protesting fascism – we search for reasons why the world view children seems 180-degress upside-down and entirely backwards. Even in the face of massive ongoing Islamic terror everywhere, they fight on behalf of Islam.
Individuals in stages 1 and 2 can be reached, with a great amount of effort to drum lies out of them and the truth in. But once an individual reaches stage 3, they cannot be reached. Their world is entirely inside-out. Their reaction to truth and fact at this stage will be to shut down or resort to violent behavior to defend their belief system. The “shut down” is the key indicator that someone has reached stage 3.
The answer to why we see these extremely odd behaviors is complex, but not at all complicated. They have been conditioned to behave in this manner and they are completely unaware of just how backwards their world really is, to any sane person. In fact, they are incapable of ever seeing or understanding. They are past the point of no return – they are unreachable – hence my use of the term “lost generation.”
As former KGB agent and Russian defector Yuri Bezmenov explained in great detail in a 1984 live interview, none of this is accidental or a coincidence. (The entire interview here) Of course, those effected by the slow programming are entirely unaware and resistant to the notion that they have been programmed. Only those who have not been programmed can see the programming.
According to Bezmenov, the four steps to “winning the hearts and minds” of an entire country are as follows;
- Destroy Moral Foundations
- Re-educate the young “mush minds” (20-year process)
- Teach the young to yearn for Marxism under an acceptable terminology (progressive)
- Move the conditioned into political and economic power
Part of that programming includes conditioning that prevents the programmed person from ever accepting the reality that they have been programmed. Instead, they believe that everyone else has been programmed. As a result, anything that challenges their belief system at all will be immediately rejected out of hand without any consideration whatsoever.
In this group, there are two sub-groups, those in stage 1 or 2 of transmarginal inhibition and those who have reached stage 3. Stage 3 members of the 1963-1993 group are beyond the reach of fact or reason. They are very dangerous to themselves and others.
Those in stage 1 or 2 of this group often experience something called cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. They were raised in a good family home and were instilled with good fundamental values, but were later introduced to and influenced by family outsiders and now struggle internally with the two divergent belief systems.
This condition can often cause symptoms similar to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). They simply cannot choose between the two divergent belief systems and are caught between the two, usually materializing in great turmoil and conflict between themselves and their closest loved ones.
Yuri Beznenov refers to this group as “drop-outs and half-baked intellectuals” otherwise known as “useful idiots.” Beznenov is correct, this group is beyond salvation or redemption.
THE HALF-GENERATION ALSO LOST
The half-generation, the millennials, born between 1983-1993, are the children of the lost generation born between 1963-1993, including the millennials in this timeline. Had only millennials voted in the 2016 election, the outcome of that election would have looked like this…
Because the millennials are projected to be the single largest voting bloc in upcoming elections, future election results could look exactly like this, unless we reach the reachable, the millennials. Dealing with this group can be a challenge, but very rewarding.
The totally lost generation, a majority born between 1963-1983, are unreachable. They exist in stage 3 (ultra-paradoxical) and are responsible for all of the damage done to this country. They are the “global Marxists” who saddled the millennials and all future generations with trillions in debt and have stolen their future in the process. Parents of the millennials are the “lost generation” that we can only ignore or retire.
However, a majority of the millennials themselves can be saved. An increasing number are beginning to figure out the hellish future that is theirs, thanks to the generation before them.
There is little time, but there is time to reach the millennials and younger generations. It’s a fact that people my age and older are America’s past. These kids are Americas future… they must be reached and they can be reached.
HOW TO REACH THE REACHABLE
At the foundation of Pavlov’s findings is the reality that all living organism must eat. Pavlov called it the “daily bread” theory. Control the “daily bread” and you can control the organism, be it plant, animal or human.
The effort to “fundamentally transform America” into something it should never be, has been done by a multitude of strategic initiatives, not the least of which is a form of mass mind control. Watch the Beznenov interview again…
The mind is like a digital recorder with unlimited storage capacity. But it only records data being pushed in its direction. Today, massive amounts of data are being forced in through every channel – music, movies, TV, fake news, politicians, video games, social media, formal education and even church. You almost never see a kid who isn’t on their smart-phone no matter the time of day or night.
We know who controls all of these data venues today and we know exactly what data is being pumped into these kid’s digital recorder, their minds. Because we also know that the way to transform (control) any society is to “control their daily bread,” or their daily diet of data, we know that to reach these kids, we have no choice but to cut off the flow of that data. Simply stated, junk in means that you will only get junk out…
Because we do not control the venues of mass data flow into the minds of our young, we must control their access to it. Before their minds can record anything good, we must stop the pumping of bad data from other sources. We have to “parent” again.
The way out is the same as the way in… Based upon Bezmenov interview
- Reverse mass demoralization – Before you can convince an entire society that up is down and down is up, you must first remove the moral absolutes. To turn the world right-side-up again, you must return to moral absolutes. Remember that the global mind-controllers had to destroy the church first. The church is not a safe haven in America today.
- Reverse exposure to anti-American programming – stop the pumping of Marxism into the minds of our youth. Like an empty glass on the table, when we force water (truth) in, we are forcing air (lies) out.
- Reverse the un-education system – End public sector union control over the public education system and replace false educational materials with truthful education materials designed to raise a decent society of free adults rather than lifelong slaves of the federal government.
- Drain the political swamp – The individuals born 1963-1983 are the people currently in political and private power today. Their destructive nature is the result of their upbringing in youth. They are entrenched in that belief system and cannot be turned around. They simply must be removed from the equation and replaced by a new generation of pro-American leaders grounded in American principles, values and ideas.
Who should do it?
All of us who know that a mass deprogramming must be done. We must do it within our own families, our local churches and schools, local, state and federal government and reach outward to our communities and entire society.
Face it… everyone is a “patriot” today until you mention words like “action” – “solution” or call upon them to get up and do anything. Most wait for someone else to do it, which is why it never gets done.
But as has always been the case, the future of our country rests in the hands of its people, those willing to take appropriate action. The future of this country depends entire upon our ability and willingness to reach the reachable. Do it now, or our country will soon be lost forever.
Religious Protection Gone Wild
The First Amendment guarantees Americans the freedom of religion in the “establishment” clause:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Words matter, so the first question that must be answered is a matter of definition. What is religion?
The dictionary defines religion as:
- The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
- A particular system of faith and worship.
- A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.
Dictionaries have been used for centuries to help codify the meaning of words in an attempt to make language useful. Without accepted specific meanings for words it is impossible to communicate through language effectively. Language is the common denominator of speech. Even biblical stories express the importance of the meaning of words as they are understood or misunderstood in any language. The most famous example is the biblical story of The Tower of Babel that begins with everyone on Earth speaking the same language and able to understand each other. Whether the scattering of people around the world was a punishment for hubris or not, the consequence was that people began speaking different languages and could no longer understand each other.
But what happens when people speaking the same language no longer understand each other because they interpret the meaning of the same words differently? That is the situation we are facing in contemporary American society today.
The second question that must be answered is a matter of interpretation. What does religion mean to you?
Thomas Jefferson wrote eloquently on the subject in an 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists who worried about their minority status in Connecticut. Jefferson was reassuring the Baptists that being a minority religion would not be a problem in a Protestant majority state as far as the federal government was concerned.
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof’, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.”(Wikipedia)
Jefferson’s letter clearly indicates that for Jefferson, religion was a matter of Man and God. Jefferson’s interpretation was the widely accepted and understood view of religion in the early 18th century. By the 20th century the U.S. Supreme Court “incorporated” the Establishment Clause and expanded its application from the federal government to the state governments as well.
The practical application of the freedom of religion also requires a uniform understanding of the meaning and interpretation of the word religion. The Exercise Clause clarifies the supremacy of Constitutional laws and freedoms over religious laws and freedoms. This is particularly important in contemporary America because we are facing “religious” practices of Islam that threaten our Constitutional freedoms.
The Free Exercise Clause distinguishes between religions beliefs and religious practices. It is the equivalence of distinguishing between thinking and doing. In America an individual is free to think murderous thoughts but he is not free to murder. Islam is a religion governed by religious Sharia Law that endorses honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage and pedophilia. American jurisaprudence does not have the will or authority to change people’s beliefs whether they are citizens of the United States, guests in this country, here illegally, or citizens of other countries, but we most certainly have the right and legal obligation to disallow any and all practices in conflict with the U.S. Constitution and our cultural norms. Free Exercise Clause (Wikipedia)
“Freedom of religion means freedom to hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties or subversive to good order.”[28] In Reynolds v. United States (1878), the Supreme Court found that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can be made to regulate some religious practices (e.g., human sacrifices, and the Hindu practice of suttee). The Court stated that to rule otherwise, “would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government would exist only in name under such circumstances.”[29] In Cantwel
In Jefferson’s time as in Truman’s time the meaning of the word religion was understood as items 1 and 2:
- The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
- A particular system of faith and worship.
Seventy years later in 2017 we must reconsider the meaning of the word religion and ask the question What is Islam?
Islam is not a religion like Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, or Judaism. Islam is a unified supremacist socio-political system with a military wing and a religious wing. Islam is governed by religious sharia law. The goal of Islam since the 7th century is to make the world Islamic and impose sharia law worldwide.
Islam is tyrannical in its demand for conformity to its barbaric sharia laws. Islam is intolerant. Islam is a political force seeking world dominion and cannot be allowed religious protections like the Baptists in Connecticut during Jefferson’s times.
Islam is far more like the Nazis during Hitler’s time. Consider this question. What if Hitler declared Nazism to be a religion. It certainly qualifies as a religion according to Item 3. A pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes superhuman importance.
If Adolph Hitler declared his Nazism a religion would the left-wing liberal apologists for Islam defend Nazism and its determination to rule the world and rid the Earth of every Jew? Would the lefty-wing liberals declare murder of Jews protected by religious freedom? How is this different from allowing Muslims to perpetrate honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of apostates, murder of homosexuals, wife beatings, child marriage, and pedophilia.
There is no difference.
If, as apologists for Islamic barbarity claim, Islamists have perverted their religion – then it is also true that they have perverted our concept of religious freedom. Islam is not a religion like any other and its savage practices do not deserve protection under our religious freedom laws and the free exercise clause.
Islam Is The Enemy
Islam is the enemy.
Apparently these four words are the most difficult for anyone in elected positions to utter, yet they hold the key to victory over an entrenched adversary who intends to destroy our way of life.
Those Americans who understand the necessity of honestly naming the enemy are increasingly frustrated by the willful blindness on the part of leadership to address an indisputable Islamic strategy of global conquest. This blindness thus handicaps the majority of elected officials and their advisors. No wonder we see them stumbling in the dark trying to find politically correct adjectives so as not to offend the liberals, establishment, and Muslim advocacy groups.
When Islam is not named as the enemy, it results in the placement of Muslims and others complicit and/or ignorant of their doctrine into sensitive jobs. Some of these jobs actually entail overseeing what is acceptable training for our law enforcement and military. One weighty example was when John Brennan took advice from a Muslim woman, Ms. Farhana Khera, regarding specific training given to those groups just mentioned.
Ms. Khera, president and executive of Muslim Advocates, wrote a letter to Brennan who was then the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and Deputy National Security Advisor to Obama. In the letter, dated October 19, 2011, she proceeded to lay out all the “offensive” material the FBI and military trainers were using, and demanded they be purged.
Fifty-seven Muslim groups signed Khera’s letter, the same number of members in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). This is probably no coincidence; but, someone would have to understand the Islamic movement to recognize it. Those working to undermine our Constitution in order to pave the way for a Caliphate don’t normally act randomly, but with purpose.
Brennan obliged Khera like a dutiful subordinate, and purged what any rational person would agree to be factual teaching, not biased, false, or offensive. If the material had been allowed to remain within law enforcement and military training, it would have undoubtedly saved American lives.
Obviously leadership that goes along with the Islamic Movement narratives, don’t seem to do any homework on Islam itself, or they wholly are in line with its objectives of subversion. See John Brennan’s response to Khera here.
Some objections of Khera were quotes in an Army Command and General Staff College report dated May 21, 2009, which states:
“Moderate Muslims are not exercising moderation; they are simply applying other means to accomplish the same goal of establishing global Islamic dominance.”
And, “Islamic doctrine is based upon the establishment of its culture in dominance of all others. In essence, all other cultures must not only accept, but convert or submit, to Islam.”
The Koran 9:29 proves those statements have relevance as it states,
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
And in Koran 60:4, which was used by Bin Laden to remind other Muslims what their relationship should be with non-Muslims, or infidels says,
“We renounce you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us-till you believe in Allah alone.”
Few elected officials, like Senator Ted Cruz, have educated themselves on these issues. He presided over a Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts in June of 2016, called, “Willful Blindness: Consequences of Agency Efforts to Deemphasize Radical Islam in Combating Terrorism.”
“Willful Blindness,” was taken from the title of a book by Andrew McCarthy, federal prosecutor and lead investigator of the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman. McCarthy sat on the panel of expert witnesses.
The description of the hearing included the qualifier, “radical,” even though McCarthy’s work revealed to him that these mastermind terrorists were simply following Islamic doctrine, not some bastardized version. Strangely enough, in addition to McCarthy and notable others on the panel, was the very Ms. Khera who had written the infamous letter that was largely responsible for the cleansing of factual training necessary to understand our enemies.
“Radical”, “extreme”, and other words used to describe Islam allow for an established premise. The premise is based on an assumption that something in Islamic doctrine is being hijacked, or used against its original intent. However, this is not so. For instance, the Koran has over one hundred verses advocating violence against non-Muslims or kaffirs. Muslims are to behave just like Mohammad did, and follow their doctrinal books to the letter, which necessarily places them in the category of our enemy.
How can we rely upon leadership to make the right decisions for America when they are uninformed, willfully blind, to the threat Islam poses to our free Republic?
There are brave counter terrorism experts who’ve researched and studied this threat – why won’t our elected representatives (at all levels of government) accept their assistance rather than relying on the afore mentioned Islamic advocacy groups?
These experts spend their lives studying this enemy and desire to protect our Constitution, something authentic Muslims are working directly to undermine. Any reasonable person briefed on the reality of Islam has no other choice but to come to the conclusion that Islam is the enemy.
RELATED ARTICLES:
Courtney Love calls out Linda Sarsour: ‘You’re a vile disgrace to women and all mankind’
At last, someone who is on the cultural Left calls out this pro-Sharia anti-Semite — in this case, for making money off a fake hate crime.
“Courtney Love Rips Linda Sarsour: ‘Vile Disgrace to Women and All Mankind,’” by Charlie Nash, Breitbart, June 7, 2017:
Musician and alternative icon Courtney Love has blasted anti-Donald Trump Women’s March leader and Muslim activist Linda Sarsour, calling her a “vile disgrace to women and all mankind” in a message on social media Wednesday.
“You’re a vile disgrace to women and all mankind [Linda Sarsour],” posted Love, the former partner of the late Nirvana musician Kurt Cobain, before engaging in an argument with Women’s March social media head Alyssa Klein.
“Linda is the kindest, most generous, most incredible woman I know. She makes me proud to be a woman. I am forever proud to be her sister,” responded Klein, prompting Love to reply “Well that’s a shame, count me out of anything else related to her. Shes a fraud.”
Sarsour quickly responded to Love’s post, commenting “[Courtney Love is] trying to make a name for herself amongst Trump supporters I guess. Denying a woman justice who was brutally beaten.”
Another Women’s March activist also attacked Love, accusing her of directing hate “at a woman of color and feminist leader.”
Sarsour, a prominent Palestinian activist, has frequently praised Sharia law and Saudi Arabia, attempting to convince the public that women’s rights in the Middle East are better than in the United States.
In 2011, Sarsour also expressed her desire to “take the vagina away” from Ayaan Hirsi Ali, an ex-Muslim activist and a victim of female genital mutilation.
“I wish I could take their vaginas away,” Sarsour declared, referencing Ayaan Hirsi Ali and ACT for America founder Brigitte Gabriel for their criticism of Islam. “They don’t deserve to be women.”
According to Alex VanNess, director of the Middle East Peace & Security Project at Secure Freedom, Sarsour “also has a long history of criticizing Israel in ways that cross the line into anti-Semitism and terrorist sympathizing.”…
RELATED ARTICLE: Canada: Muslim migrant beats wife with hockey stick for half an hour, says he didn’t know it was against the law
NSA leaker Reality Winner sympathized with bin Laden and Taliban
She isn’t a jihadist. She is just a Useful Idiot. Clearly these sympathies indicate that she hates President Trump, and would do anything she could to make his administration look bad.
Reality Winner mug shot.
“‘I want to burn the White House down’: NSA leaker Reality Winner, 25, is DENIED bail as prosecutors claim she may have stolen more top secret information, was fascinated with Islamic terrorism and planned to play the ‘pretty, white girl’ card in court,” by Louise Boyle, Regina F. Graham and Liam Quinn, Dailymail.com, June 9, 2017:
Reality Winner portrayed little emotion in court Thursday as she was denied bond in her federal espionage case after the government alleged that she may have stolen other top secret information and poses an ongoing risk to national security.
The Air Force veteran, 25, is accused of mailing a classified report on a Russian military intelligence cyber-attack in 2016 to a news website.
She entered a plea of not guilty before Judge Brian K. Epps at U.S. District Court in downtown Augusta, Georgia on Thursday afternoon after she was charged with a single count of ‘willful retention and transmission of national defense information’….
The prosecution stated that Winner had a fascination with the Middle East and Islamic terrorism.
The government claimed that they had found handwritten notes during a search at Winner’s home which appeared to sympathize with Osama bin Laden and other terrorists.
Authorities claim another handwritten statement found during a search of Winner’s home allegedly read: ‘I want to burn the White House down and go live in Kurdistan.’
Prosecutors said in recorded jailhouse calls that Winner told her mother how to play her side of the story in the media.
They also said in a phone call she made to her sister that she was confident in how to ‘play the court’ during her bond hearing.
‘I’m pretty, white and cute,’ she allegedly told her sister. Prosecutors said Winner told her sister she would braid her hair and cry in court….
Winner’s notes allegedly contained sympathetic statements on Osama bin Laden and Taliban leader, Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, and referenced going to live in a number of countries including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Nepal and Mexico. Solari said that Winner had taken a three-day trip to Belize last month and had researched travelling from Atlanta to Tel Aviv in September 2017.
Solari also said that in recorded conversations from jail, Winner had told her mother to ‘play that angle’ with the press that she had been afraid for her life when FBI agents arrested her at her home. In a separate call she also told her sister that she would ‘go out and play the cute, blonde white girl. Braid my hair, going to cry.’…
RELATED ARTICLE: Sharia UK: Two arrested over video of Qur’an burning
VIDEO: Hazem Farraj tells his story — From Islam to ex-Muslim
Hazem Farraj telling his story at Celebration Church. Hazem hopes this encourages you to be bold even when its scary.
“Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful. And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works,” Hebrews 10:23-24