YouTube Bans X22 Report, Red Pill, Q News Corner, and others

In the last few days YouTube has just banned, according to some reports, over 30 more channels. The Winston84 website was built to help people still find these content providers as they are forced to migrate to other platforms. Here are our profiles for some of the banned channels, providing links to the other places their work can be found:

Destroying the IllusionLori ColleyRed Pill 78SGTreportX22 ReportQ News Corner.

There are many more. Combined, the YouTube videos posted by these 30 or so channels amassed hundreds of millions of views by tens of millions of viewers. Every one of those viewers has been slapped in the face today. How does this help YouTube, or the corporate media they’ve become part of?

What better way to lend credence to the latest conspiracy theory, which claims Osama Bin Laden was not killed in Pakistan? If you want to hear the arguments favoring this new story, to decide for yourself if it is BS, you can’t, because the online channels that promote the theory, or even that merely examine its merits without automatically dismissing it as pure fabrication, are all gone. Meanwhile, a Google search on the words “osama bin laden not killed in pakistan” yields the usual suspects – CNN, Washington Post, CBS, “factcheck.org” and all the rest, vigorously debunking the story.

Simultaneously, the mainstream media is awash with criticism of President Trump, who said “people can decide for themselves” regarding these conspiracy theories. But the President is right. When YouTube censors and shuts down content providers, working in lockstep with the biggest news corporations in the world, it doesn’t end the discussion. It just raises suspicion that maybe there is something to all of this.

The timing is also suspect. Another wave of shutdowns right before the November election. And the Bin Laden story, less believable, providing cover to also squelch the new developments in the Biden/Burisma story, which is very believeable.

The frightening conclusion one has to consider is that there is, mixed within the more outlandish reports and claims, some hidden truths that represent a grave threat to some very powerful special interests. Otherwise they would not give so much publicity to these online rebels by destroying their voice.

©Winston84. All rights reserved.

ACB’s Grilling is Strikingly Soviétique

Judge Amy Coney Barrett and the Krylenko Test. At the Senate hearings for the Barrett nomination, it was apparent the first day that the Judge was being Krylenkoed.


By any standard, Judge Amy Coney Barrett appears to be a superbly qualified, first-rate nominee to the US Supreme Court. That would normally be a widely shared and bi-partisan perspective of someone with her experience and reputation, but these are hardly normal times. They are hyper-politicized, ultra-partisan, politically correct, and hysterically ideological times.

For example: Until this nomination, “court-packing” meant stuffing a bench with additional justices. To a significant number of public figures who ought to know better (and probably do), court-packing now is when a President exercises his constitutional duty to nominate a single person to fill a vacancy. George Orwell would call this startling transformation of court-packing “Newspeak.”

As in Orwell’s 1984, the purpose of today’s Newspeak is to serve the interests of power and power-seekers, no matter what, the truth be damned. Politics is everything to this crowd. It is apparently what makes their lives worth living, which is a profoundly sad commentary on their balance and priorities. To cast aside such values as fairness and honesty for the sake of political power is about as anti-social as human behavior gets.

As I watched the first day of hearings on Judge Barrett’s nomination, I was reminded of a largely forgotten Soviet legal theoretician from decades ago. His name was Nikolai Krylenko. Judge Barrett is being given the Krylenko treatment by Democrat senators like Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, meaning this: The only thing that matters is whether she will vote their party line in future cases.

Under the communist dictatorship of Lenin and then Stalin, Krylenko (1885-1938) rose through the Soviet Union’s legal system to become People’s Commissar for Justice and a Prosecutor General. He was a leading practitioner of the theory of “socialist legality,” which held that an accused person’s innocence or guilt depended on that person’s politics (real or imagined). It sounds nuts and indeed, it was. It was the stuff of Orwell’s nightmare, and one of the reasons the Soviet Union thankfully perished of its own poison.

In The Gulag Archipelago, the famous Soviet dissident and Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn recounted an episode involving Krylenko. Shortly after Lenin’s Bolsheviks assumed power in 1917, an admiral named Shchastny was sentenced by one of the regime’s judges “to be shot within 24 hours.” When some in the courtroom expressed shock, it was Krylenko who responded thusly: “What are you worrying about? Executions have been abolished. But Shchastny is not being executed; he is being shot.”

To Krylenko, the only morality was what served the Party and the State, which of course in the Soviet Union were one and the same. If your politics were not correct, you would be “corrected,” one way or the other. In Richard Pipes’ authoritative book, The Russian Revolution, Krylenko is quoted as exclaiming, “We must execute not only the guilty. Execution of the innocent will impress the masses even more.”

At the Senate hearings for the Barrett nomination, it was apparent the first day that the Judge was being Krylenkoed. Hostile senators pronounced their verdicts before she had uttered a word, and those verdicts had nothing to do with Barrett’s stellar qualifications or keen legal mind. Legal analyst and George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley commented,

What they were suggesting is that they will be voting against her because of what they expected her vote would be in a pending case, and that is a conditional confirmation…Here, the senators seem to be saying, “I’m not even going to listen; I’m going to vote against you because I don’t think you’re going to vote the right way….”

Judge Barrett clearly articulated her judicial philosophy, borne out by the way she has ruled at the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit: She believes the role of a judge or justice is to follow the Constitution and the law as written, not make stuff up in the service of a political agenda. How ironic that this is a point of fiery contention. Senators who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and the law hate the guts of a judge who does just that!

Perhaps Amy Coney Barrett should tell those hostile senators, “If the Constitution stands in the way of your ideology, I’ll gladly scrap it on your behalf. All power to the State!” She would pick up a few votes in the process.

What happened to Nikolai Krylenko? It’s called “what goes around, comes around.” The very system of politicized, arbitrary judgments he wielded against his fellow citizens came back to bite him. He lost favor with the politicians (namely, Stalin) and fell victim to the Great Purge of 1938. Accused of anti-Party activity, he was tortured until he “confessed” to crimes he never committed and summarily executed.

The rule of law did not exist in the Soviet Union of Joseph Stalin and Nikolai Krylenko. In its place, what prevailed was the rule of men—power-mad men of no conscience. Civilized people will not pity the likes of Krylenko, but they will always regret the innocent that his “legal theory” victimized. Shame on us if we allow his brand of evil to ever take root among us.

COLUMN BY

Lawrence W. Reed

Lawrence W. Reed is FEE’s President Emeritus, Humphreys Family Senior Fellow, and Ron Manners Global Ambassador for Liberty, having served for nearly 11 years as FEE’s president (2008-2019). He is author of the 2020 book, Was Jesus a Socialist? as well as Real Heroes: Incredible True Stories of Courage, Character, and Conviction and Excuse Me, Professor: Challenging the Myths of Progressivism. Follow on LinkedIn and Twitter and Like his public figure page on Facebook. His website is www.lawrencewreed.com.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

You Should Absolutely NOT Read The Disgusting, Totally False Story About Joe Biden’s Son That We’ve Linked To In This Article

There’s a disgusting, absolutely 100% false story about Joe Biden’s son going around. It’s so bad that it has been condemned by the wise, moral, upstanding people who run Twitter and Facebook. Even mentioning the story can get you banned from these platforms. That’s how bad and false the story is.

It claims that Biden’s son did a lot of really bad stuff, allegedly, stuff that he CERTAINLY did not do. It says that there was clear alleged corruption in the Obama-Biden administration, with Biden allegedly pulling strings for his allegedly wayward son. The story also had a bunch of obviously doctored photos of the former vice president’s alleged son doing some insane stuff, allegedly.

All of this stuff is 100% false, and you should not even give it the time of day. You should not read it at all.

Here is the story, that again, to be clear, you absolutely should not read:

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Since you did not click on that article, you were not horrified by all the alleged revelations about H. Biden. So your life is much better for not reading the completely false story. We are glad you did not read it and share it with others. Because you are a good, upstanding citizen and would not share false smears about someone. Good job!

RELATED POLITICAL SATIRE:

Trump Attempts To Catch Hunter Biden In Trap Labeled ‘Free Crack’

Twitter Shuts Down Entire Network To Slow Spread Of Negative Biden News

Big Tech Fights Election Interference By Interfering In Election

Facebook Bans The Babylon Bee For Being Too Accurate

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Cultural Marxism Is Grinding Christianity Down

During a recent prayer session in support of Black Lives Matter, the pastor of St. Xavier Catholic Church in New York City instructed white congregants that they must renounce their white privilege to help “transform the church culture.”  Using the noble cause of racial equality as a fig leaf, Black Lives Matter is in fact a violent political organization whose Marxist ideology is anti-Christian — and anti-American — in the most profound meaning of those terms.  In many churches across America, cultural Marxists in the pulpit are quietly supplanting traditional Christian values with those of the hammer and sickle.

“Cultural Marxism” is the gradual process of grinding down Western democracies by subverting the pillars of their culture, the structures and institutions of family, religion, education, politics, law, the arts, and the media as they provide the social cohesion necessary to a functioning society.  Challenge the legitimacy of these institutions, and a capitalist society can be overthrown from within without firing a shot.  Known as the father of cultural Marxism, 20th-century Italian communist Antonio Gramsci summarized his stratagem for dismantling Christian nations thusly:

Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity.  Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.

Gramsci referred to his stratagem as “the long march through the institutions,” infiltrating a society’s cultural institutions and gradually supplanting their traditional values and principles with communism.  Operating via stealth and deception, Gramsci’s disciples in this country have diligently labored to grind down every cultural institution in America, including its predominant religion, Christianity.

The communist plan to diminish Christianity’s hold on America

Communism cannot flourish in a society with a strong religious footing.  In his best-selling book, The Naked Communist, former FBI special agent Cleon Skousen listed 45 communist goals to subvert America from within.  Two of those goals pertain to diminishing Christianity:

Goal No. 27 calls on communist warriors to infiltrate churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion.  Revealed religion is based on Scripture; the communist concept of social religion teaches citizens to look to government, rather than God, for their salvation.  Scriptural religion is about individual salvation; social religion is about collective salvation, a concept that does not exist in Christianity.  In many churches on the religious left, the communist goal of replacing revealed religion with social religion has largely been accomplished, as evidenced by the constant refrain of religious-left pastors who sermonize about their undying commitment to the cause of “social justice.”  The term refers to justice within a society that allocates wealth according to the Marxist directive “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Goal No. 28 calls on communist warriors to infiltrate schools and eliminate prayer and every type of religious expression on the grounds that it violates the principle of separation of church and state.  In addition to using classrooms as transmission belts for socialist propaganda, cultural Marxists have also infiltrated the entertainment industry, the media, government, and corporate America.

Cultural Marxism’s message to Christians: Sit down and shut up

In attempting to drive Christianity from the public square, cultural Marxists in our midst, nearly all of whom belong to the Democratic Party, routinely mock and ridicule Christianity and its believers.  The following sacrileges were carried out by members of the entertainment industry:

  • Bill Maher began one of his programs on HBO with an attack on Christianity by comparing Holy Communion to sodomy.
  • On his nationally syndicated radio show, Howard Stern said, “If I was president, I would have you pro-lifers gassed.  I would have you marched into the ovens.”
  • Upon receiving an award for her cable reality show, comedienne Kathy Griffin said, “A lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this.  No one had less to do with this award than Jesus.  All I can say is suck it, Jesus.”
  • In an episode of HBO’s Curb Your Enthusiasm, the star of the show, Larry David, urinated on a picture of Jesus.
  • In an in-your-face to Christians, the Netflix film The First Temptation of Christ, portrays Jesus as a homosexual and depicts God the Father as a lecherous seducer of women.

Using “diversity,” “inclusivity” and “multiculturalism” as justifications, cultural Marxists in corporate America, government, and publicly funded schools and colleges regularly scold, threaten and punish Christians, as well as censor religious activities by Christians and Christian organizations:

  • Employee of major package-shipper ordered on administrative leave for wearing a Christian cross on her dress while at work.
  • Christmas decorations banned at Florida’s turnpike toll booths.
  • NBC edited out “under God” from pledge of allegiance recited by children during broadcast of U.S. Open golf tournament.
  • Pentagon orders Air Force officer to remove Bible from his desk.
  • Court of Appeals upholds school district’s ban on Christmas carols.
  • The ACLU filed suit to force removal of 8-foot cross erected on remote federal land to honor soldiers killed in war.  See video about the Mojave Desert Cross here.
  •  Army warns soldiers that pro-life Christians are “tearing the country apart” and constitute a “radical threat to the nation.”
  • Obama DOJ defunds at-risk youth program after it refused to ban prayer.
  • V.A. hospital refuses “Merry Christmas” cards sent by 4th-graders to sick and wounded veterans.
  • High school prohibits valedictorian from telling how Jesus changed his life.
  • Military base takes down Nativity scene after atheists complain.
  • Federal judge prohibits high school band from playing “How Great Thou Art.”
  • Texas school bans Christmas trees, red and green colors from holiday party due to fear of “offending others.”
  • “Introduction to Humanities” professor fails student because she refused to renounce her Christian faith.
  • University prohibits Christian club from setting up table at meet-and-greet for new students.
  • Children banned from saying “Merry Christmas” at elementary school’s “Winter Party.”
  • High school prohibits students from praying together, cites “separation of church and state.”
  • University de-certifies campus Christian club for insisting on having a Christian as its leader.
  • Government tells ministry that feeds the poor to remove portrait of Jesus.
  • University’s diversity guidelines warn: “Make sure your holiday party isn’t a Christmas party in disguise.”

The above instances are but a small sample of the efforts aimed squarely at driving every vestige of Christianity from the public arena.

Most distressingly, disciples of Antonio Gramsci have infiltrated top leadership positions of every major branch of the Christian religion.  While pretending to do God’s bidding, cultural Marxists hiding under the ecclesiastical robes of the Christian faith are knowingly subverting their professed religion from within.

For example, earlier this year, Pope Francis announced that he will sign the Global Education Pact, which will usher in a “new humanism,” under which God “withdraws” so that all of humankind can be “free.”  Under the pact, children of the world will be indoctrinated with “climate change” and other U.N. propaganda designed to pave the way for a New World Order under the banner of global communism.  Operating by stealth and deception, Marxists have methodically seized control of the Vatican in a way that went virtually unnoticed by most Catholics until after the fact, just as Gramsci planned.

To understand the importance of religion to a free society, please consider watching and sharing the brief presentation below by Harvard professor Clay Christensen.

©John Edison. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Inspirational: President Trump Speaks to Catholics.

President Trump and Judicial Appointments: Leaving a Legacy

Monumental Events – Leaving a Legacy

At any given moment in time if there were one monumental event occurring it would consume our hearts, minds and the news cycle.  However, as we enter the last stretch of the election season there are numerous monumental events at play that will determine how we live as Americans not just in the short term, but for the next generation. Trump, regardless, will be leaving a legacy.

The Supreme Court

We thought the Cavanaugh inquisition was a circus.  We haven’t seen anything yet.  Amy Coney Barrett will be the pinnacle of craziness.  I believe she will be the next justice in the Supreme Court but not without a fight.  She is a God-fearing constitutionalist who cares about ALL human life—humans that are born and unborn.  This is exactly what we need and will give freedom-loving Americans the security of knowing someone one the court loves God, loves, life, loves freedom, and loves America.  I also believe we will lose a conservative from the court that will have to be replaced.  At minimum President Trump has put 1/3 of the Justices in place (Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and probably Barrett) leaving a legacy.  If there is another that makes four and he will have appointed almost ½ of the Supreme Court to a lifetime appointment!  That legacy will live on for decades after President Trump is out of office.

Federal Circuits and Appeals Courts

194 the total 792 active federal judges have been appointed by President Trump according to Pew Research.  How does this compare to other Presidents?  Trump has appointed 24% of all of the active Federal Judges in just 3.5 years.  President Obama appointed 312 (or 39% of all active Federal Judges), and George W. Bush appointed 166 or 21% of all of the active federal judges.  Put this into perspective President Bush was President for eight years and President Trump has already appointed almost thirty more judges in three years that his eight total years.

President Obama was extremely active in packing the courts as he appointed 312 (39% of all of the active Federal Court judges).  That changed the fabric of America for a while, but the tide is turning.  President Trump is on pace to surpass that.

Leaving a Legacy in Federal Appeals Court

Something significant has already occurred.  The Federal Appeals Court Judges that hear controversial cases and is most times the final say, unless the case is important enough to be heard by the Supreme Court have been largely impacted by Trump’s Presidency.  To date, President Trump has appointed 53 Federal Appeals Court Judges.  This is the most since President Carter in the late 1970s!  Don’t forget, this was accomplished in just the first 3.5 years—there are many more to come.

As important as the Supreme Court is, most of our daily life laws are guided by the Federal Court Judges.  President Trump is turning the tide and erasing the damage done by President Obama as many of his appointees have turned out to be activists that legislate from the bench.  This is exciting, and now that we have a blueprint for success being established the rest is up to us.

What is Our Duty?

President Trump set the table for us.  Now it’s up to us to make something from his hard work.  Life is lived at the local level.  Now that laws are going into effect that increase our freedom rather than destroy it, we must take as much ground as we can before it is taken away again.  How do we do this?  If we are able, we need to run for local positions such as county commissioner, city council, school board, mayor, etc.  These local positions are important is almost all of life is lived in this area.  We may not be able to personally get involved in national politics or run for a national office, but running for local offices is much more simple and cost effective.  I encourage you to run!  Run with everything you have and together we can help the president not just take back lost ground, but secure freedom for years to come.

One Last Story

I wanted to take a moment and reflect on courage by telling you a story.  Let’s take a moment to ponder the life of Queen Esther, a Jewish queen of the Persian king Ahasuerus.  Haman, the king’s right-hand man, tricked the king into signing a law that would have all of the Israelites killed. Esther’s parents, who were Israelites, already had died and she was raised by her cousin Mordecai. Through a series of events, King Xerxes chose Esther to be his queen. As was tradition however, anyone who came into Xerxes’ presence without being asked could be killed – even Esther!

She conquered her fear. She defied the odds and stood for what was right. She literally put her life on the line, entered the king’s chamber and spoke. She made her request to the king to have the horrible law changed – a law that would have killed all of her people, including herself.  When Esther requested an audience with the king, what could the results have been? The answer is simple: Either she would find favor with the king and her request be granted, or she could have been killed for even making such a request.

The consequences were severe, but the act of one brave woman saved the lives of an entire nation. Consider the ancient monumental scripture that defined Esther: The scripture says, “If you keep quiet at a time like this, deliverance and relief for the Jews will arise from some other place, but you and your relatives will die. Who knows if perhaps you were made queen for just such a time as this?”

There are certain turning points in our lives where we need take a stand for what is right. We need to make our voices heard. We may not be popular, we may even be putting our security and comfort levels at risk, but the implications for not acting may be the death of a culture, the death of a people group, the death of an economy, or the death of a civilization. An entire nation was at risk until Esther took a bold step of faith and essentially reconciled in her mind to be the sacrificial lamb for all her people.  Think about where you could rise up, be courageous, defend the defenseless, and stand up for truth.  The world needs heroes.  Will you be one of them?  This generation and future generations will be impacted by what we do now. Now is the time to let our light shine! You were born for such a time as this.

Leaving a Legacy Summary

The Deep State and Shadow Government will stop at nothing. We are at a crossroads for humanity. It’s either us-or them. We watch with great anticipation as the President leaves a legacy. This one is for all the marbles and this story is not yet over.We have an awesome responsibility to expose the lies and crimes and to reveal the truth. Freedom? It’s up to us. This is John Michael Chambers. Thank you for viewing this special report be sure to share it far and wide. And remember, stay the course, trust the plan,  heed the call for WWG1WGA. God Bless…

Buckle down. Pray. Stay safe. Stay the course and trust the plan. Freedom? It’s up to us!

©John Michael Chambers. All rights reserved.

The Dems’ October Surprise — The Plandemic

Curiouser and curiouser. Out of the blue, just weeks before the most consequential election in American history, our indefatigable President gets sick, and a growing contingent of key Republicans are consigned to their basements to supposedly recover from a virus they almost certainly don’t have.

Remember Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, wherein people’s reputations could be destroyed, possibly along with their lives, if anyone accused them of being witches? Not a bad analogy for what we’re witnessing today––simply inform your political enemies they’ve tested positive for the Chinese Coronavirus and need to cool their heels for two precious weeks during the homestretch of the election. The Russia Russia Russia mantra has apparently morphed into the Covid Covid Covid narrative.

Think back to 2019—the booming economy, unemployment at a 50-year low, African-American unemployment the lowest in our history, offshoring corporations heading back to the U.S. in droves, our energy sector revving up, the stock market hitting record highs, consumer confidence strong, America standing tall among the nations once again—this was Trump’s America in full swing. Everyone knew the Trump card was the rip-roaring economy. But a funny thing happened on the road to the 2020 election. The bottom dropped out of Trump’s economic miracle.

In fact, every aspect of Trump’s America took a nosedive. And those who believe this was unavoidable due to the scourge of the Chinese Coronavirus are likely CNN/MSNBC watchers, politically naïve, or not paying attention.

The Plandemic: Phase One

Fortunately, many astute researchers have documented the fact that America-hating New World Order globalists—with Bill Gates and his massive funding at the forefront—planned and orchestrated the whole pandemic scenario. Why? Because they, along with their Deep State and Democrat allies, have bet the farm on this election. They know they’ve committed high crimes including sedition and treason, and four more years of a Trump Administration would almost certainly mean indictments, trials and lengthy prison sentences for these felons.

Not only that, but the American people might get used to prosperity and the pursuit of happiness again, and decide to pass on the globalists’ “sustainability” agenda for We the People—i.e. austerity, privation and virtual serfdom under a surveillance-mad technocracy. What’s not to like?

In short, the globalist Left, aided and abetted by the hyperventilating media, did all it could to wreck our economy, as well as the lives and businesses of millions of Americans, largely by substituting the scary-sounding word “pandemic” for “flu.”

Yes, Covid-19 can lead to fatal complications, especially for the frail elderly and those with serious preexisting conditions, but so can the seasonal flu. In fact, Dr. Fauci––whose models, projections and predictions were almost entirely wrong––equated it to a bad seasonal flu in his article in the New England Journal of Medicine article months back. But I digress.

All the hype surrounding this virus—the lockdowns, masks, testing, contact tracing, etc.––has been phony. CNN has yet to broadcast that the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) recent data show Covid-19 to be far less lethal than the last three major pandemics.

What many are now calling the “plandemic” is surely the most audacious con job ever attempted in history. Amazingly, it’s still going strong—the hype, that is—while the virus itself is petering out and almost certainly no longer meets the threshold for even an epidemic, much less a pandemic.

The result of these diabolical shenanigans? As Biden announced, in what may have been his one accurate statement during the recent presidential debate: “Under this President, we’ve become weaker, sicker, poorer, more divided, and more violent.”

Mission accomplished.

But the Dems can be counted on to leave nothing to chance. After all, Trump is still hugely popular, and a fearless truth-teller who keeps exposing their corruption, hypocrisy and lies, which drives the Leftists stark raving mad. Even though they’ve now brought America to her knees to prove Trump hasn’t made her great after all, they fear their nemesis could still win.

The Plandemic: Phase Two

Let’s examine what I’m calling Phase Two of their Plandemic: the targeting of the President, First Lady, members of Trump’s team, and several Republican senators—using the virus and/or testing as a presumptive political weapon.

For starters, testing someone who’s “asymptomatic”—i.e. healthy—is a scam. It’s similar to branding someone as a racist, except for the two-week expiration date. And just look at the list of such branded Republicans:

  • Senators Thom Tillis and Mike Lee, members of the all-important Judiciary Committee needed to proceed with Amy Coney Barrett’s vital confirmation
  • Trump’s former campaign manager and consultant Kellyanne Conway
  • Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel
  • Senator Ron Johnson
  • Trump’s campaign manager Bill Stepien!
  • And perhaps worse yet, Kayleigh McEnany, Trump’s Press Secretary!

The Dems may be playing “Can you top this?” because Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s top advisors and speechwriters, was added to the victim list shortly after Kayleigh.

Apparently, this virus is a Deep State smart bomb.

Medical Deep Staters can claim, “So-and-so tested positive!” and thus temporarily remove any pesky patriot from the game-board. What luck for the desperate Dems that with mere weeks to go before the election, whole batches of pro-Trump Conservatives can be shut out of the public sphere for two weeks while they are forced to “self-quarantine.”

Now let’s do some debunking of our own: the PCR test that’s being given to the Trump team on a daily basis is a sham. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), warned that this test should never be used diagnostically, as it cannot give accurate results. Says Dr. David Rasnick, founder of Viral Forensics lab, “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.” (Italics mine.) His advice? “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life…”

What about the media claim that the White House gathering for Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination was a “super-spreader event?” Let’s recall that one of the top people at the World Health Organization on Covid-19, Maria Van Kerkkhove, confirmed that asymptomatic people do not spread the virus—and you can bet that no one, including the President, was walking around the Rose Garden coughing and sneezing.

Nevertheless, MSNBC, CNN, and the rest of the treasonous tribe of Deep State cheerleaders are singing the same tune: No one at this event wore a mask! No wonder they’re testing positive! It’s Trump’s fault! He never took the Coronavirus seriously! Of course the science tells us masks don’t protect anyone, so this is just more propaganda to sway the public to “blame Trump.”

One more point: Seems the media pundits have forgotten that the only thing that ever eradicates a virus is herd immunity. That means we should actually rejoice when healthy people who are under 70 get the virus. They’ll be fine—most with mild symptoms, or none at all—and they’re helping to get us to our goal post: herd immunity!

Trump Targeted?

But let’s turn our attention to the man of the hour, President Donald J. Trump. Summoning my inner Hercule Poirot, I’m going to suspect everyone, and trust nothing I can’t verify. Since Trump and Melania both developed symptoms, we know they got a respiratory illness. But how do we know it’s Covid-19? We don’t. We have to take the White House doctors’ word for it.

But assuming Trump did come down with the Chinese coronavirus, we still need to ask whether the White House doctors who spirited him off to Walter Reed Medical Center, and immediately gave him Regeneron’s experimental drug cocktail, were acting in his best interest. Trump was obviously not in critical condition––we even watched him walk out of the White House on his own to board Marine One.

If he needed treatment, why wasn’t he given Hydroxychloroquine, zinc and Z-Pak—a safe protocol that has worked so well for many? And why put him on a second new drug, Remdesivir, that hasn’t performed well in clinical trials, but is the Big Pharma drug Dr. Fauci has been touting? In fact, no one had ever been given these two new drugs in combination, so how could the doctors know they wouldn’t cross-react and cause harm? They couldn’t.

In other words, these doctors experimented on the President of the United States!

But let’s also consider the worst-case scenario that we were fortunately spared.

Suppose the Deep Staters––who’ve been trying to oust Trump from the presidency for nearly four years—had announced that the President had succumbed to the Coronavirus? I regret to say that the Democrats would be jubilant. And suppose they said Vice President Pence also tested positive and had been taken to Walter Reed Hospital for observation? This would have put Nancy Pelosi in the Oval Office!

Everyone knows the Coronavirus can be fatal—especially for the elderly and those with co-morbidities. How could We the People stand up against such a diabolical takeover of our government if the radical globalist Left should pull off their wished-for coup d’etat through this kind of assassination that would not only give them plausible deniability, but also downright credibility with the misguided half of the American public? Thankfully, Trump has recovered. But this remains a scenario the Deep State could potentially pull off in one way or another, so we need to remain vigilant.

And since we’re speculating, we must also consider the possibility that the virus had been intentionally deployed to target the President. If so, he would likely have been infected several days prior to the debate, in the hope that he’d be too sick to engage with Biden. In any case, to get the most bang for their buck and to make this all look legit, the plotters would merely have to claim that attendees at Barrett’s nomination, etc. got the virus from Trump. No proof required. No active cases required. Just say they “tested positive.”

The Dems’ Payoff

Sad to say, phase two appears to be a win-win for the treasonous cabal. They’ve ratcheted up the virus hysteria, which Dems can use to prolong shutdowns, mask-wearing mandates, and general misery. They got Biden off the hook for at least one debate with Trump—maybe two. But their biggest payoff: the Republicans may lack a majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee to move forward with Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation due to quarantined senators.

So you tell me, do you really think it’s just bad luck that our hale-and-hearty President got Covid four short weeks before the election, potentially meaning no more rallies, no more debates—a big plus for dementia Joe—no more campaigning, and no Supreme Court appointment as the mail-in ballot fiasco waits in the wings?

We’re still in the realm of conjecture, to be sure, but the Big Picture, as far as I’m concerned, reveals a calculated, devious second phase of the massive Pandemic psy-op that’s been carefully orchestrated to bring down President Trump, and with him, America. We can stop waiting for the Democrats’ October Surprise. This is it!

© Cherie Zaslawsky. All rights reserved.

Twitter Employees Profile Shows Over 86% Donated to Democrats and .15% to Republicans

Open Secrets lists those employees of Twitter and who they donated to in the 2020 election cycle at this link (HT to JCR). Here is just the first page of what we found:

Candidates

Congressional Candidates

Party of Recipients

Democrats $215,388 86.63%
Others $32,852 13.21%
Republicans $370 0.15%

Incumbents vs. Non-Incumbents

Incumbents $134,756 54.20%
Non-Incumbents $113,854 45.80%

House Recipients

Party # of Members Average Contribution Total Contributions
Democrats 58 $457 $26,517
Republicans 3 $36 $110
Independents 1 $4 $250
All Parties 62 $433 $26,877
The US House of Representatives has 435 members

Senate Recipients

Party # of Members Average Contribution Total Contributions
Democrats 14 $5,425 $75,963
Republicans 0 $0 $0
Independents 1 $2,127 $31,916
All Parties 15 $7,191 $107,879
The US Senate has 100 members

All Federal Candidates

Party of Recipients

Democrats $347,270 98.99%
Republicans $3,556 1.01%

Source of Funds

Individuals  $352,137 100.00%
PACs  $0 0.00%

All Recipients

Filter by View:

Filter by Type:

Filter by Chamber:

Recipient Total From Individualsmore info From Organizationmore info Recipient Type
Biden, Joe $66,929 $66,929 $0 Candidate (D-PRES)
Warren, Elizabeth $45,792 $45,792 $0 Candidate (D-MAS1)
Sanders, Bernie $31,916 $31,916 $0 Candidate (I-VTS1)
Yang, Andrew $14,327 $14,327 $0 Candidate (D-PRES)
Harris, Kamala $12,929 $12,929 $0 Candidate (D-CAS1)
Kelly, Mark $11,216 $11,216 $0 Candidate (D-AZS1)
Buttigieg, Pete $10,451 $10,451 $0 Candidate (D-PRES)
Greenfield, Theresa $10,192 $10,192 $0 Candidate (D-IAS2)
Gideon, Sara $10,050 $10,050 $0 Candidate (D-MES2)
Amico, Sarah Riggs $8,425 $8,425 $0 Candidate (D-GAS1)
Bullock, Steve $7,800 $7,800 $0 Candidate (D-MTS2)
Ossoff, Jon $6,394 $6,394 $0 Candidate (D-GAS1)
Kennedy, Brynne $5,655 $5,655 $0 Candidate (D-CA04)
Steyer, Tom $5,623 $5,623 $0 Candidate (D-PRES)
Jones, Doug $5,580 $5,580 $0 Candidate (D-ALS1)
Harder, Josh $5,391 $5,391 $0 Candidate (D-CA10)
McGrath, Amy $4,568 $4,568 $0 Candidate (D-KYS1)
Eastman, Kara $4,328 $4,328 $0 Candidate (D-NE02)
Harrison, Jaime $3,813 $3,813 $0 Candidate (D-SCS2)
Booker, Cory $3,712 $3,712 $0 Candidate (D-NJS2)
Cunningham, Cal $3,696 $3,696 $0 Candidate (D-NCS1)
Hickenlooper, John $3,517 $3,517 $0 Candidate (D-COS2)
Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria $3,411 $3,411 $0 Candidate (D-NY14)
Trump, Donald $3,186 $3,186 $0 Candidate (R-PRES)
Peters, Gary $3,083 $3,083 $0 Candidate (D-MIS1)
Liberal/Democrat Conservative/Republican No View
Showing 1 to 25 of 223 entries

CLICK HERE TO SEE MORE

RELATED ARTICLE: Facebook, Twitter employees send over 90% of political donations to Democrats: report

©All rights reserved

QUESTION: Is Your Life Better Today Than It Was 47 Years Ago?

On January 5, 1973 Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was first sworn in as a U.S. Senator. Biden was 30-years old at the time. This was forty-seven years ago. At that time I was a young officer in the United States Army serving in Germany. I was born and grew up in St. Louis, Missouri.

I recently returned to St. Louis, my place of birth, for a family gathering. As I was there I began reflecting on the question:

Was life better in 1973 than it is in 2020?

Why did I ask this question?

Because St. Louis has dramatically changed, like most other inner cities, since I entered the U.S. Army and subsequently retired to Florida. That change has been for the worse, not the better. St. Louis, like many other inner cities, have become breeding grounds for hate, violence and murder. Inner cities have become the home of the homeless populated by those who “vote for a living” rather than work for a living. St. Louis is a prime example of a lawless enclave controlled by the mob. In 2019 St. Louis was the murder capital of the United States with a rate of 64.6 murders per 100,000 residents (click here for the murder rates of U.S. cities).

I began to ask myself why have the fond memories I had of  St. Louis gone away and been replaced by what I saw during my recent visit? St. Louis is now a ghost town, due to the public policies of its Democrat leaders. You see my wife and I were warned by our family not to go to the City of St. Louis because it was too dangerous. I couldn’t even go to visit the graves of my mother and father because the cemetery in which they are buried is in a very dangerous City of St. Louis neighborhood.

WHY IS ST. LOUIS SO DANGEROUS TODAY?

One possible reason is that the City of St. Louis has not had a Republican mayor since 1949. Wikipedia has this chart of mayors of the City of St. Louis. Here are the political parties of those mayors of St. Louis elected since 1943:

36 Aloys P. Kaufmann August 1, 1943 April 19, 1949 Republican [Q]
37 Joseph Darst April 19, 1949 April 21, 1953 Democratic 1
38 Raymond Tucker April 21, 1953 April 20, 1965 Democratic 3
39 Alfonso J. Cervantes April 20, 1965 April 17, 1973 Democratic 2
40 John Poelker April 17, 1973 April 19, 1977 Democratic 1
41 James F. Conway April 19, 1977 April 21, 1981 Democratic 1
42 Vincent C. Schoemehl April 21, 1981 April 20, 1993 Democratic 3
43 Freeman Bosley Jr. April 20, 1993 April 15, 1997 Democratic 1
44 Clarence Harmon April 15, 1997 April 17, 2001 Democratic 1
45 Francis Slay April 17, 2001 April 18, 2017 Democratic 4
46 Lyda Krewson April 18, 2017 Incumbent Democratic

THE DOUBLE WAMMY OF BLACK LIVES MATTER AND COVID-19 [a.k.a THE CHINA FLU]

When we arrived at our Hilton Airport hotel we found it to be a ghost town. The lobby was eerily empty, there was a City induced requirement to wear a face mask, the staff had been cut dramatically due to the St. Louis mandated “lock-down.” If we wanted to have our room cleaned we had to call the front desk before 9:00 and ask for this service, which normally was done automatically. Why? Because the Hilton Airport hotel has dramatically cut its custodial staff, putting many out of a job and on government welfare. We found the same is true of restaurants, small businesses and even public schools.

The China Flu has become the perfect vehicle to shut down, not only the economy of the City of St. Louis, but the entire world. Can you think of any better way to seize control of the individual than implementing mandates under the idea that we are “doing this for your and the public’s safety?” Instant control. Instant tyranny. Instant police state. You are an enemy of the state if you don’t wear a face mask! Obey!

Another reason is how St. Louis treats its citizens like enemies of the state is the rise of Black Lives Matter movement. According to Wikipedia:

In July 2013, the movement began with the use of the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of African-American teen Trayvon Martin 17 months earlier in February 2012. The movement became nationally recognized for street demonstrations following the 2014 deaths of two African Americans, that of Michael Brown—resulting in protests and unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, a city near St. Louis[Emphasis added]

WHY ARE WHITE RIOTERS LABLED CRIMINALS BUT BLACK RIOTERS LABLED PEACFUL PROTESTERS?

In April 2015, well before the current George Floyd riots, I published a column with a video titled “A Black Woman Explains Why Ferguson Rioters Are Worse Than The KKK.” Chloe Valdary, a black student at the University of New Orleans, explains,

When whites riot, the public rightly labels them as criminals. When blacks riot, the public considers them to be protestors with legitimate grievances. Is this different standard fair? Or is it an example of a new form of racism cloaked in low expectations?

WATCH CHLOE VALDARY’S “DON’T JUDGE BLACKS DIFFERENTLY” COMMENTARY BY CLICKING HERE.

CONCLUSION

Life in any large city is determined by the public policies of those who hold elective office. As the former Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Tip O’Neill (D) said, “all politics is local.” This is now truer than ever before. Just look around you and see the truth.

Today for cities like St. Louis, MO, New York, NY, Portland, OR, Chicago, IL, Detroit, MI, Atlanta, GA, Minneapolis, WI, Baltimore, MD, Los Angeles, CA, San Francisco, CA and many others the policies of the local leaders drives everything. These policies since 1973 have become more onerous and damaging to the lives and lively hoods of the citizens of these cities.

Life has become more dangerous, taxes more onerous, regulations more intrusive and violence more prevalent.

The U.S. Constitution states very person has “equal protection under the law”, unless you live in a city that is controlled by the Democrat Party. In Democrat controlled cities, like St. Louis, some people have more protection than other people.

Dr. Martin Luther King said, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

Today, Democrats, and the WOKE culture, demand that you and I judge people by the color of their skin, not the content of their characters.

©Dr. Rich Swier, Ed.D. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEETS:

PODCAST: The Barrett Confirmation — Is It a Done Deal?

What did we learn from the questions Democrats asked at the Amy Coney Barrett hearings? A lot, says Senator Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). Listen to his key takeaways from this important week and what kind of stunts he thinks the minority party could still pull heading into her vote next Thursday.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden on Trans Agenda: ‘I Will Flat out Change the Law’

Biden Bombshell Gets the Silent Tweetment

Calling Our Florida Friends!

RELATED VIDEOS:

Reflections on Judging: A Conversation with Amy Coney Barrett

Confirm Amy

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Voter Registration in 353 Counties in 29 States Exceeds 100%

In 2018 the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from our settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. California settled a NVRA lawsuit with us and last year began the process of removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s voter rolls. Kentucky also began a cleanup of hundreds of thousands of old registrations last year after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit. In September 2020, we sued Illinois for refusing to disclose voter roll data in violation of Federal law.

So we’ve been busy and effective. Unfortunately, the problem persists.

Our newly released study reveals that 353 U.S. counties had 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens. In other words, the registration rates of those counties exceeded 100% of eligible voters. The study finds eight states showing statewide registration rates exceeding 100%: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

The September 2020 study collected the most recent registration data posted online by the states themselves. This data was then compared to the Census Bureau’s most recent five-year population estimates, gathered by the American Community Survey (ACS) from 2014 through 2018. ACS surveys are sent to 3.5 million addresses each month, and its five-year estimates are considered to be the most reliable estimates outside of the decennial census.

Our latest study is necessarily limited to 37 states that post regular updates to their registration data. Certain state voter registration lists may also be even larger than reported, because they may have excluded “inactive voters” from their data. Inactive voters, who may have moved elsewhere, are still registered voters and may show up and vote on election day and/or request mail-in ballots.

We rely on our voter registration studies to warn states that they are failing to comply with the requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which requires states to make reasonable efforts to clean their voter rolls. We can and have sued to enforce compliance with federal law.

Earlier this month, we sued Colorado over its failure to comply with the National Voter Registration Act. In our new study, 42 Colorado counties—or two thirds of the state’s counties—had registration rates exceeding 100%. Particular data from the state confirms this general picture. As the complaint explains, a month-by-month comparison of the ACS’s five-year survey period with Colorado’s own registration numbers for the exact same months shows that large proportions of Colorado’s counties have registration rates exceeding 100%. Earlier this year, we sued Pennsylvania and North Carolina for failing to make reasonable efforts to remove ineligible voters from their rolls as required by federal law. The lawsuits allege that the two states have nearly 2 million inactive names on their voter registration rolls. We also sued Illinois for refusing to disclose voter roll data in violation of Federal law.

Our study updates the results of a similar study from last year. In August 2019 we analyzed registration data that states reported to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in response to a survey conducted every two years on how states maintain their voter rolls. That registration data was compared to the then-most-recent ACS five-year survey from 2013 through 2017. The study showed that 378 U.S. counties had registration rates exceeding 100%.
The new study shows 1.8 million excess, or ‘ghost’ voters in 353 counties across 29 states. The data highlights the recklessness of mailing blindly ballots and ballot applications to voter registration lists. Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections.

STATES AND COUNTIES WITH REGISTRATION RATES EXCEEDING 100%

(* means no separate reporting of inactive registrations)

Alabama: Lowndes County (130%); Macon County (114%); Wilcox (113%); Perry County (111%); Madison County (109%); Hale County (108%); Marengo County (108%); Baldwin (108%); Greene County (107%); Washington County (106%); Dallas County (106%); Choctaw County (105%); Conecuh County (105%); Randolph County (104%); Shelby County (104%); Lamar County (103%); Autauga County (103%); Clarke County (103%); Henry County (103%); Monroe County (102%); Colbert County (101%); Jefferson County (101%); Lee County (100%); Houston County (100%); Crenshaw County (100%)

*Alaska: Statewide (111%)

Arizona: Santa Cruz County (107%); Apache County (106%)

*Arkansas: Newton County (103%)

Colorado: Statewide (102%); San Juan County (158%); Dolores County (127%); Jackson County (125%); Mineral County (119%); Ouray County (119%); Phillips County (116%); Douglas County (116%); Broomfield County (115%); Elbert County (113%); Custer County (112%); Gilpin County (111%); Park County (111%); Archuleta County (111%); Cheyenne County (111%); Clear Creek County (110%); Teller County (108%); Grand County (107%); La Plata County (106%); Summit County (106%); Baca County (106%); Pitkin County (106%); San Miguel County (106%); Routt County (106%); Hinsdale County (105%); Garfield County (105%); Gunnison County (105%); Sedgwick County (104%); Eagle County (104%); Larimer County (104%); Weld County (104%); Boulder County (103%); Costilla County (103%); Chaffee County (103%); Kiowa County (103%); Denver County (103%); Huerfano County (102%); Montezuma County (102%); Moffat County (102%); Arapahoe County (102%); Jefferson County (101%); Las Animas County (101%); Mesa County (100%.

*Florida: St. Johns County (112%); Nassau County (109%); Walton County (108%); Santa Rosa County (108%); Flagler County (104%); Clay County (103%); Indian River County (101%); Osceola County (100%)

*Georgia: Bryan County (118%); Forsyth County (114%); Dawson County (113%); Oconee County (111%); Fayette County (111%); Fulton County (109%); Cherokee County (109%); Jackson County (107%); Henry County (106%); Lee County (106%); Morgan County (105%); Clayton County (105%); DeKalb County (105%); Gwinnett County (104%); Greene County (104%); Cobb County (104%); Effingham County (103%); Walton County (102%); Rockdale County (102%); Barrow County (101%); Douglas County (101%); Newton County (100%); Hall County (100%)

*Indiana: Hamilton County (113%); Boone County (112%); Clark County (105%); Floyd County (103%); Hancock County (103%); Ohio County (102%); Hendricks County (102%); Lake County (101%); Warrick County (100%); Dearborn County (100%)
Iowa: Dallas County (115%); Johnson County (104%); Lyon County (103%); Dickinson County (103%); Scott County (102%); Madison County (101%); Warren County (100%)

*Kansas: Johnson County (105%)
Maine: Statewide (101%); Cumberland County (110%); Sagadahoc County (107%); Hancock County (105%); Lincoln County (104%); Waldo County (102%); York County (100%)

Maryland: Statewide (102%); Montgomery County (113%); Howard County (111%); Frederick County (110%); Charles County (108%); Prince George’s County (106%); Queen Anne’s County (104%); Calvert County (104%); Harford County (104%); Worcester County (103%); Carroll County (103%); Anne Arundel County (102%); Talbot County (100%)

*Massachusetts: Dukes County (120%); Nantucket County (115%); Barnstable County (103%)

*Michigan: Statewide (105%); Leelanau County (119%); Otsego County (118%); Antrim County (116%); Kalkaska County (115%); Emmet County (114%); Berrien County (114%); Keweenaw County (114%); Benzie County (113%); Washtenaw County (113%); Mackinac County (112%); Dickinson County (112%); Roscommon County (112%); Charlevoix County (112%); Grand Traverse County (111%); Oakland County (110%); Iron County (110%); Monroe County (109%); Genesee County (109%); Ontonagon County (109%); Gogebic County (109%); Livingston County (109%); Alcona County (108%); Cass County (108%); Allegan County (108%); Oceana County (107%); Midland County (107%); Kent County (107%); Montmorency County (107%); Van Buren County (107%); Wayne County (107%); Schoolcraft County (107%); Mason County (107%); Oscoda County (107%); Iosco County (107%); Wexford County (106%); Presque Isle County (106%); Delta County (106%); Alpena County (106%); St Clair County (106%); Cheboygan County (105%); Newaygo County (105%); Barry County (105%); Gladwin County (105%); Menominee County (105%); Crawford County (105%); Muskegon County (105%); Kalamazoo County (104%); St. Joseph County (104%); Ottawa County (103%); Clinton County (103%); Saginaw County (103%); Manistee County (103%); Lapeer County (103%); Calhoun County (103%); Ogemaw County (103%); Macomb County (103%); Missaukee County (102%); Eaton County (102%); Shiawassee County (102%); Huron County (102%); Lenawee County (101%); Branch County (101%); Osceola County (101%); Clare County (100%); Arenac County (100%); Bay County (100%); Lake County (100%)

*Missouri: St. Louis County (102%)

*Montana: Petroleum County (113%); Gallatin County (103%); Park County (103%); Madison County (102%); Broadwater County (102%)

*Nebraska: Arthur County (108%); Loup County (103%); Keya Paha County (102%); Banner County (100%); McPherson County (100%)

Nevada: Storey County (108%); Douglas County (105%); Nye County (101%)
*New Jersey: Statewide (102%); Somerset County (110%); Hunterdon County (108%); Morris County (107%); Essex County (106%); Monmouth County (104%); Bergen County (103%); Middlesex County (103%); Union County (103%); Camden County (102%); Warren County (102%); Atlantic County (102%); Sussex County (101%); Salem County (101%); Hudson County (100%); Gloucester County (100%)

*New Mexico: Harding County (177%); Los Alamos County (110%)

New York: Hamilton County (118%); Nassau County (109%); New York (103%); Rockland County (101%); Suffolk County (100%)

*Oregon: Sherman County (107%); Crook County (107%); Deschutes County (105%); Wallowa County (103%); Hood River County (103%); Columbia County (102%); Linn County (101%); Polk County (100%); Tillamook County (100%)

Rhode Island: Statewide (101%); Bristol County (104%); Washington County (103%); Providence County (101%)

*South Carolina: Jasper County (103%)

South Dakota: Hanson County (171%); Union County (120%); Jones County (116%); Sully County (115%); Lincoln County (113%); Custer County (110%); Fall River County (108%); Pennington County (106%); Harding County (105%); Minnehaha County (104%); Potter County (104%); Campbell County (103%); McPherson County (101%); Hamlin County (101%); Stanley County (101%); Lake County (100%); Perkins County (100%)

Tennessee: Williamson County (110%); Moore County (101%); Polk County (101%)

Texas: Loving County (187%); Presidio County (149%); McMullen County (147%); Brooks County (117%); Roberts County (116%); Sterling County (115%); Zapata County (115%); Maverick County (112%); Starr County (110%); King County (110%); Chambers County (109%); Irion County (108%); Jim Hogg County (107%); Polk County (107%); Comal County (106%); Oldham County (104%); Culberson County (104%); Kendall County (103%); Dimmit County (103%); Rockwall County (102%); Motley County (102%); Parker County (102%); Hudspeth County (101%); Travis County (101%); Fort Bend County (101%); Kent County (101%); Webb County (101%); Mason County (101%); Crockett County (101%); Waller County (100%); Gillespie County (100%); Duval County (100%); Brewster County (100%)

Vermont: Statewide (100%)

Virginia: Loudoun County (116%); Falls Church City (114%); Fairfax City (109%); Goochland County (108%); Arlington County (106%); Fairfax County (106%); Prince William County (105%); James City County (105%); Alexandria City (105%); Fauquier County (105%); Isle of Wight County (104%); Chesterfield County (104%); Surry County (103%); Hanover County (103%); New Kent County (103%); Clarke County (103%); King William County (102%); Spotsylvania County (102%); Rappahannock County (102%); Albemarle County (101%); Stafford County (101%); Northampton County (101%); Poquoson City (100%); Frederick County (100%)

Washington: Garfield County (119%); Pend Oreille County (112%); Jefferson County (111%); San Juan County (108%); Wahkiakum County (108%); Stevens County (103%); Pacific County (103%); Clark County (102%); Island County (102%); Klickitat County (102%); Thurston County (102%); Lincoln County (101%); Whatcom County (100%); Asotin County (100%)

*West Virginia: Mingo County (104%); Wyoming County (103%); McDowell County (102%); Brooke County (102%); Hancock County (100%)

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Vadym Pozharskyi: ‘Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent some time together’

WATCH:


Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post.

Then Joe lied about it.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE NEW YORK POST THREAD OF EMAILS

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden demanded Chinese billionaire pay $10 million for ‘introductions alone,’ emails show

Twitter Locks Trump Campaign Account Over Hunter Biden News Story Post: Spokesman

Biden campaign ‘glad’ Twitter, Facebook censored Post’s Hunter Biden exposé

C-SPAN suspends Steve Scully indefinitely after he admits he lied about his Twitter being hacked

South Carolina Elections chairman resigns after removing and defacing Trump signs

Democrat Party Member Suggests Using Violence: ‘Morally Acceptable’ To ‘Lie,’ ‘Cheat,’ ‘Steal’

Biden Donor Group Sends 225,000+ Ballot Requests, Including for DEAD Citizens

WATCH: NYC Jewish Institutions Spied On and Searched For Jews Praying

Ex-Facebook honcho Tim Kendall says Big Tech is a ‘threat to democracy,’ calls for social media reform

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Dangers of Online Dating

When you’re considering online dating, you might see all the good sides at first. You have many profiles to check out, and various potential partners are just waiting for the mutual swipe. You are chatting from your home, and nobody knows where you are (unless you decide to tell them). It seems easy and safe.

However, according to dangers of online dating statistics, 53% of people lie on their online dating profiles. That means you don’t know who you’re really talking to, even if they have the cutest photos.

You Might Get Catfished

Even though catfishing is not illegal, a catfish can waste your time and break your heart. They might fake their whole online identity and lie to you about almost everything. A catfish is simply not the person you see in photos, so it can be dangerous to meet them in person.

They will usually chicken out before it comes to a real-life date, though. They know they’ll be caught in a lie, showing up as a completely different person. Most of the time, they will even avoid video chatting or call you from a dark room. But can you imagine how creepy and potentially dangerous it can be to meet someone who lied about their identity?

Beware of Scammers

Nowadays, there are many known types of scams, such as the infamous Nigerian prince scam. However, scammers aren’t only sending emails in hopes of deceiving a victim. They can be on dating sites, too. They’ll usually be sweet and romantic until they get what they want, and then you’re in trouble.

A scammer can try to get you off the dating platform because it’s “easier” to communicate somewhere else (this doesn’t leave a trace of what they’re doing on the platform). Then, they’ll work on obtaining your personal information they need for fraud like identity theft or even blackmail. You can protect yourself by never giving anyone your full name and address, date of birth, social security number, or other sensitive information.

The Risk of Sexual Assault

Before meeting in person, look for any red flags while chatting online. Your partner may get impatient, pushy, or mad if you don’t respond right away. This shows they might be prone to anger outbursts or violent behavior. Moreover, insisting on meeting up in a secluded location or at their apartment for the first time is a huge red flag. It would leave you potentially vulnerable to a sexual assault. You should be able to agree on where you both want to meet, without any pressure.

You can protect yourself by meeting in a public place, such as a restaurant or a coffee shop. Let your friends know exactly where you’re going, and don’t leave your drink unattended to avoid a potential risk of a date-rape drug being slipped into it.

Conclusion

The dangers of online dating are real. However, even if you’ve met someone offline, it doesn’t mean you are 100% safe. It’s important to be cautious but also have fun. Online dating works for many couples all over the world. If you don’t notice any red flags, your match probably wants to get to know you and have a good time. The best thing you can do is be yourself, enjoy the process, and let things unfold.

©Josh Wardini. All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Joe Biden’s Dilemma

Joe Biden is caught between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, he desperately wants to be seen as a man of the working class, it is where he feels most comfortable. On the other hand, he needs the support of the far-left in order to capture the presidency, and this is a group of people he feels least comfortable with, but must work with them. Senator Sanders and AOC claim Mr. Biden is on their side, but they know they have to push him should he win, which also explains why Sen. Kamala Harris, voted the most liberal Senator in 2019, was asked to be his running mate. Harris will play a pivotal role should Mr. Biden win the election, simply by being a watch dog and pushing him to the left.

As to the middle class the Democrats once controlled, it was hijacked by Donald Trump in 2016. He has successfully forged an alliance with moderates and his approval rating is improving among Latinos, Asians, African-Americans, and women. This explains why Mr. Biden has been trying to target these groups in his latest round of television ads.

The former VP’s “Made in America” campaign slogan is copied from the Trump campaign. The only problem is that his proposed tax increases will force American companies to move offshore again, taking their jobs with them. If elected, Mr. Biden will also negate the Trump Executive Orders to minimize bureacracy, thereby throwing gasoline on the fire. So he really cannot pitch to the middle class as his policies will ultimately hurt them, particularly the Green New Deal he is being forced to embrace (even though he really doesn’t want to).

Aside from the economy, middle America is very much concerned with law and order, including all racial persuasions. Unfortunately, no law enforcement agency is willing to endorse Mr. Biden as he is viewed as the party of Antifa and Black Lives Matter, and all of the violence and mayhem associated with them. This represents the Achilles heel of his campaign. Ultimately, it means the American public does not trust him to safeguard the populace.

Let us also not forget Mr. Biden is not popular with the military. Anyone remember the 2012 Benghazi attack? It stained the reputations of President Obama, Sec. Clinton, and VP Biden who were blamed for this deadly fiasco. Further, the VA was considered broken under the Obama/Biden administration. Military people are more likely to embrace President Trump than Mr. Biden, as the president has rebuilt both the military and the VA, not to mention reduced our involvement in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Following Donald Trump’s stay at Walter Reed Hospital, the President told the country “Don’t be afraid” of the COVID-19 virus and tackle it head on instead. The media and the left thought this was incredibly wrong. However, Trump’s bravado played well with the American people who respect a strong person. It’s a glass half full of water as opposed to half empty type of phenomenon, and the people gravitated to his positivity. This is not the image Mr. Biden projects.

Mr. Biden has made a deal with the devil to get elected, and he must now live with it. He is hoping the hatred of the country to President Trump will carry the day, but the reality is only the far left possesses this intense anger, not middle America, the group is primarily interested in the economy and law enforcement. You know, the “silent majority” of people who vote more than any other group.

Keep the Faith!

P.S. – Also, I have a NEW book, “Before You Vote: Know How Your Government Works”, What American youth should know about government, available in Printed, PDF and eBook form. This is the perfect gift for youth!

RELATED VIDEO: Tucker Carlson on Hunter Biden email scandal being covered up by Facebook and Twitter.

RELATED TWEET:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1316581285691830275

EDITORS NOTE: This Bryce is Right podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

The Mob Goes After Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln’s statues dot the landscape for a reason that is well-understood: He is a symbol of wisdom, decency, sacrifice, and perseverance in defeating slavery and liberating millions of black Americans.

Antifa rioters knocked down his statue in Portland during a self-proclaimed “Day of Rage” on the eve of Columbus Day.

They also trashed the Oregon Historical Society, which preserves treasures of the past so that people of succeeding generations may understand their culture and history.

Citizen journalist Andy Ngo quoted one rioter as the mob pulled down a statue of Theodore Roosevelt: “F— all you colonizers! … Everyone of you that’s against Black Lives Matter can f— the f— off.”


How are socialists deluding a whole generation? Learn more now >>


Such ugly and hateful scenes continue, month after month. Local officials continue to enjoy fame, power, and money without having to meet their most basic responsibility of protecting the public.

The Portland public seems indifferent to this, and even the federal government—which in the past has enforced Americans’ civil rights when local authorities refused to do so—seems like a flabby and impotent giant.

When Antifa and its radical associate Black Lives Matter began their campaign of hatred and violence months ago, the news media helped sell the movement as “mostly peaceful” and devoted to ending endemic racism in law enforcement, an object virtually all Americans could support.

But, of course, it soon became clear the movement was divorced from peace and reason. The details of altercations between police and the public that might tend to exonerate officers, or at least put their actions in context, were not promulgated. The movement advanced violence, rather than the peaceful means we have, under our rule of law, of holding police accountable.

Burning black businesses and killing black Americans, as anyone with an ounce of common sense could discern, did nothing to advance the professed cause. The movement promoted defunding the police, a means of subjecting citizens to the violence and terror of the mob.

Many good and caring people have marched for racial justice. But the movement—at its core—was not about holding police accountable.

It was about tearing down America, its freedoms, and the foundational rule of law that protects people’s civil rights. It was about assaulting America’s founding and the statues that honor those who created and sustained this country. A country that, as Lincoln put it, is the last, best hope of mankind.

George Orwell wrote about this approach in his brilliant and chilling analysis of totalitarianism, the novel “1984”:

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.

President Donald Trump tweeted on Monday morning, “The FBI and Law Enforcement must focus their energy on ANTIFA and the Radical Left, those who have spent the summer trying to burn down poorly run Democrat Cities throughout the USA!”

But he has mouthed such words for months, and the violence and destruction proceed apace, no doubt fueling outrage in many voters.

Perhaps the most unsettling thing about this year of COVID-19 and rioting is the way the Constitution and the rule of law have been laid aside, at the encouragement of many politicians and with the willing acceptance of the public.


What’s the best way for America to reopen and return to business? The National Coronavirus Recovery Commission, a project of The Heritage Foundation, assembled America’s top thinkers to figure that out. So far, it has made more than 260 recommendations. Learn more here.


Lincoln, a lifelong advocate of the rule of law, waged a gruesome war to preserve this nation. It makes a powerful symbolic statement of our country’s demise when his statue is facedown in the mud—and no one pays any consequences for such violent destruction.

Originally published by RealClearPublicAffairs

COMMENTARY BY

Edward Achorn

Edward Achorn, an award-winning journalist, is the author of the new book “Every Drop of Blood: The Momentous Second Inauguration of Abraham Lincoln.” Twitter: .

RELATED ARTICLES:

8 Big Moments From Day 3 of Barrett’s Confirmation Hearings

2 Female Senators Share Perspectives on the Amy Coney Barrett Hearings

Judge Amy Coney Barrett Maintains Poise Under Fire

Why Liberals Hate Amy Coney Barrett


A Note for our Readers:

Democratic Socialists say, “America should be more like socialist countries such as Sweden and Denmark.” And millions of young people believe them…

For years, “Democratic Socialists” have been growing a crop of followers that include students and young professionals. America’s future will be in their hands.

How are socialists deluding a whole generation? One of their most effective arguments is that “democratic socialism” is working in Scandinavian countries like Sweden and Norway. They claim these countries are “proof” that socialism will work for America. But they’re wrong. And it’s easy to explain why.

Our friends at The Heritage Foundation just published a new guide that provides three irrefutable facts that debunks these myths. For a limited time, they’re offering it to readers of The Daily Signal for free.

Get your free copy of “Why Democratic Socialists Can’t Legitimately Claim Sweden and Denmark as Success Stories” today and equip yourself with the facts you need to debunk these myths once and for all.

GET YOUR FREE COPY NOW »


EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Whose Lives Matter? – 87% of Republicans say All Lives Matter, 63% of Democrats say Black Lives Matter.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA/PRNewswire/A Crisis of Confidence in our Police?

Whose Lives Matter? While 63% of Democrats agree more with Black Lives Matter, 61% of independents and 87% of Republicans choose All Lives Matter.

VIEW PDF

Complete toplines and crosstabs for Reality Check Insights’ Race and Policing in America Survey.

  • Barely half (49%) of Americans believe that police officers treat racial and ethnic groups equally.
  • 16% of women disagree that seeing a police officer in their neighborhood makes them feel safe.
  • While more than 72% of wealthy Americans report that seeing police officers make them feel safe, only 50% of low-income Americans agree.

U.S. Public Split on Whether Recent Protests are Non-Violent

  • 41% of Americans believe that the majority of recent protests are non-violent – 44% disagree.
  • While more than 65% of Democrats believe that the protests are nonviolent, only 38% of independents and 13% of Republicans share a similar viewpoint.

Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter?

  • More Americans have a favorable opinion of Black Lives Matter than an unfavorable opinion.
  • Nevertheless, when forced to pick, only 32% of Americans choose Black Lives Matter.  60% of white Americans, 43% of African-Americans, and 63% of Hispanic Americans choose all lives matter.

NBA – Sports League or Political Organization?

  • More than 75% of Republicans disapprove of the NBA, while more than 67% of Democrats approve.

How the public views police, protests, and the NBA

“This survey shows that one month before the 2020 U.S. presidential election, attitudes toward the police, protests, and even the NBA are highly partisan. We also see evidence of public concern with the police.  More than a third of the public disagrees with the statement that `police officers treat racial and ethnic groups equally’ and just over half of Americans agree that `seeing a police officer in my neighborhood makes me feel safe.'”

ABOUT PETER K. ENNS

Peter K. Enns, Co-founder of Reality Check Insights and Professor of Government at Cornell University.

RELATED TWEET:

©All rights reserved.