Bunny Ranch ‘Sex Workers’ Endorse Hillary Clinton For President – Bill excited!

hookers for hillaryCARSON CITY, Nev. /PRNewswire/ — In advance of this weekend’s Nevada caucuses, prostitutes at Dennis Hof’s world famous “Moonlite Bunny Ranch” legal brothel in Carson City, Nevada are banding together to announce their support of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.  Following Clinton’s formal announcement last year, the sex workers launched their “Hookers For Hillary” initiative, drafting a four point platform to explain their endorsement:

*Protecting health care reform

Hillary Clinton, as part of her husband’s administration, envisioned health care reform in the 1990s, long before President Obama was able to sign it into law.  The Affordable Health Care Act made health insurance available for the first time ever to the 500 independent contractors employed by Dennis Hof.  With any Republican nominee likely to work for its repeal, the bunnies want to protect the quality health coverage that they now enjoy.

*Foreign policy experience

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton gained invaluable experience negotiating with foreign leaders, and the bunnies can definitely relate to negotiating through a language barrier.  The Bunny Ranch entertains customers from all around the globe, and the girls have great respect for any woman who can take powerful men from oppressive cultures and make them bend to her will.  With her eye on the international landscape, the bunnies are confident that President Hillary Clinton would also avoid a repeat of the Secret Service’s Colombian prostitution scandal by making sure that her detail “buys American.”

*Support for agencies that protect the public’s health

Nevada’s mandatory testing of legal prostitutes for sexually transmitted diseases is a successful example of effective government regulation.  While Republican candidates have questioned the need for agencies like Health and Human Services (HHS) & the Food And Drug Administration (FDA), the bunnies applaud Hillary’s recognition of the fact that responsible government oversight is a key to protecting the public’s health from widespread disease.

*Prevention of a return to supply side economics

Bill Clinton presided over the most prosperous time in Bunny Ranch history, which coincided with a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans, like brothel owner Dennis Hof.  The bunnies recognize that thriving economies are built from the bottom up, where the vast majority of their clients originate.  A return to relying on the disproven theory of trickle down economics would only serve to exclude the vast majority of hard working Bunny Ranch clients from having the discretionary income to enjoy with their favorite bunny.

Hundreds of legal prostitutes that are employed by Hof’s seven legal brothels will be out in force all overNevada this weekend in support of Clinton.

RELATED ARTICLE: Hillary Clinton just can’t win: Democrats need to accept that only Bernie Sanders can defeat the GOP

Super PAC Helping Elect Republicans Supporting a Conservative Clean Energy Agenda

CHARLOTTE, N.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Conservative philanthropist Jay Faison today announced the formation of ClearPath Action, a new independent expenditure-only political action committee being established to help elect Republicans to public office and advance a conservative clean energy policy agenda for GOP lawmakers.  Faison is also the CEO and founder of ClearPath, a private non-profit foundation dedicated to accelerating conservative clean energy policy solutions.

“No one is currently providing enough support to candidates who embrace conservative clean energy principles and feel compelled to talk about clean energy as part of their campaign,” said Faison in announcing the effort.  “We’re forming this committee to make an impact, provide support, and help Republicans this election cycle and in future election cycles.”

“We know that Democrats are using clean energy as a wedge issue and we’re committed to fighting back and going on offense for the GOP,” added Faison.  “We don’t have to agree on climate change to agree that Republicans can support a conservative clean energy platform that provides energy security, creates jobs and boosts our economy, and reduces pollution.”


ClearPath Action is building a sophisticated campaign infrastructure with plans to help support multiple Republican candidates throughout the country in 2016.

For more information on ClearPath Action, visit www.ClearPathAction.org.

Donald Trump: America’s Champion

At this crucial moment in our nation’s history, America needs a hero.

We need a strong champion of our national security.

We need an unapologetic promoter of economic prosperity that’s made possible by free enterprise capitalism.

We need a bold defender of our Constitutional rights, including our freedoms of speech, religion and right to bear arms to protect ourselves from criminals and rogue terrorists.

We need a courageous fighter to stop Democratic Party socialists from destroying our country with their failed policies and actions.

Capitalism Is Freedom; Socialism Is Slavery” is the title of the below article by John Hawkins which demonstrates clearly why I stand with Donald J. Trump, the champion America needs to make our country great again.

trump embraces american flagCapitalism Is Freedom; Socialism Is Slavery

By John Hawkins

“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both.” — Milton Friedman

“If there is ever a fascist takeover in America, it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors but with lawyers and social workers saying, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” – Jonah Goldberg

In a time where consumers have almost unlimited choices of music, movies, websites and every product you can imagine in the supermarket, socialism is an outdated economic system that no longer fits with the world we live in. Socialism requires the intervention and control of the marketplace by an overwhelmingly powerful centralized government. It penalizes high achievers, rewards laziness and stifles choice.

Socialism is a government regulation that stops you from creating a successful business. It’s the Bureau of Land Management or the EPA making arbitrary decisions about what you can do with your own land. It’s the IRS taking the money you busted your butt to earn and giving it to people who didn’t work as hard as you did.

Almost every socialist policy requires taking resources from someone who’s earned them and giving them to someone who hasn’t. Even programs that are supposed to be self-funding rarely are because the juice is never quite worth the squeeze. The real reason we’re so deeply in debt is because if the middle class was forced to choose between paying for what our government is spending or dramatically cutting back, our government would already be much smaller than it is – and no wonder.

What does our government do well anymore? Do you trust the IRS? FEMA? Are our borders secure? How does the customer service of the post office or DMV compare to, let’s say Apple or Amazon? Who wants to live in government housing? Who wants a minimum wage job? Who wants to answer to bureaucrats, jump through their hoops and do as he’s told by people who see him as a nameless, faceless slob dependent upon them for his livelihood?

This is what socialism offers.

Socialism will take something from someone else who earned it and give it to you and in return, you will do what socialists want you to do. If you’re irresponsible, lazy, have a habit of making poor decisions or just need a master, this can seem like a good deal. You can work a menial job and get paid more than you’re worth! You can go to college and you don’t have to pay for it! Someone else will give you a place to live, food stamps, welfare and health care! In return, you just have to give up on your pride, your dreams and control of your own life.

People who can take care of themselves don’t need socialism and most of those who have difficulty taking care of themselves would still be better off under a more capitalistic system. The more capitalistic an economy is, the faster it grows. The faster an economy grows, the more jobs and wealth are created.

Eighty percent of humanity lives on less than $10 a day. Meanwhile, 96% of the poor in America have televisions, 93% have microwaves and 81% have cell phones. Ultimately, it’s the economic growth produced by capitalistic policies that has allowed America’s poor to do so well compared to the poor in more socialistic nations. Paradoxically, the more we move towards socialism in the name of “helping” the poor, the less poor Americans will ultimately have. That’s because the more regulations, the more taxes and the more GOVERNMENT a country has, the slower its economy grows.

Socialism requires a gargantuan government so it can confiscate property, control behavior and manage an always growing list of programs to achieve “fairness.” Unfortunately, “fairness” is a will-o’-the-wisp that can never be caught because human beings have different levels of talent, skill and effort.

The factory worker who spent 30 years working his way through the ranks to become regional sales manager should make more than the new guy who just started yesterday. The man who spent 10 years building his own successful business should make more money than his employees.

The man who invested every extra dime he had and does well should make more money than the fellow who used all his extra money to buy a bigger car and nicer furniture for his house. Socialists say, “Not so fast. Maybe those guys should make more money, but they’re making too much money. We should control how much they make. We should decide how much of their money they get to keep. We should control how much of their money is given away and to whom.”

On the other hand, capitalism is freedom. Capitalism says you should do what you want to do with your own time and either suffer the consequences or reap the rewards. Sure, we might all cooperate to create a military and a police force along with building sewage systems, roads, street lights and stop signs and a few other necessities, but beyond that, let everyone rise and fall as he deserves.

If you want to get a four year degree in women’s studies at an Ivy League university? Great, pay for it yourself. You want to live cheaply and work a second job so you can save up money? You should be able to do that and someone else shouldn’t get the benefits from your hard work. If you want to spend your twenties as a beach bum, surfing all day and sleeping in a tent at night, you can do that, but no one else should be asked to help pay for your lifestyle.

Having real freedom means you get to make real choices and when that happens, some of those choices will work out better than others. The only way to change that is to build a massive government apparatus that makes everyone poorer in return for reducing the amount of natural inequality that will happen when people are allowed to pursue their wildly differing hopes and dreams.

Capitalism is not perfect, but it won’t bankrupt the country, it doesn’t reward failure and it can’t control you like socialism. To the contrary, in a capitalist system, businesses benefit from voluntary transactions. Do you want to get rich in a capitalist system? Find a way to give people what they want. If you’re just okay at it, you can make a decent salary. If you’re as good at it as Henry Ford or Bill Gates, you can become rich beyond imagination.

Do you want to get rich in a socialist system? Be well connected. Make friends or just pay off people who can give you government contracts. Make contributions to politicians so they’ll change the laws to help you and hurt your competitors. Get the government to take money from other people and give it to you as part of a bailout.

Which sounds more admirable? Which sounds healthier for our country? When you give the government unlimited power to create “equality,” you also give it the power to tilt the playing field towards corrupt businesses that have every incentive to try to take advantage of it.

At the end of the day, socialism is for slaves who are willing to give up their freedom for promises that they’ll be given some minimal level of support no matter what. On the other hand, capitalism is for people who want the freedom to rise or fall based on their own effort. If you know which type of person you are, then you know whether you should be a capitalist or a socialist.

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of the author Frances Presley-Rice with Donald Trump.

Why Rubio Faltered: TEA Party Treason

According to Jack Oliver, legislative director of Floridians for Immigration Enforcement, Senate Bill 744 would have given work permits and legalization to over 11 million illegal aliens, doubled authorized immigration to 22 million over the next decade, and added millions to welfare and entitlement rolls.  Oliver called it “amnesty first and a promise for enforcement later.” He contended that the bill never would have gotten through the Senate without Rubio acting as the immigrant “poster child” of the sponsoring “Gang of Eight.” The immigration bill would change demographics forever, with Democrats fast-tracking the newly legalized immigrants to citizenship and voting rolls.

Going into the Republican debate of February 13 there was much speculation about whether Senator Marco Rubio could recover from his faltering at Chris Christie’s cross-examination about immigration during the debate in New Hampshire. The punditry ascribed Rubio’s “robotic” performance, the repetition of the line that Obama “knows exactly what he’s doing,” to having a “bad night.”  Rubio’s campaign used the same spin, as a day-after fundraising email indicated, by claiming he had “dropped the ball,” that it would “never happen again.”  He also claimed to know about “tough times,” based on his father’s life story.  He used the example of having to move to Las Vegas when his father lost his job as an apartment manager, but then had to start over as a busboy before he went on to become a bartender again.

But it does not appear that Marco Rubio ever had to compete with an illegal alien for a job such as busboy or construction laborer. Little was said about the substance of the questions that unnerved Rubio so much in New Hampshire.

Moments after the February 13 debate, Rubio supporters skirted the immigration debate again.  Congressman Trey Gowdy told Fox News that Rubio had had the “courage” to change his mind about immigration, which is what Rubio had tried to say once when Christie pressed him about not pushing his own bill, the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013,” Senate Bill 744.  Rubio had claimed that he did not back the immigration bill once he learned that the “American people” did not like it.  Actually, if Rubio were walking back his immigration position, he would be going back to his original position, if we could believe what he told Florida tea party members as he sought their support for his bid for Senate in 2010.

Perhaps the reason Rubio faltered so badly under Christie’s cross-examination was because he heard the sound of “traitor” ringing in his ears, the shouts of these fellow Floridians, whose hands he had shaken as he promised to stand firm on immigration.

The occasion was the Americans for Prosperity Foundation conference, on Labor Day weekend, 2013, in Orlando.  As the shouts of “traitor” came from the audience of 2,000, Rubio continued on with his speech, but became visibly flustered and faltered.

I was at that event in 2013 and wrote about it.  I talked to one of the protestors in the hallway wearing bright pink t-shirts emblazoned with “Pink Slip Rubio.com,” Jack Oliver, legislative director of Floridians for Immigration Enforcement, who felt betrayed by Rubio, who had shaken his hand and promised that he would never support comprehensive reform, legalization, or the Dream Act.

Oliver began his career in construction as a plasterer laborer in 1968, a time when such a trade could support a family, but saw his wages drop 30 percent under George W. Bush’s lax immigration policies. As a field superintendant he saw that construction workers were making less in actual dollars than what they had been making in the 1980s.  The black community had been especially hard hit as construction labor jobs were taken over by illegal aliens.

According to Oliver, Senate Bill 744 would have given work permits and legalization to over 11 million illegal aliens, doubled authorized immigration to 22 million over the next decade, and added millions to welfare and entitlement rolls.  Oliver called it “amnesty first and a promise for enforcement later.” He contended that the bill never would have gotten through the Senate without Rubio acting as the immigrant “poster child” of the sponsoring “Gang of Eight.” The immigration bill would change demographics forever, with Democrats fast-tracking the newly legalized immigrants to citizenship and voting rolls.

And lest anyone dismiss these opinions as those of a mere tea party activist/construction worker, Emory political science professor Alan Abramowitz, said the same thing in Atlanta the previous year as he predicted a Democratic victory due to changed demographics.  The importation of Democratic voters helped in Obama’s reelection as did the fact that disgusted white middle class voters simply did not vote.  Similarly, conservative Hispanics do not vote for those who adopt the policies of the left.

Yes, as Rubio says, Obama knows exactly what he is doing when it comes to “transforming” this nation.  Obama promised to do that when he campaigned.  A large part of that transformation is coming from opening the borders to illegal aliens.  Entire neighborhoods have been transformed and not for the better as I saw as I drove through Florida in 2013.  For the most part, these illegals do not resemble the legal immigrants of earlier generations. Schools have decayed.  Welfare rolls have exploded.  Crime has risen.

Those who helped put Rubio in the Senate were not in the debate room on Saturday night and could not shout “traitor” at him again.  Nor are they privy to backroom deals or to what Rubio tells other Spanish speakers.  On February 13, when Ted Cruz attacked Rubio for his “Rubio-Schumer amnesty plan” and for going on Univision and speaking in Spanish, Rubio mocked Cruz by implying he couldn’t speak Spanish.  It was a telling moment.

Unfortunately, Cruz fell for it, and said something in Spanish that hundreds of millions of Americans couldn’t understand.  Among these millions are those who have lost their jobs to illegal aliens and to new positions that require bilingual speakers.  They are fed up with Obama’s executive orders that bypass the laws and allow in “undocumented” aliens who bring with them criminal records, diseases, and illiteracy. They are disgusted when Obama tells them to learn Spanish.  They are fed up with having to “press one for English” and watching illegal aliens shouting protest slogans in front of state capitols.  That is why Donald Trump’s message has been resonating.

Cruz would do himself a favor by reminding Rubio of the manners that generations of immigrants learned: one does not exclude certain people by having a side conversation in his native language.

To do so, to similarly go to foreign-language media as a senator, might make voters think that you have something to hide.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on the Selous Foundation for Public Policy Research website. The feature image is of Jorge Ramos of UNIVISION interviewing Senator Marco Rubio

Young Alchemists Make a Patriotic Invitation to All Presidential Candidates

HOUSTON, TX /PRNewswire/ — The Young Alchemists Foundation, a patriotic nonprofit organization for planetary healing, has written a letter to the President and to all presidential candidates inviting them to join their global movement to plant the seed of patriotism in the hearts and minds of our youth. The American children are losing their culture and no one is doing anything to prevent it.

This patriotic campaign has been initiated by the Young Alchemists, a group of extraordinary teenagers that in a fun way will educate, protect, inspire and entertain the youth of America!

young alchemists logoTo the President and all Presidential Candidates
United States of America

Dear Mr. President and Presidential Candidates,

The Young Alchemists Foundation, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization for planetary healing-guardians of our youth, protectors of the planet and defenders of World Peace, has initiated a global movement to educate, inspire and entertain the youth of planet earth in a fun way. This movement was born in the United States and it is for this reason the first mission of the Young Alchemists Foundation is to help revive the American spirit and restore the Spirit of God and Patriotism in the hearts of all American children without distinction of race, culture or religious affiliation.

The young Alchemists are here to remind Americans and immigrants from all over the world that they live in this land of freedom.  As parents and citizens of this nation, their duty and responsibility is to teach their children to love and respect God and the ideals, culture and traditions that made the United States of America the greatest nation in the world. The Young Alchemists Foundation has created this patriotic movement because the American children are losing their culture and we must educate and protect them from negative influences determined to win their hearts and persuade them to betray their country, themselves, their families and all humanity.

As president and presidential candidates of the United States of America and role models for the American children, with much love and respect, we ask you to join our cause and become Alchemist Knights and American patriots; support our movement and help the Young Alchemists Foundation to teach our American children respect for their country, its culture and for the American heroes and martyrs that have contributed to make our nation the greatest nation in the world. 

If you agree with our movement, help us to remind the world that the American Spirit is alive in our hearts and in the hearts of our children our future leaders and our only hope for a better world.

Remember, it’s great to help children around the world; however it will be a great disgrace for the future of this nation if we neglect our own.


Norma Pastor
Founder, Young Alchemists Foundation

The Young Alchemists Foundation
2135 Hill Canyon CT
Sugar Land Texas 77479
Tel: 281 781 4385

Trey Gowdy Backs Ineligible Candidate for President

Dear Representative Gowdy,

I have no idea how much time you spent vetting Mr. Rubio but you missed a most important point and that is Rubio is not a Natural Born Citizen which is a requirement to serve as president or vice President of the United States.

Marco Rubio was born in Miami in 1971 to Cuban parents who were not U.S. citizens

It is more than a stretch to simply say being born on U.S. Soil makes a child a Natural Born Citizen. If in fact that were true there would be no need for the requirement for it to be in the Constitution. Since all children born here of illegal aliens (anchor babies) and to mothers from around the world who come to have a child on U.S. Soil (birth tourism) so the child automatically is deemed a U.S. Citizen and the mother returns to whichever country she came from with baby and social security number in hand would be deemed Natural Born Citizens. Do you really believe all of these children are Natural Born Citizens?

By the way Steve King’s H.R. 140 would solve the above problems. Are you a co-sponsor?

I have been a resident of Florida for thirty years and witnessed Rubio’s entire state career from his cosponsoring a Florida Dream Act bill for illegal alien children to barring committee meetings dealing with containing the illegal aliens in the state.

Rubio won the election because Florida’s citizens suffer an annual cost to educate, medicate and incarcerate illegal aliens at of over $FIVE BILLION and wanted a senator that would oppose amnesty as he promised to do. He betrayed Florida’s voters when he joined the Gang of Eight whose main purpose was to grant amnesty to the illegal aliens.

Interestingly enough another Cuban American by the name of Mel Martinez pulled the same betrayal of Florida voters in 2004 winning the senate seat opposing amnesty only to lead the push in 2007 to pass amnesty.

My favorable impression of you has diminished dramatically with the decision by you to support a candidate who has a checkered past and as a former prosecutor did not adequately vett him perhaps believing he was just another of the “good ole boys” in the senate.


George R. Fuller

PS: I’ll be shocked if he does well in the Florida primary since voters are not quick to forgive a politician that betrayed them.

Letter to the RNC RE: Request for donations using Donald Trump’s name

Dear Republican National Committee Co-Chair Sharon Day,

You sent me the below email asking for my financial support using the good name of Mr. Donald Trump. My last communication with Mr. Trump was he is funding his own campaign and that he did not authorize you to use his name in this way. This is a slight of hand. This is political whoring.

You set me a deadline of 7:00 p.m. to pay you. Seriously? Mr. Trump says not so.

The GOP does not represent Mr. Trump as a fund raising tool under the leadership of John Boehner, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell it does not represent me and millions of others like me across this nation.

With all due respect Mr. GOP RNC – I will not give a dime to the Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Obama friendly Obama care – Planned Parenthood supporting good ole boy country club. Period.

Patriots if you get this same E mail below Mr. Trump has not authorized it or the use of his name in such fund raising efforts by the RNC. He is funding his own campaign and this is deceit.

Senior Chief Geoff Ross
US Navy retired
Surface Warfare Air Warfare


gop.com logo

Senior Chief Geoff Ross,

Before Trump takes the stage at tonight’s debate, I’ll be giving him a list of his most active supporters within our Party.

Since you’ve identified as a Trump supporter, I wanted to make sure you had the opportunity to make it on his list.

Contribute $100, $75, $50, or even just $35 to identify yourself as one of Trump’s earliest supporters within our Party.

Trump could proudly see your name on his list of supporters before he gets up on that stage and fights for his platform in front of millions of Americans.

To send these lists over before the debate, I’m setting a firm 7 PM deadline.

And when I give this list to Team Trump, here’s what I’m going to say:
These are Trump’s earliest supporters who have pledged their commitment from the very start
Trump can confidently turn to them when he comes under fire and needs help
…and every single one of them has already made a contribution to the nominee’s war chest
Be one of Trump’s earliest supporters. Get your name on Trump’s list before 7 PM TONIGHT.

If Trump is our nominee, I can guarantee you that millions of conservatives will claim they stood by him from the very beginning.

But with your name on this list of early supporters — before we even have a nominee — both you and Trump will know the truth: that you stood by him before everybody else.

Show your early commitment and get your name on Trump’s list today.


Sharon Day
Republican National Committee

Socialism/Communism: A Paradox of Incompetence

Knowledge of Socialism/Communism is the key issue in the elections of 2016. And this was the exact reason I began this series with the presentation of both to show their nefarious influence in America for the last 50-60 years. I planned to title this column “A Paradox of Incompetence”, then I change my mind. Yet, I was not the first one to warn America of the danger of infiltration of the Socialism/Communism ideology on our soil. The following law was enacted 60 years ago:

The Communist Control Act (68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844) is a piece of United States federal legislation, signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954, which outlawed the Communist Party of the United States and criminalized membership in, or support for the Party or “Communist-action” organizations and defined evidence to be considered by a jury in determining participation in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of such organizations.

An Act to outlaw the Communist Party, to prohibit members of Communist organizations from serving in certain representative capacities, and for other purposes.CCA
Acronyms (colloquial)

The question is whether our political class have the fortitude to execute the law or not. The events during the last decade definitely present the negative answer—they did not defend free market capitalism. The Democrats have even gone so far as to legitimize the notion of Soviet Socialism, which is a fraud and in doing so they open the door for our enemies to undermine our political system. The Republicans did not fight like Newt Gingrich in the 1990s— they didn’t stop the aggressive posture of Socialism in America. The last decade was a decade of paralyzed opposition.

Teaching in two largest universities in New York City, I had a close ties with young people at the end of the 20th century. I knew that they had been seduced by the fake positive appearance of Socialism and I tried to educate them by bringing them the truth about the creations of Marxist theory. For my efforts I was fired from both universities—the Socialist professors prevailed and you can realize the impact of that today in the election of 2016–an army of indoctrinated and deceived youth. Today young people naively assume that they will continue to enjoy liberty and private property under Socialism.

If our youth is indoctrinated, deceived and fascinated with a new-for-them term Socialism, the Republican establishment is just incompetent and timid for not arguing against Socialism and praising Capitalism. During the Republican candidates’ debate on February 6, 2016, just two days before the New Hampshire primary, Rubio drew mockery for repeating a rehearsed line four times and most analysts predicted his defeat that would to give new life to the struggling candidacies of the Republican establishment governors: Christie, Bush, and Kasich.  I saw the event in a completely opposite way.

For me, the Rubio rehearsed phrase (though he could’ve changed the wording) was the main point of our entire election—Obama intentionally harming our country. What Rubio repeated four times, I have been writing about for years. From childhood to the present Obama has clung to the same mantra—American capitalism is the guilty party for all the unfairness, grievances, and inequality in the world.  It is Obama’s core Socialist principles learned from Saul Alinsky and Marshal Davis. That is why Rubio was right to repeat the axiom. His critics paid attention to the form and none of them mentioned the substance.

A result for the main accuser Governor Christie was suicidal—he withdrew from the race for presidency. That was one example of paradox of incompetence—aspects of the official establishment of the GOP are incompetent, they missed the opportunity to expose Socialist Agents of Influence “working” for decades on our American soil. Unfortunately, incompetence has a lot of company in 2016 America—they all underestimated the incredibly smart people of America and their deep love for their country.

The GOP has never misses the opportunity to miss an opportunity. We saw it when the icon of conservatism the National Review tried to discredit Republican front-runner Trump. “Trump is a philosophically unmoored political opportunist who would trash the broad conservative ideological consensus within the GOP in favor of a free-floating populism…”

There is no “ideological consensus,” in the party. I was a member of the Conservative Party in New York City in the 1980s. That experience taught me the difficulty of finding consensus. Besides, the party itself was a microscopic one, let alone the age of the people there. I left it. I remember disagreements between social conservatives, fiscal conservatives, and a huge paradigm of different types of conservatives seeking consensus. I am still a conservative, writing about Stalin’s Soviet Fascism that is destroying America today, yet nationally recognized conservatives are not talking about or calling a spade a spade. Where are the conservatives who know that Putin again praising Stalin, using his image and his tricks in Russia to prop up the human spirit there by creating an outside enemy— America? This knowledge will serve all conservatives the best–national security should be the issue around which we find our consensus, real consensus.

The National Review openly agitated the voters: Don’t vote for Trump, he is an existential threat to the party. This was a kick below the belt, a knife in the back of the Republican Party and its future. The words “Trump is a philosophically unmoored political opportunist” is a mere offence of a front-runner at a time when we are entering the point of no return due to the Democrats adherence to the ideology of socialism, I called Soviet fascism. This is another paradox of incompetence that forces me to return to the ideology of socialism.

Look at Bernie Sanders; he called himself a Democratic-Socialist. Respecting his age, I won’t use rude words, but Democratic-Socialist is an oxymoron.  Why isn’t the National Review addressing the most important issue of our days, the ideology of Socialism? It is currently being accepted as a valid political philosophy in America, seducing an army of young people to vote for Sanders, who is clueless about real socialism. Don’t the people of the National Review see the upcoming catastrophe, created by the Socialists masquerading as Democrats, led by Obama?

A 74 year Democrat’s candidate for the US presidency Sanders displays a spectacular ignorance in talking about the Scandinavian countries: there are no Democrat-Socialists in their leadership, they are Social-Democrats. Sanders does not recognize the difference. The terms Social and Socialist are different words carrying different notions. Socialism ultimately results in dictatorship, represented by a one-party system; Europe has among other parties Social-Democratic Party, some members of which are in the leadership of the country. Go to Greece and see what is going on there, when Communists and Socialists are in power.

The term Socialism is an abstract notion for the vast majority of Americans.  Discussing the nature of Socialism would be very beneficial for Americans. It would expose Stalin’s tricks and how they are being used by his devoted disciples in the Democrat Party of America. Do you remember the collapse of the Soviet Union? Socialism had never worked anywhere—Socialism had produced Chernobyl. That is the real socialism. The Stalinist model is a waste of time, waste of money, waste of human energy, and very importantly, being openly implemented by Obama in his transformation of America. Those who are familiar with my writings know that. We are the witnesses of how Hillary, Sanders and Obama are using Stalin’s Political Correctness to deceive the voters by false hopes today.

Hillary, Sanders and Obama are operating off the same page and theatrics from the KGB’s play-book, written by Stalin. They are using political correctness to deceive and fool YOU. Do you remember Stalin’s formula or model, substituting the result with the process? All three are doing just that—they can’t keep their promises, and like Stalin’s promises, they will never be delivered. Yet, I will go further, because today Obama represents the Democrat Party and both candidates Hillary and Sanders—will continue Stalinism, they are his devoted disciples in America.

Sometimes the methods or activities of the candidates indicate their ideology. Reportedly, Sanders is using bussing to bring young people from the different towns in Iowa. This is a Red Flag! Obama provided money for the Democrats to use this method in the election 2012 in America and later in Israel to bus Arabs to the voting pricings to vote against Netanyahu in 2015. Do you know the origin of the method? It came from Russia, Putin uses young people by bussing them to different precincts to vote for his United Russia Party. The method is called carousel (roundabout).What is Happening to America? Xlibris, 2012, pp.191-192.

.Look at the current event presented by Accuracy in Media: Did Putin Strike in the Heart of Washington, D.C.? Cliff Kincaid — January 21, 2016 3 Comments   |   Printer Friendly  “ With the release of the British report into the role of the Russian government in the death of former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko in London, some attention is returning to how President Vladimir Putin murders his perceived enemies…  Last November…the Russian creator of the propaganda channel, Russia Today (RT), Mikhail Lesin, was found dead in a Washington D.C. hotel room. Former FBI agent John Whiteside, who handled Russian espionage cases, told me in an interview that it wouldn’t surprise him if Putin had engineered the death of Lesin. ‘Putin is a KGB guy through and through,’ …The speculation in the media is that Lesin was in Washington, D.C. to cooperate with the FBI, and expose corruption and other misdeeds by the Putin regime.”

As you can see Stalinist Socialism, his tricks and methods are alive and well in the 21st century. Instead of discussing the principal philosophy of Socialism, which has definitely entered our soil, the National Review attacks and damages Trump, who is up to now a front-runner for the Republicans. Moreover, just wait for the real actions of Russia and Iran against Donald J. Trump. The usual arsenal of the KGB’s dirty tricks will be unleashed, including assassinations, to prevent Trump from winning the election in America. Trump is an existential threat to the worldwide Soviet Mafia I have been writing about for the last twenty years. Be prepared for those dirty tricks in America.

My warning has been echoing in Europe:

“Today our civilization is still in danger, as a matter of fact worse than ever before. We are facing an existential threat. You can see it everywhere, in all Western European countries. Our borders have been opened to Islamic mass immigration. And the consequences are terrible. The costs are gigantic, the attacks horrible and the threat of terrorism has never been higher. So we need to act.” – Statement by Geert Wilders Press conference Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF) Milano, 29 January, 2016

Often history repeats itself as a farce. The Russian Socialist Revolution in 1917, had been a tragedy for the country and the world. Some historians called Russian revolution a coup de etas.  The centennial of the October Socialist Revolution in Russia is coming in 2017. Since its inception, it has caused untold misery, wars, starvation and millions of deaths, and now the entire planet is on fire.  It seems, we are witnessing an attempt to repeat the same dirty scheme playing in the America soil hundred years later. Sanders is not only a Socialist, he even uses a typical Stalin’s lexicon—“the working class.” America doesn’t have class divisions, but Russia did. Sanders also calls for “transformation of America,” aren’t we in a stage of Obama’s transformation now?

Don’t be surprised by Bernie Sanders’ speeches resonating with the army of millennials. The youth are the main targets of socialism. The incremental transformation is taking place as Obama passes the torch to Sanders. The attempt to infiltrate our elections by the KGB has been going on since McGovern—now, an open Socialist Sanders confirms it in the 21st century. Do you know who is behind the man? Have you heard about “Trojan Horse?” We have already met two.

There is another paradox of incompetence.  Website Wikipedia gives us information on Sanders and on some of his “relatives who remained in Poland were killed in the Holocaust.” It is perhaps the greatest irony of his political career, in spite of knowing the evil that was perpetuated by the National Socialist Party in Germany, Sanders has embraced socialism his entire life. Once in the United States Congress, Sanders founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus. For your information Nazi is an acronym of National Socialist Party of Fascist Germany. You can now see an extricable chain-connection in the history between fascism and socialism and begin to grasp our political predicament in the 21st century.

According to David Horowitz’s FrontPageMag.com website: “Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) are undoubtedly socialists, though most shy away from the label. The CPC has long had ties to the far-left Institute for Policy Studies, Democratic Socialists of America (the largest Marxist group in the country), and the Communist Party USA.” David Horowitz is right, the source of the current socialist movement in America goes back to the fraudulent Marxist Theory, exposed by this exact series titled Soviet Fascism in the 21st Century.

Now you can see a logical ideological connection of the 20s century to the reality in the events in the 21st century—Soviet Socialism is in fact Soviet Fascism. It has become a legitimate model implemented in America by the Democrat Party and its leader President Obama. There is another paradox of incompetence– the ideology of Soviet Fascism emanates from the fraudulent Marxist Theory … See more at www.simonapipko1.com.

Yet, I will go further, because today Obama represents the Democrat Party and both candidates Hillary and Sanders.

RELATED ARTICLE: Obama Administration Once Again Concedes to Putin in Syria

Florida Federation of Republican Women Launches Aggressive 2016 Legislative Advocacy Program

TALLAHASSEE – The Florida Federation of Republican Women has launched an aggressive legislative program to give a voice and action to responsible women across Florida.

“Our members want to clarify that the liberal League of Women Voters does not speak for us at the ballot box or at the Florida Legislature,” said Dena Decamp FFRW president.

“Women want jobs and to create businesses in a friendly atmosphere free of burdensome regulations and high taxes. Women want opportunity and safety for themselves and their families. We have long advocated for education excellence, smaller government at the state and national level, support for Veterans and abuse prevention of children, adults, and animals. In 2016, are again putting a strong voice to those efforts,” said DeCamp.

The 2016 FFRW legislation advocacy program will focus on issues such as preventing human trafficking, animal cruelty, abuse of Florida’s elderly and vulnerable adults, reducing small business rental rates, and boycotting companies that boycott Israel.

“As charity begins at home, legislative action begins at the grassroots level. Our members represent the political grassroots in counties across this state,” said DeCamp. The Florida Federation of Republican Women is composed of 50 county organizations and thousands of women volunteers in Florida.

DeCamp went on to say that the members of her organization, in addition to legislative advocacy, will reprise their leadership roles to work in tandem with the GOP to elect officials at every level to stamp out the over-reach of the Federal government in Florida.



The Florida Federation of Republican Women (FFRW) was chartered in 1950 and is comprised of  over 50 clubs throughout the state that share our goals and ideals. We are affiliated with the National Federation of Republican Women (NFRW), a grassroots organization of around 100,000  women throughout the country who support Republican candidates and issues at all levels of government.

FFRW nurtures a powerful network of women in both large cities and small communities who produce results in elections.

We commit ourselves to advancing the participation of Republican Women in all areas of the political system and are dedicated to encouraging and empowering women of all ages and backgrounds.  Our goal is strengthening the Republican Party and working to influence the crucial issues that face our communities, state, and nation.  Learn more by clicking here. 

Census Bureau Demographic and Economic Profiles of South Carolina’s Electorate

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — In advance of the South Carolina primaries onFeb. 20 and Feb. 27, the U.S. Census Bureau presents a variety of statistics that give an overall profile of the state’s voting-age population and industries. Statistics include:


Cruz: His Momma is Natural Born. Thus, So is He.

Stunning pundits who said a conservative could not score high in New Hampshire, congrats to Ted Cruz for finishing strong in the primary.

Okay folks, here is why Ted Cruz is eligible to be president according to the Constitution. First, I wish to give a shout-out to my dear friend, Mike “Mr Constitution” Holler, author of “The Constitution Made Easy.” Mike explained and confirmed Cruz’s eligibility.

In a nutshell, the first immigration law passed by Congress and signed by George Washington says, “And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens…” An additional qualification is that the father of such children must have lived at some time in the US. There you have it folks.

The Congressional Research Service published a paper on this question.

“Considering the history of the constitutional provision, the clause’s apparent intent, the English common law expressly applicable in the American colonies and in all of the original states, the common use and meaning of the phrase “natural born” subject in England and the American colonies in the 1700s, and the subsequent action of the first Congress in enacting the Naturalization Act of 1790 (expressly defining the term “natural born citizen” to include those born abroad to U.S. citizens), it appears that the most logical inferences would indicate that the phrase “natural born Citizen” would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth.” Such interpretation, as evidenced by over a century of American case law, would include as natural born citizens those born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction regardless of the citizenship status of one’s parents, or those born abroad of one or more parents who are U.S. citizens (as recognized by statute), as opposed to a person who is not a citizen by birth and is thus an “alien” required to go through the legal process of naturalization to become U.S. Citizen.”

While some question Cruz’s eligibility out of respect for the Constitution, I suspect others have ulterior motives.

GOP establishment elites are exploiting ignorance regarding Cruz’s eligibility because they despise Cruz. Who does this guy think he is bucking the system; standing up for The People against the Washington Cartel; getting into the face of GOP Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell? By the way, McConnell announced that the GOP will not oppose Obama in anyway this year; fearful it would anger voters and hurt the GOP’s chances of winning the White House

McConnell’s surrender gifted Obama free rein to continue regarding the U.S. Constitution as little more than toilet paper. Thus, our outlaw president will fast-track implementing as many anti-American and anti-God leftist dream initiatives as possible in his remaining time in office.

Ted Cruz has been and continues to be a rare voice sounding-the-alarm and pushing back against Obama repealing our God-given freedom and liberty.

Then, there are those who simply do not believe a true conservative can win the general election. They are using the bogus issue of Cruz’s eligibility as cover for not supporting a fellow Christian and stand up guy.

Voters who do not believe a true conservative can win the presidency are, in essence, saying they believe we have lost our country. Righteousness, morals and traditional values no longer rule the day. Thus, Cruz is too goody-two-shoes for the masses.

Well, I do not believe that folks. I believe that if we rally behind Ted Cruz, a good man can still win the presidency in America.

Proverbs 29:2 – “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.”

Let’s put the “righteous in authority” folks, Ted Cruz.

No, Women Are Not Obliged to Vote for Hillary by Sarah Skwire

“There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.”

It’s one of Madeline Albright’s most famous lines, and she’s brought it out on any number of occasions. Starbucks even put it on a coffee cup. I understand why. It’s eminently quotable and suggests a kind of tough-minded sisterhood that can be appealing. I can see its ready application, for example, when helping a drunk friend get home safely from a party or when holding another mom’s infant so she can use the restroom in peace.

But Albright should have been a lot more careful before she applied her signature line to what she sees as an obligation for women to vote for Hillary Clinton in the democratic primaries. Because the minute that you take her line out of the context of relationships among people and move it to the political context it loses whatever tough-minded charm it has, and it becomes a bullying, sexist, prescriptivist piece of obnoxious nonsense.

I don’t believe in hell, so threatening me with it has never had much purchase. But to the best of my understanding, for religions that do believe in hell, the things that get people sent there are sins against God or against other people. Taking a political action that someone doesn’t agree with (voting for someone other than Hillary Clinton) doesn’t seem to fit that bill in any way. Suggesting that it does mingles church and state in ways that sit uncomfortably with long American traditions.

And even if voting in a way that Albright thinks is wrong is a sin that leads to damnation, if Albright really is a believer in eternal torment and hellfire, she should probably be led by the many New Testament verses that counsel believers to use gentle correction and instruction toward those who have gone astray.

If Albright isn’t a believer in eternal torment and hellfire, she might be well advised to keep theology out of her politics entirely.

But even if we leave aside the myriad objections that arise when a bullying and inaccurate theology is dragged into the political realm, Albright’s insistence that women have a duty to vote for Clinton because she is also a woman remains moronic.

It is sexism of the oldest and most annoying type. With one comment, Albright managed to suggest the following:

  1. Women should shut up and vote the way they are told to vote.
  2. All women should vote the same way.
  3. All women have the same interests and objectives.
  4. Women who have made choices others disagree with have chosen incorrectly and must be brought back into line.
  5. Women cannot be trusted to recognize (and vote in favor of) their best interests.

Women have, over the centuries, gotten quite practiced at responding to these particular bits of idiocy. So while it’s disconcerting, at best, to hear this tosh from a woman of Albright’s stature and experience, it’s not particularly challenging to formulate an intelligent response. In fact, one thing that makes Albright’s comment so maddening is that, to many women, it seems so incredibly retrograde when applied to politics. It ignores the very real progress made by 21st century feminist thinkers in recognizing the different kinds of lives lived by different kinds of women — from different classes, of different colors, with different religions, of different sexualities, and in different bodies. By shouting right over that kind of nuance, Albright’s comment sounds like it’s stuck in the feminism of the 1960s.

But it’s worse than that. In its gender essentialism — its insistence that women are all women and therefore all alike — Albright’s comment could have been ripped right out of the first years of the 20th century. Or the 19th century. Or the 18th.

Happily, we have had Mary Wollstonecraft around for the past nearly 225 years to respond to that kind of nonsense. Albright would do better if, like Wollstonecraft, she would “consider women in the grand light of human creatures, who, in common with men, are placed on this earth to unfold their faculties.”

Telling a woman how she should vote because she is a woman is no less insulting than telling her that she shouldn’t vote because she is a woman. Both approaches deny an individual the opportunity to unfold her unique faculties as she sees fit. Both approaches reduce a complex individual to a single characteristic. Politics routinely does this to all sorts of groups — women, people of color, people of faith, gun owners — and it is in every case an insult to the dignity of the individual.

But Albright’s comment does something even worse. Or perhaps, for our purposes, it does something even better. Albright’s comment reveals the truth about politics. And that truth is that Clinton’s run for the White House, like Sanders’s run, or Trump’s, or Bush’s, or Cruz’s, or anyone’s, is not about serving the people.

We are told to vote for Clinton because we have a special duty to help other women. But Albright and Clinton do not mean that we have a special duty to the women standing next to us in line at the grocery store, or to the women who are suffering from poverty, or out of work, or abused by their spouses, or harassed by their bosses. They mean that we have a special duty to one woman: Hillary Clinton. It is our duty, as women, to help her to a spot in the White House, because no woman has done that before. Seeing her up there proves … something. And it will make us all feel … something.

That’s pretty weak tea, Albright.

But it is, at least, weak tea that exposes the fundamental truth about politics. It’s not about helping women. Or men. Or people of color. Or the unemployed. Or whomever we are told it is about helping.

It’s about helping the politician.

And I’ll be damned if I’m going to do that.

Sarah SkwireSarah Skwire

Sarah Skwire is the poetry editor of the Freeman and a senior fellow at Liberty Fund, Inc. She is a poet and author of the writing textbook Writing with a Thesis. She is a member of the FEE Faculty Network.

VIDEO: Terrorists to Register 1 Million U.S. Muslim Voters

Nihad Awad, Executive Director of the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), calls for Muslims to use their mosques for Voter Registration and Polling Stations with the aim of registering 1,000,000 Muslim Voters!

According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism:

Nihad Awad is among the founders of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and serves as its executive director. In that role, he has attained a degree of political clout, invited to stand beside President George W. Bush at the Islamic Center of Washington days after the 9/11 attacks. Before that, Vice President Al Gore appointed Awad to a civil rights advisory panel for the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security.

These are influential recognitions for a man with past ties to Hamas, designated a foreign terrorist organization by the United States in 1995. In fact, Awad publicly declared “I am in support of the Hamas movement,” during a March 1994 symposium at Barry University.


The aim of CAIR is to CHANGE the way AMERICA looks.

Click here to read the full dossier on CAIR.

TrustTheVote™ Project Launched

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire/ — 2016 NASS Conference – The non-profit technology research institute Open Source Election Technology (OSET) Foundation today announced that it is collaborating with Amazon Web Services (AWS) on the Foundation’s TrustTheVote Project.  The project is an open source initiative that makes the software used to run elections free to the States and counties managing elections. OSET and AWS are working together on thought leadership and outreach to champion the cause with decision-makers and researchers also working to improve elections. The cloud-driven open source approach means that anyone can adopt and adapt OSETs existing apps for voter services, like online registration and results reporting, and launch these apps and services faster and more cost effectively.  With the open source nature of the tools, modification and improvement is possible by anyone.

Finding ways to innovate the critical infrastructure of elections administration is imperative. In 2014 the US had 178,636 election precincts and over 114,000 physical polling places spread out over 7000 Election Jurisdictions in all 50 states and 3,143 Counties. Elections occur every week, including primaries, ballot initiatives, and voter referenda. American University estimated that there were 519,682 elected officials United States in 2012. A study released in September 2015 by the Brennan Center for Justice revealed that the vast majority of the nation is relying on archaic voting technology with severely limited budgets to make any improvements to either elections administration tools or voting machinery.

OSET launched the TrustTheVote Project to foster innovation in elections technology, which is outdated, difficult to maintain, and in the case of voting machinery, relies on proprietary software that’s difficult to inspect or audit.  The administration tools project is run on AWS’s GovCloud (US), because it offers a cost effective, secure, compliant, and scalable solution that doesn’t require buying hardware, and can be delivered easily anywhere in the country. OSET’s TrustTheVote Project so far includes software for handling voter registration services, ballot generation, and election results reporting.

The OSET Foundation’s goal is to improve the critical infrastructure that makes fair and verifiable elections possible and help revitalize an industry that needs innovation.  “Cloud technology combined with open data, open standards, and open source development has the potential to be a game-changer in election administration,” said Teresa Carlson, VP, Worldwide Public Sector, Amazon Web Services, Inc. “The OSET Foundation is taking advantage of the cloud’s ability to help lower costs, while increasing innovation in voter registration services, creating ballots, and reporting election results.”  Gregory Miller, Chief Development Officer for the OSET Foundation explained, “There are several aspects of managing elections that can be innovated. There is enormous opportunity to innovate the many aspects of managing election processes.”

AWS is supporting OSET with cloud computing credits, and elections administration software will be available on AWS Marketplace, and helping with outreach to elections officials. “Now on the AWS GovCloud (US), the TrustTheVote Project technology can be developed, demonstrated, and proven for any State or county looking to rapidly deploy election administration services, while gaining the agility, cost savings, compliance, and scalability offered by the AWS Cloud,” said John Sebes, Chief Technology Officer for the OSET Foundation.

For example, the TrustTheVote Project offers open source online voter registration and services portal software for any State or county to use for a fraction of the cost of building such web services from the ground up.  “We are thrilled to host this technology on the AWS Cloud to further our open source efforts to innovate election administration in the digital age for the benefit of the public,” added Miller.  “Cloud-based voter registration, ballot design, and elections results reporting is an ideal start to lowering costs and improving the public trust in our democracy. I anticipate this is the beginning of a unique collaboration to help develop new elections technology for the public benefit.”

About the OSET Foundation

The Open Source Election Technology (“OSET”) Foundation is a 9-year old tax-exempt 501.c.3 non-profit technology research and development institute located in the heart of the Silicon Valley focused on electoral innovation.  OSET is led by a team of social entrepreneurs comprised of seasoned technologists with extensive hardware, software, and systems design experience from leading Tech Sector companies including Apple, Netscape, Facebook, and Sun Microsystems.  OSET is focused on making voting systems more verifiable, accurate, secure, and transparent using open source principles to treat this technology as “critical democracy infrastructure.”  The OSET mission is to reinvent voting technology using open data, open standards, and open source in order to increase confidence in elections and their outcomes, and improve voter participation.  The outcome of that mission will deliver lower cost higher quality publicly owned election technology and rejuvenate the commercial industry to deliver, deploy, service, and support resulting democratic voting systems globally.

RELATED ARTICLE: Is Twitter Censoring Non-Politically Correct Viewpoints?

Bernie trounced Hillary in NH Primary despite his Israel Hating Advisers

Bernie Sanders may have trounced Hillary Clinton in yesterday’s New Hampshire primary by a significant double digit margin with his Wall Street bashing and Swedish-style entitlement giveaways trolling for millennials and the economically disaffected.  However little known are his foreign policy advisers who are notoriously anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian. Among them are Jim Zogby of the Arab American Institute, former Defense official Larry Korb and, of course, the Soros-funded operatives of J Street.

Adam Credo’s article in yesterday’s Washington Free Beacon article noted the views of these ‘foreign policy’ advisers, “Meet Bernie Sanders’ Israel Hating Advisers.”   You thought his stint in a left Socialist Hashomer Hatzair Israeli kibbutz in his 20’s would make him a lifelong Zionist defender of the Jewish State. As my mythic cousin Vinny from Brooklyn would say, FERGEDABOTIT. Just look at his brother who lives in the UK, a supporter of the anti-Israel pro-Palestinian Labor Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn.  Bernie congratulations Corbyn on his victory winning the Labor Party leadership. The UK Daily Mail article  noted his email to Corbyn saying:

The Democrat presidential hopeful said he is ‘delighted’ to support a leader who ‘tells the billionaire class that they cannot have it all’.

‘At a time of mass income and wealth inequality throughout the world, I am delighted to see that the British Labor Party has elected Jeremy Corbyn as its new leader,’ he said in an email to Daily Mail Online.

‘We need economies that work for working families, not just the people on top.’

His words come after then Argentina’s President  Cristina Kirchner, since ousted by conservative successor Mauricio Macri, gushed that ‘hope has triumphed’ and that Corbyn ‘stands with Argentina’ in their anti-American stance.

Bernie also has a close friendship with notorious left wing anti-Israel advocate Noam Chomsky who endorsed him for President. They both share an Israeli kibbutz experience that in Chomsky’s case bolstered his Israel hating obsessions.

Watch this You Tube video of Chomsky’s endorsement of Bernie for President:

Note these comments from Noah Pollak, executive director of the Emergency Committee for Israel, Michael Rubin, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and Yehudit Barsky, fellow at Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy in Kredo’s Washington Free Beacon article:

Sanders, who is Jewish and had family members slaughtered during the Holocaust, recently disclosed that his top foreign policy advisers include J Street, a dovish Middle East advocacy group that backs some of Congress’ most vocal critics of Israel, former assistant Secretary of Defense Larry Korb, and James Zogby, an Israel detractor who heads the Arab American Institute.

The inclusion of these advisers in the Sanders’ campaign, which has already come under fire for ignoring prominent Jewish-American political organizations, has prompted speculation from some that the presidential hopeful will pursue anti-Israel foreign policy priorities.

“Bernie seems to care very little about foreign policy, and so his views are shaped inordinately by advisers,” said Noah Pollak, executive director of the Emergency Committee for Israel, an advocacy organization. “And now we know who those advisers are. Two of them—Zogby and J Street—are leading anti-Israel apologists for terrorism. By his association with these extremist groups, Bernie fails the commander-in-chief test.”

“If advisers are a crystal ball to the future of foreign policy, then Sanders seeks a policy which doubles down on many of the failed assumptions that have undercut Obama’s policies,” said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon adviser and terrorism analyst. “America’s adversaries are real and are motivated by ideology rather than grievance. To rest American national security on the good will of anti-American despots and Islamists is never a good gamble.”

Zogby has accused the Jewish state of committing a “Holocaust” against the Palestinians and has referred to Israelis as “Nazis.” He has also described sitting members of Congress as “Israel firsters,” an anti-Semitic trope that implies dual loyalty to the Jewish state.
Zogby also has come under fire for exploiting the memory of the Holocaust for political purposes.

Zogby claimed in a 2010 blog post for the Huffington Post that “the plight of Palestinians is to the Arabs, what the Holocaust is to Jews world-wide.”
His comparison immediately drew outrage, with researchers from the UK Media Watch organization describing it as “grievously insulting.”
“Nothing that I could say to highlight his words would make them any more insulting or horrid than they are on their own,” a representative of that group wrote at the time.

“Zogby has two goals: to make Arab Americans more powerful than Jewish Americans and to be their preeminent leader,” Yehudit Barsky, a fellow at the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy, wrote in a profile about Zogby’s anti-Israel attitudes.

J Street has faced similar criticism for its efforts to pressure Israel into making security concessions to the Palestinians that could endanger its survival.

J Street accused the Jewish state of “fanning growing flames of anti-Semitism” due to its efforts to stop daily attacks on civilians during Israel’s 2014 battle against Hamas terrorists.

The group’s leaders also have accused leading Israeli politicians of being racists.

We’ll see how Bernie Sanders fares in the upcoming Democratic primaries.  Given his radical background there was a reason why the media took to calling the city he was elected to serve the People’s Republic of Burlington.  With the FBI released a letter yesterday that Hillary is under investigation because of alleged confidential intelligence abuses using her private email server, you never know what can happen next in the 2016 Democrat Presidential nomination race.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review.