More examples of the dialectic attack on our basic rights and some rare, really good news!

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Dialectic Attacks

This is a really good look at one of the most annoying forms of dialectical attacks against whatever target they have in mind. In this case, the attack is specifically the leaping levels of abstraction. The left has done this for decades now in order to move or reallocate blame from a group, that could be said to be responsible for an issue, to one that they wish to destroy. They do this by messing with the various levels of taxonomy. One example would be how Islam kills a crap-load of people in the name of its religion, and the wily leftist will blame religion altogether for it, as the goal of the Marxist is to replace God with the state and religion with the never ending dialectical revolution of destruction. See? They move up the ladder one rung from which religion, to all religions. Or for example, a certain demographic of humanity may beat women or be more violent in general and the leftist will blame men overall.

We see this a great deal especially in the past few years. The inverse of this trick is where the leftist will accuse a non-leftist of doing it with the trope: “So what you’re saying is..”

Below, in the left’s attempt to ban all means of self defence or force equalizers in the hands of the public, they are now going after a certain brand of ammunition. The reason being of course, once you can ban a brand of ammo for being used in a crime, you can ban all ammo used in a crime and hey presto! only the state will have access to force multipliers.

Stephen Coughlin: Communism is only the dialectic attack on Western civilization

Some great news!

We interviewed Jesse around May of 2022. Please watch this video for the back story on this.

.Discrimination charge filed against Michigan salon after owner’s comments on gender identity

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A hair salon in northern Michigan is facing a discrimination charge from the state’s Department of Civil Rights after its owner posted on social media earlier this year that anyone identifying as other than a man or a woman is not welcome at her business.

The department claims in the charge filed Wednesday that Traverse City’s Studio 8 Hair Lab violated the state’s civil rights act in a Facebook post in July from its owner, Christine Geiger, by unlawfully discriminating against three claimants.

The post, which is no longer available, read, “If a human identifies as anything other than a man/woman please seek services at a local pet groomer. You are not welcome at this salon. Period. Should you request to have a particular pronoun used please note we may simply refer to you as ‘hey you.’”

A hearing will now be scheduled before an administrative law judge, who will issue a recommendation after hearing the merits of the complaint, according to the civil rights department. The recommendation will then go before Michigan’s Civil Rights Commission to either adopt or make their own ruling.

Some people still imagine that communism is somehow, an alternative economic model, as opposed to what it actually is. An actual war on reality itself as it is understood by Socratic thinkers. Economics was just one of the prime vectors of attack by communists in the 20th century. This century it’s culture. In the story above, we see another excellent example of this. A woman who owns a business which is singularity geared towards helping men and women achieve greater and greater displays of reproductive fitness, refuses to deal with people who pretend to be something that does not exist. As a consequence, she has charges against her for not indulging the fantasies of what are inevitably communists or their pawns.

Video evidence confirms Hamas using Al-Shifa hospital as Base, contrary to the propaganda.

Met Police admit they lost London to Muslim protestors.

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tapes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Johnson Scores First Win, Dodging Shutdown and Year-End Bloat

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

That sound you hear in Washington, D.C. is every congressional staffer breathing a sigh of relief. For once, the Hill will be home at a reasonable time for Christmas — not staring down another government shutdown or stuffing an unread trillion-dollar omnibus down the Democrats’ chimney. In the real first hurdle of Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) young tenure, the House did as he asked: they passed a budget bridge to next year that spares America a whole lot of headaches.

By a 336-95 vote, the House decided to cut Mike Johnson some slack — agreeing to his unique “laddered” approach to the continuing resolution (CR) that buys Republicans more time to live up to their fiscal promises. “We were a little bit behind the eight ball here,” Glenn Grothman (R-Wisc.) admitted to Family Research Council President Tony Perkins immediately following the vote. “Your listeners will remember that we went through a long process without a speaker.” Now that the House has one, he pointed out, it will take some extra time for the chamber “to get our work done.”

With just days to go before a government shutdown, Johnson made impassioned pleas for the GOP to come together and agree to a plan that gives the House a window to debate these budgets individually. “We’re not surrendering,” Johnson argued. “We’re fighting, but you have to be wise about choosing the fights. You’ve got to fight fights that you can win — and we’re going to.” But let’s face it, he said. “It took decades to get into this mess. I’ve been at this job three weeks. … I can’t turn an aircraft carrier overnight, but this was a very important first step to get us to the next stage so that we can change how Washington works.”

Leading up to the vote, several Republicans applauded Johnson for doing his best to avoid both a government shutdown and a 2,000-page “Christmas tree omnibus.” “We set that as one of our goals at the first of the year, that we did not want that to happen again,” Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) told Perkins. Under this plan, the House has until January 19 and February 2 to pass two waves of appropriations bills. “I personally like that,” Carter said. “I personally like the idea of doing it as you can. You know, how do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time, right? Well, let’s take these bites as we can get them, and then we go on and we work until February 2nd on everything else and try to get it done as well.”

Not every Republican agreed, insisting that anything the House passed — including a short-term CR — should have spending cuts. According to Grothman, Johnson openly confronted those critics, asking, “How is this going to end? How are you going to wind up ahead of the game by shutting down the government? Because eventually, it’s going to reopen.” And his point, Grothman said, was that “it will reopen when the Republicans get beat up in the news media. And none of these people who are voting against Mike today, breaking from our new speaker, could give him a reason or an explanation of how this was going to end.”

Johnson deserved better from his party, Grothman believed. “I felt sorry for our speaker. Most Republicans stuck with him, but on this first test, a lot didn’t. … He should have got[ten] … every single Republican to vote for him when he called for the vote. And sadly, [93] Republicans voted against him.”

Democrats filled in the blanks, pushing the CR across the finish line. Some, like Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Ct.), snarkily told the media, “Once again, the Republican majority needs Democratic votes to govern,” as if bipartisanship is suddenly the most shocking thing to happen to the House. And maybe it is. Apparently, Congress is so used to one party imposing its will that regular order and compromise seem foreign.

The 93 Republicans’ objections notwithstanding, Grothman insisted that “the most important thing is who wins the arguments over what’s in these bills” in the new year. “…And [with] this [laddered] CR, you’re not going to be able to [roll] every appropriation bill together [in a last-minute omnibus] and have one of these 2,000-page behemoths. You’re going to have to break out a separate vote on education, a separate vote on national defense, a separate vote on military construction and veterans affairs, general government. Hopefully we’ll get as many separate votes as possible so we know what’s in the bills, which will be really a feather in the cap of Mike Johnson. But in order to get there, we had to win today [and] give him more time to get things done. And we did that.”

To those who complain this CR doesn’t cut spending, Carter said, “I get it. But the point is, we’re not going to be able to get [the appropriations bills] done [by Friday’s deadline]. We’re not going to be able to get all 12 bills with the spending cuts done anytime soon, certainly not before January the 19th. And why not go ahead and do what we can do until then? And I know that there may be a certain amount of leverage when you have all of them together. But, you know, we’ve tried that, and it hasn’t worked,” he insisted. “I’ve always said Washington is about big ideas. This is a big idea [that’s] never been done before. We ought to try it.”

And frankly, Perkins replied, “What would be gained by shutting down the government?” The House has to work “inch by inch, mile by mile,” he said. This proposal “is a step in the right direction. It moves us toward responsible governing.”

Absolutely, Carter agreed. “Let’s take incremental wins when we can. Let’s move the ball down the field. No, it’s not a Hail Mary, no it’s not a long touchdown pass, but it is advancing the ball down the field.” As for blaming the speaker over what might have been done with the CR, Carter called that “unfair.” “Mike Johnson inherited this situation,” he insisted. “… And he’s doing the best he can with it. … Personally, I thought it was a dumb thing to do to vacate the chair and to get rid of the speaker, [Kevin] McCarthy. I thought that was a big error on our part, but it is what it is. It’s done.”

At the end of the day, Grothman believes, “Mike will pull us together. [He’s] such a sincere guy. Everybody knows he’s trying to do the best he can. And of course, right now, because we had a new Democrat sworn in [Monday], we only can afford to lose three votes. So it’s tough to have 218 of 221 stick together,” the Wisconsin congressman admitted. “But if anybody can do it, Mike can do it.”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Vivek Ramaswamy Launches FireRonna.com After Viral Debate Callout Of RNC Chair

/in , , , , , , /by

Business entrepreneur and White House hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign launched FireRonna.com, a petition to unseat the Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, the Daily Caller has learned first.

The petition aims to rally “grassroots conservatives” in support of Ramaswamy’s call for McDaniel to resign, one week after the presidential candidate called for the RNC leader to step down during the third primary debate, the Daily Caller learned. During his opening statement at the third presidential debate, Ramaswamy called the Republican Party the “party of losers” under McDaniels leadership, adding that he would cede his time to the chair if she would like to resign.

“I am sick and tired of this Republican Establishment that has made us a party of losers. Where is the accountability for years of losing: 2018, 2020, 2022 and now 2023,” Ramaswamy said in a press release obtained by the Daily Caller. “On the debate stage, I called on Ronna Romney McDaniel to resign. Now, I’m asking grassroots conservatives across the nation to join me so she can feel the power of the people. It’s time to stop the culture of surrender and losing. Resign, Ronna!”

NBC’s own Lester Holt opened the third presidential debate by asking each presidential candidate why they deserved to be the Republican nominee, rather than the front-runner former President Donald Trump. Ramaswamy used his time to answer to call out McDaniel.

“Since Ronna McDaniel took over as chairwoman of the RNC in 2017, we have lost 2018, 2020, 2022 – no red wave … We got trounced last night in 2023. And I think that we have to have accountability in our party,” Ramaswamy began, adding that he would cede his time on the stage to McDaniel if she would like to resign from the RNC.

Ramaswamy also blasted the RNC’s decision to allow NBC to host the third presidential debate. The RNC chose the outlet, alongside Salem Radio News and the Republican Jewish Coalition.

The moderators of the evening were Holt, NBC’s own Kristen Welker as well as Salem Radio News’ Hugh Hewitt. An RNC spokesperson has previously told the Daily Caller that the RNC does not choose the moderators but the outlets hosting do.

“Think about who’s moderating this debate, this should be Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk. We’d have ten times the viewership, asking questions the GOP primary voters actually care about and bringing in more people to our party. We got Kristen Welker here, you think the Democrats would actually hire Greg Gutfeld to host a Democratic debate?” Ramaswamy asked.

“The fact of the matter, and Kristen I’m gonna use this time ’cause this is actually about you and the media and the corrupt media establishment, ask you the Trump-Russia collusion hoax that you pushed on this network for years — was that real? Or was that Hillary Clinton made up disinformation? Answer the question. Go,” he continued.

McDaniel responded to Ramaswamy’s viral debate moment in an interview with CNN, saying that the presidential hopeful is just “looking for headlines.”

“Last I checked, I wasn’t running for president,” McDaniel said. “He’s at 4%, he’s looking for headlines.”

Members of the RNC have been quick to defend McDaniel and her leadership after Ramaswamy’s comments, many previously telling the Daily Caller that they found the presidential candidate’s comments to be “inappropriate” and “unfair.”

“The comments from Vivek last night were unfair. Ronna is doing an amazing job uniting our party and working to make [President] Joe Biden a one-term president. She is the exact right person to chair the committee in this moment.” Nevada GOP Chairman Michael J. McDonald said in an earlier statement provided to the Daily Caller.

“No one fights harder to get Republicans elected all over this country than Chairman McDaniel,” California GOP Chairwoman Jessica Millan Patterson added in a statement to the Daily Caller. “The infrastructure she has built and implemented is the strongest in our party’s history, including early and unprecedented investments into California. She’s the leader we need to help Republicans take back the White House, flip the Senate and hold the House next year.” 

AUTHOR

REAGAN REESE

White House correspondent.

RELATED ARTICLE: The RNC Said This Time Would Be Different, Yet The First Two Debates Have Conservatives Frustrated And Disappointed

RELATED POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

OB-GYN Testifies Before Congress on Alarming Miscarriage Spike Among Vaxxed Women, ‘I’ve Never Seen This Before’

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

The greatest medical crime in human history.

OB-GYN Testifies on Alarming Miscarriage Spike among Vaxxed Women

By: Frank Bergman, Slay News, November 14, 2023:

A leading American obstetrician-gynecologist, or OB-GYN, has testified before Congress regarding an alarming spike in miscarriages among women who have received Covid mRNA injections.

On Monday, Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OB-GYN who has been involved in 8,000 pregnancies, joined a panel of experts to testify before Congress in the “Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines” hearing on Capitol Hill.

“I’ve never seen this before,” Biss warned congressional lawmakers.

Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who led the hearing, asked Biss:

“How many of your patients or pregnant women that you know of experience miscarriages after taking the COVID-19 vaccines — or injections?”

Biss first explained that the vaccination rate among her patient population was about 60%.

She revealed that most of the patients received three injections.

“Very few received four or more,” Biss noted.

Read more.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE RELATED COVID VACCCINE ARTICLES

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Here Are the 8 Republicans Who Joined Democrats to Shelve Impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

The uniparty is systematically destroying this country. Biden’s migrant crisis will cost taxpayers $451 BILLION a year: Staggering Republican report lays out how much is spent on healthcare and accommodation (not to mention the threat to our national security) – as they tried to impeach “the border is secure“ Mayorkas for malfeasance.

The resolution was defeated with the support of eight Republicans, including:

  1. Cliff Bentz of California,
  2. Ken Buck of Colorado,
  3. Darrell Issa of California,
  4. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina,
  5. Tom McClintock of California,
  6. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina,
  7. John Duarte of California,
  8. and Mike Turner of Ohio.

All of these “republicans” sided with all Democrats in opposing the measure.

On Monday evening, the House voted to effectively kill a bold attempt by Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia to impeach Biden’s Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The bipartisan decision, with a vote of 209-201, involved referring the resolution to the House Homeland Security Committee.

UPDATE: US House Votes with 8 Republicans Joining Democrats to Shelve Impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Who Has Overseen the Purposeful Invasion at the US Border

By: Red Right Updates, November 14, 2023:

The House voted on Monday night on Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Articles of Impeachment against Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.

Following a vote on the Democrats’ Motion to Table, which is expected at approximately 6:30 pm ET, the House is expected to vote on Greene’s resolution.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Greene introduced the resolution following a tragic incident in which two of her constituents were killed by human traffickers near the border. These deaths and many more are the results of Biden and Mayorkas’ failure to control the border and prevent the entry of terrorists, human traffickers, drugs, and other contraband into the United States.

House Set to Vote Next Week on Impeaching DHS Secretary Mayorkas Following the Tragic Death of Two Americans by Traffickers

The resolution to impeach Mayorkas cites a long, long list of evidence – enough to fit on six pages – of Mayorkas’ failures as DHS Secretary.

Under Mayorkas the US southern border has remained wide open for three years. Nearly 10 million illegal aliens have walked across the open border and allowed into the United States.

This is the purposeful destruction of America.

This legislation is damning!

There is NO WAY that any US Representative who loves this country could allow this deranged man to continue as DHS Secretary.

Mayorkas impeachment resolu… by Cami Mondeaux

Mayorkas impeachment resolu… by Cami Mondeaux

The House just voted to shelve the legislation and refer Rep. Greene’s resolution to impeach DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to the Homeland Security Committee to prevent a vote tonight on the resolution itself. The motion to refer was offered by Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA).

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TERROR TOWN: Dearborn Heights, Michigan Raises ‘Palestinian’ Flags in Support of Hamas

/in , , , , , , , , /by

“Okay but where’s the American flag,” said one commenter.

Dearborn Heights, Michigan raises Palestinian flags in ‘solidarity’ with Gaza

“Okay but where’s the American flag,” said one commenter.

By: Libby Emmons, The Post Millenial Nov 14, 2023:

Local news outlet Dearborn posted a photo on their Instagram page praising the town of Dearborn Heights for plastering their welcome sign with Palestinian flags.

“This morning,” the outlet wrote, “in another show of solidarity, Palestinian flags were placed on the ‘Welcome to Dearborn Heights’ sign along Ford Road, highlighting the city’s support for the people of Palestine.”

Dearborn Heights is 84.1 percent “white,” per the latest census. The comments on the post were not entirely in solidarity with the sentiment.

“Okay but where’s the American flag,” said one commenter.

Another person said “don’t try and change flags in the USA. Our flag flies first then whatever flag. This is AMERICAN LAND. Keep that I’m mind.”

“We need more AMERICAN FLAGS in these ppls hands they all live in America. Where’s the American flag tho?” said another.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller 

RELATED ARTICLES:

MEF Investigation Exposes Hamas Funders in America

LIVE FROM DC: Hundreds of Thousands March for Israel in Washington, D.C.

“Suellaism is Here to Stay”

Pentagon Aide Part of ‘Covert Campaign’ to Undermine Iran Opposition: Report

BLOOD LIBEL: ‘DEI Teacher’ In Jewish Area Says Jews Kill Palestinians To Sell Their Organs

TREASON: Biden Moves To Approve of Fresh $10 Billion for Terror State of Iran

Nazi Faction: 400 Jew-Hating Biden Officials Stand With Hamas, Want Biden To Abandon Support for Survival of Israel and the Jewish People

RELATED POSTS ON X:

 

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Couldn’t Make It Clearer Where He Stands on Israel If He Screamed ‘Allahu Akbar’ and Blew Himself Up

/in , , , , , , /by

Old Joe Biden couldn’t make it clearer where he stands on the Hamas-Israel war if he screamed “Allahu akbar” and blew himself up in a crowd of Jews.

The alleged president demonstrated, for anyone who was paying attention, which side he is really on in the Hamas-Israel conflict when he went over to Israel in late October and met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He took the opportunity to announce that he was giving $100 million to Gaza, which means, despite his denials, $100 million to Hamas, as there is no entity in Gaza that is not controlled by Hamas and could both receive this money and keep it out of the hands of the terror group. As if that weren’t bad enough, now Old Joe and his henchmen are considering sending $10 billion to the Islamic Republic of Iran, the chief funder of Hamas. Yes, it’s so far beyond outrageous that it is coming up on outrageous from the other side, but it’s true nevertheless.

The Washington Free Beacon reported Monday that “the Biden administration may approve a sanctions waiver on Tuesday that will allow Iran to access at least $10 billion in previously frozen funds held in Iraq.” Displaying an admirable talent for understatement, the Free Beacon noted that this is “driving concerns that the Biden administration is maintaining financial avenues for Tehran as the country’s terrorist proxies foment chaos across the Middle East.”

Now, why would the Biden regime even consider freeing up billions for Iran while the “Death to America, Death to Israel” regime is bankrolling not only Hamas, but Hizballah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in their jihad war against the Jewish state? There are three possibilities: the regime is either stupid, or evil, or both. In this case, the most likely answer is the third: the sinister, senescent, faux-folksy corruptocrat and his cronies are as clueless as they are immoral. Oh, and wrongheaded, and a hundred other things.

Biden and his team are stupid insofar as they apparently still believe that showering money upon the Islamic Republic will lead that rogue, terror-supporting regime to moderate its practices and possibly even grow friendly toward America and possibly even Israel as well. This is a ridiculous idea for the State Department wonks and foreign policy “experts” to have, but they have it nonetheless; in fact, American diplomacy has largely consisted of efforts to buy friends internationally for many decades now.

This seldom works with anyone, but it is particularly doomed to fail when tried upon the Islamic Republic of Iran, where the rulers believe the Qur’an when it says: “And the Jews will not be pleased with you, neither will the Christians, until you follow their religion.” (2:120) Efforts at winning hearts and minds are often seen through this prism, as cynical attempts to begin to lure pious Muslims away from Islam. But of course they have no idea of this in Foggy Bottom, where they’re all bound to believe the iron dogma that Islam is a religion of peace that not only has nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism, but nothing whatsoever to do with contemporary geopolitics.

The evil part of this bargain comes from the fact that if the regime really does manage to send $10 billion to the mullahs, a large part of it, if not all of it, will go for the jihad against Israel. When Barack Obama sent pallets of unmarked bills to Tehran in the dark of night, much of it ended up going to jihad terror groups. What are the chances that at least some of Old Joe’s $10 billion would end up with Hamas, Hizballah, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad? Oh, about one hundred percent.

In response to such concerns, the Biden regime is pretending yet again that the American people have no idea of the most basic principles of economics. It insists that if it does send this $10 billion, it will be earmarked only for humanitarian purposes. The basic lesson of economics here is that getting $10 billion from the United States will free up $10 billion that the Iranian regime would have spent on food for its people, but which can now go to kill Israelis.

The new speaker of the House, in a classic example of failing to notice about fifty elephants in the room, just said that there wasn’t enough evidence to impeach Joe Biden. Well, the fact that the regime is even thinking about sending money to an avowed enemy ought to get Old Joe not only impeached, but tried for treason. But for that, we’d need some genuine opposition that had some guts.

AUTHOR

RELATED POST ON X:

RELATED ARTICLES:

MEF Investigation Exposes Hamas Funders in America

Reports: Iran announces new secret U.S. sanction relief bringing total to $50 billion

Leftist Fascists Accuse Trump of ‘Nazi Talk’

California imam: ‘The most hating people for the Muslims are Jews’

Hamas Held Hostages in Basement of Children’s Hospital

MIT wouldn’t suspend students who threatened Jews, over fears they’d be deported

Obama ‘Champion of Change’ Claims ‘Kidnapped’ Posters are a Jewish Conspiracy

Switzerland: Muslim migrants sleep, urinate in church, ‘If you acted like this in a mosque, they would kick you out’

Meet the Photojournalist for CNN and AP Who Went In with Hamas on October 7

400 Biden regime officials denounce him for being too pro-Israel, demand he force ceasefire

New Oct. 7 footage shows Hamas jihadis setting aside captured woman as sex slave

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Systemic Voting Fraud in America?

/in , , , , , , , , /by

The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump’s presidency, and by its end in 2020, many of his supporters raised concerns about the credibility of the electoral system.

Well, voter fraud appears to have metastasized and is now out of control.   We saw that in Arizona’s gubernatorial race, and we see it all across America.

In recent years, concerns about voter fraud have grown significantly, with many individuals asserting that there are systemic issues within the American electoral system.

One striking example cited by those raising concerns about voter fraud is the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which looked like a close race, with the Democrat nominee, Andy Beshear, defeating Republican incumbent Matt Bevin by just over 5,000 votes, or 0.37%. This made it the closest gubernatorial election in Kentucky since 1899 by votes and the closest ever by percentage.

The discrepancy in the voting patterns in this election raises eyebrows and sparks suspicions among those alleging voter fraud. While Kentucky Republicans voted overwhelmingly for their party’s candidates for other statewide offices, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, they simultaneously chose a Democrat for the governor’s position. This divergent behavior among voters, especially within the same party, appears perplexing and contradictory.

The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race. However, the outcome of the Kentucky gubernatorial election needed to align with this pattern, raising concerns about the integrity of the voting process. Such inconsistencies in voting behavior could indicate manipulation or irregularities in the election system, as it is unusual for voters to exhibit such discrepancies in their choices.

The assertion that elections are rigged is rooted in a belief that nefarious forces may be at play and that a coordinated effort could be behind the inconsistent voting outcomes.

It is, therefore, crucial to consider the possibility that allegations of rigged elections could have a basis in reality, thus warranting a thorough investigation.

The close relationships between prominent politicians, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat parties in Kentucky suggest a hidden agenda. Even if we take it for granted that political alliances are common in politics, it is not unreasonable to wonder if such connections could influence election outcomes. A closer look at these alliances and their impact on elections is justified.

This alignment or collaboration between high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat parties suggests that they might be working together with shared interests rather than representing distinct political ideologies. The “hidden agenda” here is that these politicians, despite belonging to different parties, are collaborating behind the scenes to achieve specific goals.

The practice of split-ticket voting, where individuals choose candidates from different parties for different offices, may be more complex than it seems. Moreover, the nature of these splits, where voters make different choices for various offices, is a sign of manipulation within the electoral process and doesn’t reflect the diverse political opinions of the electorate. The varying outcomes in other races may be more indicative of foul play than genuine voter choices.

The Heritage Foundation has posted a long list of verified election fraud cases in the U.S.

Allegations of systemic voter fraud in America, exemplified by cases such as the Kentucky elections, deserve serious consideration. While some may dismiss these concerns, it is essential to recognize that the electoral system’s rectitude is paramount. Investigating these claims and addressing potential issues will help safeguard the democratic process and ensure the public’s trust in elections remains intact. By taking these concerns seriously, we can work to protect the sanctity of our democratic institutions.

©2023. Amil Imani. All rights reserved.

More than 100 Junior-level diplomats signed scathing memo echoing Jew-Hating pro-Hamas rhetoric

/in , , , , , , /by

As the war against Hamas continues on the ground in Gaza we are witnessing pro-terrorist rallies across the world and in the United States.

These rallies and this pro-terrorist support is not by chance, it is planned, well funded and has the goal of destroying America, its Constitutional Republican form of government and replacing it with the ideology of Hamas.

As one New York City pro-Hamas Muslim said in Times Square, “This is the religion that all of humanity needs to be a part of Islam, and we will not stop until Islam enters every home [in America].”

Watch:

Here is an excellent presentation on the historic roots of the war between Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) and the free state of Israel, which is now become a war between Hamas, and its supporters, and the free world.

Now we learn that there are many pro-Hamas members of the U.S. Department of State. Some of whom are willing to sign a letter that echoes Hamas talking points.

On November 13th, 2023 Sharon Zhang from TRUTHOUT published an article titled “Scathing Internal State Dept. Dissent Memo Slams US Aid of Israeli ‘War Crimes‘” reporting,

Anew report has uncovered a scathing internal State Department dissent memo signed by 100 U.S. federal foreign affairs employees objecting strongly to the U.S.’s approach to Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and condemning President Joe Biden for “spreading misinformation” about the siege.

The five-page memo, dated November 3, says that Israel is committing “war crimes” in Gaza, echoing what international aid organizations and political analysts have said about the genocide, and urges senior U.S. officials to change their approach toward aid to Israel and demand a ceasefire. They also call for a transfer of all those detained by Israeli forces and Hamas.

The dissent memo was first reported by Axios, which reports that the letter was organized by a junior State Department employee who is also criticizing the administration’s policy on Israel on social media. It was signed by employees for the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Read the full article.

The Bottom Line

Since the October 7th, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel we have seen a growing smear campaign against any person, group, organization or political party that supports Israel in its right to defend itself against the terrorists, Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) and Ḥizbu ‘llāh (Party of Allah), in Gaza and Lebanon.

We are now in a world war between we the infidels, those who do not follow Mohammed, and those who do.

This war has been going on for 1400 years and will not end until one side is victorious. 

This is and always has been a religious war. Just as Communists hate religion, Islamists hate all other religions, beliefs and non-religions.

Just as Communists want to take over the world, so to do the Islamists.

We are now seeing in the streets the Red/Green/Rainbow alliance exposed. We are seeing Communists and homosexuals marking in support of Hamas. We are seeing groups like Gays for Palestine marching in the streets. What these gays do not understand is that same-sex sexual activity is prohibited in Gaza under the British Mandate Criminal Code Ordinance 1936. The relevant provision carries a maximum penalty of ten years’ imprisonment. Only men are criminalized under this law. The law was inherited from the British. It continues to be in operation in Gaza today…

Gird your loins because our enemies believe that we are in WW III.

It is time for use to wake up and realize that it time to defend ourselves now from this growing threat or we may see a much worse attack on our homeland than happened on 9/11/2001.

Abraham Lincoln wrote, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we lose our freedoms it will be because we have destroyed ourselves from within.”

Our enemies are now within and they want to destroy we the people.

WW III is now a war against the forces of radical Islam, the Communist/Socialist/Marxist/Stalinist/Maoist and the LGBTQIE+ community.

As a beginning Hamas must unconditionally surrender now!

Get it, got it, good!

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED POST ON X:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Nazi Faction: 400 Jew-Hating Biden Officials Stand With Hamas, Want Biden To Abandon Support for Survival of Israel and the Jewish People

TREASON: Biden Moves To Approve of Fresh $10 Billion for Terror State of Iran

BLOOD LIBEL: ‘DEI Teacher’ In Jewish Area Says Jews Kill Palestinians To Sell Their Organs

Pentagon Aide Part of ‘Covert Campaign’ to Undermine Iran Opposition: Report

PODCAST: Fake Palestinian History and the GOP Needs to Connect the Dots!

/in , , , , , , , /by

GUESTS AND TOPICS

ANDREW E HARROD

Andrew E. Harrod is a freelance researcher and writer who holds a PhD from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and a JD from George Washington University Law School. He is admitted to the Virginia State Bar. He has published over 600 hundred articles concerning various political and religious topics at the American Spectator, American Thinker, the Blaze, Breitbart, Capital Research Center, Daily Caller, FrontPage Magazine, Institute on Religion and Democracy, Independent Journal Review, Investigative Project on Terrorism, MercatorNet, Washington Times, and World, among others. He is a contributor to Jihad Watch and a Middle East Forum Campus Watch Fellow. He is a fellow with the Lawfare Project, an organization combating the misuse of human rights law against Western societies.

TOPIC: DEBUNKED The Fake Palestinian History

ROBERT KNIGHT

Robert Knight is a columnist for the Washington Times and a senior fellow for Bishop E.W. Jackson’s Staying True to America’s National Destiny (STANDamerica.us). His books include:. A Strong Constitution: What Would America Look Like If We Followed the Law? and A Nation Worth Fighting For: 10 Steps to Restore Freedom And his latest book is Crooked…. And his newest book is “Crooked: What Really Happened in the 2020 Election and How to Stop the Fraud ”

TOPIC: GOP Needs to Connect the Dots!

RELATED ARTICLE: MEF Investigation Exposes Hamas Funders in America

EDITORS NOTE: This Conservative Commandoes Radio Show is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Social Emotional Learning & Critical Thinking

/in , , , , , , , /by

For those new to this topic, Social Emotional Learning (SEL) is basically about instilling a set of values into school children. For more information, see two of the prior articles I’ve written about this: SEL Intro and SEL in Public Schools.

The advertised goals of SEL sound great! Who could be against the Stated Objectives of helping children to: a) Make better decisions, b) Set goals, c) Gain confidence, d) Collaborate with others in work and play, and e) Navigate the world more effectively? After all, the SEL promoters cite studies that say that these are good things! DUH…

For any such program, there are two obvious questions: WHAT? and HOW? In other words WHAT are the entire objectives that will be conveyed to our children, and specifically HOW will they be taught (i.e. methodology)?

There appear to be three main SEL packages, and the answer to each of these questions is quite different:

Click here to view SEL OPTIONS infographic.

The promoters of SEL 1.0 do not advertise their Unstated Objectives, and they certainly do not compare the results of alternative approaches to acheiving the Stated Objectives! Let’s do a brief overview of each, and see what the takeaway is…

SEL 1.0

This is the initial version and the most common one in use today. This is what is heavily marketed by CASEL, Second Step, etc.

OBJECTIVES are both the Stated Objectives, plus several Unstated Objectives. The Unstated Objectives include major elements of current progressive ideology — e.g., DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), CRT (Critical Race Theory), and Woke. In this powerful talk, this PhD connects these objectives with Communism.

METHODOLOGY is atheism, secularism, and relativism. These are man-made (as vs God-made) standards, which are embedded in Marxism and communism. For more details, see these good explanations: here, here, and here.

An example of SEL 1.0 methodology is “group consciousness” (as compared to “individualism”). As stated well here “SEL 1.0 exercises are constructed to maximize group awareness, group decision-making, and group activities. The peer pressure for conformity to the group becomes irresistible.” Marxism and communism are about groups, while America and our Constitution, etc. are about individual rights.

Another methodology example is that SEL 1.0 works to diminish the importance of thinking and understanding. Consider this statement: “As a species, emotion is more important than understanding because, instead of our willful rationality and effortful pursuit of universal truths, we are ‘wired’ for emotion and it drives us forward — up, away, and back again countless and quiet little cycles in life.” Got that? Emotion and feelings trump knowledge and thinking!

One more methodology concern with SEL 1.0 is that it is strongly based on moral relativism. Essentially this means that there are no absolute truths (e.g., God, Ten Commandments, etc.) as truth is relative to every individual. This is an important basis for progressive ideology, and has been rightly called “The Worst Idea Ever.”

What public school system would say to parents: “We are going to downplay teaching your children critical thinking, knowledge, traditional values, etc., and instead instill in them Marxist ideology?” But that is what SEL 1.0 is. See more about this here.

Note: SEL 1.0 may violate the Education Parental Rights laws of some states. For example, North Carolina’s version gives parents the exclusive right “To direct the upbringing and moral or religious training” of their child (see § 114A-10, [2]). SEL 1.0 is likely legally in conflict with that, as SEL 1.0 provides moral training that is not only not fully disclosed, but is certainly not under the direction of parents.

SEL 2.0

There are other options than SEL 1.0! For example, the admirable Stated Objectives can be met by adherence to traditional and common US standards: Judeo-Christian values. Some examples of sources for SEL 2.0 are here and here.

OBJECTIVES are just the Stated Objectives. There are no hidden objectives.

METHODOLOGY is via Judeo-Christianity. Consider that each of the five Stated Objectives would be accomplished by close adherence to the Bible.

The best part is that this methodology would not have any of the major downsides of SEL 1.0. For example, our children would not be a faceless part of a Pied-Piper-led group. As well stated here: “Christian training encourages kids to conform to what is right, and to avoid and oppose what is wrong. They are not to go along with the world.” Further, SEL 2.0 would not be pushing DEI, CRT, Woke, or Marxism.

The fly in the ointment is that teaching Judeo-Christian values in public schools has been squelched by atheistic activists, under the guise of “separation of church and state.” What they don’t acknowledge, though, is that atheism is a religion, secularism is a religion and relativism is a religion — so why don’t the same rules apply? They do, but we’re waiting for a lawsuit to make it happen.

Note: SEL 2.0 may violate the Education Parental Rights laws of some states. For example, SEL 2.0 may be in conflict with NC’s law, as SEL 2.0 provides moral training that may not be considered to be under the direction of parents.

SEL 3.0

In the meantime, there is a clever solution to accomplish the Stated Objectives that avoids the religion minefields: properly teaching Critical Thinking. A good discussion of this is here. Also see this study that verifies this as legitimate.

OBJECTIVES are just the Stated Objectives. Again, there are no hidden objectives.

METHODOLOGY is to teach children to use and enjoy Critical Thinking. Amazingly, that will bring about every one of the five Stated Objectives!

Let’s take an example: Make better decisions. We all make thousands of decisions, big and small. It’s in our best interest — and (in most cases) society’s best interest — if we use Critical Thinking for these. For example, students should Critically Think about managing their time effectively (e.g., for homework). Doing that would directly benefit them, and indirectly benefit our society.

Considering the power of Critical Thinking, SEL 1.0 would certainly be promoting it, right? NO! They are advocating feelings over intellect, group conformity over individualism, etc. Look at their websites for “Critical Thinking” and it’s only mentioned in passing. Although it is not acknowledged, they are opposed to Critical Thinking as Critical Thinking and group conformity (SEL 1.0) are at odds.

How does Critical Thinking fit in with SEL 2.0? Since the term “Critical Thinking” did not come about for centuries after the Bible was written, you won’t find it there. However, the messages in the Bible are entirely consistent with Critical Thinking. (See here for a good discussion about this.)

Since those who believe in God are faced with the challenges of atheism, secularism, relativism, etc., etc., if they are not Critical Thinkers, they will likely become easy prey.

The bottom line is that SEL 3.0 is the most practical and least problematic way to bring about the initial five Stated Objectives, in US Public Schools. (In Catholic Schools a combination of SEL 2.0 and SEL 3.0 would be ideal.)

Note: SEL 3.0 will not likely violate Education Parental Rights state laws, as there is no religion involved in using the Critical Thinking approach.

There is one caveat though to SEL 3.0!

The Left has been aggressive in perverting everyday terminology to suit their political agendas. Be on the lookout for them to distort the concept of Critical Thinking as well. However, if you are a true Critical Thinker you will not be fooled.

PS — A good discussion: The Power of Independent Thought In A Divisive World.

Equipped with an inner compass, critical thinkers are less vulnerable to the manipulations of those trying to control narratives for their own gain. Their minds remain permeable to new data but impervious to disempowering agendas. They choose which voices to tune into, instructing their attention to amplify the insightful, while tuning out the deceptive. From this intentional space, they distill signal from noise. While powerful entities expend enormous resources trying to manipulate how people think, the critical thinker sees through these efforts. Their connection to source provides a clear window into reality.

©2023. John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.

GUEST: America Must Stand with Israel

/in , , , , , , , , /by

In 1945, when Allied troops liberated the concentration camps in Germany and they witnessed firsthand the horrors of the Holocaust, the world cried, “Never again.” The Holocaust led to the tragic ending of six million innocent lives. Men, women, and children suffered and died only because they were Jews. The horrors of the Holocaust were detailed by those who survived and evidenced by those who lost their lives. Shock waves reverberated around the world at the massive destruction and death. In 1933, only 9.5 million Jews lived in Europe, and the Holocaust brought that number to a devastating low. By 1945, two out of every three European Jews had been killed.

The tragedies were mind-boggling and left the Allies questioning how these things could have happened. At the Nuremberg trials, the world learned more of the horrendous atrocities Holocaust victims suffered. Survivors spoke of how people were herded like cattle, and how men, women, and children were driven to their deaths in the Nazi gas chambers. These victims suffered only because of their Jewish heritage.

The Jewish people were not new to suffering, as they for nearly 2,000 years were without a homeland. They wandered the world seeking a place to belong, and the Holocaust nearly wiped out the entire European Jewish population. Upon the discovery of Nazi Germany’s slaughter of the Jewish people, the Allies rallied to establish the nation of Israel and give the Jewish people back their homeland. In 1948, the Jewish nation-state of Israel was established.

Since regaining their homeland, the Jewish people have been a stalwart Middle Eastern ally of Americans. Israel remains a counterweight against radical forces in the Middle East, including radical Islam and violent extremism. Israel has also prevented the further proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the region by thwarting Iran, Iraq, and Syria’s nuclear programs. This makes Israel our greatest ally and friend. Israel and America work together to ensure peace throughout the Middle East. Hamas, Hezbollah, and others surrounding Israel have no desire for peace, and the recent war in Israel is a reminder of that.

Since 1948, the Jewish people have fought to protect their homeland from various wars, daily encounters with terrorists, and a constant fear of losing their land. In this way, the current crisis in Israel is like other crises in Israel over the last 75 years. The Jewish people are resilient in their defense of their homeland, and with the reminder of the

Holocaust less than 100 years ago, it is imperative America stands with our ally and friend, Israel, and the Jewish people.

Last year, my wife, Haley, and I had the honor of visiting Israel and meeting the country’s incredible people. We are appalled by the actions of Hamas, an Iranian-backed terrorist organization. Hamas’s deliberate, gruesome attacks on innocent Israeli citizens are despicable acts of war, and I support Israel’s right to self-defense as the nation protects its

people and homeland.

I have joined bipartisan legislation supporting Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists. This legislation condemns these horrific acts and reinforces support from the U.S. House of Representatives to help Israel in this time of distress, and I am pleased that the resolution was approved in a bipartisan vote recently. I also have joined letters to President Biden expressing concern about his administration’s decision to unfreeze $6 billion in assets for Iran, and I have cosponsored legislation that would refreeze and ultimately redirect the $6 billion to support victims of terrorism.

You have likely seen news reports regarding Americans held hostage in Gaza. I, too, am closely monitoring the crisis, and I am in communication with our State Department and military authorities regarding Hamas’s continued terrorist activities. Please know that we will continue to work non-stop to see that all Americans return home safely.

Now, more than ever, the United States must support Israel. It is in the national security interest of the United States to unequivocally stand behind our longtime friend and greatest ally in the Middle East, Israel. I hope that you will join Haley and me as we “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem” (Psalm 122:6). May we, as a great and prayerful people, continue to offer our support to our Israeli brothers and sisters in their time of unexpected challenges.

AUTHOR

Michael Guest

Michael Guest represents Mississippi’s 3rd congressional district in U.S. House of Representatives.

RELATED ARTICLE: A ‘Critical Moment’: Broad Coalition to March against Anti-Semitism on National Mall Tuesday

RELATED POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘All In’: Speaker Mike Johnson Endorses Donald Trump For President

/in , , , , , /by

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson endorsed former President Donald Trump during a Tuesday morning television appearance, saying he is “all in” for Trump to be the 2024 GOP nominee.

Johnson was asked on CNBC who he would be endorsing as the Republican nominee for 2024. He did not hold back his support for Trump.

“I have endorsed him wholeheartedly. Look, I was one of the closest allies that President Trump had in Congress. He had a phenomenal first term those first two years, as you all know, we brought about the greatest economic numbers in the history of the world, not just the country, because his policies worked and I’m all in for President Trump,” Johnson said.

WATCH: 

“I expect he’ll be our nominee. Yeah. And he’s gonna win it and we have to make Biden a one-term president,” he added.

Johnson served on Trump’s impeachment defense team and has been a staunch supporter of the former president.

AUTHOR

HENRY RODGERS

Chief national correspondent. Follow Henry Rodgers On Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Weighs In On Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce Relationship

Trump Calls To Federalize Washington DC So He Cannot Be Tried In Court

Trump Rips RNC, Says They Have To Stop Debates

New Documents Reveal US Department Of Homeland Security Conspiracy To Violate First Amendment And Interfere In Elections

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is Republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Stand with Israel – Against its Enemies, and Ours

/in , , , , , , , , /by

In Washington today, Americans standing with Israel will rally on the National Mall. Their purpose is to speak for the vast majority of us who reject the narratives relentlessly promoted by our enemies in the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood and allied Marxist groups, here and abroad.

WATCH:

In particular, the latter insist the Jewish State is engaged in genocide. Yet, they support – and relentlessly endorse – the truly genocidal goal of Hamas, namely eliminating Jews “from the [Jordan] River to the [Mediterranean] Sea.”

In fact, supporters of Hamas not only effectively endorse the anti-Semitic violence it relentlessly unleashes on Jewish civilians and decry Israel’s justified efforts to prevent more. They also ignore the jihadists’ murderous mistreatment of Gazan civilians reduced to human shields for underground command centers and firing positions in hospitals, schools and refugee camps.

Stand with Israel and against its enemies – and ours.

This is Frank Gaffney.

AUTHOR

Frank Gaffney, Jr.

Frank J. Gaffney is the Founder and Executive Chairman of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., a not-for-profit, non-partisan educational corporation established in 1988. Under Mr. Gaffney’s leadership, the Center has been nationally and internationally recognized as a resource for timely, informed and penetrating analyses of foreign and defense policy matters.

Mr. Gaffney is the host of Secure Freedom Radio, a nationally-syndicated radio program heard weeknights throughout the country. He is an associate author of highly acclaimed Shariah: The Threat to America and the publisher of over a dozen other books and monographs from the Center for Security Policy Press.

RELATED POST ON X:

RELATED ARTICLES:

A ‘Critical Moment’: Broad Coalition to March against Anti-Semitism on National Mall Tuesday

The future of the Democrats lobbies for Hamas

Israel’s Navy is ready for war against Hamas

Putin Raises A New Generation For War

London Has Fallen

EDITORS NOTE: This Center for Security Policy column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Britain Surrenders to Jihad Violence, UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman FIRED For Telling the Truth About Antisemitic Marches

/in , , , , , , , /by

The nation that gave the world the Magna Carta Is dead. I hope she runs for Prime Minister.

Surrendering to Islamic demands empowers the jihadis. It gets worse, not better.

UK Shakeup: Fmr PM Cameron Now Foreign Secretary; Conservative Sacked

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron made a shock return to high office on Monday, becoming foreign secretary in a major shakeup of the Conservative government that also saw the firing of divisive Home Secretary Suella Braverman.

Cameron, who led the U.K. government between 2010 and 2016, was appointed by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in a Cabinet shuffle in which he sacked Braverman, a divisive figure who drew anger for accusing police of being too lenient with pro-Palestinian protesters.

She was replaced by James Cleverly, who had been foreign secretary.

Cameron’s appointment came as a surprise to seasoned politics-watchers. It’s rare for a non-lawmaker to take a senior government post, and it has been decades since a former prime minister held a Cabinet job.

The government said Cameron will be appointed to Parliament’s unelected upper chamber, the House of Lords. The last foreign secretary to serve in the Lords, rather than the elected House of Commons, was Peter Carrington, who was part of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s.

Cameron said Britain was “facing a daunting set of international challenges, including the war in Ukraine and the crisis in the Middle East.”

“While I have been out of front-line politics for the last seven years, I hope that my experience — as Conservative leader for 11 years and prime minister for six — will assist me in helping the prime minister to meet these vital challenges,” he said in a statement.

His appointment brings back to government a leader brought down by Britain’s decision to leave the European Union. Cameron called the 2016 EU membership referendum, confident the country would vote to stay in the bloc. He resigned the day after voters opted to leave.

Sunak was a strong backer of the winning “leave” side in the referendum. Cameron’s return, and Braverman’s sacking, are likely to infuriate the Conservative Party’s right wing and inflame tensions in the party that Sunak has sought to soothe.

Prominent right-wing lawmaker Jacob Rees-Mogg said sacking Braverman was “a mistake because Suella understood what the British voter thought and was trying to do something about it.”

Sunak had been under growing pressure to fire Braverman — a hard-liner popular with the authoritarian wing of the governing Conservative Party — from one of the most senior jobs in government, responsible for handling immigration and policing.

In a highly unusual attack on the police last week, Braverman said London’s police force was ignoring lawbreaking by “pro-Palestinian mobs.” She described demonstrators calling for a cease-fire in Gaza as “hate marchers.”

On Saturday, far-right protesters scuffled with police and tried to confront a large pro-Palestinian march by hundreds of thousands through the streets of London. Critics accused Braverman of helping to inflame tensions.

Last week Braverman wrote an article for the Times of London in which she said police “play favorites when it comes to protesters” and acted more leniently toward pro-Palestinian demonstrators and Black Lives Matter supporters than toward right-wing protesters or soccer hooligans.

The article was not approved in advance by the prime minister’s office, as would usually be the case.

Braverman said Monday that “it has been the greatest privilege of my life to serve as home secretary,” adding that she would “have more to say in due course.”

Braverman, a 43-year-old lawyer, has become a leader of the party’s populist wing by advocating ever-tougher curbs on migration and a war on human rights protections, liberal social values and what she has called the “tofu-eating wokerati.”

Last month she called migration a “hurricane” that would bring “millions more immigrants to these shores, uncontrolled and unmanageable.”

As home secretary Braverman championed the government’s stalled plan to send asylum-seekers who arrive in Britain in boats on a one-way trip to Rwanda. A U.K. Supreme Court ruling on whether the policy is legal is due on Wednesday.

Critics say Braverman has been building her profile to position herself for a party leadership contest that could come if the Conservatives lose power in an election expected next year.

The bold changes are an attempt by Sunak to reset his faltering government. The Conservatives have been in power for 13 years, but opinion polls for months have put them 15 to 20 points behind Labour amid a stagnating economy, persistently high inflation, an overstretched health care system and a wave of public sector strikes.

Read more.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED POSTS ON X:

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Palestinian Victim’: ‘Mom, I’m Fine, It’s Just For The Camera!’

Paris Rally Against Jew Hatred Attracts Hundreds of Thousands

Police Just Stood There

WATCH: Muslim Demo in NY’s Time Square Declares, “We Will Not Stop Until Islam Enters Every Home!”

WATCH: Hamas Opening Fire on Civilians Trying To Leave Northern Gaza

Another UNRWA School That was Cover for a Hamas Underground Bunker

Genocidal ‘Khaybar’ Chant Sounds Again

A Jewish House in London…..”Hitler Knew How To Deal With These People”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.