Woke Bud Light Can’t Give Their Beer Away – Literally, Now Forced to Buy It Back

Death spiral. The voiceless, the silent majority, have spoken.

Bud Light Essentially Giving Beer Away During Memorial Day Weekend Amid Boycott

Bud Light’s marketing team has unveiled a new effort to bolster sales in the midst of ongoing boycott by essentially giving away a 15-pack of beer for free for Memorial Day.

Until May 31, consumers can get up to a $15 rebate on the purchase of Bud Light, Budweiser, Budweiser Select, and Budweiser Select 55 in a 15-pack or larger. The rebate comes in the form of a digital prepaid credit card that will be equivalent to up to $15.

It comes as Bud Light sales have dropped for another consecutive week since a transgender influencer shared a post of a custom Bud Light can that was sent to celebrate “365 Days of Girlhood” in early April. The influencer and activist, a biological male, also posted “#BudLightPartner” in one of the social media posts that included the can.

Sales of the light beer were down 24.6 percent for the week that ended May 13 compared to a year ago, worse than the 23.6 percent drop the brand suffered a week prior, according to data released by Bump Williams Consulting and Nielson IQ research. Rival light beers made by Miller and Coors have seen sales increases during the same timeframe, the data has shown.

Keep reading.

Anheuser-Busch Offers To Buy Back Expiring Cases Of Bud Light After Dylan Mulvaney Fiasco

By  Virginia Kruta •  •  DailyWire.com

Anheuser-Busch is offering to buy unsold cases of Bud Light back from retailers as sales continue to crater in the aftermath of a brief but disastrous partnership with trans-identifying influencer Dylan Mulvaney.

The offer, reported by The Wall Street Journal, comes as boycotts continue to dog the brand in the wake of the controversial deal. Mulvaney raved in a TikTok video about a gift from Bud Light — a can featuring the trans-influencer’s face — and the partnership, which reportedly consisted of just the one can, sparked a boycott that caused sales of the beverage to plummet nearly overnight.

By mid-May, Bud Light sales were down 28% in comparison with 2022 sales numbers for the same time period — according to a Bump Williams analysis of Nielsen data — and several high-profile celebrities had thrown their weight behind a total boycott of the brand.

Musician Kid Rock shared a video of himself firing a gun at several cases of Bud Light, saying, “Grandpa’s feeling a little frisky today. Let me say something to all of you and be as clear and concise as possible. F*** Bud Light. And f*** Anheuser-Busch. Have a terrific day.”

Nashville bar owner and country music star John Rich revealed that customers had simply stopped buying Bud Light when they came into his establishment.

“I think the customers decide,” Rich said. “Customers are king. Our number one selling beer up until a few days ago was, guess what? Bud Light. That was the number one beer. We’ve got cases and cases and cases of it sitting back there.”Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Bud Light Essentially Giving Beer Away During Memorial Day Weekend Amid Boycott

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Woke Ford’s ‘Very Gay Raptor’ Endorses Trans Lifestyle. Take action, tell them to stop it!

Very Gay Raptor woke promotion is still alive on Ford website after June 2021 and June 2022 releases.


Click here to send your email to complain to Ford Motor Company about its woke “Very Gay Raptor” promotion which is still on its website.


Conservatives have called out Ford’s “Very Gay Raptor” promotion even though it was produced in 2021 and relaunched during Gay Pride Month in June 2022.

Ford and other critics claim the promotion was for 2022 not 2023.

However, these critics fail to mention that the “Very Gay Raptor” promotion was produced in 2021.  It was rereleased in 2022.  What’s to say Ford won’t continue the promotion again in June 2023 during this year’s gay pride month?

Additionally, if Ford was done with this promotion in 2022 why does the auto maker continue the “Very Gay Raptor’ promotion on its website?  The Ford website headline reads:  Ford’s ‘Very Gay Raptor’ Set to Redefine ‘Tough’ at Goodwood.  The promotion states in part:

“Very Gay Raptor”’ (VGR) and Next-Gen Ranger Raptor to appear at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, reaffirming Ford’s long-term commitment to LGBTQ+ allyship.

Ford’s current continuation of the “Very Gay Raptor” promotion on its website makes it fair game for consumers to complain about the automaker’s wokeness.  Sadly, the words “Redefine ‘Tough”” can easily be interpreted that Ford is endorsing the destructive transgender lifestyle.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to complain to Ford Motor Company about it’s woke “Very Gay Raptor” promotion which is still on its website.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.


Click here to send your email to complain to Ford Motor Company about its woke “Very Gay Raptor” promotion which is still on its website.


Contact information:

Jim Farley, CEO
Ford Investor Relations
One American Road, Suite 1026
Dearborn, MI 48126-2798

Phone 313-322-3000 Ext 0 ask for Jim Farley’s office.

Jim Farley, President and CEO
jim.farley@ford.com

John Lawler, CFO
john.lawler@ford.com

Kumar Galhotra, President
kumar.galhotra@ford.com

Investor Relations
fordIR@ford.com

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ford Burns Through Billions, Expects to Lose $12 Billion on Electric Vehicle Line

Biden Raves Over Expensive Inefficient, Electric Ford F-150 Truck

Woke Bud Light Can’t Give Their Beer Away – Literally, Now Forced to Buy It Back

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Florida Family Association column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Coming of the Mahdi

The world is presently at its most wicked. It is beyond human help. It requires only a nudge to implode and prepare for the divine ruler, the Saheb-ul-Zaman (the Mahdi, the Lord of the Age) to come and set it aright. It is the sacred duty and privilege of every Muslim to do all he can to hasten the death of the old world and the birth of the global Islamic Ummah. Thus goes the thinking of Iran’s ruling mullahs and their hand-picked presidents.

It seems like the old millennialism thinking. The belief in supernatural intervention to set the world aright is scriptural to major religions, including Islam. The Jews have been earnestly supplicating the Lord for the Messiah to come, the Christians are impatiently awaiting the second coming of Christ, and, the Zoroastrians are convinced that Saoshayant is the one who shall come, defeat the trouble-making Ahriman — Satan — and make the creatures again pure. But this time around, a group of believers with tremendous resources are intent on forcing the issue, making the conditions so dire that they leave the reluctant Saheb-ul-Zaman no choice but to appear and assume his universal reign.

Up to this point, millennialism was a belief and a hope. No one ever aspired to or had the means of making the anticipated events come about. The matter was in the hands of God. The Muslims’ perennial prayer recited every day, posted in mosques and even on bumpers of vehicles has been, “O, Saheb-ul-Zaman, hasten your coming.” The prayer for the advent, thus far, has been limited to passive supplications of the faithful.

It is a well-established fact that beliefs are the potent impetus to action. If you believe your home is about to be burglarized, you secure the house and take other precautions. If you, under the influence of drugs, believe that a bug is burrowing into your skin, you may take a knife to your own body and try to dig the imaginary bug out.

Hence, it is shortsighted to dismiss the mullahs as a bunch of lunatics who are out of touch with reality and that they have no intention of doing catastrophic mischief to compel the Mahdi’s coming — maybe some arming of the Iraqi Shiites, a little support for Hezb’allah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine — but no, no major idiocy. After all, they are rational people and in touch with reality. Any large-scale troublemaking spells their doom as well. Thus goes rationalization — the greatest risky tranquilizer of the mind.

Rationalization, compounded by complacency and denial, can be deadly, particularly when adversaries have different realities. To the fanatic mullahs ruling Iran, Sahaeb-ul-Zaman is an absolute reality, and his promised advent is irrevocably ordained. This is their reality and their belief and they have every intention of leading their life according to them.

It is foolish for non-Muslims to dismiss the mullahs and the likes of the Taliban as a bunch of fringe lunatics who are going to go away simply by wishing for it. The Islamist reality is that non-Muslims are the ones who deserve to be done away with, they are the ones who have refused to submit to the summons of Allah for much too long, and, it is time for the faithful to get rid of them. This makes for a lopsided contest. The non-Muslims are passively wishing that the nightmarish surge of Islamism is only a temporary fringe phenomenon doomed to die on its own, while the other side is marshaling its huge destructive power to accomplish its aim by eradicating non-Muslims.

The cabal of fanatical mullahs ruling Iran has lost its patience, not only with the unbelievers but also with the Mahdi as well. They aim to force his arrival. The mullahs believe they have the means to make it impossible for the Mahdi to tarry any longer by causing unprecedented death and destruction — conditions deemed essential for his coming. The world must hit the very bottom before the savior of the world comes to the rescue, so they firmly believe.

The question is: What does prudence demand? Wishing the problem to go away is not a very effective solution in the same way that wishing for the Saheb-ul-Zaman to come has not been. Reasoning and negotiating with the mullahs and their ilk hold very little if any, lasting promise. There are always easy ways of denial and appeasement. We are very good at both practices. No, the Muslims have been around for ages. They make some trouble from time to time. But they are not all that bad and dangerous. We’ll get along. If we have to, we’ll even let them live by the Sharia — their stone-age laws — in our midst. We’ll be reasonable and they will come around. We’ll just have to get along. So goes the line.

One problem: The other side doesn’t think this way. The Islamofascists don’t believe in the notion of live and let live.” They believe that the earth is Allah’s and it has been sullied by the heathens, the unbelievers, and the kafir for far too long. Now that they have the means, they aim to make the world to their design and bring about the final solution — a nasty reminder of not too long ago Nazism.

Is this alarmist, or even hatemongering? You don’t believe Muslims can be that intolerant and hostile toward non-Muslims and that they’ll never go to the extremes? Do you know Muslims personally in your neighborhood or your workplace and they are nice people? The nice Muslims you know are presently small minorities in alien lands. They have to be nice, and they may indeed be nice. Yet, when the main force of Islam surges forward, these nice folks will either have to join it or be swept aside like the rest of the resisters.

The concern is not with individual Muslims who live as solid citizens in democratic societies. They may have developed a taste for the freedom democracy bestows or have simply learned to tolerate it. Our concern is with the gathering Islamic storm from the heart of Islamdom. To truly appreciate Islam, you must experience firsthand Islam in power. Take a quick trip to the lands of the Muslims and find out for yourself how horribly they treat the non-Muslims, even the “People of the book,” Jews and Christians. Try to have a Bible study group or build a church in Saudi Arabia and discover the benevolence of Islamic rule.

I urgently call on US politicians to redirect U.S. foreign policy in line with our nation’s lofty ideals and principles. I urge the Administration to proclaim its unequivocal support for the Iranian people and back that claim with concrete effective peaceful actions. It is the best investment that the U.S. can make to attract the powerful nation of Iran as a vital ally and concurrently refrain from foolishly undermining its present sole friend, Israel. Recall that it was the Iranian people’s massive magnificent movement against the re-election of the fraud Ahmadinejad that inspired the so-called “Arab Spring.” That movement has not stopped. It is ongoing.

The world is a laboratory where the experiment with Islam shows irrefutable results. To the extent that Islam rules any society, that society is stagnant, backward thinking, repressive and violent. The Islamic Republic of Iran represents the cutting edge for the newly petrodollar-invigorated Islam. It is determined to complete its task of ending the world of “Dar-ul-Harb” — the non-Muslim world to be warred upon — and establishing the “Dar-ul-Solh,” or “Dar-ul-Salam” — the Muslim world of the Ummah under the rule of the Mahdi. If achieving this aim hinges on the conflagration of a cataclysmic nuclear World War, the mullahs are happy to make it happen.

©2023. Amil Imani. All rights reserved.

Is America Still Worth Fighting For?

With another Memorial Day upon us, we may consider the question: Is America still worth fighting for?

On November 21, 1864, President Lincoln wrote to a Mrs. Bixby of Massachusetts, who had lost five sons in the Civil War.

He penned, “I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom.”

But, alas, today’s military—like so many institutions in our country—is going “woke.” That is to say that they are being infected with a cultural Marxism that has re-written our history, making America out to be irredeemably evil.

One regular contributor to NPR said several months ago: “[T]he United States does not yet have the stomach to look over its shoulder and stare directly at the evil on which this great country stands. That is why slavery is not well taught in our schools.”

To this sentiment, conservative commentator and author Michael Medved responded: “Dr. Martin Luther King, by contrast, never dismissed his American heritage and identity. He summoned his nation to honor its highest ideals, rather than disparaging its claims to greatness and goodness. His example stressed American possibilities and promises, not guilt or accusations concerning its multiple shortcomings.”

But what the cultural Marxists propagate is that we’re just as racist a nation as we’ve ever been. There’s been no progress, supposedly. If you deny that, then you’re a racist, they say.

No doubt America has had many flaws. But the brilliance of this nation is the foundation the founders laid whereby we could correct these flaws.

America is a grand experiment, encapsulated by an idea which flies in the face of Marxism: self-rule under God. Remove either part, the “self-rule” or the “under God” (as our internal and external enemies would like to see happen) and we would no longer have America as founded.

As noted, wokeism is infesting today’s military. Even the U.S. Navy partnered with a Drag Queen influencer on social media to promote recruitment.

The offices of Senator Marco Rubio and Congressman Chip Roy have produced an eye-opening report called, Woke Warfighters: How Political Ideology is Weakening America’s Military.

They write, “Our military’s singular purpose is to ‘provide for the common defense’ of our nation. It cannot be turned into a left-wing social experiment. It cannot be used as a cudgel against America itself. And it cannot be paralyzed by fear of offending the sensibilities of Ivy League faculty lounges of progressive pundits.”

After all, they add, “The world is a dangerous place.”

Basically we’re raising up young people to hate their own country, warns Dr. William Donohue, the president of the Catholic League, in his new book, The War on Virtue: How the Ruling Class Is Killing the American Dream. I got to speak with him on a radio segment recently.

In The War on Virtue, he writes, “If Americans become convinced that their country is fatally flawed, why will they defend it?”

I asked him to elaborate on this quote. First, he mentioned how the military is down 25% in reaching its recruitment goal.

Then he told me, “We’re teaching kids to hate America, not in every school but in too many of them. And they’re starting in kindergarten, going right through to graduate school. That’s what they teach—that America is a racist country that rips people off.”

Donohue elaborated, “If you teach people to hate their own country, the greatest country in the history of the world, then don’t be surprised when some young people—who’ve been indoctrinated, basically brainwashed, by these left wing college professors and in high school—don’t be surprised if they say, ‘Hey, why would I want to defend this country? After all, we’re not any better than anybody else?’ It’s almost a form of national suicide.”

Donohue said ordinary Americans need to push back, like what we saw in the recent response to Bud Light giving in to “transgender mania.”

“It’s a dangerous time,” said Dr. Peter Lillback, the founder of Providence Forum, for which I serve as executive director.

But he also told me, “There’s never a last word for a nation until God’s Providence says ‘You’re done.’ I’m not ready to give up on America, there’s too much treasure of great freedoms, of wisdom, of biblical truth, of even of sending the Gospel out to the nations. There’s always a chance for revival, reformation, new beginnings.”

Because the foundation is still there, America is even yet worth fighting for. But those foundations are being eroded, day by day. It would seem that we are faced with a choice of two options for our national future: revival or ruin.

©2023. Dr. Jerry Newcombe, D. Minn. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Theodore Dalrymple | Historiography and the State of the Western Mind | NatCon UK

Ron DeSantis Files To Run For President

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Wednesday to run for president in 2024.

DeSantis has been widely expected to jump in the Republican primaries for months and has consistently polled in the double digits alongside former President Donald Trump. The FEC filing comes ahead of his highly-anticipated presidential announcement at 6 p.m. Wednesday on Twitter Spaces with CEO Elon Musk, the Daily Caller News Foundation confirmed.

The governor has been traveling to key early primary states, touting his book “The Courage To Be Free” and pitching his “Florida Blueprint” agenda. DeSantis has already secured key endorsements from state legislators in Iowa, New Hampshire and Florida, as well as top Republicans in Congress like Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Bob Good of Virginia.

DeSantis’ entrance into the Republican primaries comes after he wrapped up Florida’s legislative session filled with GOP-backed bills. The governor scored conservative wins on parental rights in education, school choice, gun rights, immigration, the death penalty, abortion and plenty more.

The governor changed his political Twitter account handle Monday, preceding with his imminent presidential launch. The governor’s account had previously been used for both Florida gubernatorial campaigns, so he dropped the “FL” from his handle “@RonDeSantisFL.”

On a private phone call last week held by Never Back Down, the political action committee tasked with drafting DeSantis into the race, DeSantis indicated that he is the only Republican contender who can win the GOP primary and beat President Joe Biden in a general election.

“You have basically three people at this point that are credible in this whole thing,” DeSantis said. “Biden, Trump and me. And I think of those three, two have a chance to get elected president — Biden and me, based on all the data in the swing states, which is not great for the former president and probably insurmountable because people aren’t going to change their view of him.”

The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average for a 2024 national Republican primary, based on polls conducted between April 21 and May 18, indicates that DeSantis has 19.4% support.

The governor joins a growing GOP primary field with former President Donald Trump, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, conservative businessman Vivek Ramaswamy and conservative radio personality Larry Elder, with former Vice President Mike Pence soon to follow.

DeSantis was elected to Congress in 2012 where he served until he narrowly won the governorship in 2018, beating former Democratic Mayor of Tallahassee Andrew Gillum 49.6% to 49.2%, according to Ballotpedia. The governor handily won reelection in 2022 by nearly 20 points, trouncing former Democratic Rep. Charlie Christ.

DeSantis’ political team did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

MARY LOU MASTERS

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Stay Tuned’: Ron DeSantis Quietly Changes Twitter Handle Ahead Of Expected 2024 Run

Ron DeSantis made a guarantee about Donald Trump that made everyone sit up and take notice

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The Eyes are the Windows of the Soul

Observing the plague of virulent Socialism and Marxism infecting America, I am reminded of my own youth in England and of a particular incident when I was but seventeen years of age, which both changed my life and my political outlook.

As we know, young people have always been – and certainly are today – filled with idealistic notions. That is good and is part of growing up. I certainly was idealistic and, not surprisingly, had automatically wished to assert my own ideas in opposition to those of my father. I loved him greatly, but he was a staunch member of the British Conservative party and so I foolishly chose – to his dismay – to join the left-wing and radically Socialist opposition Labour Party.

Now my father’s relatives being mostly working-class folks were all automatically wedded to Britain’s Labour Party that claimed to be for the workers. In fact, Communist ideas were front and center among so many Brits in the 1950’s and 60’s. The old Socialist song, “We’ll keep the Red flag flying here” was often sung along with the parading of the slogan; “Workers of the World Unite.”

Back now to that incident when I was about seventeen. I was getting off a double decker bus in my hometown. An elderly man was boarding the bus and he saw a lapel badge I was wearing. He asked what was written on it and I proudly and naively said, “Oh, it shows I’m a member of the Young Socialists.”

It was what I saw in the eyes of that elderly stranger that so profoundly shook me. The look was one of weary, even ageless despair, and I could not stop thinking about it. I later learned how many older people shared that same anguished look when similarly confronted by youthful ignorance and naivety. I also later learned of the horrific history of worldwide Marxist, Communist and Socialist state control and the vast numbers of hapless people who had died horribly under their heartless regimes.

I soon left the Young Socialists, outraged at what I had read. It was then that I grew up. I was comforted by Winston Churchill’s allegedly famous quote: “If a man is not a socialist when he is 20, he has no heart; If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.” Of course, Churchill famously went on to also say the following:

“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Perhaps the greatest conservative successor to Winston Churchill in Britain was Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the daughter of a grocer, known as the iron lady and of whom it was said, ironically, that she was the only man in the Cabinet. She had pointed out that, “The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Here in our American towns and cities the Socialist youth today now go by names such as Antifa or Black Lives Matter. Unwittingly they are now the violent and very fascist heirs to Hitler’s thugs. even though they falsely preach with utter idiocy that they are anti-fascists.

Traditional temples of free thought, our Universities and Colleges, have now become academic gulags where only so-called progressive (aka regressive) speech is permitted. Watching them howl at any conservative speaker, should one show up to speak, and you will see the extent of the leftwing rot.

Of course, Communism in America never died. It simply changed its name. We now hear leftists calling themselves progressives when they are the “regressive” political plague of the 21st century.

In the nation’s universities or, what Michael Savage once called, “the universities of lower learning,” those rioting youth of the sixties are now ensconced as aged leftwing and Socialist tenured professors, spewing corrosive Marxist twaddle to the current crop of idealistic youth. The generations come and go, but students are now political fodder on an ever-fateful Socialist conveyor belt which works tirelessly to bring empty headed youth to unknowingly enable a Marxist revolution in America.

The left is divisive. Socialism separates people by class and by race. This is its powerful weapon of choice, along with its manufactured support of multi-gender identities as we march towards what may well be a most fateful coming general election in America’s history.

Conservatism eschews and disdains class, race or multiple gender identities. It prefers values of character, individuality, personal freedom, a love of America and its wondrous Constitution and the enduring bedrock of Judeo-Christian civilization.

I think back now with gratitude to that older man who long ago boarded that bus and whose eyes told me all I needed to know.

© 2023 Victor Sharpe. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Gender vs. Free Speech

Constitution Corner with Robert Owens published the video below titled Gender vs. Free Speech. Owens states,

A school district in Ohio recently enacted a policy that allows administrators to expel a student for the crime of “misgendering”.  Sound Crazy?  The group, Parents Defending Education, thought so too, so they are suing the school district to keep Freedom of Speech alive.­

WATCH:

Take Action:

1.) Like and Share this video with others.

2.) Apply for Membership with The John Birch Society and get involved.

3.) Learn more about home school options at the Freedom Project Academy.

©2023. Robert Owens’ Constitution Corner. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Why The Media Attacks Detransitioners

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FILED AGAINST: Biden, Garland, Mayorkas, Graves, Wary. Ask your Representative to Co-Sponsor!

Articles of impeachment, below, have been filed against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Please call, text or write to your member of Congress and demand he or she sign on to each of these House Resolutions:

H.Res420 — Against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

H.Res411 — Against Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

H.Res410 — Against Attorney General Merrick Garland.

H.Res406 — Against Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

H.Res.405 — Against Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

You know what to do. Just do it!

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

List of current U.S. House members

Office Name Party
U.S. House Alabama District 1 Jerry Carl Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 2 Barry Moore Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 3 Mike Rogers Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 4 Robert Aderholt Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 5 Dale Strong Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 6 Gary Palmer Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 7 Terri Sewell Democratic
U.S. House Alaska At-large District Mary Peltola Democratic
U.S. House American Samoa At-large District Aumua Amata Radewagen Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 1 David Schweikert Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 2 Eli Crane Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 3 Ruben Gallego Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 4 Greg Stanton Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 5 Andy Biggs Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 6 Juan Ciscomani Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 7 Raúl Grijalva Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 8 Debbie Lesko Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 9 Paul Gosar Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 1 Rick Crawford Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 2 French Hill Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 3 Steve Womack Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 4 Bruce Westerman Republican
U.S. House California District 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican
U.S. House California District 2 Jared Huffman Democratic
U.S. House California District 3 Kevin Kiley Republican
U.S. House California District 4 Mike Thompson Democratic
U.S. House California District 5 Tom McClintock Republican
U.S. House California District 6 Ami Bera Democratic
U.S. House California District 7 Doris Matsui Democratic
U.S. House California District 8 John Garamendi Democratic
U.S. House California District 9 Josh Harder Democratic
U.S. House California District 10 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic
U.S. House California District 11 Nancy Pelosi Democratic
U.S. House California District 12 Barbara Lee Democratic
U.S. House California District 13 John Duarte Republican
U.S. House California District 14 Eric Swalwell Democratic
U.S. House California District 15 Kevin Mullin Democratic
U.S. House California District 16 Anna Eshoo Democratic
U.S. House California District 17 Ro Khanna Democratic
U.S. House California District 18 Zoe Lofgren Democratic
U.S. House California District 19 Jimmy Panetta Democratic
U.S. House California District 20 Kevin McCarthy Republican
U.S. House California District 21 Jim Costa Democratic
U.S. House California District 22 David G. Valadao Republican
U.S. House California District 23 Jay Obernolte Republican
U.S. House California District 24 Salud Carbajal Democratic
U.S. House California District 25 Raul Ruiz Democratic
U.S. House California District 26 Julia Brownley Democratic
U.S. House California District 27 Mike Garcia Republican
U.S. House California District 28 Judy Chu Democratic
U.S. House California District 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic
U.S. House California District 30 Adam Schiff Democratic
U.S. House California District 31 Grace Napolitano Democratic
U.S. House California District 32 Brad Sherman Democratic
U.S. House California District 33 Pete Aguilar Democratic
U.S. House California District 34 Jimmy Gomez Democratic
U.S. House California District 35 Norma Torres Democratic
U.S. House California District 36 Ted Lieu Democratic
U.S. House California District 37 Sydney Kamlager Democratic
U.S. House California District 38 Linda Sánchez Democratic
U.S. House California District 39 Mark Takano Democratic
U.S. House California District 40 Young Kim Republican
U.S. House California District 41 Ken Calvert Republican
U.S. House California District 42 Robert Garcia Democratic
U.S. House California District 43 Maxine Waters Democratic
U.S. House California District 44 Nanette Barragán Democratic
U.S. House California District 45 Michelle Steel Republican
U.S. House California District 46 Lou Correa Democratic
U.S. House California District 47 Katie Porter Democratic
U.S. House California District 48 Darrell Issa Republican
U.S. House California District 49 Mike Levin Democratic
U.S. House California District 50 Scott Peters Democratic
U.S. House California District 51 Sara Jacobs Democratic
U.S. House California District 52 Juan Vargas Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 1 Diana DeGette Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 2 Joe Neguse Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 3 Lauren Boebert Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 4 Ken Buck Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 5 Doug Lamborn Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 6 Jason Crow Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 7 Brittany Pettersen Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 8 Yadira Caraveo Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 1 John Larson Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 2 Joe Courtney Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 3 Rosa L. DeLauro Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 4 Jim Himes Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 5 Jahana Hayes Democratic
U.S. House Delaware At-large District Lisa Blunt Rochester Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 1 Matt Gaetz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 2 Neal Dunn Republican
U.S. House Florida District 3 Kat Cammack Republican
U.S. House Florida District 4 Aaron Bean Republican
U.S. House Florida District 5 John Rutherford Republican
U.S. House Florida District 6 Michael Waltz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 7 Cory Mills Republican
U.S. House Florida District 8 Bill Posey Republican
U.S. House Florida District 9 Darren Soto Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 10 Maxwell Alejandro Frost Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 11 Daniel Webster Republican
U.S. House Florida District 12 Gus M. Bilirakis Republican
U.S. House Florida District 13 Anna Paulina Luna Republican
U.S. House Florida District 14 Kathy Castor Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 15 Laurel Lee Republican
U.S. House Florida District 16 Vern Buchanan Republican
U.S. House Florida District 17 Greg Steube Republican
U.S. House Florida District 18 Scott Franklin Republican
U.S. House Florida District 19 Byron Donalds Republican
U.S. House Florida District 20 Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 21 Brian Mast Republican
U.S. House Florida District 22 Lois Frankel Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 23 Jared Evan Moskowitz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 24 Frederica S. Wilson Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 25 Debbie Wasserman Schultz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 26 Mario Diaz-Balart Republican
U.S. House Florida District 27 Maria Elvira Salazar Republican
U.S. House Florida District 28 Carlos Gimenez Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 1 Earl Carter Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 2 Sanford Bishop Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 3 Drew Ferguson Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 4 Hank Johnson Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 5 Nikema Williams Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 6 Rich McCormick Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 7 Lucy McBath Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 8 Austin Scott Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 9 Andrew Clyde Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 10 Mike Collins Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 11 Barry Loudermilk Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 12 Rick Allen Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 13 David Scott Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 14 Marjorie Taylor Greene Republican
U.S. House Guam At-large District James Moylan Republican
U.S. House Hawaii District 1 Ed Case Democratic
U.S. House Hawaii District 2 Jill Tokuda Democratic
U.S. House Idaho District 1 Russ Fulcher Republican
U.S. House Idaho District 2 Michael K. Simpson Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 1 Jonathan Jackson Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 2 Robin Kelly Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 3 Delia Ramirez Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 4 Jesus Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 5 Mike Quigley Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 6 Sean Casten Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 7 Danny K. Davis Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 8 Raja Krishnamoorthi Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 9 Jan Schakowsky Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 10 Brad Schneider Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 11 Bill Foster Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 12 Mike Bost Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 13 Nikki Budzinski Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 14 Lauren Underwood Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 15 Mary Miller Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 16 Darin LaHood Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 17 Eric Sorensen Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 1 Frank Mrvan Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 2 Rudy Yakym Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 3 Jim Banks Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 4 Jim Baird Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 5 Victoria Spartz Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 6 Greg Pence Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 7 André Carson Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 8 Larry Bucshon Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 9 Erin Houchin Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 2 Ashley Hinson Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 3 Zach Nunn Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 4 Randy Feenstra Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 1 Tracey Mann Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 2 Jacob LaTurner Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 3 Sharice Davids Democratic
U.S. House Kansas District 4 Ron Estes Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 1 James Comer Jr. Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 2 Brett Guthrie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 3 Morgan McGarvey Democratic
U.S. House Kentucky District 4 Thomas Massie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 5 Hal Rogers Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 6 Andy Barr Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 1 Steve Scalise Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 2 Troy Carter Democratic
U.S. House Louisiana District 3 Clay Higgins Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 4 Mike Johnson Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 5 Julia Letlow Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 6 Garret Graves Republican
U.S. House Maine District 1 Chellie Pingree Democratic
U.S. House Maine District 2 Jared Golden Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 1 Andrew Harris Republican
U.S. House Maryland District 2 Dutch Ruppersberger Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 3 John Sarbanes Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 4 Glenn Ivey Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 5 Steny Hoyer Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 6 David Trone Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 7 Kweisi Mfume Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 8 Jamie Raskin Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 1 Richard Neal Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 2 Jim McGovern Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 3 Lori Trahan Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 4 Jake Auchincloss Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 5 Katherine Clark Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 6 Seth Moulton Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 7 Ayanna Pressley Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 8 Stephen Lynch Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 9 Bill Keating Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 1 Jack Bergman Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 2 John Moolenaar Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 3 Hillary Scholten Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 4 Bill Huizenga Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 5 Tim Walberg Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 6 Debbie Dingell Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 7 Elissa Slotkin Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 8 Dan Kildee Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 9 Lisa McClain Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 10 John James Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 11 Haley Stevens Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 12 Rashida Tlaib Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 13 Shri Thanedar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 1 Brad Finstad Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 2 Angie Craig Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 3 Dean Phillips Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 4 Betty McCollum Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 5 Ilhan Omar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 6 Tom Emmer Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 7 Michelle Fischbach Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 8 Pete Stauber Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 1 Trent Kelly Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 2 Bennie Thompson Democratic
U.S. House Mississippi District 3 Michael Guest Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 4 Mike Ezell Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 1 Cori Bush Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 2 Ann Wagner Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 3 Blaine Luetkemeyer Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 4 Mark Alford Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 5 Emanuel Cleaver Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 6 Sam Graves Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 7 Eric Burlison Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 8 Jason Smith Republican
U.S. House Montana District 1 Ryan Zinke Republican
U.S. House Montana District 2 Matt Rosendale Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 1 Mike Flood Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 2 Don Bacon Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 3 Adrian Smith Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 1 Dina Titus Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 2 Mark Amodei Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 3 Susie Lee Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 4 Steven Horsford Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 Chris Pappas Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 Annie Kuster Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 1 Donald Norcross Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 2 Jeff Van Drew Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 3 Andrew Kim Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 4 Chris Smith Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 5 Josh Gottheimer Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 6 Frank Pallone Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 7 Thomas Kean Jr. Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 8 Robert Menendez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 9 Bill Pascrell Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 10 Donald Payne Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 11 Mikie Sherrill Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 12 Bonnie Watson Coleman Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 1 Melanie Ann Stansbury Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 2 Gabriel Vasquez Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 3 Teresa Leger Fernandez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 1 Nicholas J. LaLota Republican
U.S. House New York District 2 Andrew Garbarino Republican
U.S. House New York District 3 George Devolder-Santos Republican
U.S. House New York District 4 Anthony D’Esposito Republican
U.S. House New York District 5 Gregory W. Meeks Democratic
U.S. House New York District 6 Grace Meng Democratic
U.S. House New York District 7 Nydia Velazquez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 8 Hakeem Jeffries Democratic
U.S. House New York District 9 Yvette D. Clarke Democratic
U.S. House New York District 10 Daniel Goldman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 11 Nicole Malliotakis Republican
U.S. House New York District 12 Jerrold Nadler Democratic
U.S. House New York District 13 Adriano Espaillat Democratic
U.S. House New York District 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 15 Ritchie Torres Democratic
U.S. House New York District 16 Jamaal Bowman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 17 Michael Lawler Republican
U.S. House New York District 18 Pat Ryan Democratic
U.S. House New York District 19 Marcus Molinaro Republican
U.S. House New York District 20 Paul Tonko Democratic
U.S. House New York District 21 Elise Stefanik Republican
U.S. House New York District 22 Brandon Williams Republican
U.S. House New York District 23 Nicholas A. Langworthy Republican
U.S. House New York District 24 Claudia Tenney Republican
U.S. House New York District 25 Joseph Morelle Democratic
U.S. House New York District 26 Brian Higgins Democratic
U.S. House Non-Voting Delegate District of Columbia Eleanor Holmes Norton Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 1 Donald Davis Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 2 Deborah Ross Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 3 Gregory Murphy Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 4 Valerie Foushee Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 5 Virginia Foxx Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 6 Kathy Manning Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 7 David Rouzer Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 8 Dan Bishop Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 9 Richard Hudson Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 10 Patrick T. McHenry Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 11 Chuck Edwards Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 12 Alma Adams Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 13 Wiley Nickel Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 14 Jeff Jackson Democratic
U.S. House North Dakota At-large District Kelly Armstrong Republican
U.S. House Northern Mariana Islands At-large District Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 1 Greg Landsman Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 2 Brad Wenstrup Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 4 Jim Jordan Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 5 Bob Latta Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 6 Bill Johnson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 7 Max Miller Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 8 Warren Davidson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 9 Marcy Kaptur Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 10 Michael Turner Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 11 Shontel Brown Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 12 Troy Balderson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 13 Emilia Sykes Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 14 David Joyce Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 15 Mike Carey Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 1 Kevin Hern Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 2 Josh Brecheen Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 3 Frank Lucas Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 4 Tom Cole Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 5 Stephanie Bice Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 1 Suzanne Bonamici Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 2 Cliff Bentz Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 3 Earl Blumenauer Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 4 Val Hoyle Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 5 Lori Chavez-DeRemer Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 6 Andrea Salinas Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 1 Brian Fitzpatrick Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 2 Brendan Boyle Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 3 Dwight Evans Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 4 Madeleine Dean Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 5 Mary Gay Scanlon Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 6 Chrissy Houlahan Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 7 Susan Wild Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 8 Matt Cartwright Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 9 Dan Meuser Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 10 Scott Perry Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 11 Lloyd Smucker Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 12 Summer Lee Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 13 John Joyce Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 14 Guy Reschenthaler Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 15 Glenn Thompson Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 16 Mike Kelly Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 17 Christopher Deluzio Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 1 David N. Cicilline Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 2 Seth Magaziner Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 1 Nancy Mace Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 2 Joe Wilson Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 3 Jeff Duncan Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 4 William Timmons Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 5 Ralph Norman Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 6 James Clyburn Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 7 Russell Fry Republican
U.S. House South Dakota At-large District Dusty Johnson Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 1 Diana Harshbarger Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 2 Tim Burchett Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 3 Charles J. Fleischmann Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 4 Scott DesJarlais Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 5 Andy Ogles Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 6 John Rose Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 7 Mark Green Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 8 David Kustoff Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 9 Steve Cohen Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 1 Nathaniel Moran Republican
U.S. House Texas District 2 Daniel Crenshaw Republican
U.S. House Texas District 3 Keith Self Republican
U.S. House Texas District 4 Pat Fallon Republican
U.S. House Texas District 5 Lance Gooden Republican
U.S. House Texas District 6 Jake Ellzey Republican
U.S. House Texas District 7 Lizzie Pannill Fletcher Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 8 Morgan Luttrell Republican
U.S. House Texas District 9 Al Green Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 10 Michael McCaul Republican
U.S. House Texas District 11 August Pfluger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 12 Kay Granger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 13 Ronny L. Jackson Republican
U.S. House Texas District 14 Randy Weber Republican
U.S. House Texas District 15 Monica De La Cruz Republican
U.S. House Texas District 16 Veronica Escobar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 17 Pete Sessions Republican
U.S. House Texas District 18 Sheila Jackson Lee Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 19 Jodey Arrington Republican
U.S. House Texas District 20 Joaquin Castro Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 21 Chip Roy Republican
U.S. House Texas District 22 Troy Nehls Republican
U.S. House Texas District 23 Tony Gonzales Republican
U.S. House Texas District 24 Beth Van Duyne Republican
U.S. House Texas District 25 Roger Williams Republican
U.S. House Texas District 26 Michael C. Burgess Republican
U.S. House Texas District 27 Michael Cloud Republican
U.S. House Texas District 28 Henry Cuellar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 29 Sylvia Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 30 Jasmine Crockett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 31 John Carter Republican
U.S. House Texas District 32 Colin Allred Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 33 Marc Veasey Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 34 Vicente Gonzalez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 35 Greg Casar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 36 Brian Babin Republican
U.S. House Texas District 37 Lloyd Doggett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 38 Wesley Hunt Republican
U.S. House Utah District 1 Blake Moore Republican
U.S. House Utah District 2 Chris Stewart Republican
U.S. House Utah District 3 John Curtis Republican
U.S. House Utah District 4 Burgess Owens Republican
U.S. House Vermont At-large District Becca Balint Democratic
U.S. House Virgin Islands At-large District Stacey Plaskett Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 1 Robert J. Wittman Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 2 Jennifer Kiggans Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 3 Robert C. Scott Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 4 Jennifer McClellan Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 5 Bob Good Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 6 Benjamin Lee Cline Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 7 Abigail Spanberger Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 8 Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 9 H. Morgan Griffith Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 10 Jennifer Wexton Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 11 Gerald Edward Connolly Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 1 Suzan DelBene Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 2 Rick Larsen Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 3 Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 4 Dan Newhouse Republican
U.S. House Washington District 5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers Republican
U.S. House Washington District 6 Derek Kilmer Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 7 Pramila Jayapal Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 8 Kim Schrier Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 9 D. Adam Smith Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 10 Marilyn Strickland Democratic
U.S. House West Virginia District 1 Carol Miller Republican
U.S. House West Virginia District 2 Alexander Mooney Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 1 Bryan Steil Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 2 Mark Pocan Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 Derrick Van Orden Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 4 Gwen Moore Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 5 Scott Fitzgerald Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 6 Glenn Grothman Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 7 Tom Tiffany Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 8 Mike Gallagher Republican
U.S. House Wyoming At-large District Harriet Hageman Republican

Largely Unnoticed, WHO Moves Forward with Global Governance Plan

Former congresswoman Michele Bachmann sounded the alarm Monday about developments coming out of the World Health Assembly that suggest that the World Health Organization (WHO) is intent on establishing “a platform for global governance through health care” in the wake of the COVID pandemic.

On Sunday, the WHO kicked off its annual 10-day World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, described as the “decision-making body of WHO.” Concerns over the WHO’s actions have been steadily building since the beginning of the pandemic, when observers noted that the WHO’s deference to China arguably worsened the spread of COVID. In addition, observers are also pointing out that the Biden administration is working to enable the organization to “centralize authority not just for pandemics, [but] for any health emergency in the hands of the director-general.”

Now, says Bachmann, the current World Health Assembly is poised to increase the WHO’s mandate over the health care decisions of sovereign nations.

“There’s a dual track process that they’re following,” she explained during an on the ground report from Geneva on Monday’s edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.” “One is through a global pandemic treaty that they’re calling an ‘accord.’ The second is through a package of about 300 amendments to the international health rules. Both lead to the same result. Both lead to the creation of a platform for global governance through health care. And it is a web that locks us in … the likes of which we’ve never seen before.”

As Bachmann went on to observe, the potentially massive ramifications of the decisions being made at the World Health Assembly are happening with surprisingly little fanfare.

“There were no members of Congress here,” she pointed out. “I was actually shocked because this has been a big issue that a lot of their constituents have rightfully been very concerned about. … There was no American press here. So how would anyone even know what was going on unless they tuned in and they watched for themselves?”

Bachmann, who currently serves as dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, further noted that the WHO’s view of COVID appears to be exactly the same now as it was at the beginning of the pandemic. “We’ve learned a lot of things in the last three years, haven’t we? And the World Health Organization bungled almost everything, whether it was masks or vaccines or lockdowns, but yet they acted like nothing happened. There was no review. They acted like everything was just normal.”

Bachmann then laid out the WHO’s plans going forward. “They’re planning to meet in New York City in September. They’ll go over the progress that they’re going to make in January. They’ll give a final completed package of the 300 amendments, together with a global pandemic treaty, to the World Health Organization and the U.N. And then they’ll meet again in Geneva next February. But one year from this week, they will take the vote. And so they intend to vote for a platform for global government and to give themselves the power that no one has ever seen before.”

The former congresswoman from Minnesota also described the U.S. government’s involvement in the WHO’s agenda.

“I heard from Secretary Xavier Becerra, the head of our Health and Human Services [who] said he wants more ‘bio surveillance,’ in other words, surveillance of our bodies. And then they want to share that data with everyone else in the world. This is highly invasive. They were very clear today. They want very bold language. They intend to have surveillance over every citizen on earth, and they intend to … control us through health care.”

Bachmann further detailed how the WHO’s agenda goes well beyond pandemics.

“They’ve got this concept they talked about today called ‘One Health’ — they’ve got graphics on it [that] show humans, animals, the earth — ‘One Health.’ So when decisions are made about health care, they have to take into account the earth and what the impact would be on climate change. … So what it boils down to is, ‘Humans = cockroaches = a clump of dirt.’ … That’s why you don’t want to give up decision-making authority to someone like the director general of the WHO. They have a very different agenda at hand.”

At the same time, she underscored, the WHO’s emphasis seems to be on “equity” rather than innovations in medicine.

“The number one word that they use besides ‘urgent’ was ‘equity.’ [They want] to have equal outcomes for everyone on earth with universal health care. … And for those countries that are producing health products, they need to produce more health products and give them away to the world. So one thing they didn’t do [was] focus on any new breakthroughs in medicine. … There was nothing about breakthroughs or cures. Everything was about giving themselves more power and more authority control.”

Bachmann called on Congress to start confronting concerns over the WHO’s attempted power grab sooner rather than later.

“We need our senators to wake up, hold hearings, pull these documents in, [and] start to review them. [I]f they’re thinking they’ll wait until January, that’s pretty late, because the next meeting will be in in Geneva in February. The final vote will take place in May. … They should have been there this week. … And I would call on [House Speaker] Kevin McCarthy as he is negotiating for raising the debt ceiling [to] put on the table that Joe Biden has to get the United States out of the World Health Organization and pull [their] funding … as the price of raising the debt ceiling.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Democracy Victorious: U.S. Must Defend Global Civilization with Justice, Sympathy, and Humility

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden Admin Tells Adults How to Discuss Sex with Teens Behind Parents’ Backs

As part of its month-long focus on adolescent health, the Biden administration is promoting a document that tells Planned Parenthood and other taxpayer-funded family planning offices how to talk to minors about sex without their parents overhearing, and how to secretly deliver birth control to adolescents without parental knowledge or consent.

Federally-funded guidelines instruct adults to pause before discussing sex with minors and to ask, “Are you alone in the room?” These instructions specify tactics to follow “if you’re really having a hard time getting a parent” to leave the room during the sex talk. They suggest children as young as 13 discuss sex with groups like Planned Parenthood in a parked car or communicate in writing, so their parents cannot hear the adults’ side of the conversation. And they encourage offices to have vans roam neighborhoods giving minors federally funded contraceptives; to mail birth control to adolescents in “plain, unmarked packaging;” and/or to have teenagers receive contraceptives at public meet-up places.

A federal grant recipient admitted the cloak-and-dagger sex discussion is necessary, because “parents might not agree with some of the things that we’re talking about.”

The emphasis on shutting out adults comes as the Biden administration and 24 states are fighting against a lawsuit to recognize parents’ right to know if the government is enabling underage sexual activity by giving teens birth control.

Biden Admin: ‘It Takes a Village’ to Teach Teens about Sex

The Biden administration revealed that it aimed to “expand sexual and reproductive health information and services” for teens during National Adolescent Health Month (NAHM), which runs during the month of May. The announcement made it clear government-funded strangers would take a leading role in forming teens’ views of sexuality.

“The adage ‘It takes a village’ has been proven time and again,” said Jessica Marcella, deputy assistant secretary for Population Affairs and director of the Office of Adolescent Health in the official press release. “[T]his year,” the Biden administration is “amplifying the important role of youth-serving professionals and other caring adults in their interactions with young people.”

The Biden administration’s official Resources for National Adolescent Health Month™ 2023 links to a document titled “Providing Family Planning Services to Adolescents During Uncertain Times,” produced by the Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC), a group that trains Title X providers at taxpayers’ expense. Its instructions detail how Title X recipients, who distribute federally funded contraception to children in the name of “family planning,” can and should bypass parents during sex-related telehealth meetings.

‘Why Are You Talking to My Young Person in the Bathroom with the Door Locked?’

The plan to speak about sex one-on-one with impressionable youth begins during scheduling. “Confirm with youth clients that you have their phone number/contact information rather than their parents’ contact information,” the document tells federal grant recipients. “At the beginning of the visit, do a privacy screen. Ask ‘Are you alone in the room?’ or ‘Can other people hear what you are saying?’”

The document links to a webinar which fleshes out these ideas in greater detail. A slide on “Ensuring Adolescent Privacy” tells Title X grantees to ask:

1. Are they alone in the room? Always ask first! If a parent is present, ask to provide alone time during the appointment.

2. Can people hear them outside the room? Can they relocate? Use headphones? Use yes/no questions or chat feature?” (Emphases in original.)

The written document tells teens who want to “protect their privacy” from their parents “during a virtual visit” to:

  • “Take the call in the bathroom, outside, or in a parked car.”
  • “Use headphones.”
  • “Schedule the call at a time when there are fewer people at home.”

“[P]arents might not agree with some of the things that we’re talking about and some of the services that our patients are looking for,” Safiya Yearwood, a nurse at Baltimore’s Star Track Clinic, told the webinar. Title X grantees must “mak[e] sure that patients are, number one, safe to even have these conversations, and determine[e] where they can do it.”

The easiest method is to assure teens know how to call without their parent or guardian’s input. “[A]re we letting all of our adolescent patients know what their protections are?” asked webinar host Kaleigh Cornelison, MSW, who was then lead program specialist at the University of Michigan’s Adolescent Health Initiative, and who now works at ETR, which specialized in “health equity” advancement. “[A]re we informing everyone of what their rights are?”

“Are we ensuring that everyone knows what their rights are and what they have access to without a parent or caregiver’s consent?”

If parents are present, Title X grantees should make every effort to get them to leave the room. “Standardize time alone for all adolescent clients with the provider,” Cornelison instructed Title X offices. Have a “system in place so it’s standard practice; it’s not out of the ordinary. It comes to be expected every time.”

“We had to create scripts” for telehealth visits, explained Chinwe Efuribe, MD, MPH, who founded the Centered Youth Clinic and Consulting clinic and medical director of Every Body Texas, on the webinar. Employees told parents their absence “is our practice” and, “we usually have one-on-one time with our young people, and we would like to continue that.”

It is important to normalize the practice to evade parents’ suspicion, she said. “If the parent was there in the visit, also let them know that this is something that we’ve always been doing that we want to continue doing, so they don’t think that, you know, ‘Why are you talking to my young person in the bathroom with the door locked?’” said Efuribe.

If parents refuse to leave, Cornelison told Title X recipient offices, they should tell teens they “can maybe get a little creative about moving rooms, putting on headphones, maybe some questions are asked in a chat instead of verbally just to sort of deal with that privacy issue if you’re really having a hard time getting a parent or caregiver outside of the space.”

To maintain silence after the visit, Cornelison told providers to assure all emails are sent to the teens’ private email account, so no “parent is going to get a red flag.”

Two sexually active minors testified the Biden administration-promoted guidelines helped them hide their sexual activity from others, including parents.

“It had been an ongoing battle for me” to keep her parents uninformed of her sexual activity, said Kacie, an underage teenager. “I did not think I needed to hear or experience the repercussions from my family.” Her efforts included talking to her Title X office “on the phone behind the shed” and lying to her parents to get the use of the family car. “I’d be like, ‘Hey, I’m going here, and I’m doing this.’ It’s not like, ‘I’m going to my doctor to get help with Title X services,’” she said. Bianca, a teen who uses they/them pronouns, added that she particularly appreciated online events, where “you can tell someone, ‘Hey, I’m going to this event!’ and you don’t have to say, ‘I’m going to the clinic.’”

Contraceptive Vans and Unmarked Boxes of Condoms

After the consultation, adult Title X grantees must deliver contraceptives to minors without the parents’ knowledge. “With more virtual visits happening, clinics have come up with creative ways to deliver the prescriptions and supplies that they previously gave youth on-site at the clinic,” says the document, which encourages offices to begin:

  • “Mail delivery of supplies in plain, unmarked packaging”
  • “Curbside pickup of supplies at the clinic or other community locations frequented by youth”
  • “Use of a mobile van to bring supplies to people in their neighborhoods”

Yearwood told the webinar she mailed teens “That Box,” a box full of condoms, “little toys,” and other sex items. “There’s no sort of markings on there that would say, ‘There’s HIV [testing kit] and condoms in here,’” she said.

“When I go to the clinic, Safiya and them [sic] always give me like a ‘goodie bag.’ And it’s so cute. It’s like a bag but it has condoms and all these things that I need,” said Bianca — with her parents none the wiser.

Eroding Parents’ Rights Did Not Begin with Gender

“These guidelines encourage health care providers to keep the parents of teens in the dark about their potentially life-altering decisions surrounding sexual activity,” Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, the founder and president of the Ruth Institute and author of “The Sexual State: How Elite Ideologies are Destroying Lives and How the Church was Right All Along,” told The Washington Stand.

“It has long been federal policy that minors past the age of puberty have a right to contraception without their parents’ knowledge or consent,” Morse told TWS. “This latest effort by the federal government to actively encourage health care providers to help teens deceive their parents is part of a longstanding pattern of the Sexual State to spread the ideology of the Sexual Revolution — whether people know it or not, whether people want it or not.”

Title X became law when President Richard Nixon signed the Family Planning Services and Public Research Act of 1970 (now Public Law 91-572). In 1978, Congress amended the law specifically to include adolescents. A series of courts ruled that the law forbids parental consent or notification laws. In 2021, the Biden administration codified these rulings in regulation to federal law 42 C.F.R. § 59.10(b), which states that “Title X projects may not require consent of parents or guardians for the provision of services to minors, nor can any Title X project staff notify a parent or guardian before or after a minor has requested and/or received Title X family planning services.”

Family advocates have tried to remove the government-imposed barrier between parents and unemancipated minors for more than a quarter of a century. In 1997, then-Rep. Ernest Istook attempted to require parental consent before federally funded facilities could give birth control to minors. But the House Appropriations Committee defeated the Istook amendment, substituting a watered-down alternative that asked Title X participants to encourage family involvement “to the extent practical.”

More recently, parents earned a victory in a federal courtroom — a breakthrough the Biden administration is trying to reverse.

Biden Takes Parents to Court

A concerned parent sued HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, Deanda v. Becerra, last December, arguing that Title X confidentiality guidelines violate parents’ rights — and won.

The secretive “administration of the Title X program violates the constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children,” ruled U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, who also recently found the FDA had wrongly approved the abortion pill (mifepristone). “[P]arental rights … do not completely disappear with respect to a minor child’s sexual activity.”

The Biden administration appealed the decision in February. The attorneys general of 24 states and the District of Columbia signed an amicus brief siding with Biden and against parents/guardians.

They are supported by Planned Parenthood and other federally funded contraceptive providers who oppose parental “involvement” — starkly framing the legal battle as a struggle between their business and parents’ rights.

“Forced parental notification and involvement undercuts the integrity of the Title X program and creates barriers to care and decision-making,” said Clare Coleman, president and CEO of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA). Establishing parental oversight of their minor children’s sex life would “eviscerate longstanding Title X program protections that ensure young people can access the care they need from providers they trust.”

The Deanda lawsuit is “shameful,” said Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson. “Young people deserve access to the health care they need to make their own decisions about their bodies, lives, and futures.”

Planned Parenthood said it is “grateful” to the president and “fortunate that the U.S. Justice Department and the Biden administration [is] dedicated to fighting back,” said Johnson, adding that Planned Parenthood will “look forward to our ongoing work with them.”

Sexually Active Teens Have Worse Mental Health: Biden Administration

The Biden administration’s anti-parental rights legal efforts seem at odds with its own advice on how to improve poor teen mental health. The CDC website states multiple times, “Parent engagement also makes it more likely that children and adolescents will avoid unhealthy behaviors, such as sexual risk behaviors and tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use.” Sexually active teens are more likely to suffer from depression, addiction, and suicidal ideation than their abstinent heterosexual peers, according to a report the CDC released in February. Teens who have sex with members of the opposite sex are twice as likely to self-report attempting suicide, more than twice as likely to use marijuana, and 45% more likely to report overall poor mental health.

The rates are higher for teens who have sex with members of the same sex.

Independent studies have found parental involvement is particularly important for vulnerable populations the Biden administration uplifts as the center of its policies. Black female teens living in low-income urban areas and “at increased risk for sexually transmitted diseases” found high levels of “perceived parental supervision” resulted in lower rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia, concluded one such study. “[P]arental supervision can result in lower sexually transmitted disease rates in urban high-prevalence populations.”

“Given the mental health crisis among American teens, deliberately putting a communication barrier between children and their parents is a really bad idea,” Morse told TWS.

Any sexual activity increases the possibility of physical health impacts, as well. While abstinence prevents all pregnancies and disease, the oral contraceptives distributed by Title X fail to prevent pregnancy at least 7% of the time, and condoms have a “typical use failure rate [of] 13%,” according to the CDC. The NAHM’s resources page admits that “condom use with every sexual act can greatly reduce — though not eliminate — the risk of” sexually transmitted infections/diseases (STIs/STDs). People between the ages of 15 and 24 accounted for half of the 26 million new STDs/STIs in the U.S., according to the CDC.

Many of the hormonal contraceptives and long-acting reversible contraceptives Title X offers teens also constitute potential abortifacients. And many are now distributed by Planned Parenthood, which may now refer visitors for abortions.

‘It Takes a Family,’ Not a Village

Perhaps knowing how incendiary its materials are, the RHNTC guide carries a disclaimer that, although “[t]his publication was supported by the Office of Population Affairs (Grant FPTPA006030),” the “views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services.” It does, however, reflect a training document intended to teach Title X providers how to use the taxpayer dollars furnished by the HHS.

Pro-family advocates say these prescriptions align with the Biden administration’s attempt to have minors guided on sexual issues by unrelated adults at the government’s direction, instead of loving parents.

Marcella’s reference that “it takes a village to raise a child” is “simply an attempt to replace parents. It takes a family to raise a child — not a village. It takes a loving mother and father who work together to teach their child to strive for the good, true, and beautiful,” Mary Szoch, director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand.

“Since day one, the Biden administration has worked to replace mothers and fathers with a village — and not just any village, but one that is only made up of people intent on leading teenagers down the path of self-destruction and death.”

Resources: You can read the document here. You can view the webinar here.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Transgenderism on Trial

I routinely ask people in social gatherings ‘how do we win – how do we defeat the Left?’  One answer that’s come back is lawfare, tying up our opponents in court.  Transgenderism is one area where lawfare could actually work.  Legal action has the potential to bring down the entire Transgender-Industrial Complex.

To that end, I have created a new section on my website – Transgenderism on Trial – to foment more litigation against doctors, psychologists, school administrators, teachers, and other instrumentalities of the Transgender-Industrial Complex who are either out to make a buck or to make America a communist country.

I don’t throw around the word ‘communism’ lightly, only when I have the goods and here I most definitely do.  The first thing you will see in my new transgenderism section is a video showing four transgender activists openly and explicitly discussing how the purpose of transgenderism is to usher communism into the United States.  If you think communism is cute, we’ll see how cute you think it is when communism arrives here and you get the midnight knock on the door from the secret police to haul you off to the gulag for thought crimes.

Transgenderism on Trial starts with a news feed.   I am the only one collecting all the stories from all around the country about litigation against health care providers and school districts pushing life-altering drugs and irreversible mutilating surgery on defenseless kids.  The news out of Missouri is amazing.   A trans whistleblower documented enough corrupt practices at a gender clinic in St. Louis to bring a whole-of-government investigation down on the clinic that may result in civil enforcement actions and criminal charges.  The practices include pushing transitioning on kids without psychological assessments in individual cases, prescribing drugs without parental consent or after consent was revoked, lack of full disclosure of the adverse and long-term consequences of sex change drugs and surgery, false claims children would commit suicide if not allowed to transition, and other high pressure sales tactics.  The investigation will determine whether school officials conspired with clinicians to form a school-to-clinic pipeline of steady business for the clinic.

That’s just one case.  My news feeds chronicles other cases where doctors are being sued for botched surgeries, medical experimentation with unstudied or unapproved drugs, and pushing transgender drugs and surgery instead of providing counseling.  Cases are also sprouting up against school districts for transitioning kids without parental knowledge or consent, violating teachers’ religious beliefs, and firing teachers who refuse to lie to parents or otherwise get with the transgender program.

Transgenderism on Trial provides a list of law firms and legal foundations around the country bringing these types of cases or expressing a desire to enter the field.  These are the courtroom warriors who vindicating parental rights, pursuing medical malpractice claims, and taking action against so-called transgender sanctuary states that lure kids from other parts of the country.

Using my collection of parental resources, parents can arm themselves with the facts and learn how to deal with gender-questioning children and high-pressure sales tactics from clinicians and school administrators.  In addition to books and parental guides, the list of resources tells parents how to find support groups and objective counselors who will give parents unbiased information about the subject.

Finally, there’s a page on the most despicable high-pressure sales tactic of all – telling parents their children will commit suicide if not allowed to transition.  A second set of researchers reexamined the raw data from the original study making this claim and found that the data did not support the study’s conclusions.   When confronted with this information, the University of Washington which participated in the original study tried to cover it up.  Other early studies making similar claims were later found to be flawed for, among other things, failing to track outcomes long enough to draw reliable conclusions and hiding raw data from other researchers.  Finally, the page describes two other studies showing people who transition are MORE likely – not less likely – to commit suicide.  Lies, misrepresentations, hiding data, ignoring later studies – there’s enough on the page to completely debunk the high pressure sales tactics the snake-oil salesmen are using on parents.

Plaintiffs of the World, Unite!  Let’s bring down the communist transgender activists who are trying to destroy the country and the doctors, school administrators, and other financially self-interested useful idiots who are getting paid handsomely for doing their bidding.  There’s nothing like legal liability and a blizzard of court cases to focus the mind.  Let’s swarm them and put them out of business.

©2023. Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and dWatch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

Israeli Considering $1.3 Billion Lawsuit Against CNN Over Amanpour Terror Coverage

Amanpour has been to inciting to Jew hatred and genocide for years, this is long overdue.

Rabbi Leo Dee’s wife and two daughters were murdered by a Palestinian terrorist. CNN’s Christiane Amanpour described the terror attack as a shootout. Amanpour apologized to Rabbi Dee after he threatened a lawsuit against CNN. Rabbi Dee should not accept Amanpour’s apology, and proceed with a lawsuit against CNN. CNN continues to allow Amanpour to demonize Israel (hereherehere) with impunity. It’s about time CNN pay a price for employing this vicious anti-Semite.

Rabbi Dee Considering $1.3 Billion Lawsuit Against CNN Over Amanpour Terror Coverage

By Jewish Journal, May 22, 2023

Rabbi Leo Dee, whose wife and two daughters were murdered in a terror attack, is considering a $1.3 billion lawsuit against CNN over their international anchor Christiane Amanpour describing the terror attack as a “shootout.”

Dee made the announcement via video during a May 21 event at The Carlebach Shul in New York titled, “Antisemitism: Is There No Solution?” as part of the third annual Yoav Boteach Memorial Lecture series, in honor of Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s late father. Dee was speaking alongside Boteach, Elisha Wiesel, chairman of the board of the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity, and Rabbi Naftali Citron. Media watchdog HonestReporting had reported that Amanpour had said during an April 10 interview with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh, “We have a young 15-year-old Palestinian boy who’s been shot and killed by security — Israeli security forces. We also have the mother of two sisters, Israeli British sisters. They were — they were killed in a shootout, and now the mother has died of her injury — injuries.”

“A shootout is two sides firing at each other,” HonestReporting tweeted on May 11. “A mother & her two daughters were shot at close range by Palestinian terrorists. @amanpour, you owe a grieving family an apology.”

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

NAACP Vice Chair Lives in Florida as Organization Issued Travel Advisory for Black Americans to Not Go to Florida

You can’t make this stuff up.

As I wrote when the news of the NAACP’s racist declaration broke, this is what happens to organizations after they’ve achieved their founding goal. Instead of disbanding and moving on, they become increasingly radical and dangerous. The NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, was founded in 1909. They achieved their civil rights goals in the last century and yet here they are issuing racist edicts against states standing for individual rights.

NAACP Issues Travel Warning for Florida…There’s Just One Problem

As Leah has reported, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issued a formal travel advisory for the state of Florida for what the group claims are Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) “aggressive attempts to erase Black history” and take down Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs in state colleges.

The NAACP went on to say that the state under DeSantis “has become hostile to Black Americans and in direct conflict with the democratic ideals that our union was founded upon. He should know that democracy will prevail because its defenders are prepared to stand up and fight. We’re not backing down, and we encourage our allies to join us in the battle for the soul of our nation.”

DeSantis Press Secretary Jeremy Redfern noted how the National Board of Directors Vice Chair Karen Boykin-Towns had taken a Florida vacation in 2021, during the time when Democrats were accusing DeSantis of still not doing enough to clamp down on COVID-19.

On top of that, Redfern also pointed out that Leon Russell, the chairman of the board of directors, currently lives in Tampa. 

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Toxic: NAACP Announces Travel Advisory for Florida Claiming the State Attacks Civil

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Weaponized DOJ SHUT DOWN Clinton Foundation ‘Investigation’ as Trump Left Office, Biden’s FBI Destroyed All Evidence

This goes well beyond “two tiered” justice. This is treason.

DOJ Halted Clinton Foundation ‘Investigation’ as Trump Left Office, Biden’s FBI Destroyed All Evidence

By: Kyle Becker, May 22, 2023:

Newly revealed documents and interviews with former Justice Department officials indicate that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation, focused on its interactions with foreign donors during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, remained open for the majority of President Donald Trump’s administration.

The case was eventually closed just days before Trump left office, as detailed in closing documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the New York Times reported on Monday.

The investigation, which had been a subject of intense scrutiny and campaign promises by Trump to “lock her up,” continued despite FBI agents and prosecutors leading it to a dead end. The prolonged investigation became a rallying cry for Republicans who anticipated finding evidence of corruption that would harm Clinton’s political prospects.

The scrutiny of the Clinton Foundation began in 2015 after the publication of “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich” by conservative author Peter Schweizer. The book examined donations made by foreign entities to the foundation. Republicans accused Clinton of engaging in a quid pro quo by supporting the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian company connected to mining interests in the United States, to a Russian nuclear agency in exchange for substantial donations to the foundation.

The FBI initiated a preliminary investigation based on the book’s claims in 2016, but it relied on unverified hearsay information. Additional investigations were launched by the FBI in New York and Little Rock, Arkansas, based on confidential source reporting. However, the Justice Department expressed doubts about the validity of the investigations, causing frustration among FBI agents. Some prosecutors even believed that Schweizer’s book had been discredited.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: THE BIDEN REPORT: Physical and Video Proof of The Biden Family’s Corruption

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

THE BIDEN REPORT: Physical and Video Proof of The Biden Family’s Corruption

The Marco Polo USA website has provided links and a video, below, of proof of corruption in the Biden family. Please take the time to click on each link and learn the truth about Benedict Biden and his cohorts.

Please read Marco Polo USA’s Biden Report.

REPORT PHYSICAL COPIES PDF


THE BIDEN FAMILY BUSINESSES


SAR #1   SAR #2   SAR #3   SAR #4   SAR #5

CATHAY BANK 8969

CATHAY BANK 8992

SUBPOENA ON 05/15/2019

A WRECKED LIFE: HUNTER’S BILLS

WANTED: JAMES ANDREW GILLIARČEŠTINA


EMAILS


BIDEN LAPTOP EMAILS

EMAIL ADDRESSES ON THE BIDEN LAPTOP


COMMUNICATIONS


HB IPHONE BACKUP MESSAGESATTACHMENTS

HB IPHONE BACKUP WHATSAPP MESSAGES.ZIPATTACHMENTS
PDF

BIDEN LAPTOP MESSAGES.ZIPPDF

TONY BOBULINSKI MESSAGES.ZIPPDF


INFLUENCE PEDDLING


SOFT COUP PLANNING CALL ON 10/25/2018TRANSCRIPT

BIDEN + MCCAIN = AMERICAN MISERY


ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY


ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY: TRANSCRIBED

ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY: ORIGINAL
DELRAY BEACH FL POLICE REPORT
DELRAY BEACH FL POLICE BODY CAM


PERSONAL


A “DEVASTATING” OP-ED FROM MAUREEN DOWD

TRANSCRIPT

AN ORGY WITH DAPHNE GUINNESS, AND JOE THINKS I’M A GOD

TRANSCRIPT

HUNTER BIDEN SAFARI BROWSER HISTORY.CSV

ALIMONY FROM HELL ON 03/21/2017

“MOST GENIUS SHIT EVER.MP3” ON 05/11/2018

TRANSCRIPT

HUNTER AND HALLIE: THE COCAINE SAGA ON 06/23/2018TRANSCRIPT


TRANSCRIPT

©2023 Marco Polo USA. All rights reserved.