Trump Announces 2024 Presidential Run

Former President Donald Trump officially launched his 2024 presidential campaign at Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday, making a run for the White House for the third consecutive time.

Trump announced his run after highlighting what he did in his first term, as well as inflation, the open border and record-breaking gas prices under the Biden administration.

“I am officially running for president of the United States, and we are going to make our country great again,” Trump said.

“Our country needs a truly great leader, and we need a truly great leader now. We need a leader that wrote ‘The Art of the Deal.’ We need a leader that can bring back our jobs, can bring back our manufacturing, can bring back our military, take care of our Vets. Our Vets have been abandoned!” Trump said, after noting that “America’s comeback starts right now.”

He officially filed his candidacy with the Federal Election Commission as a Republican for 2024.

Trump had teased the announcement the day before the midterms by saying he had a “very big announcement” set for Nov. 15, and had repeatedly hinted that he would run in 2024. Reports had ramped up about Trump’s impending announcement before the midterms, with sources suspecting that he would officially declare his campaign during his rally for Ohio’s J.D. Vance. Axios reported that the former president’s inner circle had marked Nov. 14 as the official launch date.

If he wins in 2024, Trump would be the first U.S. president since Grover Cleveland to win another four-year term after losing re-election.

After Republicans did not secure a red wave in the midterms, Republicans splintered on whether Trump should announce his candidacy while the results are still being tabulated.

“Every ounce of Republican energy, every last ounce needs to go into that Georgia race because it could potentially be what makes or breaks the Senate,” former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said.

Some, including Republican Rep. Byron Donalds, have questioned whether Trump represents the future of the Republican Party, given that several of his handpicked candidates underperformed in the midterm elections.

Other Republicans, including Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, New York Rep. Elise Stefanik and Vance, have argued that Trump needs to be back in the White House to complete what he started in his firm term.

The former president has also launched verbal attacks on other potential Republican presidential candidates by taking credit for their electoral victories, calling Ron DeSantis an “average” governor and saying Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s name “sounds Chinese.” The outward criticism of DeSantis comes after the governor secured a major victory in Florida, defeating his opponent by nearly 20%.

Several polls show that a majority of voters prefer DeSantis over Trump, with the Florida governor leading Trump by 3% in a YouGov poll conducted after the midterms.

Trump’s announcement marks the first major presidential candidate to officially declare their bid for the 2024 election. President Joe Biden has insisted throughout his presidency that he intends to run for another term, but hedged his statement on Nov. 9, saying that it’s “ultimately a family decision.” 

Former Vice President Mike Pence has also said he’s potentially eyeing a 2024 presidential bid, telling ABC on Monday that he’s giving it a “prayerful consideration.”

AUTHOR

DIANA GLEBOVA

White House correspondent.

RELATED TWEET: 

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘We’re Going To Have Discussions About It’ 2024 Run, Biden Says While Addressing Midterm Results

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Defense Department Records Reveal U.S. Funding of Anthrax Laboratory Activities in Ukraine

Washington, D.C. – Judicial Watch announced today it received 345 pages of records from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), a component of the U.S. Department of Defense, revealing that the United States funded anthrax laboratory activities in a Ukrainian biolab in 2018. Dozens of pages are completely redacted, and many others are heavily redacted. The records show over $11 million in funding for the Ukraine biolabs program in 2019.

The records were obtained in response to a February 28, 2022, Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency for records regarding the funding of Black & Veatch involving work of any manner with biosafety laboratories in the country of Ukraine.

Three phases of work are discussed in the records, several of which are indicated to have occurred “on site” at the Ukrainian labs.

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency provided a report titled “PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] at the [redacted (b)(3), which exempts information from disclosure when a foreign government or international organization requests the withholding, or the national security official concerned has specified in regulations that the information’s release would have an adverse effect on the U.S. government’s ability to obtain similar information in the future] Phase 2 On-the-Job Training Report, December 11-13/December 26, 2018” The Executive Summary includes information regarding “on-site” activities, likely referring to a Ukrainian biolab:

  • PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] on-the-job training was conducted for users of the [redacted (b)(3)] on December 11-13, under Phase 2 implementation activities, Anthrax Laboratory activities were conducted on December 28, 2018.
  • PACS existing configuration and customization were checked jointly with the on-site PACS Working Group
  • Phase 1 implementation activities including progress and current status were reviewed; issues and problems discussed and resolved;
  • Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for PACS use at [redacted (b)(3)] was updated to include Subculturing Operation process – the updated SOP submitted to the on-site Working Group.

The report provides a list of titles of “OJT [on-the-job training] Participants” with all participants names from Black & Veatch redacted, citing exemptions (b)(6) for personal privacy and (b)(3).

Senior Researcher Laboratory of Anacrobic Infections

Leading Researcher Laboratory of Anacrobic Infections

Senior Researcher Laboratory of Anacrobic Infections

Researcher Laboratory of Anacrobic Infections

Leading Veternarian Laboratory of Anacrobic Infections

Senior Researcher Laboratory of Bacterial Animal Diseases

Head of Anthrax Laboratory

Researcher Anthrax Laboratory

Senior Research Scientist Laboratory of Mycotoxicology

Leading Veternarian Laboratory of Mycotoxicology

Junior Researcher Laboratory of Leptospirosis

Laboratory Assistant Neuroinfection Laboratory

Research Scientist Sector of International Relationships and Geoinformation

A section titled “Future Activities” notes: “Phase 3 implementation agreed for March 2019.”

Included in the records is an Order for Supplies or Services dated August 1, 2019, is issued by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency to Black and Veatch Special Projects Corp. The total amount of the contract award is $11,289,142.00. The order contains approximately 35 contract line items set forth in a statement of work (SOW), dated March 5, 2019, titled: “Electronic Integrated Disease Surveillance (EIDSS) and Pathogen Asset Control (PACS) Implementation” The statement of work, consisting of 24 pages, was not provided, nor was there an explanation for the withholding.

A report titled “PACS [Pathogen Asset Control] Implementation at the [redacted (b)(3)]. Phase 3 On-the-Job Training Report, November 28-29.2018” states in its Executive Summary:

  • B&V has completed the final stage of PACS implementation at the [redacted (b)(3)]. The site has been fully commissioned in operations of PACS functionality.
  • PACS on-the-job training and on-site activities were conducted for users on November 28-29, 2018 under Phase 3 implementation activities
  • PACS existing configuration and customization were checked jointly with the on-site PACS Working Group
  • Phase 2 implementation activities were reviewed; issues and problems discussed and resolved;

report titled “PACS [Pathogen Asset Control] Implementation at the [redacted (b)(3)]. Phase 3 On-the-Job Training Report, April 3-5, 2019” has its Executive Summary and other portions redacted, citing FOIA exemptions (b)(4) trade secrets, (b)(5) interagency or intra-agency communications and/or attorney-client privilege.

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency also provided a 2018 report titled “PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] Implementation Plan at [redacted (b)(3)]. Phase 2 On-the-Job Training Report, September 25-27, 2018.” The Executive Summary includes: “PACS on-the-job training was conducted for users of the [redacted (b)(3)] on September 25-27, 2018, under Phase 2 implementation activities.”

A list of “OJT [on-the-job-training] Participants” from contractor Black & Veatch includes job descriptions but all names have been redacted through exemptions (b)(6) personal privacy and (b)(3). Some of those job descriptions include:

  • Head of Laboratory Virology
  • Department of Molecular Diagnostics and Control
  • Researcher of Pigs Diseases Research Laboratory
  • Scientist of Laboratory of Virology
  • Department of Avian Diseases
  • Researcher of Department of Avian Diseases
  • Laboratory for Biosafety, Quality Management
  • Engineer of the Laboratory for Biosafety, Quality Management
  • Laboratory of Biotechnology
  • Researcher of the Laboratory of Biotechnology
  • Head of the Brucellosis Laboratory
  • Senior Researcher of the Brucellosis Laboratory
  • Head of the Molecular Diagnostics and Control
  • Head of the Tuberculosis Laboratory
  • Researcher of Tuberculosis Laboratory
  • Researcher of the Laboratory of Virology
  • The report also contains a section titled “Future Activities:”
  • PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] users to continue with material registration, moving and destruction operations.
  • PACS users to reflect the process of Subculturing in PACS.
  • B & V to update Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to include the Subculture operations process.

[Redacted (b)(3)] to perform check of PACS interface and provide feedback (if any).

Phase 3 implementation agreed for December 2018.

A December 19-21, 2018, Pathogen Asset Control System report begins with an Executive Summary that states: “B & V has completed the final stage of PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] implementation at the Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine of the National Academy Agrarian Sciences (NAAS) of the Ukraine. The site has been fully commissioned in all operations of PACS functionality.”

In a report titled “PACS Implementation Plan at the [redacted (b)(3)]” has the subtitle “Phase 3 On-the-Job Training Report, October 30 – 31, 2018 / November 14, 2018” The Executive Summary provides in part:

B & V has completed the final stage of PACS implementation at the [redacted (b)(3)]. The site has been fully commissioned in all operations of PACS functionality.

PACS on-the-job training and on-site activities were conducted for users on October 30 – 31, 2018, under Phase 3 implementation activities. Virology Department “activities” were conducted on November 14.

A section of the order titled “Special Contract Requirements” cites the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act and states the contractor “shall not engage in activities that incur expenditures in the Russian Federation, such as project management activities, procurement and shipping activities, travel or direct and indirect cost incurrences.” The contractor may, however, procure Russian-origin equipment from a Russian or non-Russian vendor located outside of Russia.

The records include 10 reports titled “Report of Transfer of U.S. Government Property Ownership.” between the Defense Threat Agency and the [redacted (b)(3)]. All of the property listed in the reports is redacted, citing exemptions (b)(3) and (b)(6). The total value of the property is $20,293.05

The U.S. Embassy in Ukraine claims the U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program is purely for bio-threat reduction:

The U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks (deliberate, accidental, or natural) of the world’s most dangerous infectious diseases.  The program accomplishes its bio-threat reduction mission through development of a bio-risk management culture; international research partnerships; and partner capacity for enhanced bio-security, bio-safety, and bio-surveillance measures. The Biological Threat Reduction Program’s priorities in Ukraine are to consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern and to continue to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.

“These new documents shed needed light on U.S. involvement in the management and handling of pathogens in Ukrainian biolabs,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

On March 8, 2022, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland admitted to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned that Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of, so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces, should they approach.”

On March 26, 2022, the New York Post reported that Hunter Biden helped secure funds for a U.S. biolab contractor in Ukraine.

According to a webpage expunged from the website of the State Department:

PACS [Pathogen Asset Control System] was first installed in Ukraine in test mode in November 2009 at the Interim Central Reference Laboratory of the Especially Dangerous Pathogens (ICRL). Since then, Sanitary-Epidemiological Department (SED) of the Medical Command of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense received four mobile laboratories from DTRA with the goal of reinforcing the system of epidemiological surveillance in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

A Way Forward for Public Policy and Marriage in the U.S.

Creating a healthy marriage culture is not a job for governments alone. 


This is a lightly edited excerpt from the Witherspoon Institute’s recently published book, Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles (Second Edition).


When it comes to family life, the great paradox of our time is this: every society that we think of as generally best for human flourishing—stable, democratic, developed, and free—is experiencing a radical crisis around human generativity. Family fragmentation and fatherlessness are increasing enormously, usually coupled with the collapse of fertility to levels that, if continued, spell demographic and social decline. Suddenly, developed nations are finding themselves unable to accomplish the great, simple task of every human society: bringing young men and women together to marry and raise the next generation together.

With legalized same-sex marriage and historically low marriage and fertility rates, the United States has accelerated its own descent into this state of affairs. For the first time in our nation’s history, older people are projected to outnumber children by the year 2030. In the face of decline, however, we are witnessing a “marriage movement” and pockets of reasoned resistance. The great task for America in our generation is to energize a return to and renewal of traditional marriage. We need to transmit a stronger, healthier, and more supportive marriage culture to the next generation, so that each year more children are raised by their own mother and father united by a loving marriage, so that they can grow up to have thriving marriages themselves.

Our task is a daunting one. Creating such a marriage culture is not a job for the government. Families, religious communities, and civic institutions must point the way. But law and public policy are also teachers; they will either reinforce and support these goals or undermine them. We call upon our nation’s leaders and our fellow citizens to support public policies that strengthen traditional marriage as a social institution. This nation must reestablish the normative understanding of marriage as the union—intended for life—of a man and a woman, who welcome and raise together any children who are the fruit of their self-giving love, extending the family tree into a flourishing grove where other citizens can rest in its shade.

In particular, we advocate the following eight actions toward undergirding and strengthening marriage:

1. Maintain the legal distinction between married and cohabiting couples.

Powerful intellectual institutions in family law, including the American Law Institute, have proposed that America follow the path of many European nations and Canada in erasing the legal distinction between marriage and cohabitation. But since such a shift in law would create further harm by sending a false message to the next generation that marriage itself is irrelevant or secondary, we encourage our legislators to refuse to extend legal marital status to cohabiting couples. We believe it is unjust as well as unwise to either impose marital obligations on people who have not consented to them or extend marital benefits to couples who have not promised marital responsibilities.

2. Investigate divorce-law reforms.

Under America’s current divorce system, courts today provide less protection for the marriage contract than they do for an ordinary business contract. We believe that the current system is a failure in both practical and moral terms, and deeply in need of reform. We call for renewed efforts to discover ways in which laws can strengthen marriage and reduce unnecessarily high rates of divorce. We affirm that protecting Americans from domestic violence and abuse is a critically important goal. But because both children and adults in nonmarital unions are at vastly increased risk for both, encouraging high rates of family fragmentation is not a good strategy for protecting them. Proposals we consider worthy of more consideration include the following:

Extend waiting periods for unilateral no-fault divorce. Require couples in nonviolent marriages to attend (religious, secular, or public) counseling designed to resolve their differences and renew their marital vows.

Permit the creation of prenuptial covenants that restrict divorce for couples who seek more extensive marriage commitments than current laws allow. (The enforcement by secular courts of Orthodox Jewish marriage contracts may provide a useful model, as well as Louisiana’s “Covenant Marriage” option.)

Expand court-connected divorce-education programs to include divorce interventions (such as PAIRS or Retrouvaille) that help facilitate reconciliations as well as reduce acrimony and litigation.

Apply standards of fault to the distribution of property, where consistent with the best interests of children. Spouses who are abusive or unfaithful should not share marital property equally with innocent spouses. The laments of spouses whose mate has left them against their will—especially in order to form a new union—ought to be heard and considered.

Create pilot programs on marriage education and divorce interventions in high-risk communities, using both faith-based and secular programs. Track program effectiveness to establish “best practices” that could be replicated elsewhere.

3. End marriage penalties for low-income Americans.

To address the growing racial and class divisions in marriage, federal and state governments ought to act quickly to eliminate the marriage penalties embedded in means-tested welfare and tax policies—such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Medicaid—that affect couples with low and moderate incomes. A recent study found that where there was an anticipated loss of income-tax credit due to a marriage penalty, lower-income women were less likely to marry and more likely to cohabit; thus, financial disincentives are potentially affecting the marriage decisions of millions of low-income women. It is unconscionable that government levies substantial financial penalties on low-income parents who marry. Other approaches to strengthening marriage for couples and communities at risk include public information campaigns, marriage education programs, and jobs programs for low-income couples who wish to get and stay married. Experimenting with such new initiatives allows scholars to determine which measures are best suited to the task at hand.

4. Protect and expand pro-child and pro-family provisions in our tax code.

The tax code ought to privilege institutions that stabilize society and help those making sacrifices to ensure the next generation.

5. Protect the interests of children against a powerful fertility industry.

Treating the making of babies as a business like any other is fundamentally inconsistent with the dignity of human persons and the human rights of children. At the very least, we urge our legislators to consider restricting reproductive technologies to married couples. In addition, we believe the following proposals are worthy of further investigation:

Ban the use of anonymous sperm and egg donation for all adults. Children have a right to know their biological origins. Adults have no right to strip children of this knowledge to satisfy their own desires for a family. Countries such as the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Finland, New Zealand, and the UK all have banned this practice to protect the identity rights of donor-conceived children.

Ban all surrogacy. Some countries, such as Thailand and India, have banned commercial surrogacy; others, such as Nepal and Sweden, have banned all surrogacy. The European Parliament has condemned surrogacy as “reproductive exploitation” that “undermines the human dignity” of women, particularly “vulnerable women in developing countries.” Surrogacy also commodifies the children being carried, subjects them to increased health risks, and disregards their rights by prioritizing adult desire over a child’s best interests.

Refuse to create legally fatherless children. Require men who are sperm donors (or the clinics that trade in gametes) to retain legal and financial responsibility for any children they create who lack a legal father. The most important forces underwriting the current United States fertility industry are not technological; they are social and legal. Both law and culture have stressed the interests of adults to the exclusion of the needs of children. Parents seeking children deserve our sympathy and support. But we ought not, in offering this, deliberately create an entire class of children deprived of their natural human right to know their own origins and to experience the unique love of both a mother and a father.

6. Protect the freedom to live out and express belief in the uniqueness of traditional marriage without fear of government coercion and institutional hostility.  

Instances of intolerance for individuals who hold a traditional view of marriage grow more numerous by the day and are increasingly accompanied by legal efforts to compel either violations of individual conscience or religious beliefs. For instance, faith-based adoption and foster-care providers have been forced to compromise their belief that placing children in homes with a mother and a father is in the best interest of the child—or to cease offering services entirely, leaving vulnerable children in need. In a similar way, sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination laws are often used by their backers as a sword “to punish the wicked,” as multimillionaire activist Tim Gill refers to his goals for such laws. We can only interpret this kind of language to indicate an intention to silence and stamp out dissent, violating legitimate individual and religious liberty.

7. Protect the freedom to conduct scholarly inquiry and promote dissemination of accurate research findings on marriage and related topics.

In tandem with the widespread misrepresentation of research findings both in academia and public media on the subject of marriage, a disturbing trend toward actual suppression of research based on ideological rather than scientific grounds appears to be emerging and altering the playing field in the study of sexuality and gender. For example, in August 2018, Brown University professor Lisa Littman published a study that explored the recent statistical upsurge of adolescent and young-adult gender-dysphoric girls and the possibility of social media and peer influence as a contributing factor. Despite being peer reviewed and found acceptable, the study was immediately denounced online by gender ideology activists, since it suggested that some of the girls could have been influenced by forces outside of themselves. In response to the attacks, Brown University removed the article from its news distribution on the basis that it “could be used to discredit efforts to support transgender youth,” while the journal editors posted a comment of concern and conducted an additional review that ultimately resulted in the publication of a revised version, even though the article’s results were unchanged. A former dean of Harvard Medical School spoke out against the journal’s and Brown’s actions.

8. Restore the public understanding of marriage as uniquely the union of one man with one woman as husband and wife.

In 2015, the Supreme Court redefined marriage and imposed a new legal standard of what marriage means, with some justices erroneously declaring that our historic understanding of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is rooted in animus or ignorance. While these legal mandates won’t be easily reversed, we can seek to restore the public’s understanding of the unique goods of traditional marriage for society. Our best hope in the years ahead is to foster a nonpartisan cultural renewal so that a new generation of legislators and justices will arise to legally reestablish the institution of marriage for the good of all Americans. Families, religious communities, community organizations, and public policymakers must work together toward a great goal: strengthening marriage so that each year more children are raised by their own mother and father in loving, lasting marital unions. The survival of the American experiment depends upon it. And our children deserve nothing less.

This article has been republished from Public Discourse, the journal of the Witherspoon Institute.

AUTHOR

Witherspoon Institute

The Witherspoon Institute, located in Princeton, New Jersey, is an independent center that renews culture by fostering the intellectual and moral formation of students, families, and tomorrow’s leaders. More by Witherspoon Institute

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘So Pissed Off, I Cannot Even See Straight’ — Ted Cruz Blames Mitch McConnell For GOP Midterm Losses

Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz slammed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell during a Monday podcast, saying the GOP should have won the majority of the upper chamber and blamed McConnell for not supporting Arizona Senate candidate Blake Masters.

Cruz released an episode of his podcast, titled Verdict with Ted Cruz, where he and co-host Ben Ferguson discussed the midterm elections and the GOP’s failure to recapture the Senate. Cruz mentioned his frustration, saying there was no excuse for McConnell to abandon Masters, calling it “indefensible.”

“Well, Ben, let me start off by saying I am so pissed off, I cannot even see straight,” Cruz said.

“We had an extraordinary opportunity. We had a generational opportunity. This should have been a fundamental landslide election. We should have won the House and the Senate. We should have a 30, 40, 50 vote majority in the House. We should have 53, 54, 55 Republicans in the Senate,” Cruz continued.

McConnell’s PAC reportedly yanked $8 million in campaign spending from Arizona after Masters won his primary election, according to Fox News.

Cruz was also asked if McConnell would donate to Georgia Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker’s campaign in a run-off. Cruz replied he likely will, but said he believes the GOP could have won Arizona.

“Oh, look, I’m sure he will raise money and invest in the race … But if you look at this last cycle, Mitch McConnell pulled the money out of Arizona. We could have won — won Arizona. We nearly won Arizona and abandoning Blake Masters was indefensible,” Cruz said.

“Explain to me, Senator, why in a race where the polling showed that we had a legitimate chance of winning there. Why did he pull out that money from Masters who desperately needed it?” Ferguson asked Cruz.

“Because Masters said he would vote against Mitch McConnell, and so Mitch would rather be leader than have a Republican majority. If there’s a Republican who can win, who’s not gonna support Mitch, the truth of the matter is he’d rather the Democrat win. So he pulled all the money out of Arizona,” Cruz responded.

Cruz also said that “the country is screwed for the next four years” due to the GOP’s failure to regain the majority, saying “because of this, we’re gonna see horrible Left-wing judges confirmed for the next two years, because of this. We’re gonna see judges taking away our free speech rights, our religious liberty rights, our Second Amendment rights. It is an enormous missed opportunity. And I gotta say, it is hard to describe my feelings as anything other than rage,” Cruz concluded.

Cruz’s criticisms follow former President Donald Trump’s criticisms of McConnell over the Blake Masters campaign. Trump’s critics have responded that the former president did not use the $100 million his PAC has collected to support GOP candidates in the midterms.

“McConnell allied groups spent $13.1M in Arizona,” a One Nation spokesperson told the Caller.

“During the summer, Steven Law, the head of a McConnell-aligned super PAC, told the financier Peter Thiel, who had spent millions supporting Mr. Masters, that Mr. Masters had scored the worst focus group results of any candidate he had ever seen,” The New York Times reported.

The Daily Caller contacted McConnell’s office about Cruz’s comments.

AUTHOR

HENRY RODGERS

Senior Congressional correspondent. 

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘We Didn’t Pick Up A Single Seat?’: Watters Blasts Trump, McConnell Over Campaign Spending In Senate Races

Blake Masters: Mitch McConnell ‘Doesn’t Deserve’ Leadership Post

ANALYSIS: Election Night Was Good For Conservatives. They Just Don’t Know It Yet

Rep. Bob Good Says Republicans ‘Got Rolled’ In Midterms, Blames Kevin McCarthy At Conference Meeting

Fox News Hires Tulsi Gabbard

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

National Exit Polling Shows that Securing the Border and Removing Illegal Aliens Are Top Immigration Priorities for Voters

Washington, D.C. — National exit polling of voters who participated in the midterm elections indicate that immigration was important to their vote. The polling also found that Congress has a clear mandate to secure our borders and ensure that immigration laws are enforced.

By a wide margin, 62 percent to 32 percent, voters favor strong action to secure our border and remove illegal aliens over granting amnesty to illegal aliens or increasing the number of people we admit legally.

Half of voters nationwide, said “securing the border and stopping illegal immigration” should be the top immigration issue for the 118th Congress to address. An additional 12 percent of voters said that “finding and removing illegal immigrants” is their top priority.

Fewer than 9 percent said that “granting legal status to people who are in the country illegally,” should be the first action, while 23 percent want more people to enter the country legally, not illegally.

Americans’ immigration priorities also represent a sharp rebuke of the Biden administration’s policies. 55.3 percent of voters believe that the “administration’s policies have encouraged illegal immigration,” compared with just 11.2 percent who think the president’s policies “have discouraged illegal immigration.” In order to discourage continued mass illegal immigration, 67.7 percent support requiring asylum seekers to file their claims from outside the United States.

“Republicans, who seem likely to control the House of Representatives in the 118th Congress have made explicit promises to the American public that they will use their majority to hold the Biden administration accountable for their deliberate and destructive border and immigration policies. Voters want the border brought under control, the wall built, and our nation’s immigration laws enforced,” noted Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

“The likely Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, pledged that a border security bill will be the first piece of legislation he brings to the floor next year, and he has a clear mandate to fulfill that pledge. Additionally, the House must use its power of the purse to ensure that this administration is not given a blank check to spend taxpayer money to undermine immigration laws, as they have for the past two years. When it comes to immigration and border enforcement, the Biden administration has betrayed the trust of the American people. It is now up to congressional Republicans to show they can earn that trust,” concluded Stein.

The national exit poll of 2,000 midterm voters was conducted by Zogby Analytics on behalf of FAIR. Among the key findings of the FAIR national exit poll:

  • 83 percent of voters said immigration was an important factor in their voting decisions.
  • 56 percent believe the border is currently insecure, or out of control.
  • 64 percent want to see the border security wall completed.
  • 55 percent believe Biden’s policies encourage mass illegal immigration, compared with only 11 percent who think his policies discourage it.
  • Two-thirds of voters want to end widespread abuse of our asylum process
  • 50 percent of voters believe that securing the border is the most pressing immigration policy issue facing the nation, while 12.3 percent think removing illegal aliens already here is the top priority.
  • Only 8.8 percent of voters believe granting amnesty to illegal aliens is a priority, while 23.2 percent think we should expand legal immigration to accommodate those who wish to come legally.

The full results of the national exit poll, conducted between Nov. 9 and Nov. 11 can be found here.

EDITORS NOTE: This FAIR column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Should Trump Run in 2024?

At his rally in Wilmington in Oct, 2022, Trump told me that he had many things to consider before announcing his candidacy for president in 2024. Should he run?

Many in the GOP establishment are pushing Ron DeSantis only because they want to eliminate Donald Trump. The “elites” do not really want Ron DeSantis in the Oval Office. But they want him to serve their short term purpose of stopping Trump.

GOP establishment prefer a candidate like Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley, or Mike Pence because they can be controlled by them. Remember that in 2016, the “elites” wanted the presidential contest to be between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, because either one would be easily controllable. Donald Trump came along and upset their plans, which is why everything that can be done to destroy Trump is being done.

The Republican establishment allowed Democrats to win, to cheat, in the 2022 midterm elections so that they could blame Trump for the losses. McConnell held back funding for many key races that Republicans could have won.

The elections in Florida, Texas, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, provided results just as the pollsters predicted. Ballots were counted by 10:00 PM in each of those states. Those who were expected to win, won. But why not in Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania? Why were the ballots counted immediately in Florida, Texas, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, but not in those other battle-ground states? Why did it take a week to count ballots in states with less than 5 million votes when France completed an election for 36 million with paper ballots all on one day? No early voting. No mail-in ballots except for those out of the country. No touch machines.

55 races in the house were too close to call on election night. At that time, Reps had won 200 seats while Dems had 180. 55 races were ”too close to call.” Tied. Ballots being counted for 7 days. 7 days! Why? Any reasonable person would believe that a bell shaped curve would happen in which Dems and Reps would split those remaining 55 seats since they were all tied and “too close to call.” Tied. Reps would end up with about 228 and Dems would get 207. Is that what happened? No.

How could Dems have won every Senate seat that was “too close to call?” Every tied seat? How? That is statistically unbelievable.

So why aren’t Republican leadership making a big deal about this? Why aren’t they calling for action?

  1. Because Reps fear being persecuted as “election deniers” as what happened to those who questioned the 2020 election. Election denial is the new demonization of conservatives just as when Democrats labeled them racists, deplorables, homophobes.
  2. Because RINOs, establishment GOP, really want Dems to win so Dems will continue pursuing Trump just as Biden promised in his election integrity speech.
  3. To keep from having to investigate Joe Biden from the Hunter laptop, to investigate 2020 election irregularities, investigate Fuaci, and investigate Pelosi/FBI actions on Jan 6.
  4. To kill the MAGA movement.

The GOP leadership just demonstrated what is most important to them. Power. They sold out their constituency to regain control of the Republican Party from Trump. At what price?

Donald Trump is a marked man because he stood up to the establishment politicians, the deep state, rich oligarchs, and the liberal media cartel.

So what should Trump do about 2024?

Well, Trump must have many personal issues that impact his decision. Only he can evaluate those. So let me just concentrate on these:

  1. If Trump decides to run, then he will win the Republican nomination.
  2. His support in the Republican Party is huge.
  3. The media is gaslighting America with their stories about his demise.
  4. MAGA is the only real alternative to Democrat destruction of American values. McConnell, et al have no answers.
  5. 93% of Trump candidates won in the Republican primary elections.
  6. Trump will win the Republican nomination in 2024 if he wants it.

Now, can Trump win the national election in Nov, 2024?

Democrats have figured out how to cheat. Ballot harvesting, drop boxes, mail-out of ballots, weeks of early voting (50 days in Pennsylvania… 50 days), days of counting ballots, machine manipulations/malfunctions, last minute ballot dumping, violations of state voting laws.

So who can stop Democrats from cheating? Especially since states are responsible for how each one runs its own elections? If Republican leadership will not try to stop the cheating, the irregular voting issues, then who else can? Who will stand up to the bad guys? So far, only Trump has done it.

Is Trump strong enough to continue his war against establishment politicians, RINOs, Democrats, deep state, and the liberal media cartel by himself with his MAGA army?

If he is not, then no other Republican can or will.

©Michael Charles Master. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEETS:

Watch Dutch MP Thierry Baudet explain ‘Modern Marxism’

Dutch MP Thierry Baudet has made this new video on the topic of Marxism. With a calm voice, without a Dutch accent, Baudet explains how Marxism became so dominant in the West in our current era.

WATCH:

The maker of this video is on the one hand a brilliant thinker, on the other hand, he is highly controversial. In this video you do not get to see his controversial side.

His party is currently very small, but they can dominate the political debates with rhetoric and intellect.

If Geert Wilders wins the next elections, he would have to cooperate with people like Baudet to end mass immigration.

But now I’m telling you my dream.

Realty is, that we still have quite a mountain to climb, will we -the Dutch- be able to save our country from the Leftist elites.

Si vis Pacem para Bellum

©Matthys van Raalten. All rights reserved.

Biden Launches Multimillion-Dollar ‘Climate Gender Equity Fund’ to Address Inequalities

Demoralization of the target audience is yet another step in successful mind control. 


Every big lie in one giant fund. Climate, gender and race. Boom.

“Communist demoralization in the modern times.”

Biden Administration Launches Multimillion-Dollar ‘Climate Gender Equity Fund’ to Address Inequalities

President Joe Biden announced the launch of his multimillion-dollar “Climate Gender Equity Fund” to address purported inequalities women face in climate finance at the United Nations COP 27 climate conference in Egypt on Friday.

By: Jordan Dixon-Hamilton, Breitbart News, 11 Nov 2022:

The Climate Gender Equity Fund will “leverage private sector contributions to help provide women climate leaders with technical skills, networks, and capital to develop and scale climate solutions,” according to a White House statement.

The program will have initial seed funding of $6 million, with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) matching e-commerce giant Amazon’s $3 million investment.

The program will have initial seed funding of $6 million, with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) matching e-commerce giant Amazon’s $3 million investment.

Amazon said the program will have a “global focus” and “help women access the networks and technical skills they need to accelerate the development of their climate change technologies.”

Amazon worldwide sustainability vice president Kara Hurst said:

As an important step in solving climate change, we must address the gender inequalities that persist in climate finance, and ensure female entrepreneurs have an equal seat at the table and access to the funding, networks, and technical support they need to scale climate solutions. We’re proud to collaborate with USAID and the Biden administration to help scale women-led climate solutions globally.

Amazon added that “female-founded companies typically receive a fraction of total venture capital, and that percentage fell during the pandemic.” Amazon also announced it would allocate an additional $50 million from its Climate Pledge Fund to invest in women-founded and women-led climate tech companies.

Biden’s White House also launched, among other programs, the “Indigenous Peoples Finance Access Facility,” a $2 million program that will “enable the continued climate stewardship by Indigenous peoples and local communities improving their access to climate finance.”

Keep reading…….

AUTHOR

RELATED VIDEO: Oli London Explains “CEI” and How It’s Forcing Companies to Go Woke

RELATED ARTICLES:

“There is no Climate Emergency”: Hundreds More Sign the World Climate Declaration, Including 20 Professors

Climate scam and cowardly Republicans helped kill red wave

Tens of Billions of US Dollars Were Transferred to Ukraine and then Using FTX Crypto Currency the Funds Were Laundered Back to Democrats in US

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Red Tsunami Was Stopped by Massive, Widespread, Ongoing Election Fraud

The take-away from the mid-terms is that Trump was right about the 2020 elections. The braying mob that kept telling him (and us) to “move on” never understood or worse – was complicit – was aiding and abetting corrupt election systems rendering them nothing more than a Democrat rubber stamp for one party rule.

Without legitimate elections, we are done. Finished.

Election fraud is the cause of this nation’s ills.  We will never move on again. 2022 midterm was stolen. Just like 2020. Without election reform, none of this matters. We will never take any chamber of power again. It’s a one party state like the all the terror regimes in history.

The Red Tsunami Was Stopped by Massive, Widespread, Ongoing Voter Fraud

It’s surprisingly hard for many to believe what is blatantly obvious to some of us.

By: JD Rucker, November 14, 2022:

It appears Democrats are going to not only retain control of the Senate, but may pick up a seat and potentially have the power to take out the filibuster. The House, which was all but assured for Republican majorities for weeks before the election, appears to be heading toward giving razor-thin control to the GOP… and it still has a chance of remaining in Democrats’ hands.

The red tsunami didn’t materialize. Or, to be more accurate, it was stolen. That seems to be hard for many to accept as even some of the most outspoken conservative and alternative news outlets following the 2020 theft have gone silent on 2022. They’re blaming everything other than voter fraud for some reason. I’ve seen far too few outside of The Gateway PunditWayne Allyn Root, and a few others in media who are discussing in public what seems to be blatantly clear, at least to me.

I posted a thread of GabGettr, and Twitter explaining briefly why I am certain the 2022 election was stolen. I fought and continue to fight for the truth about the 2020 election to come out and I’m even more certain that 2022 was stolen. Yet, it appears those of us who believe that are a very tiny minority. Here’s my thread:

Why are so many people who were absolutely certain the 2020 election was stolen suddenly blind to the fact that 2022 voter fraud was even worse? Only a precious few conservative and alternative media voices are even mentioning the notion of massive, widespread voter fraud.

The gaslighting isn’t just coming from the left. It’s coming even harder from the Republican Establishment that wants to blame Trump, abortion, “bad” candidates, or anything other than a coordinated attack on our nation and our Constitution.

Florida was NOT the outlier. Florida is what happens when voter fraud is quashed and actual voters got to have their say at the ballot box without late night dumps, computer “malfunctions,” and ballot harvesting schemes at nursing homes and cemeteries.

The polls are always wrong… in favor of Democrats. This is the first time in modern history when the polls, corporate media, and everyone else predicted a red wave and it didn’t materialize. It wasn’t that everyone was wrong. It was and continues to be outright theft.

I know there’s a lot of coping involved. Believing the 2022 election was stolen would be admitting that we no longer have a say in our government. Our voices are being quashed and there are no apparent avenues of recourse. But truth is truth. Stop coping. We MUST address this.

If you truly believe Pennsylvanians are so masochistic that they’d elect a guy who can’t form a sentence to the Senate, an Attorney General who promotes crime as Governor, and a dead guy to the state legislature, then you believe Pennsylvanians are absolute morons. They are not.

“It’s the economy, stupid.”

These words have always rang true. We are in the midst of the worst economic crisis of our lives and there’s ZERO chance America rewarded the Democrats with two more years of Senate control. ZERO. They stole it and so few are uttering those words.

They called us racists so we did backflips to prove otherwise. They called us terrorists so we stopped going to school board meetings. They called us insurrectionists so we stopped going to protests. Now they call us election deniers so we’re accepting these results. I won’t.

It feels like only a tiny portion of Americans are lucid and courageous enough to acknowledge the red tsunami was stopped by ongoing voter fraud. That means a majority of people are gullible, feckless, stupid, or a combination of the three. If that offends you, I’m not sorry.

The only for this nation, Lord willing, is that the same thing that happened with the jabs happens with voter fraud. It took far too long but people are finally waking up to the risks of the jabs. Maybe someday they’ll wake up and realize elections are being stolen from us too.

We are already being told to “move on” and the votes haven’t even been fully counted yet. This is worse than the 2020 steal because it affected dozens of states, not just 7 or 8 swing states. I won’t be moving on anytime soon.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ballots vs. Votes

Election 2022

Major Election Reversal – Republican Declared Winner in Crucial Race After a ‘Computer Glitch’ Is Corrected

NH Democrat Governor Maggie Hassan Gets 1100 Votes in NH Town With a Population Under 700

Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters Investigates Bag Full of Ballots Found In California Mountains

FIX WAS IN: Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Printing Company to Scan Ballot Envelopes Before They Are Sent to County — WITH NO OBSERVERS

Maricopa County Election Judge Is Threatened by Supervisors After Speaking Out About Tabulation Errors

620,000 Ballots Still Uncounted; Machine Troubles in 20% of Sites Due to ‘Printer’ Issues: AZ Update

Cameras Go Dark At Vote Counting Facility In Key Nevada County

Arizona Announces Election Results Delayed AGAIN ….. Until Next Week, Maricopa Officials Say

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Crossroads of Collectivism: Trump Tax Plan, Laffer Curve and Reagan & Thatcher Prosperity in the US & UK

 

[ The following article was forwarded to President Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election cycle.  Today, simply apply it the 2024 cycle & update the Federal Debt to 37 Trillion. ]

 

Collectivist States seek Total State Power by Force, Political Action & Economic Means.  Once a State controls the Means of Production & Distribution it quickly controls the Wealth of the People.  Under Compulsion, Liberty evaporates & horrid enormities occur as the State purges Citizens refusing surrender.  These ill effects are the same regardless of from which sector in the political spectrum Collectivism arises.

The United States has reached a Tipping Point beyond which the Aggregation of Total State Power into the hands of a Cabal of Rulers of vetted Legislators & private Central Bankers will be fully consummated  –  unless a political course change for the Ship of State is made in the present election cycle.

With the reasonable premise we do not need to be taxed more  –  here are some thoughts about taxation policy & economic circumstances underlying the present, or any, political circumstance.

To start, it is always far more serious if taxes are too high for effective compliance  –  than if an increment of revenue is lost by tax reduction.  Lowering tax rates actually increases revenue  –  as careful consideration of the following information shall illuminate.

Consider President Ronald Reagan’s experience.

Reagan made tax cuts with a cooperative Legislative Branch.  Presidential Candidate Donald Trump can do the same  –  should Republicans hold control in the House & Senate in the general election of November, 2016.

Taxation advisor Arthur Laffer was a member of Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board from (1981-1989).

Laffer also advised Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher on fiscal policy in the UK during this period.

As you may be aware, simply stated, Laffer’s taxation premise is:

If taxes are low, compliance is high

&

if taxes are high, compliance is low.

Dubbed the Laffer Curve (LC), it is a quantification of human nature known for centuries.

The chart below expresses the LC axially.

The Laffer Curve

It also happens to demonstrate the realization European monarchs arrived at several centuries ago, assisted by the Rothschild family banking franchises.  When you tax people around 50% of their earnings, they begin to lose incentive to participate.  For a monarch this could mean losing everything  –  including one’s head in a revolt.

Enter the concept of Fiat Currency  –  printing money to bridge the gap between a monarch’s cultural limitation in tax receipts & the additional cost of Imperial Designs.  This is the camel whose nose is presently under the US fiscal tent.

A Monarch (or Government) has only to print more currency to reach further into the purses of Subjects (or Citizens) because each unit of currency in their pockets is devalued by the addition of newly created units arriving in circulation, printed out of thin air, in the act of Monarchical (or Legislative) Fiat.

After all, a nation’s currency in its entirety, reflects the sum total of a nation’s Debt  –  which can be divided into an infinite number of parts or units.

This is the same Central Banking trick known today as ‘Inflation’  –  so named because prices of goods & services become necessarily inflated to reflect the intentional devaluation of each unit of the currency.

In this way, Legislators escape culpability for grossly over-spending the People’s Treasure  –  inflating away its value in an unending game of self-interested appropriation  –  under cover of Central Bank ‘monetary policy’, over which politicians purposefully have no statutory control.

In return for this political cover, Central Banks accrue interest on Debt Notes they issue from thin air  –  paid by a government with the power to coerce its people through taxation enforcement up to & including penalty of imprisonment or corruption of blood.

Thus Inflation is onerous, unseen, unbridled & un-legislated Taxation.

By the way, the Monarch (or Government) does not suffer the effect of Inflation, because as much fiat currency as necessary can be printed without limitation  –  to pay for the original purchase supporting imperial (or state) designs.

The totality of this scheme is quite divisive in governments of popular form.

A few examples illustrate the point.

If government employees receive ‘inflation-adjusted’ compensation, they have a compelling personal stake in perpetrating the un-legislated tax of inflation upon their fellow citizens.  This self-interest becomes manifest in several unhealthy expressions for a Republic.

For example, citizens who take government pensions or benefits become wholly compromised in any consideration of the merits of government monetary or other policy & should honorably absent themselves from political advocacy  –  unless willing to demonstrate complete renunciation of those benefits.

Similarly, the until recently, unheard of practice of active duty US Military Officers engaging in political advocacy  –  previously forbidden by Service traditions & the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)  –  is now commonplace.

Witness recent Obama campaign signs in the front yards of active duty Military Officers in Washington, DC area communities.  Something compelled these officers to do this.  This is dangerous precedent for the preservation of Liberty, under a latent threat of military coercion in US politics.

Thus governments become entrenched in folly & inequity that ultimately leads to their dissolution in revolution.

To conclude the point on taxation policy, the following from the Laffer Center’s website is succinct:

“Importantly, the Laffer Curve does not say whether a tax cut will raise or lower revenues, nor does it predict that any and all tax rate reductions would necessarily bring in more total revenues.  Instead it says that tax rate reductions will always result in a smaller loss in revenues than one would have expected when relying only on the static estimates of the previous tax base.  This also means the higher the starting tax rate, the more dramatic the supply-side stimulus will be from cutting the tax rate.  It is possible this economic effect will swamp the arithmetic effect, causing an actual increase in tax revenue.”

Reagan tax cuts combined with cuts in Federal spending produced the real, positive economic effects Laffer described.

Mrs. Thatcher achieved similar results in the UK.

Prosperity resulted.

How much?

For a cogent discussion of the remarkable results achieved with tax reductions by Reagan see:

Revisiting Reagan Tax Cuts.

Then politics crept in and the advances were incrementally squandered by forces of what President George Washington called ‘Interest’  –  meaning political Self-Interest.  In our discussion, we can call this effect ‘Entitlements’.

Mrs. Thatcher codified it another way, calling it socialism:

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

How did this happen?  For an excellent summation see these two links:

  1. Stagnation Prosperity Stagnation
  2. Reaganomics Tax Cuts Alone are Not Enough

Some further observations about how this happened are worth emphasizing.  They highlight structural flaws which must be corrected by the People using further Constitutional Amendments.

First, in the smoke & mirrors world of Congressional appropriation of funds & extra-governmental management of monetary policy by the Central Bank Cartel known as the Federal Reserve (Fed), there exists a Deliberate Disconnect in Accountability to the People  –  because federally elected Legislators cannot be held accountable for monetary policy actions of the private entity Fed.  This crippling slight of hand supports vast transfers of the People’s Wealth to the Fed over time  –  the very root of income disparity in our society today.

All this results from the Federal Reserve Act of 1913  –  which established US Central Banking for the fourth time  –  and from the purported ratification of the 16th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1913, which created Income Tax.

It’s no accident they occurred simultaneously  –  a one-two punch for the Rothschild Model in a popular government.

AMENDMENT XVI  –  The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”

We’ll deal further with rectifying the problem of the Fed below, but there’s an obvious solution to the inequities & inefficiency arising from Income Tax.

Income Tax must be abolished by a 27th Constitutional Amendment repealing the 16th Amendment. Income Tax can then be replaced by a Consumption Tax in a 28th Amendment.  The Consumption Tax (CT) is a very, very low automated percentage of each transaction (no more than 1%).  CT obviates the need for an Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which can be largely retired & eliminated.  The aggregate volume of transactions occurring in the US economy ensures more than enough revenue to conduct the nation’s business.  Happily, the Laffer Effect of tax reduction boosting an economy, will ensure the US economy reaches the most robust dimensions ever enjoyed.

Understanding the elegant simplicity & unimpeachable fairness of the Consumption Tax is subject for another discussion.  Suffice to say here, CT is real, effective & has been successfully used before in the United States.

Additionally in 1971, the Nixon Administration repudiation of the ‘Gold Standard’ backing US currency opened ‘Pandora’s Box’ to the ills of fiat currency because Legislators, in collusion with Central Bankers, could print untethered currency to their heart’s content  –  and have!

It took Federal Legislators & Presidents a few years to fully realize they were no longer accountable to the People for ‘Sound Money’, but they caught on quickly enough  –  in an era of Legislative Bill ‘Riders’  –  to do serious damage to the national Treasury.  Federal Debt has spiraled uncontrollably upward ever since.  A return to backing US currency with Gold & other precious metals will help quickly dispatch this Inflation Racket.  President Richard Nixon’s Executive Order of 15 August 1971  –  the policy instrument authorizing fiat money  –  can be cancelled to commence the process of returning to Sound Money.

The following chart will water the eyes of any thinking American  –  the more so because it’s already out of date  –  the US Federal Debt now stands at nearly $20,000,000,000,000 (trillions):

US Federal Debt $20 Trillion

The American Public is paying a staggering $440 Billion in annual interest  –  just to service the US National Debt.

Who receives this interest?  The few members of the Federal Reserve  –  a private entity.  See chart below.

$440 Billion Annual Interest Paid On US $20 Trillion Debt (Aggregated Monthly Over Fiscal Year)

US Entitlements & Debt Interest in the next 15 years, completely crowd out the primary function of the Federal government  –  Defense of the Nation.  Repeat, there will be no money for Defense.

Why would a nation do that to itself?

On the chart below  –  at the intersection of Revenue & Debt  –  lay the next American Revolution.

US Entitlements & Interest On Debt Consumes Entire Federal Budget

See also:

Question, you ask:

“With the majority of accumulation of $20 trillion in US Federal Debt since after 1971, why haven’t the prices of goods & services inflated through the roof  –  most particularly given acute Federal Budget excesses committed by Congress & the Executive Branch over the last 8 years from 2008-2016?”

Answer:

The post Word War II Baby Boom Generation of Americans is now in the stage of life during which shedding debt & downsizing is the norm.  This effect is destroying private debt at a rate coincident with unrestrained creation of debt by government.

When this generational force has subsided, prices must inflate under aggregated & continuing unchecked currency devaluation by Federal government through Unbridled Spending & Debt Interest.

Our Nation & the world will experience the true Mother of All Depressions.

This is because each new added dollar represents a smaller & smaller slice of the Federal Debt Pie  –  as that Pie is sliced more & more thinly.  Ultimately, US Debt paper (dollars) will be rendered worthless, each representing a slice so thin, it won’t be negotiable.

As the currency collapses, every sector of the economy must absorb the loss.

Home prices, government pensions, everything of value is lost.  This is what happened in 1929, when markets & assets lost 90% of their value & remained devalued for the decade long Great Depression.
In the customary Revaluation that follows, secured creditors deemed ‘Too Big To Fail’ are made whole on the backs of depositors & mortgage holders  –  in what has become the customary “Bail Out”.  Only this time, since the currency will be worthless, it will be a “Bail In”.  As we saw in Argentina & other revaluations, US citizens will be permitted to withdraw only that amount of their own money not imperiling a Bank’s Reserves, which at a maximum represents only 10% of Bank Obligations  –  due to a logic-defying practice known as ‘Fractional Reserve Lending’.  And then payment will only be made at a rate consistent with a revalued currency at pennies on the dollar.

It gets pretty complicated when Central Banks tinker with money supply as a chief tool for managing monetary policy.

In fact, it is criminally complicated.  Central Bankers the world over should be held accountable for malfeasance & for the untold heartache they have caused for hundreds of millions of people through the profiteering scheme of ‘Inflation’ which is at the root of nearly two centuries of boom & bust cycles and several armed conflicts among nations.

To start in the US, using our 27th Constitutional Amendment abolishing Income Tax, we must likewise abolish the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to prevent further Central Banking & to end forever the two senseless practices of paying interest on our National Debt & paying the Un-legislated Tax called Inflation.  A deeply onerous Racket the private ‘Federal Reserve’ Bank franchise must end permanently, if our Republic will survive & flourish.  Happily on several past occasions Central Banking has been successfully repudiated by Congress & by Presidents Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Jackson & Wilson.  Absent this critical step, the People’s wealth will be consumed.

In response to the assertion that a welfare constituency in the United States has no skin in the game if they pay no tax, there is a more direct & sustainable course than fretting about lack of taxation participation:

End entitlements all together.  This is fiscally sound, Constitutionally sound & a certain inducement to innovation in income production among tax skates.  The Framers never intended the nation would encumber itself in this way.

Entitlements are a problem worth worrying about.

In sum, there is merit to be found in the Trump Tax Plan & some cogency in its numbers.  Certainly, it does not go far enough, but if extended growth of the economy can kick the can a little further up the road  –  to wean Americans off entitlements through employment  –  it may be of interim use.  In totality Trump’s Tax Plan appears to resonant with the structure of Reagan era taxation policy, which proved beneficial & prosperous.

Taking the ‘Drag Brake of Taxation’ off the ‘Wheel of the US Economy’ will create unprecedented Prosperity in the United States.  The only reason not to do so is if you don’t want the US Economy to prosper & soar!

Why would someone want that?

As a related economic issue, Mexico is a failing State ripe for the next chapter of its history.  Mr. Trump’s border wall, will prove important to our Nation’s Security & Economy Stability as the Mexican State trajectory unfolds.  Trump’s plan contains sensible points of leverage available to the United States in dealing with this issue. Certainly, allowing further abuses of US Sovereignty & Security associated with Mexico cannot serve US national interests  –  nor the long term interests of our southern neighbor.

Mexico’s trajectory is Mexico’s & not ours  –  violent La Raza Racists & other Provocateurs not withstanding.

See:  Pay for the Wall

Mr. Trump’s style is occasioned by deep sincerity in promoting a Return to American Greatness.  The deeper one looks into his platform, the stronger his arguments become.

Some would say his style is bona fide of something other than dysfunctional politics as usual.  That may well be true.

That said, regarding the fallacious assertion the Trump Tax Plan is not viable, it may be more to the point to observe the challenge is to find any discernible tax plan at all from Candidate Clinton.

Please see:  Hillary Clinton’s Plan to Raise American Incomes

Even a cursory look at this ‘offering’ reveals button-pushing, pandering & double-talking rhetoric largely offensive to Liberty loving Americans & belies a measured political calculation that is all too familiar.  Of course, we are all fed up to here with that sort of self-serving Collectivist politic.  The plain truth is Mrs. Clinton’s bromides do nothing to address serious, unsustainable structural defects in US Treasury, Taxation & Monetary Policy.

Given the overt & concentrated assaults on American Liberty, sovereignty, morality, normative culture, fiscal responsibility & official accountability that has come acutely  –  even brazenly  –  to the fore in the Obama full court press of the last 8 years, it appears we have arrived at a crossroads of historic import for the trajectory of the greatest nation to ever appear on Earth, the United States of America.

On such occasions, all hands must be mustered & the decks cleared for action.

We each must decide whether our personal trajectories are sufficient reason to countenance further politics as usual, or whether Liberty is more precious to the longer course of our Nation’s affairs for Ourselves & Our Posterity.  The Tyranny of Collectivism stands before us & we are already well worn in its rub  –  a state no nation can hope to long endure.

An answer must soon be given if our Experiment is to last.

Though we risk Tyranny of another stripe, it seems necessary to answer the present danger of Collectivism.  As Party dice appear to have been cast, this means support for Trump.

The alternative must be deemed unrecoverable.

 

© 2016 Strategic Waters International, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.

France: Isabelle Adjani says she ‘expects’ women who wear hijab to take it off in solidarity with Iranian women

Why not? Western feminists stage an annual Hijab Day in solidarity with hijab-wearing women in the West who are supposedly victims of “Islamophobia,” but Isabelle Adjani will find that her expectation is not fulfilled. As always, the outreach and accommodation go only in one direction.

Iran: Isabelle Adjani expects women who wear the veil to remove it in solidarity with ‘those who are massacred for this gesture

Translated from “Iran : Isabelle Adjani attend des femmes qui portent le voile qu’elles l’enlèvent par solidarité avec ‘celles qui se font massacrer pour ce geste,’”

FranceInfo, November 7, 2022:

A first version of the title of this article could suggest that Isabelle Adjani launched a “call” to women to remove their veil. Which she did not formally do. She said there was no question of “not hearing the call” from Iranian women. “This fight makes me want to expect women who wear the veil to remove it, all over the world, in solidarity with those who are killed, massacred, for doing this gesture.”

While the demonstrations against the regime continue in Iran, the French actress Isabelle Adjani estimates Monday, November 7 on franceinfo that there is no question of “not hearing the call” of Iranian women. “This fight makes me want to expect women who wear the veil to remove it, all over the world, in solidarity with those who are killed, massacred, by making this gesture,” she explains.

A month ago, several women artists, including Isabelle Adjani, Juliette Binoche, Apple and Marion Cotillard, cut a lock of their hair to support the protest movement born in response to the death of Mahsa Amini. The 22-year-old student died on September 16, three days after she was arrested in Tehran by morality police who accused her of breaking the Islamic Republic’s strict dress code. “It is not us who are going to change the policy of the mullahs and bring them back to human reason,” explains Isabelle Adjani. “Even if what we do with a pair of scissors is strictly symbolic, we risk nothing, that we are not in the street, we are there. We are there and we are sending Iranian women a message that can bring them a little strength in a fight that goes beyond the comprehension of courage.”

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran Lashes Out, Warns UK to Stop Coverage of Protests

Belgium: Authorities say Muslim who killed cop while screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ was on list of potential extremists

Man bites dog: Hamas-linked CAIR is criticized on TV in Sheboygan, Wisconsin

Former State Department official says new Iran deal would be disaster for the U.S. and for the Iranian people

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PREDICTION: Donald J. Trump wins in 2024—Ron Desantis wins in 2028 and 2032

“My prayer is that Trumps runs in 2024 and wins, serving the second term that was stolen from him and then, let DeSantis run in 2028 and 2032 — giving the republicans the White House for an amazing 12 years!” — Willy Guardiola, Christian on a Mission, Pro-Lifers 4 Trump and Diehard DeSantis Deplorable. 


After Florida’s massive red wave the question is: Will Governor Ron DeSantis run for president of the United States of America?

Our answer is yes!

The second question is when will Governor DeSantis run?

Our answer is in 2028 and for reelection in 2032.

Watch and listen carefully to what Glen Beck has to say about President Donald J. Trump and Governor Ron DeSantis.

President Donald J. Trump 45 & 47

President Donald J. Trump is scheduled to make a major announcement on November 15th, 2022. We predict that he will announce that he is running for reelection as the 47th president.

Why is this important. As Glen Beck said America is at a tipping point. Only Trump can bring the nation back to it rightful place as the shining city on the hill and restore power back to the states and the people.

In a November 10th, 2022 The National Pulse article reported,

Trump’s 93% Endorsement Success Rate.

Not only did President Trump win 219 of his 235 endorsed [2022 midterm election] races (that’s a 93 percent success rate at last count), but the Democrats just guaranteed themselves Joe Biden as their nominee for 2024.

[ … ]

Perception is Reality.

For example, the establishment GOP in Pennsylvania was dead set against Colonel Doug Mastriano, and they worked hand-in-hand with Democrats to defeat him. When your gubernatorial candidate is being attacked from all sides, including your own, your Senate candidate will also be dragged down, along with congressional candidates on the ballot.

If the GOP had actually rallied around the top of the ticket – Mastriano and Oz – they could have won together and delivered a down-ticket boost. But not only did the GOP establishment in that state lose the governor and the U.S. Senate race, they lost congressional races that should have been pickups. The blame lies with them, and they know it. Hence their projection – as always – onto Trump.

Donald J. Trump at the top of the GOP ticket will do what he did during the 2022 midterm elections, have an over 90% down the ticket success rate with candidates at the local, state and national levels.

Think about that for a moment.

MAGA is Trump and Trump is MAGA!

This is what must happen to save America from the subhuman ‘abort them all’ Democrats!

Want to Save America—Elect Donald J. Trump!

We believe that Trump, regardless of how hard Democrats lie, cheat and steal, will win. A Trump win sets up a win for Ron DeSantis

President Ron DeSantis 48 & 49

After Donald J. Trump drains the swamp it will then be time for a man like DeSantis to turn America red as he did Florida.

Deep blue counties like Palm Beach and Miami-Dade went red for the first time in a very long time. But that isn’t all.

Governor Ron DeSantis also has a high rate of success for those he endorsed. DeSantis focused on electing conservative school board candidates and did extremely well. DeSantis needs to do the same to insure President Trump is reelected in 2024.

In our column Governors who care about freedom must adopt the ‘DeSantis Model’ before 2024 we wrote,

After the 2022 midterm elections is has become clear that there is a winning model for elections at the state level. This model is based upon understanding what people really want and then giving it to them. What people want the most is freedom. Freedom to make their personal decisions when it comes to healthcare, education, the economy, careers, investments and who represents them.

The who represents them is key in that it demands that elections from the school house to the White House be both free and fair.

QUESTION: How do we get there?

ANSWER: The DeSantis Model!

We call this back to the future model the “DeSantis Model” because it fully implements the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The Tenth Amendment states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Ron DeSantis must complete his full term as governor which ends in 2026. Governor DeSantis then can insure his successor has his values and morals. Then Governor DeSantis must become candidate for the President of these United States and win the GOP nomination in 2028 and also win the White House.

This will ensure eight years of a new and different president, who like Donald J. Trump, is focused on faith, family and freedom.

This is our prediction and we hope you will join us in praying that, with God’s help, it comes to be.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Exceptional Breakdown of the Trump, DeSantis and the Liberal Media Whirlwind

RELATED TWEET:

It’s now U.S. Patriots vs Them—The ‘them’ being subhuman ‘abort them all’ Democrats!

“There are but two parties now, traitors and patriots.” — General Ulysses S. Grant

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.” — the character O’Brien in George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984


recently wrote,

Today’s Woke Left are the new Puritans. They do not seek to liberate our minds from habit, or challenge us to innovation, but to enslave us in new doctrines far more rigid than anything earlier generations of Americans could conceive, from redefining biological sex to re-engineering freedom itself.

They have already held dress rehearsals of their Salem Witch Trials: the Mueller hoax, two impeachment fantasies, and the phantasmagoric January 6 inquisition. Now they want to put all of us on trial.

Democrats have set themselves up as the defenders of “Democracy” in a nation that was founded and remains a Constitutional Republic. They continue on their quest to fundamentally transform America from a free society into a society based upon dependency.

James Woods put it best in this tweet,

In 2022 we had people, GenXrs, who voted for more milk. In order to get more milk, especially providing free healthcare and voting for illegal aliens, Democrats, the “they”, are willing to lie, cheat and steal.

This strategy has been shown the light of day in the growing exposé of FTX. FTX was created as a Ponzi scheme to launder American taxpayer money through the Ukraine in order to fund the campaigns of Democrat politicians. FTX’s CEO became the second largest donor to Democrats and the Democrat Party.

Democrats are now using taxpayer dollars to push their subhuman “abort them all” cultural, scientific and political agendas, a.k.a. diversity, inclusion, equity and intersectionality.

The Us v Them mentality of the Dems, the “them” being subhuman “abort them all”!

According to the president of the United States:

“The MAGA Republicans don’t just threaten our personal rights and economic security. They’re a threat to our very democracy. They refuse to accept the will of the people. They embrace, embrace political violence. They don’t believe in democracy.”

So-called ‘presidential historian’ Michael Beschloss went even further: “We’re on the edge of a brutal authoritarian system.”

If Republicans win on Tuesday, November 8th, 2022, Beschloss said, “our children will be sentenced to death and put in prison.”

warns,

It’s too easy to say that Biden and the others have lost their minds. They believe every word of it. Even a red tsunami on Tuesday will not cure them of their conviction that they alone stand up for truth, and that their opponents are the embodiment of evil.

Because they are convinced they have definitively won the battle for the soul of America, the Woke Left is now treating their political enemies as a vanquished population — to be slowly starved, silenced, and banned from social intercourse.

They are telling this to their supporters every day: they are evil, they are corrupt, they want to destroy America, destroy democracy. 

The Woke Left sees us as players in the Hunger Games. 

Today they, the Democrat Party, sound eerily like INGSOC the political party in Orwell’s’ 1984. The INGSOC slogans are:

  • Big Brother is Watching You, e.g. FBI using social media, including Facebook, to track Biden’s political opponents.
  • War is Peace, e.g. Ukraine, tensions between China and Taiwan, Iran and their internal cultural revolution and the abandoning of Afghanistan leaving behind billions in U.S. military equipment now being used by the Taliban.
  • Freedom is Slavery, e.g. Making American Great requires individual freedom and liberty, which is evil.
  • Ignorance is Strength, e.g. the dumbing down academically of our public schools, colleges and universities to implement the Democrat agenda of diversity, inclusion and equity.
  • Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past, e.g. Critical Race Theory, the renaming of anything and everything connected to our Founding Fathers and the Civil War in order to reshape history.

The Bottom Line

 Connor Vasile wrote,

If you look up “capitalism fights racism” in Google, the top search results will show articles like: “Is Capitalism Racist,” “Capitalism without Racism: Science or Fantasy,” and, “The Rise of Capitalism and the Emergence of Racism.”

Reading those titles, it would seem as if the most triumphant economic model the world has ever seen is rooted in a racist, hegemonic structure meant to benefit society’s overlords. It’s a good thing we have Google to open our eyes to this inhuman system.

Facetiousness aside, (post)modern Western society views capitalism as the very ugly elephant in the room; it doesn’t want to admit that it’s a crucial cog that keeps civilization functioning, and would rather oggle pipe dreams like socialism through heavily rose-tinted glasses.

We are led to believe that the free market is the force responsible for so much of the injustice, racism, and inequality seen in the modern world. But is this true?

Connor Vasile concludes,

The legacies of Madam Walker, Philip Payton, and many other 20th Century black entrepreneurs live on to this day. With multi-millionaires and billionaires like Rihanna, Beyonce, Kanye West, Drake, Oprah Winfrey, Tyler Perry, Jay Z, Michael Jordan, it’s clear that capitalism is a socioeconomic force that empowers people to innovate to better themselves and their communities, as opposed to being the purveyor of modern racism and injustice, as Google would lead you to believe.

Watch this video:

The fundamental transformation of our Constitutional Republic into a Democracy has nearly been achieved. As we all look forward to the presidential elections in 2024 we must understand that if the Democrats, them, win then there may be no turning back.

The only person who has the potential of stopping them transforming American into Democracy and then into a Dictatorship is President Donald J. Trump

That is why Democrats hate him so much.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Target Liberty: The Dangerous Stalinism of the “Woke” Hard-Left

State Department stonewalls investigation into how it spent $1,100,000,000 in Afghanistan since Taliban took over

Using Military Wokeness to Justify Affirmative Action

What Happens When You Google ‘Capitalism Fights Racism’

We are led to believe that the free market is the force responsible for so much of the injustice, racism, and inequality seen in the modern world. But is this true?


If you look up “capitalism fights racism” in Google, the top search results will show articles like: “Is Capitalism Racist,” “Capitalism without Racism: Science or Fantasy,” and, “The Rise of Capitalism and the Emergence of Racism.”

Reading those titles, it would seem as if the most triumphant economic model the world has ever seen is rooted in a racist, hegemonic structure meant to benefit society’s overlords. It’s a good thing we have Google to open our eyes to this inhuman system.

Facetiousness aside, (post)modern Western society views capitalism as the very ugly elephant in the room; it doesn’t want to admit that it’s a crucial cog that keeps civilization functioning, and would rather oggle pipe dreams like socialism through heavily rose-tinted glasses.

We are led to believe that the free market is the force responsible for so much of the injustice, racism, and inequality seen in the modern world. But is this true?

The fact of the matter is, capitalism as a system has always been a force for good, and this includes the tumultuous history of the United States. Even during the eras of Reconstruction and Jim Crow, periods that saw rampant civil rights abuses perpetrated on black communities, capitalism was the saving grace, helping people rise above their situation, the adversity they faced, and a culture still reeling from the effects of civil war.

As Milton Friedman stated in his book Capitalism and Freedom:

“It is a striking historical fact that the development of capitalism has been accompanied by a major reduction in the extent to which particular religious, racial, or social groups have operated under special handicaps in respect of their economic activities; have, as the saying goes, been discriminated against.”

With forces in social media, legacy networks, and the government working towards undermining the idea that capitalism is a force to promote individual liberty and agency, it’s important to revisit a few stories of how the free market lifted people out of poverty and combated racism.

Philip A. Payton (1876-1917) was a 20th Century black real estate entrepreneur from Harlem, New York. De facto segregation was still present in American cities at the time. Manhattan was no exception. With his acquisition of brownstone units after a number of white families moved out, Payton acted to provide more housing to black renters in the Upper West Side. Considering the racial tension of the time period, it’s safe to say the landlords weren’t too happy about this.

Hudson Realty Company aimed to resegregate the area by buying out the black-owned units and evicting the tenants. Payton returned the favor to white-owned units, and offered them to previously evicted black renters. Payton prevailed in the end as Hudson Reality gave up its goal of resegregation. Later attempts were made by real estate associations that used race qualifications to prevent black families renting, but were also soundly beaten by Payton and other black entrepreneurs who were inspired by his example.

Payton’s Afro-American Realty Company grew to $1 million in assets and helped numerous black families move to areas they wanted to live in—not just where the city relegated them to. He used the free market and the demand for better housing to provide a service to his community. Despite the racial obstacles, Payton prevailed because, at the end of the day, he understood that discriminaton is no match for the will of the people. As he once advertised: “The very prejudice that has heretofore worked against us can be turned and used to our profit.”

Sarah Breedlove was born in Louisiana, just four years after the Emancipation Proclamation was signed by President Abraham Lincoln. Having been orphaned at the age of seven and forced into domestic servitude to survive, Breedlove had a very grim outlook early on for her life. She would later recall how she, “…had little or no opportunity when I started out…having been left an orphan and being without mother or father…”

Despite this, Breedlove would go on to work hard and eventually develop her own hair care line. As the African American market was largely neglected at the time, Breedlove seized the opportunity to cater to a growing demographic, and began to sell her own hair products.

She would later be (famously) known as ‘Madam C.J. Walker’ after marrying Charles Walker in 1906. Much like freshly tapped oil, her business expanded rapidly, finding traction in black communities throughout the country. A small-time operation grew to include a factory, a beauty school, and a hair salon. C.J. Walker was known to hire women for top management and staffing positions, something unfathomable at the time. At the height of the company, it’s noted that several thousand women were employed as sales agents, and countless more trained in hair care.

Madam Walker’s company would have been worth around $10 million in today’s currency. She is the first recorded self-made woman millionaire in American history—an incredible feat on its own merit, but even more amazing once you factor in that she lived during a time when blacks were still seen as second-class citizens. Walker took the adversity she experienced and built a business literally from the ground up. Without the underlying culture of entrepreneurship and the free market system, who’s to say if her company would even have been formed at all.

The march to liberty which culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 conjures up images of marches, sit-ins, and MLK’s famous speech at the National Mall. A lesser-known aspect was the rise of alternative markets that helped push back against racist economic policies, which ultimately sought to constrain, not promote, markets. Under Jim Crow, black communities were restricted in their public purchasing decisions. They were prevented from going to certain stores, restaurants, and communal places. If they did manage to buy goods from a white-owned store, they were met with racist remarks, condescending tones, and even predatory pricing.

Sears revolutionized the buyer’s experience with the use of catalogs, allowing consumers to mail-order goods to their homes. This put the company at an enormous advantage by expanding their market, serving many thousands more customers than a typical brick-and-mortar shop could. Taken for granted today, the idea of ordering and receiving your product without leaving your house was a novel—and potentially life saving—invention for 20th Century families.

This innovation allowed southern Blacks to order items otherwise unavailable at their segregated stores. With mail-order, black customers also didn’t have to experience the racism and inhumanity they experienced during some public outings; they could order what they wanted when they wanted, just like the average white at the time. Capitalist innovation not only worked to benefit the companies involved, but also served to bring value to diverse communities; in this case, it acted as an escape for so many black consumers constrained by Jim Crow.

These are only a few stories of how free market capitalism helped push people above the racism they often lived under. The legacies of Madam Walker, Philip Payton, and many other 20th Century black entrepreneurs live on to this day. With multi-millionaires and billionaires like Rihanna, Beyonce, Kanye West, Drake, Oprah Winfrey, Tyler Perry, Jay Z, Michael Jordan, it’s clear that capitalism is a socioeconomic force that empowers people to innovate to better themselves and their communities, as opposed to being the purveyor of modern racism and injustice, as Google would lead you to believe.

AUTHOR

Connor Vasile

Connor Vasile is a first-generation American and writer who wishes to raise awareness about classical liberal ideas which empower every individual, no matter their background or experience, to live their best lives and fulfill their goals.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Elon Musk Connects the Dots on the FTX Ponzi Scheme

FTX was created as a Ponzi scheme to launder American taxpayer money through the Ukraine in order to fund the campaigns of Democrat politicians. FTX CEO became the second largest donor to Democrats and the Democrat Party.

FTX, having served its political purpose, is now bankrupt and “under investigation.”

Well, Elon Musk began tweeting about the links between Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO and founder of FTX, Gary Gensler the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a former MIT professor, Glen Ellison a Professor of Economics and the former boss of Gary Gensler at MIT and Caroline Ellison the CEO of Alameda Research the trading arm of FTX, who is the daughter of Glen Ellison and dated Bankman-Fried.

Here is a video and tweet with information about Caroline Ellison the CEO of Alameda Research thru which FTX laundered money from the Ukraine.

The tweet below, in reply to Elon’s tweet, gives readers an understanding of the timeline of the creation of FTX. It also shows links between Sam Bankman-Fried and his mother Barbara Fried who happens to head two Democrat Party political fundraising organizations: the left-wing super PAC Mind the Gap and the non-profit Center for Voter Information.

Here is another tweet in response to Elon’s tweet,

Influence Watch’s review of Mind the Gap reported,

In 2018, the PAC created a statistical model which attempted to score the impact each dollar donated would have on Democrats winning back control of the House of Representatives. The group ultimately raised more than 20 million dollars in its successful attempt to win back control of the House for Democrats.

MTG is known for its secretive operations where it attempts to quickly gather and coordinate donations over a short time to prevent Republicans from mobilizing donors in response. The PAC is managed by Stanford Law professors Barbara FriedPaul Brest, and researcher Graham Gottlieb. Of the three, only Gottlieb has political experience, having served former President Barack Obama as a staffer during his 2012 re-election campaign and in the White House.

Read more about Mind the Gap.

Influence Watch has this on the Center for Voter Information (CVI)

The Center for Voter Information (CVI) is a left-of-center voter registration and outreach group that is permitted to take positions on candidates that works alongside its nominally nonpartisan and charitable “sister,” the Voter Participation Center (VPC). While both organizations run general get-out-the-vote campaigns, the CVI runs targeted voter outreach campaigns for candidates. Both organizations are left-of-center, and the VPC’s political spending exclusively goes to supporting Democratic candidates or opposing Republicans. CVI shares its 501(c)(4) tax status with another voter registration activist group, Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund (WVWVAF), which the organizations treat as separate groups but are a single entity.

As of September 2020, CVI and VPC have generated 939,000 registration applications and 2 million vote-by-mail applications for the 2020 election. [1] These applications are generally targeted towards demographic groups which tend to support the Democratic Party, and have been extensively criticized by state-level officials.

All three organizations share a common founder, liberal activist Page Gardner.

[ … ]

As of October 23, 2020, CVI had committed to sending 340 million pieces of mail leading up to the 2020 general election. This included sending ballot applications as well as voter registration forms. The initiative focused on over 20 battleground states. Critics argued that some of the forms contain errors or prefilled information, preventing individuals from successfully registering and influencing votes. Additionally, the mail was not always understood to be from a non-government organization and confused voters. [3]

Read more.

This is an evolving story with many, many dots to connect.

Stay tuned for more information as we seek the truth about the 2022 midterm elections and how Democrats used FTX to launder money which ended up in the political coffers of Democrat campaigns.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEETS: