True The Vote & Protect America Now Launch ProtectAmerica.vote

New partnership will equip sheriffs, inform citizens, and protect our elections.


True the Vote and Protect America Now have joined forces in a new partnership to help protect American elections.

ProtectAmerica.vote is an initiative that will provide local sheriffs with information, resources, and tools to support election integrity in their county.

Today, ProtectAmerica.vote released the following Action Plan:

1. CONNECT CITIZENS AND SHERIFFS
Voters are understandably confused by constantly changing election rules and increasingly frustrated by lack of leadership. Put simply, they don’t know where to turn should the election processes break down. Our goal is to unite citizens and their sheriffs to work together, ensuring the real voice of America’s vote is heard loud and clear.

2.  EMPOWER SHERIFFS
Starting immediately, ProtectAmerica.vote will provide local sheriffs with the information, resources, and tools to have real-time eyes on voting in their counties:

  • Providing information on election laws specific to their state
  • Developing a grants function to provide technology and support for visibility into allegations of violations as reported throughout their county
  • Promoting programs to support citizens and uphold election integrity

3.  OPEN LINES OF COMMUNICATION
Operate a National Election Integrity Voter Hotline to help citizens in getting information and reporting problems. The hotline will be connected to sheriffs’ offices for quick evaluation of incoming information.

4.  PROMOTE PUBLIC SERVICE MESSAGES

Beginning August 1st, ProtectAmerica.vote will begin an informational campaign to educate voters state-by-state through multiple mediums, including television on election processes and laws.

Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote, said “Over 80% of Americans are concerned about the lack of integrity in America’s elections. Voters want to be helpful but aren’t sure where to turn in times of trouble. ProtectAmerica.vote will connect citizens and sheriffs, opening communications to support local law enforcement to engage if the need arises.”

Sheriff Mark Lamb, founder of Protect America Now, said “A sheriff’s primary duty is to the protect the rights of their constituents, which includes their rights as voters. ProtectAmerica.vote aims to solve this problem and bridge the gap between voters and local law enforcement. Our work will ensure we have secure elections in this country.”

©ProtectAmerica.vote. All rights reserved.

Marxist Attorney General & Leader of Department of Injustice in Ukraine

Merritt Garland, the unlawful Attorney General who leads the Department of Injustice went to Ukraine.

Following is what this extreme hypocrite told reporters speaking about alleged war crimes,

“We and our partners will make sure those responsible will be held accountable.”

REALLY!

What about these people being held accountable for their crimes?

  • The lawless rioters, looters, murderers in BLM and Antifa who were encouraged by Democrats like Kamala Harris and Maxine Waters to destroy cities and harass Republicans after the George Floyd incident? Have they been held accountable?
  • The millions of illegal aliens including criminals and terrorists streaming across our southern border over last 15 months in violation of our existing immigration laws – have they been held accountable?
  • The FBI operatives who along with BLM and Antifa agents encouraged people to storm the capitol on Jan. 6th, 2021 – have they been held accountable? Why haven’t the political prisoners detained been treated humanely and with Due Process?
  • The unarmed woman murdered by a BLM sympathizing Capitol Police Lt and another woman who was trampled and a D.C. Municipal Police Officer beat her while she was on the ground and refused to call for an ambulance and the woman later died – have they been held accountable? It is a lie that any law enforcement officer died as a result of protestor action.
  • Why has Garland not been concerned about protestors outside the homes of SOCTUS Justices?
  • Why has Garland totally politicized the FBI and its agents under his supervision?
  • What about Garland calling parents peacefully protesting at School Board meetings “domestic terrorists” and calling for their arrest?

Holding Democrat, socialist, leftists criminals accountable is NOT on the agenda of Merritt Garland – quite the opposite – he and the Department of Injustice shield them. They have removed the blindfold from the Lady of Justice. They are no longer objective and we have a 2-tiered system of INJUSTICE.

How can the chief law enforcement officer of the land allow such lawlessness to happen without taking any action or conducting total whitewashed “investigations”?

Thank God and POTUS Trump that this evil man was not confirmed for the SCOTUS.

His actions/inactions prove he is a prominent member of the anti-Constitution Deep State.

As always comments are welcomed.

Remember, “Tyranny Hates to Be Questioned”

©Royal A. Brown, III. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

BREAKING NEWS: MindGeek Layoffs & Leadership Resignations!

Thanks to you, nation and worldwide change is happening right now! The world’s largest sexual exploiter is crumbling before our eyes!

MindGeek, the parent company that owns Pornhub and many of the largest porn sites in the world is under intense pressure. This week, their CEO & COO fled the company and they laid off more than half of their employees!

With your help, NCOSE has been working for over a decade to destabilize this company and the whole exploitation industry. These actions prove that our plan is working! MindGeek is now facing millions of dollars in lawsuits that the NCOSE Law Center has filed and helped to spur!

With the help of thousands, we got mainstream companies to stop running ads on their flagship website – that was 50% of their revenue! We’ve impacted their payment processors & their distribution partners, getting nearly all “respectable” companies to cut ties with them. Together, we have moved governments to take notice and we expect criminal charges soon!

Your help—financially, in prayer, signing our endless number of petitions! – made this possible, Thank you!

What does all of this mean?

Change takes time, but this is happening faster than most thought possible. If we can keep the momentum going, it means:

  • The era of anonymous, affordable, accessible pornography will be over.
  • The endless amount of pornography available online will go away. Many millions of these detrimental videos causing great public health harm will be gone. (Remember, we already got Pornhub to delete 11,000,000 videos in 2020!)
  • The extreme violence, the child-teen themed, the racist, incest, voyeuristic and other extreme common themes In pornography will be drastically reduced.
  • With this business model failing, you won’t see as many of these giant websites.
  • The impunity enjoyed by the online pornography industry for decades is ending.
  • Soon, thousands of survivors of sex trafficking, rape, child sexual abuse and other non-consensually recorded/shared material will get their lives back and won’t have to live in fear that their abuse will be seen by their neighbors, coworkers, and families.

Please consider a donation to help continue this momentum!

©NCOSE. All rights reserved.

Chevron CEO Fires Back at Biden, Slams His Attacks And ‘Political Rhetoric’ in New Letter

The Democrat USG is out of control – destroying our economy, our freedoms, our every way of life.

In the wake of Democrat-induced hyper inflation amid massive government spending, the Biden regime has gone on the attack against ……. business.

In this case, Chevron has responded, which is mighty brave. Speaking truth to power makes you an an enemy of the Biden regime — a suicidal act.

Biden last week blamed oil companies for contributing to high prices — arguing they aren’t refining enough oil after previously claiming they aren’t drilling enough on existing federal leases and slamming companies such as ExxonMobil and Chevron for reaping massive profits as global prices rise.

Wirth pushed back on Biden’s portrayal of the companies as responsible for soaring gas prices, which last week hit an all-time average of more than $5 per gallon.

Chevron CEO Fires Back at Biden, Slams ‘Political Rhetoric’ in New Letter

By: Jack Phillips, June 21, 2022

The CEO of Chevron sent an open letter to President Joe Biden after Biden sent a letter suggesting that oil companies could face consequences and accusing them of not doing enough to increase refining capacity.

Mike Wirth, in the letter, called on the White House to end its hostilities toward the oil industry, saying there needs to be a change in its approach and policies before gas prices can drop.

“Addressing this situation requires thoughtful action and a willingness to work together, not political rhetoric,” Wirth said, adding, “Your Administration has largely sought to criticize, and at times vilify, our industry.”

More than a week ago, Biden attacked oil companies and claimed they’re making record profits before urging them to increase oil production to alleviate record-high gas prices. Targeting ExxonMobil specifically, Biden accused them of making “more money than God” and not drilling enough during comments he made in May.

Soaring Gas Prices

In recent months, Biden has taken criticism as regular gas prices have eclipsed the $5 per gallon mark. AAA data shows that prices fell for several days before rising again this week to $4.96 per gallon.

Since Biden took office, gas prices have been steadily increasing as the president issued a number of energy-related executive orders, including suspending new oil drilling leases and ending the Keystone XL pipeline.

“The U.S. energy sector needs cooperation and support from your Administration for our country to return to a path toward greater energy security, economic prosperity, and environmental protection,” Wirth said in the letter, adding that Chevron has increased production in recent years.

Oil companies “need clarity and consistency on policy matters ranging from leases and permits on federal lands, to the ability to permit and build critical infrastructure, to the proper role of regulation that considers both costs and benefits,” Wirth added.

“Most importantly, we need an honest dialogue on how to best balance energy, economic, and environmental objectives–one that recognizes our industry is a vital sector of the U.S. economy and is essential to our national security,” he said. “We can only meet these challenges by working together.”

When asked about the letter, Biden didn’t appear to try and tone down the tensions.

“I didn’t know they’d get their feelings hurt that quickly. We need more refining capacity. This idea that they don’t have more oil to bring up and refine is simply not true,” he told reporters.

Last week, ExxonMobil responded to Biden’s letter and said it had invested $118 billion in new oil and gas supplies compared to a net income of $55 billion.

“We kept investing even during the pandemic, when we lost more than $20 billion and had to borrow more than $30 billion to maintain investment to increase capacity to be ready for post-pandemic demand,” the company stated.

U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm is slated to meet with oil industry executives on Thursday to discuss ways to reduce energy prices.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Go Green With Gasoline If You’re Going to Consume That Vegan Sandwich

New Study Finds Electric Cars Cost More To Refuel Than Gasoline Powered Cars

Biden Soaring Gas Prices Are Part Of Green Agenda-Gas Stations Adding Extra Digit Expecting $10 a Gallon for Gasoline

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

For 77 Minutes, Cops Never Even Tried to Enter Classroom, Police Could Have Stopped Uvalde Shooter ‘3 Minutes’ After Entering School

UPDATE: Were Uvalde Police Officers Told to Stand Down?

This new Glazov Gang episode features Dr. Paul Alexander, a pandemic adviser in the Trump Administration. Visit him at drpaulalexander.com and palexander.substack.com.

Dr. Alexander discusses Were Uvalde Police Officers Told to Stand Down?, analyzing: Something very dark went down. Is it really a mystery why?


Uvalde cops never tried entering the classroom.

According to a Texas official for 77 minutes, on site police never even tried to enter the classroom. Police could have stopped the Uvalde shooter in ‘3 Minutes’ after entering the Robb Elementary School.

On Monday, KVUE and its news partners at the Austin American-Statesman exclusively obtained surveillance footage from inside Robb Elementary School on the day of the May 24 shooting.

The footage shows that multiple officers were inside the building with rifles and at least one ballistic shield, 19 minutes after the gunman arrived. They didn’t enter the classroom the shooter was inside for nearly another hour.

Who gave the stand down order?

And why are uni-party Republicans standing with gun control authoritarians when we all know it that is not the problem and gun control just disarms law-abiding Americans?

For 77 minutes, Uvalde police officers stood by as accused gunman Salvador Ramos rampaged through Robb Elementary School, killing 19 students and two teachers. New surveillance footage reportedly shows that those sworn to serve and protect didn’t even bother wiggling the door handle to get into the classroom.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

ULTIMATE BETRAYAL: Here are THE 14 Republicans who joined Democrats to seize our gun rights

Uvalde Cops Never Tried Entering Classroom

Damning New Uvalde Shooting Evidence, Parents & Reporters Kicked Out

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Violence in the Name of “Jane’s Revenge”

Ever since the unprecedented leak of an early draft of the Dobbs decision from the Supreme Court which may overturn Roe v. Wade, the “shock troops of tolerance” have been busy interrupting church services. And they have done much destruction of crisis pregnancy centers.

They claim to be “pro-choice,” but choice involves options. And these people want to make sure women make only one choice—the choice of abortion. When there’s only one choice, then “pro-choice” is an oxymoron.

Since May 2, when the draft decision was leaked:

  • There have been numerous disruptions of church services, usually Catholic ones. However, even Joel Osteen’s church service was interrupted by topless promoters of abortion.
  • There have been illegal protests in front of the homes of conservative Supreme Court Justices to intimidate them to change their opinion.
  • There have been at least 60 attacks on crisis pregnancy centers, which are all funded by private donations to provide loving alternatives to abortion. This is becoming a regular occurrence.

Many of these attacks have been done through an ad hoc organization called “Jane’s Revenge.”

The name would imply revenge on behalf of “Jane Roe” from the 1973 Supreme Court pro-abortion decision, Roe v. Wade.

Jane’s Revenge declares open season on crisis pregnancy centers across the nation: “From here forward, any anti-choice group who closes their doors, and stops operating will no longer be a target. But until you do, it’s open season, and we know where your operations are. The infrastructure of the enslavers will not survive. We will never stop, back down, slow down, or retreat.”

A friend of mine works in a crisis pregnancy center. She told me in an email over the weekend: “I worked in the Emergency Dept as a RN for 25 years with police security, but I never dreamed that working at a pro-life clinic would be a high risk job!”

And this damage is being done in the name of Jane Roe? As the record shows, Jane Roe’s identity was revealed in 1987, and her name was Norma McCorvey. It turns out McCorvey had not been raped (as claimed in the case). She had gotten pregnant from her boyfriend, and she just wanted an abortion.

ACLU attorney Sarah Weddington lied to her as she assured McCorvey she could get an abortion, but what Weddington really wanted was McCorvey’s participation in what became Roe v. Wade.

Then in the late 1990s, something amazing happened. Norma McCorvey made a profession of faith in Jesus Christ and came to oppose abortion. Thus, Roe came to agree with Wade. Henry Wade had been the District Attorney of Dallas County, and Roe v. Wade challenged Texas’s pro-life law.

Norma McCorvey wrote her story in her 1997 book, Won By Love (with co-author Gary Thomas). The subtitle of that book is “Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade Speaks Out for the Unborn as She Shares Her New Conviction for Life.”

And now, in the name of Jane Roe, anarchists and ANTIFA-types are carrying out acts of vandalism and damage of pregnancy centers that simply exist to provide loving alternatives to abortion.

One man who knew McCorvey, who died in 2017, is Father Frank Pavone, the president of Priests for Life. He even baptized her and spent time sharing Scriptures and Church teaching with her.

I asked him for a comment on the former “Jane Roe” since these groups are doing damage to try and disrupt pro-life work in her name.

Father Pavone told me: “As for Norma McCorvey, hers was a life of repentance, not of revenge. She wouldn’t have needed to take ‘revenge’ on pro-life people anyway, because she was one of us. She would have abhorred the way the pro-abortion people are acting now. In fact, she didn’t like them even when she was on their side. She thought they were arrogant and disrespectful of her.”

He adds, “The abortion supporters were handed abortion-on-demand on a silver platter by Roe v. Wade. They didn’t have to engage in the laborious, tedious process of elections, lobbying, debating, persuading and lawmaking. Instead, a ‘constitutional right’ was just created for them.

Now that it is being taken away, they whine and stomp their feet like a child.”

Where is the U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in all this? When is he going to act against this intimidation? Our nation’s founders said that the Creator has endowed us with “unalienable rights”—first among these is “the right to life.”

Father Pavone has the final word: “Of course, their attacks on our churches are because when we restrict abortion, they perceive it as an attack on theirs. The abortion clinics are their churches, abortion-on-demand is their dogma, and abortion itself is their sacrament. May they be given the grace of repentance.”

©Jerry Newcombe, D.Min. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Kamala Harris Claims Killing Babies in Abortions is a Christian Value

Chuck Schumer Refuses to Apologize for Threatening Supreme Court After Justice Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt

65% of Americans Say Their State Would Still be Great to Live in if It Banned Abortions

Wisconsin Republicans Reject Governor Evers’ Demand to Repeal Abortion Ban

Louisiana Governor Signs Pro-Life Bill Banning Abortions

Democrat Andrew Gillum Indicted On Charges Of Wire Fraud, False Statements To FBI

A federal grand jury indicted former Democratic Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum and the National Black Justice Coalition chief executive officer Sharon Lettman-Hicks Wednesday for false statements, wire fraud and conspiracy.

The 21 count indictment, filed on June 7, alleges that Gillum and Lettman-Hicks conspired to commit wire fraud by obtaining funds from “various entities” and individuals through “false and fraudulent promises” between 2016 and 2019, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida announced in a press release. The funds were allegedly diverted to a company owned by Lettman-Hicks through third parties, then disguised as payments to Gillum for personal use.

Both are individually charged with 19 counts of wire fraud, the attorney’s office announced. Gillum is additionally charged with making false statements to the FBI in 2017 during a corruption investigation when he served as Mayor of Tallahassee and gubernatorial candidacy against then-Republican Florida gubernatorial candidate Ron DeSantis.

“On or about June 14, 2017, in the Northern District of Florida, the defendant, Andrew Demetric Gillum, did knowingly and willfully make materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements and representations in a matter within the executive branch of the Government of the United States, that is, during a criminal investigation of public corruption involving the City of Tallahassee conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the indictment said.

Assistant United States Attorneys Stephen M. Kunz and Andrew J. Grogan are prosecuting the case, according to the release.

Wire fraud and conspiracy can both lead up to 20 years imprisonment each, the release stated. Gillum could face an extra 5 years for his charge of making false statements.

They were both arrested by the FBI Wednesday and scheduled to make their first appearance in federal court at the United States Courthouse in Tallahassee in the Magistrate’s Judge’s Courtroom at 2 p.m., according to the release. The former Tallahassee mayor surrendered himself to FBI agents at 10 a.m., NBC News reported.

Gillum proclaimed his innocence of the charges against him in a Wednesday statement, accusing the case of being “political,” according to WFSU.

“I have spent the last 20 years of my life in public service and continue to fight for the people,” he said in a statement. “Every campaign I’ve run has been done with integrity. Make no mistake that this case is not legal, it is political. Throughout my career I have always stood up for the people of Florida and have spoken truth to power. There’s been a target on my back ever since I was the mayor of Tallahassee. They found nothing then, and I have full confidence that my legal team will prove my innocence now.”

His attorneys, Marc Elias and David Oscar Markus, released a joint statement vowing to fight for Gillum, the outlet reported.

“The government got it wrong today. The evidence in this case is clear and will show that Mr. Gillum is innocent of all charges. We look forward to putting this case to rest and giving Andrew and his family peace of mind once and for all.”

Gillum, who was married with three children, was discovered drunk inside a Miami Beach hotel room with gay porn star Travis Dyson in March 2020. Dyson was suspected to have been high on crystal meth at the time.

AUTHOR

NICOLE SILVERIO

Media reporter. Follow Nicole Silverio on Twitter @NicoleMSilverio

RELATED ARTICLE: Report: Andrew Gillum Used Official Government Account To Fund Campaigning

RELATED VIDEO: Former Hillary Campaign Attorney Marc Elias is Representing Gillum in his Fraud Case

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Ask U.S. Senators To Pass ‘The Stop It Now Act’ & Make School Shootings a Federal Crime!

It is time to act to stop school shootings. We have created a draft letter that readers can send to all U.S. Senators to pass laws to stop school shootings. We have title it The Stop It Now law.

What we have noticed is that politicians have a do something mentality when it comes to school shootings. But their do something legislation focuses on the weapon of choice of the killer and not the killer himself.

The Stop It Now law focuses on the killer and only the killer or potential killer or killers.

PROPOSED LETTER TO YOUR SENATORS

Dear Senator ___________________

I ask that you pass before Tuesday, November 8, 2022 a law to prevent violent criminals from attacking our most innocent and vulnerable, the children in our schools. We have seen too many children killed or maimed and criminals not getting tried rapidly and charged in a way that sends a clear signal that this type of attack will not be tolerated by you and your fellow Senators and members of Congress.

It’s past time to take action. 

I suggest calling this new legislation The Stop It Now Act.

The Stop It Now Act would:

  1. Make it a federal crime to plan to enter any school at any level with the intent to do harm to either students or teachers.
  2. If a person, or persons, does enter any school at any level with the intent to do harm to either students or teachers then that person, or persons, would be charged with a federal crime and if convicted with each count being a life sentence in a federal prison.
  3. If any person or persons does enter any school at any level and that person or persons harms or kills either a student or teacher then that person or persons are charged with a federal crime and if convicted are then executed by a means currently used to execute others, e.g. terrorists.
  4. That those who aid or abet a person or persons in carrying out an attack on any school with the knowledge that the person they aided had the intent to harm or kill a student or teacher be prosecuted under provisions 1 and 2 above.
  5. Repeal any and all “Gun Free Zones” federal legislation. Allow each state to decide how to best protect their students and teachers from those who wish to do harm to students and teachers at all levels.

I ask that you and your staff work across party lines to pass such legislation and have it signed by the president before Tuesday, November 8, 2022.

Sincerely,

Signed

If you wish to alter this email please feel free to do so to add your thoughts and concerns. If you wish please cc us at drswier@gmail.com.

Below are the email addresses of the members of the the U.S. Senate, their staff and their campaign headquarters.

Just copy and past the list into the TO box of your email or if you just wish to contact your two senators just select their names.

NOTE: We also ask that you send a copy of the email to your member of congress.

EMAILS OF U.S. SENATORS AND STAFF

senator@tammybaldwin.com;
info@chrismurphy.com;
senator@chrismurphy.com;
john@barrassoforwyoming.com;
contact@chrismurphy.com;
michael@michaelbennet.com;
info@michaelbennet.com;
marsha@marshablackburn.com;
info@moranforkansas.com;
richard@richardblumenthal.com;
info@jeffmerkley.com;
info@corybooker.com;
info@boozmanforarkansas.com;
info@mikebraunforindiana.com;
sherrod@sherrodbrown.com;
services@jeffmerkley.com;
richard@burrforsenate.com;
info@burrforsenate.com;
maria@cantwell.com;
ben@bencardin.com;
contact@menendezfornj.com;
tom@carperfordelaware.com;
info@menendezfornj.com;
info@bobcasey.com;
bill@billcassidy.com;
contact@edmarkey.com;
susan@susancollins.com;
info@edmarkey.com;
chris@chriscoons.com;
info@lummisforwyoming.com;
info@johncornyn.com;
info@catherinecortezmasto.com;
scc@catherinecortezmasto.com;
info@tomcotton.com;
kevin@kevincramer.org;
senator@romneyforutah.com;
info@crapoforsenate.com;
contact@robportman.com;
info@leeforsenate.com;
info@tedcruz.org;
steve@stevedaines.com;
info@leahyforvermont.com;
info@jameslankford.com;
tammy@tammyduckworth.com;
info@tammyduckworth.com;
senator@tammyduckworth.com;
dick@durbinforsenate.com;
info@joniforiowa.com;
info@lindseygraham.com;
senator@lindseygraham.com;
senatorgrassley@grassleyworks.com;
bill@teamhagerty.com;
info@cindyhydesmith.com;
info@maggiehassan.com;
maggie@maggiehassan.com;
josh@joshhawley.com;
senator@hoevenforsenate.com;
martin@martinheinrich.com;
info@hoevenforsenate.com;
john@hickenlooper.com;
hello@hickenlooper.com;
john@hoevenforsenate.com;
info@martinheinrich.com;
senator@hoevenforsenate.com;
cindy@cindyhydesmith.com;
justin@cindyhydesmith.com;
info@jiminhofe.com;
info@ronjohnsonforsenate.com;
press@ronjohnsonforsenate.com;
ron@ronjohnsonforsenate.com;
senator@ronjohnsonforsenate.com;
info@timkaine.com;
mark@markkelly.com;
info@grassleyworks.com;
john@johnkennedy.com;
info@angusformaine.com;
amy@amyklobuchar.com;
info@amyklobuchar.com;
jim@jameslankford.com;
james@jameslankford.com;
patrick@leahyforvermont.com;
info@fischerfornebraska.com;
mike@leeforsenate.com;
info@stevedaines.com;
info@benraylujan.com;
cynthia@lummisforwyoming.com;
info@joemanchinwv.com;
ed@edmarkey.com;
edward@edmarkey.com;
senator@stevedaines.com;
info@kevincramer.org;
roger@kansansformarshall.com;
info@kansansformarshall.com;
info@chriscoons.com;
mitch@teammitch.com;
contact@teammitch.com;
info@billcassidy.com;
robert@menendezfornj.com;
senator@menendezfornj.com;
bob@menendezfornj.com;
info@carperfordelaware.com;
jeff@jeffmerkley.com;
info@bencardin.com;
jerry@moranforkansas.com;
info@lisamurkowski.com;
info@barrassoforwyoming.com;
christopher@chrismurphy.com;
chris@chrismurphy.com;
info@richardblumenthal.com;
patty@pattymurray.com;
jon@electjon.com;
info@cantwell.com;
alex@alex-padilla.com;
info@alex-padilla.com;
info@sherrodbrown.com;
rand@randpaul.com;
info@petersformichigan.com;
rob@robportman.com;
info@robportman.com;
info@tammybaldwin.com;
info@jackreed.com;
info@senatorrisch.com;
info@romneyforutah.com;
mitt@romneyforutah.com;
senator@romneyforutah.com;
info@markkelly.com;
jacky@rosenfornevada.com;
info@rosenfornevada.com;
info@roundsforsenate.com;
mike@roundsforsenate.com;
contact@roundsforsenate.com;
info@susancollins.com;
info@marcorubio.com;
marco@marcorubio.com;
contact@marcorubio.com;
info@teamsasse.com;
brian@brianschatz.com;
info@brianschatz.com;
contact@brianschatz.com;
senator@brianschatz.com;
chuck@chuckschumer.com;
info@chuckschumer.com;
info@rickscottforflorida.com;
info@votetimscott.com;
senator@susancollins.com;
richard@shelbyforsenate.com;
kyrsten@kyrstensinema.com;
info@kyrstensinema.com;
info@tinaforminnesota.com;
info@debbiestabenow.com;
debbie@debbiestabenow.com;
info@dansullivanforalaska.com;
dan@dansullivanforalaska.com;
info@jontester.com;
friends@johnthune.com;
info@johnthune.com;
john@johnthune.com;
thom@thomtillis.com;
info@thomtillis.com;
pat@toomeyforsenate.com;
info@tommyforsenate.com;
info@vanhollen.org;
mark@markwarnerva.com;
contact@markwarnerva.com;
info@markwarnerva.com;
senator@markwarnerva.com;
raphael@warnockforgeorgia.com;
info@warnockforgeorgia.com;
press@warnockforgeorgia.com;
sheldon@whitehouseforsenate.com;
info@whitehouseforsenate.com;
senatorsheldon@whitehouseforsenate.com;
roger@wickerforsenate.com;
info@wickerforsenate.com;
contact@wickerforsenate.com;
ron@standtallforamerica.com;
contact@standtallforamerica.com;
contact@toddyoung.org;
info@randpaul.com;
jon@electjon.com;
contact@romneyforutah.com

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Police Report Proves Plainclothes Electronic Surveillance Unit Members Were Embedded Among Jan. 6 Protesters

Judicial Watch in an email share a link to an Epoch Times article published on June 20, 2022 and updated on June 21, 2022 by Patricia Tolson titled “EXCLUSIVE: Police Report Proves Plainclothes Electronic Surveillance Unit Members Were Embedded Among Jan. 6 Protesters.

Tolson wrote,

While there is growing speculation that federal agents and Capitol Police were involved in instigating acts of violence during the Jan. 6, 2021 protests and recording responses for the purposes of entrapment, evidence now proves that “plainclothes” members of a special Electronic Surveillance Unit (ESU) were embedded among the protesters for the purposes of conducting video surveillance. Evidence also points to a day of security deficiencies and police provocation for the purpose of entrapment.

According to a report—First Amendment Demonstrations, issued Jan. 3, 2021, by Chief of Police Robert Contee of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), Homeland Security Bureau, Special Operations Division, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times—the MPD began to activate Civil Disturbance Unit (CDU) platoons on Jan. 4, 2021. Full activation of 28 platoons was scheduled to occur on the following two days.

According to the Department of Justice website, “A CDU is composed of law enforcement officers who are trained to respond to protests, demonstrations, and civil disturbances for the purpose of preventing violence, destruction of property, and unlawful interference with persons exercising their rights under law.”

The objective of MPD was “to assist with the safe execution of any First Amendment demonstration and ensure the safety of the participants, public, and the officers.” CDU personnel and Special Operations Division  (SOD) members were to “monitor for any demonstration and/or violent activity and respond accordingly,” according to the report.

There has been speculation that federal agents and Capitol Police were involved in instigating acts of violence during the protests for the purposes of entrapment. As Red State reported in October 2021, “multiple surveillance videos show masked men opening up the doors to the U.S. Capitol Building to allow protesters to enter. In fact, one video shows them entering while Capitol Police officers simply stand around. Yet, we have no idea who those men are.”

Read more.

Judicial Watch in a video titled What are Pelosi & Schumer hiding about January 6? announced “[I]n February of this year [2022] that it filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Capitol Police seeking for emails and videos concerning the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 (Judicial Watch v. United States Capitol Police (No. 1:21-cv-00401)).”

Watch: Capital Riot Records Still Hidden.

On June 20, 2022  in The Hill article titled “Crack appears in Jan. 6 committee wallDon Wolfensberger reports,

On Monday, June 13, the first crack appeared in the otherwise cohesive wall of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol. The fissure opened when committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) told reporters after that day’s hearing that the committee would not be making any criminal referrals to the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump or anyone else.

Almost immediately, Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) tweeted that the committee “has not issued a conclusion regarding potential criminal referrals,” and will do so “at an appropriate time.” Another committee member, Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.) issued her own conclusion that “if criminal activity occurred, it is our responsibility to report that activity to the DOJ.” Other committee members, taken aback by the chairman’s comments, were stumbling to respond, but most chose to keep their powder dry until the committee could talk it over privately.

Meantime, a committee spokesperson released a statement to CNN the following day which attempted to clarify the chairman’s comments — sort of a sideways walk-back: “The committee has no authority to prosecute individuals but is rather tasked with developing facts….”  Two sentences later, the spokesperson said the committee would gather “all relevant information, offer recommendations, and, if warranted, make criminal referrals.”

Read more.

It appears that information and the truth about the involvement of government agents in plainclothes is coming out. As they say the truth will set you free.

Will the truth set free those currently in prison for simply attending the January 6th rally? Will the truth set the families of those killed in the Capital building, like Ashley Babbitt, by the Capital Police set them free?

We report. You decide.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Pelosi Congress Claims Sovereign Immunity in Federal Court to Keep Secret January 6 Videos and Emails

Judicial Watch Tells Court FBI May Have Violated Law in 1/6 Probes

Jan. 6 Committee Begins to Crack

The NY Sun reports, “The drama of these hearings revolves not around the events of a year and a half ago, but around the possibility of criminal charges in the future. The gravity of such a development has precipitated tension between members of the committee itself, and between the committee and the Justice Department. Officially, today’s hearing, the fourth, will focus on President Trump’s efforts to pressure state officials — particularly in Georgia and Arizona — to overturn the results of the presidential election. Representative Adam Schiff, who managed Mr. Trump’s first impeachment trial, is expected to quarterback the session.”

Crack appears in Jan. 6 committee wall

By Don Wolfensberger, The Hill, June 20, 2022:

On Monday, June 13, the first crack appeared in the otherwise cohesive wall of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol. The fissure opened when committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) told reporters after that day’s hearing that the committee would not be making any criminal referrals to the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump or anyone else.

Almost immediately, Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) tweeted that the committee “has not issued a conclusion regarding potential criminal referrals,” and will do so “at an appropriate time.” Another committee member, Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.) issued her own conclusion that “if criminal activity occurred, it is our responsibility to report that activity to the DOJ.” Other committee members, taken aback by the chairman’s comments, were stumbling to respond, but most chose to keep their powder dry until the committee could talk it over privately.

Meantime, a committee spokesperson released a statement to CNN the following day which attempted to clarify the chairman’s comments — sort of a sideways walk-back: “The committee has no authority to prosecute individuals but is rather tasked with developing facts….”  Two sentences later, the spokesperson said the committee would gather “all relevant information, offer recommendations, and, if warranted, make criminal referrals.”

It is doubtful the chairman’s remarks on referrals were an inadvertent slip of the tongue.  There have certainly been private and even public surmises as to whether criminal referrals are advisable, perhaps even some guidance from above.  Ranking committee Democrat Zoe Lofgren (Calif.), who is close to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said publicly in March that a criminal referral would be “unproductive” because “it carries no legal weight.”

That same month, the Justice Department announced it would not be prosecuting former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows and social media director Dan Scavino on House-approved contempt of Congress charges for defying committee subpoenas to appear. No reason was given. That same day, however, the department announced it was proceeding against former Trump White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on the same charges. It was an obvious muscle-flexing demonstration of prosecutorial discretion.

Unlike contempt of Congress citations, criminal referrals have no formal status in law or in Congress’s rules. Any citizen can make them. There are three good reasons why the committee would avoid making criminal referrals on Trump or anyone else. First, as Lofgren mentioned, such referrals from Congress have no legal status at DOJ. Most of such referrals from Congress, usually made by committee chairmen, have died on the department’s doorstep. Justice is very sensitive about being perceived as doing Congress’s political bidding, and prides itself on its independence and non-partisanship.

The second reason for not filing a criminal referral is a matter of optics. One of the main criticisms House Republicans level at the select committee is that its investigation is simply a smokescreen for a public show trial – a “kangaroo court.” Making a criminal referral to DOJ would only feed and confirm that accusation.  Most of the public media’s focus would be on whether the committee finds Trump criminally culpable for the Jan. 6 riot and would overshadow any other findings and recommendations the committee will presumably make.

A third reason a criminal referral would be resisted is that Trump’s role in claiming the election was stolen from him and whether he incited the violence that ensued is not necessarily a slam-dunk case. For Trump to be convicted requires proof of criminal intent on his part. Did he knowingly intend to break the law? Judging from much of the testimony already aired, it is not clear he was purposely acting illegally. As former Attorney General Bill Barr testified, at times the president seemed “detached from reality” and prone to believe the many “fantastical” conspiracy theories presented to him. Someone’s mental state is difficult enough to discern, let alone prove.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jan 6 Committee Chair Reminds Everyone It’s Irrelevant

Schiff Praises RINOs on Committee Investigating Jan. 6 ‘Attack’

First-hand account of Jan. 6 “insurrection” at U.S. Capitol

Reuters: FBI Finds No Evidence Jan. 6 Attack Was Coordinated

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Fairfax County School Board Votes To Make It A Potential Crime To Call A Boy A Boy

 

The ruling class has lost its collective mind and they mean to take us all and every good thing down with them.

Fairfax County School Board Votes To Make It A Potential Crime To Call A Boy A Boy

Dissenting students at school will now be suspended and possibly charged with a crime.

By: Auguste Meyrat, The Federalist, June 21, 2022:

Last Thursday, the school board at Fairfax County School Public Schools (FCPS) voted 8-4 to increase penalties for students who misgender or “dead-name” transgender-identifying students. This will now be classified as “discriminatory harassment,” which means offenders “could face weeks-long suspensions and referrals to local law enforcement,” according to the Washington Examiner.

The most charitable interpretation anyone could make of this move is that the school board is trying to cultivate a kinder environment by removing hateful language and attitudes from campuses. This would allow transgender students and their allies to feel safer and happier while those who oppose transgenderism have an opportunity to reflect on their intolerance and make better choices.

However, like most leftist gimmicks in education, all of this is based on false premises and will only create more dysfunction in an already dysfunctional school system. Specifically, there are three major problems with this new policy, two of them concern the idea behind it while the third has to do with its implementation.

Not an Expression of Hate

The first problem is that the school board conflates the refusal to accommodate a transgender student with an expression of hate. However, the two things are completely different. In the case of accommodating transgender classmates, a student is refusing to betray his own senses and reason to conform to the classmate’s fabricated reality; in the case of expressing hate, a student is actively seeking to harm and demean a classmate with hateful language.

Of course, the usual rebuttal to this is asking what the big deal is. After all, if objective reality (otherwise known as truth) is as relative and meaningless as transgender activists suggest, then why not humor people who live by a different truth? Professor Patrick Grzanka’s defensive interview with Matt Walsh in “What Is a Woman?” reflects this sentiment perfectly, as he asserts, “You keep invoking the word ‘truth,’ which is condescending and rude.”

On the contrary, it’s the exact opposite. Forcing someone to abide by another person’s arbitrary truth is “condescending and rude.” Empowered by the school faculty, trans-identifying students in FCPS can force every other student to lie and go along with the delusion. This isn’t much different from a big kid putting a smaller kid in a headlock and asking him to say “uncle,” and if he doesn’t — in this case, he will face severe consequences from a school administrator.

Is Transgender Identity on Par with Race and Sex?

This brings up another more fundamental problem with FCPS’s new policy: how should one properly view transgenderism? Is it really fair or accurate to say that transgender identity is on par with one’s race or sex? Shouldn’t it matter that race and sex are based on biology while transgenderism is based on feelings?

It most definitely matters because sometimes people’s feelings can be wrong, and if those feelings aren’t corrected by reason, they can become harmful. Researcher Jared Eckert argues this point in The American Conservative with the example from two decades ago of young people suddenly developing Body Identity Integrity Disorder (BIID), the belief that there is something wrong with one’s body.

They would go online and read blog posts about others seeking to amputate healthy limbs because they felt like they didn’t belong — and then these young people started feeling it too. The same thing happened with young people developing eating disorders because they felt like they were overweight.

Fortunately, as Eckert explains, social media platforms censored material that promoted these disorders because of the harm it was doing to young people. Unfortunately, in the case of transgenderism, censorship goes the other way — anyone who dares to question the idea that feeling like a woman makes one a woman will be censored. It’s the equivalent of punishing people who tell an anorexic woman she’s not fat, or an able-bodied man that he shouldn’t dismember himself.

Read the rest…..

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

BREAKING: U.S. Rep. Curtis Campaign EXPOSED

*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


Project Veritas Action published undercover footage of a Utah congressional campaign staffer discussing the multiple ways the campaign tries to “manipulate” voters while hiding not only the candidate, but also the candidate’s true intentions.

In the footage, Field Director, Daniel Stephens for U.S. Representative, John Curtis, is seen discussing the switch Curtis made from Democrat to Republican in 2006 saying that Curtis did so “to be able to run.” Stephens added, “he [Curtis] thought that it was ineffective to be a Democrat in Utah Valley.”

Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:

  • Project Veritas Action published video of Field Director, Daniel Stephens, who works for U.S. Representative, John Curtis (R-Utah). Stephens appears in undercover footage talking about Curtis’ campaign strategy to “manipulate” voters with a litany of hidden motives and agendas, including lack of support for Utah’s abortion trigger law.
  • Rep. John Curtis’ Field Director, Daniel Stephens, on Abortion Trigger Laws: “Here in Utah it means abortion is completely illegal. Which is fascinating…I never thought that Governor Cox would get into something so restrictive. I don’t think it solves any problems. I think you’re going to run into a lot more unhealthy, you know, marginalized communities that get, you know, unproductive care… he [Curtis] does not like the trigger laws.”
  • Discussing Representative Curtis’ switch from Democrat to Republican in 2006, Curtis’ second time changing parties, Stephens said, “I think he switched that year to be able to run” adding, “he [Curtis] thought that it was ineffective to be a Democrat in Utah Valley or Utah County.”
  • Stephens also made questionable comments about misrepresenting Curtis’ views to voters saying, “it might not be the truth, right?” before saying voters were, “not willing to do the research.”

You can watch the full video HERE.

When reached for comment, the manager of Rep. Curtis’ re-election campaign, Adrielle Herring, offered an official comment saying, “Statements made by someone who is not authorized to speak for the Congressman are not relevant.”

When pressed on specifics, Herring replied “no” to a litany of questions about whether statements made by Stephens were true and laughed about a question regarding Stephens’ comments about hiding from voters.


*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


EDITORS NOTE: This Project Veritas video exposé is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Providing Former Taliban Associates with Visas and Asylum

The Biden administration continues its assault on U.S. national security.


Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan has created unprecedented threats to U.S. national security as I noted in an earlier article, Biden’s Catastrophic Policies: Immigration and Afghanistan and those threats are about to be exacerbated by a policy change of the Biden administration.

On June 14, 2022 The Los Angeles Times reported, Some Afghan refugees now have chance to avoid terrorism designation that blocked path to U.S.

Here is how this disconcerting news report begins:

Doctors, teachers, engineers and other Afghans who were forced to associate with the Taliban will now have a chance at asylum or visas after the Biden administration loosened a terrorism-related designation on Tuesday, according to government officials and documents reviewed by the Los Angeles Times.

The exemption will be applied on a case by case basis after security vetting and is expected to help Afghans who fled their country after U.S. troops withdrew and the Taliban took over last August, as well as some Afghans who entered the U.S. earlier, said officials from the Department of Homeland Security.

The administration assurances that each case will be adjudicated on a case by case basis that will involve security vetting does absolutely nothing to assuage my serious concerns.

The fact that among the refugees are doctors, teachers and engineers does nothing to prove that these individual do not pose a threat to US security.  I would remind you that Osama bin Laden had a degree in civil engineering (which, in fact, made him all the more dangerous) and George Habash the founder of the PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine) an exceedingly violent terrorist organization, was a pediatrician.

That news report and the policy change of the Biden administration comes on the heels of a February 18, 2022 Fox News report: Pentagon IG report says 50 Afghan evacuees brought to US had ‘potentially significant security concerns’

Here is how that report began:

A Pentagon inspector general report released this week found that officials identified at least 50 Afghan evacuees who were brought to the United States in the wake of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan whose information indicated “potentially significant security concerns” –and were unable to locate dozens of those who it said had “derogatory information” that would make them ineligible for parole.

The report, released on Thursday, found that U.S. agencies “did not use all available data when vetting Afghan evacuees.” The National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC) later expanded its review to fill the gaps in screening, the report said.

The Fox News report is only the tip of a very huge iceberg.

There is a Yiddish expression that states, “When the fish goes bad, it smells from the head!”

The head of DHS is Alejandro Mayorkas the very same Mayorkas who now promises that the applications for visas and asylum will be carefully scrutinized.

Putting Mayorkas in charge of DHS is the equivalent of putting an arsonist in charge of the fire department!

In short, Mayorkas, who demanded that those who worked for him at USCIS approve virtually all applications for visas, demonstrated serious malfeasance that undermined the integrity of the visa issuing process.

Even before Biden was sworn in as President, he announced that Mayorkas would be his pick to become the Secretary of DHS (Department of Homeland Security).  I wrote an article about Biden’s choice for this important position in my December 7, 2020 article, Biden’s DHS: Department of Homeland SurrenderAlejandro Mayorkas, architect of DACA, picked by Biden to head DHS.

My article included a link to an Inspector General report that was issued on March 24, 2015 into allegations made by employees of USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services)that were, at the time under the direction of Mayorkas.  Here is how the cover letter from the Inspector General began:

Attached is our report of the investigation on the allegations made against Deputy Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. I have also attached the written statement he gave to our investigators. The report is furnished for whatever action you consider appropriate.

This report resulted from employees within USCIS who stepped forward to tell us what they witnessed. We will protect the confidentiality of these courageous employees, who are protected from retaliation by the Whistleblower Protection Act and whose identities are protected under the provisions of the Inspector General Act. We hope that their actions will set an example for all potential whistleblowers who look to the Office of Inspector General to give them a voice.

My article also included this excerpt:

ABC News published several in-depth articles about the troubling findings of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG).

On March 24, 2015 ABC News reported, Top Homeland Official Alejandro Mayorkas Accused of Political Favoritism Alejandro Mayorkas oversaw controversial $500,000 visa program.

The above-noted report was preceded by two ABC News reports that were published on February 3, 2015 which illustrate a clear nexus between these visas and national security:

Whistleblowers: US Gave Visas to Suspected Forgers, Fraudsters, Criminals Internal documents show feds ignored warnings from FBI.”  This report began with this excerpt:

Officials overseeing a federal program that offers an immigration short-cut to wealthy foreign investors have ignored pointed warnings from federal agents and approved visas for some immigrants suspected of having committed fraud, money laundering, and even one applicant with alleged ties to a child porn website, an ABC News investigation has found. The shortcomings prompted concerns within the Department of Homeland Security that the boutique immigration program would be exploited by terrorists, according to internal documents obtained by ABC News.

It is shocking,” said Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican. “Particularly when you have F.B.I. and other law enforcement agencies that are saying national security could be compromised or is being compromised — that’s enough for us to be concerned.”

Feds Investigating Iran Ties to Firm Involved in US Visa Program Documents: Iranian operatives may be abusing program to “infiltrate” U.S.”  This report began with these excerpt:

Federal agents in Los Angeles are investigating an L.A. shipping firm and its Iranian-born owner who for years have participated in and promoted an obscure U.S. immigration program — allowing the company to recruit wealthy foreign investors to receive visas and potentially Green Cards, law enforcement sources told ABC News.

The companys name surfaced in a confidential Department of Homeland Security government document, which raised “concerns that this particular visa program may be abused by Iranian operatives to infiltrate the United States.”

Whistleblowers inside the federal agency that oversees the immigration program told ABC News they have been deeply frustrated by an inability to de-certify the company, even after they became aware of the investigation and saw the companys name surface in an alarming internal Department Homeland Security memo. The memo, shared with ABC News, outlines concerns that Irans Revolutionary Guards have attempted to exploit the visa program “to infiltrate the United States.”

The ABC report included this excerpt about one company in particularly, TTC (Total Transportation Concepts):

The records show that the TTC employee was suspected of ties to an Iranian terror network that was involved in bombing plots and attempted assassinations. In 2012, federal investigators sent an email to immigration officials to advise them against re-certifying American Logistics for the immigration program, warning that an approval “would likely have serious national security implications.”

I strongly advise against a favorable adjudication,” wrote a Homeland Security Special Agent in the Counter-Proliferation Investigations Center in the April 30, 2012 email.

But agents with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) moved forward and green-lighted American Logistics and Mahdavi, to continue overseeing a designated “regional center” for a special U.S. immigration program for wealthy foreigners known by its visa classification, EB-5.

Under the best of circumstance, vetting aliens, particularly those who come from countries that are under the control of hostile governments is daunting, to say the least.

My December 2019 article, Terror Attack At Naval Air Station Highlights Immigration Catastrophe– Limitations in the vetting process endanger national security.was predicated on the deadly shooting at the Pensacola Air Naval Station by a 21 year old member of the Saudi military, Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, a second lieutenant in the Saudi Air Force as reported in the New York Times on December 6, 2019, Trainee on Military Base Mounts Deadly Attack.

That article included links to reports about other terrorists who were not stopped by the vetting process:

On December 3, 2019 the DOJ reported, Hizballah Operative Sentenced to 40 Years in Prison for Covert Terrorist Activities on Behalf of Hizballahs Islamic Jihad Organization; Ali Kourani Was Trained by Hizballahs External Terrorist Operations Component and Gathered Intelligence in New York City in Support of Attack-Planning Efforts.

My recent article, Alleged Hezbollah Sleeper” Arrested In NYC By Joint Terrorism Task Force included this paragraph:

On September 19, 2019 the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York issued a press release that announced, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Indictment Of New Jersey Man For Terrorist Activities On Behalf Of Hizballahs Islamic Jihad Organization. The subtitle of that press release provides more disturbing information, Alexei Saab Allegedly Was Trained by Hizballahs External Terrorist Operations Component in Bomb-Making and Conducted Intelligence-Gathering in New York City and Washington, D.C., and Elsewhere in Support of Hizballahs Attack-Planning Efforts.

On August 2, 2019 the Justice Department posted thus extremely this worrying news release, Afghanistan National and Former U.S. Military Interpreter Charged for Role in Human Smuggling Conspiracy.

On August 20, 2018 the Department of Justice issued a press release, Two Individuals Charged for Acting as Illegal Agents of the Government of Iran.

My piece written in February 2018, Saudi Graduate Of Al Qaeda Terror Training Camp Arrested In Oklahoma –  Alleged classmate of 9/11 hijackers attended US flight school in 2016 included a link to the DOJ press release, Saudi Citizen Charged in Oklahoma With Concealing Attendance at Al Qaeda Training Camp.

When you add to the mix the mindset of an individual such as Mayorkas, who has refused to secure our borders, enforce our immigration laws from within the interior of the United States and refuse to pursue immigration fraudsters, as I wrote in my October 22, 2022 article, Biden Administration Plans To Protect Immigration Fraudsters we have a potentially catastrophic situation even as intelligence services warn that within a couple of years ISIS and other terror groups will be in the position to carry out deadly terror attacks within the borders of the United States- the borders the Biden administration refuses to secure.

As I noted in a recent article, Mayorkas is not Americas guardian — he’s its innkeeper.

©Michael Cutler. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: After the Guns Were Confiscated, the Killing Fields Began

“Our Founding Fathers didn’t give us the Second Amendment for duck hunting or simply for self-protection in a country that at the time had a vast and yet unknown frontier. They bestowed it upon us so that we could protect our precious nation from devolving into tyranny as so many others have done.”

Watch this flashback video of Pamela Geller on the Dr. Drew Show debating gun control:

After the Guns Were Removed, the Killing Fields Began

By: J. William Middendorf, June 16, 2022

J. William Middendorf is a former secretary of the Navy and author of “The Great Nightfall: How We Win the New Cold War” (2020).

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The Communist Party must command all the guns; that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”

The quote was from Mao Zedong, founder of Communist China. Mao’s first act after gaining complete control of China in 1949 was to take away all guns from the population. It was a policy he began in 1935 as he took over each rural province. Anyone found with a gun post-confiscation was executed.

An estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with—by execution, imprisonment, or forced famine.

Mao killed more people than either Stalin or Hitler during World War II. And it all began after he took away the guns.

Dictators throughout much of history have disarmed their populations before they began their mass killings. Examples abound beyond Mao: Hitler took guns from the Jews in November of 1938, and Kristallnacht and the Holocaust followed; and then there was Fidel Castro in Cuba and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, to name but a few.

Cuba and Gun Control

Everybody ought to have a gun, Castro maintained—until he took over Cuba in 1959. At a rally in Havana before he assumed power, he explained: “This is how democracy works: It gives rifles to farmers, to students, to women, to Negroes, to the poor, and to every citizen who is ready to defend a just cause.”

Weapons ranging from Czech submachine guns to Belgian FN automatic rifles were handed out to 50,000 soldiers, 400,000 militiamen, 100,000 members of the factory-guarding popular defense force, and to many men, women, and children in Cuba’s 1 million-strong “neighborhood vigilance committees.”

Immediately after assuming power in 1959, Castro changed his position, following Mao’s rule that guns should not be in the hands of the people.

For three weeks after the Castro government was formed, Radio Havana warned, “All citizens must turn in their combat weapons. Civilians must take arms to police stations, soldiers to military headquarters.”

Radio Havana’s explanation was somewhat contradictory: The guns were in bad shape anyway and the “struggle against our enemies requires a rigorous control of all combat weapons.”

There was an urgency about the new policy that suggested serious concern. Failure to turn in military weapons by Sept. 1, 1959, warned Radio Havana, would be punished not by criminal courts but by the dreaded Revolutionary Tribunals—those kangaroo courts that sentenced thousands of Cubans to death after Castro took over.

Venezuela and Gun Control  

Venezuela is now paying the price for allowing Chavez to implement the Mao rule when he came to power in 2012.

The shocking nature of an economic collapse that led Venezuela from being one of the richest countries in Latin America to one of the poorest has been well documented.

One aspect of the Venezuelan crisis that does not receive much coverage is the country’s gun control regime. All guns were outlawed when Chavez came to power, and harsh penalties were imposed on violators. The Venezuelan Armed Forces have exclusive power to control, register, and potentially confiscate firearms.

Many citizens now regret the repressive gun control legislation the Venezuelan government implemented in 2012. Naturally, this regret is warranted. The Venezuelan government is among the most tyrannical in the world, with a proven track record of violating basic civil liberties such as free speech, debasing its national currency, confiscating private property, and creating economic controls that destroy the country’s productivity.

Elections have proven to be useless, as they’ve been mired with corruption and charges of government tampering. For many, taking up arms is the only option left for the country to shake off its tyrannical government. But the Venezuelan government has prevented such an uprising with its draconian gun control.

These life-and-death lessons of history are lost on too many Americans. Our Founding Fathers didn’t give us the Second Amendment for duck hunting or simply for self-protection in a country that at the time had a vast and yet unknown frontier. They bestowed it upon us so that we could protect our precious nation from devolving into tyranny as so many others have done.

Politicians who respect the American ideal don’t try to diminish the Second Amendment or blame it for other ills of society that they have failed to solve, but rather embrace it as part of the legacy of rights that helps keep America free.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

EXCLUSIVE: More Than A Dozen Republican AGs Demand Senators Reject Biden’s ‘Anti-Gun’ ATF Nominee

Five Major Cities on Pace to Pass High 2021 Homicide Totals Halfway Through 2022, UP 25% – All Run By Democrats

Muslim Privilege: Cleveland ‘Officer of the Year’ Ismail Quran Under Investigation for Jew-Hating, Pro-Hitler Tweets

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Florida Woman Who Found Ashley Biden’s Diary in a Halfway House Is Under FBI Investigation

Instead of investigating this abhorrent child abuse, the FBI is prosecuting anyone who came in contact with Ashley Biden’s diary after she left it behind  at a halfway house Ashley Biden had stayed in after treatment for her compulsive sexual urges.

“Biden is using the FBI as his personal secret police, dispatching them forward to crush and intimidate and prosecute people who get in his way or his family’s way. Maybe that’s not surprising from a guy who spent his entire life living off taxpayers. He believes he owns the Department of Justice, but he doesn’t. In fact, he’s behaving as if he does is scary as hell. We could not let the FBI become enforcers for politicians and their families. If we allow that. It’s the end of everything.” (Tucker Carlson)

Florida Woman Who Found Ashley Biden’s Diary in ‘Halfway House’ Is Under FBI Investigation

By: Truth Press, June 18, 2022

Ashely Biden’s diary revealed that her father, the current President of the United States, might have played a role in her being sexualized at a young age, and the big news is that it might have been criminal for someone else to possess the sordid autobiographical details.

No, really.

In the diary, the president’s daughter wrote that “showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate)” might have played a role in her sex addiction as an adult, as well as being “hyper-sexualized [at] a young age” which allegedly involved another family member as a child, according to the U.K.’s Daily Mail.

Considering “dad” is President Joe Biden, the chief executive and leader of the party which has made drag queens and classroom discussions on sexuality a political rallying point, this is rather significant.

But as far as the establishment media is concerned, the big news is that … dun dun dun … someone discovered and sold the diary to journalists.

Gasp!

I mean, what is this country coming to, amirite?

If this gloriously overlooked point of the story doesn’t sum up how the fourth estate has treated the Biden administration in a nutshell, well, there are practically countless other examples of legacy media’s glaring double standards and how it leverages its power of influence to exercise its thinly veiled political agenda, but I digress.

Anywho, just like the president’s long history of racism, sexual assault allegations and the dumpster fire that is First Son Hunter Biden’s entire life story and sundry shady connections to his father’s political career, the fact that Ashley Biden’s diary reveals these unsettling facts about her relationship with her father should cause many a massive media sensation, but won’t, because, well, wild media bias and corruption.

So, let’s examine the facts, since, as illustrated, there’s a good chance you haven’t caught this one in the cable news evening lineup lately.

A Florida woman is reportedly being investigated by the FBI for her connection to the discovery of the diary and subsequent role she played in conveying it to the conservative guerrilla journalism group, Project Veritas, the Mail reported on Thursday.

Aimee Harris, 39, was named in a report in The New York Times in 2021 which revealed that she had discovered the First Daughter’s diary in a home in which Ms. Biden had previously taken residence.

Harris sold the diary to Project Veritas after she found it in a Delray, Florida, home that she was staying in with her two children during a contentious custody dispute, as the Times reported.

Before this, in the early days of the 2020 presidential campaign, Ms. Biden had taken up residence in the home after doing a stint in rehab.

“I have always been boy crazy,” Ms. Biden, the only daughter of President Biden and his second wife, First Lady Jill Biden, wrote in the most eyebrow-raising entry, according to the Mail. “Hyper-sexualized @ a young age … I remember somewhat being sexualized with [a family member]; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate).”

In July 27, 2019, during the thick of the Democratic presidential primaries, the diary revealed that Ashely Biden was still using drugs.

“My dad cried on the phone saying he has the debate in a week + ‘now has to worry about you,” she wrote.

“And he cried. Maybe he knows what he is doing + it’s worked but my feelings of guilt often are overwhelming,” she added.

At the time, it must be noted, Hunter Biden is said to have been struggling with crippling drug addiction as well, and human decency urges me to set all political animus and my culture war spirit entirely aside and note that perhaps if a person has exactly two children in the throes of devastating drug addictions, it might not be the best time to seek public office, let alone the highest office in the freest most powerful country in the history of humankind.

Just, you know, for future reference, since the Biden presidency ship has long since sailed and, well, we all know how well that’s going.

Maybe we can dodge a few economy-crashing, entire-future-of-America-is-at-stake minefields in the future if more politicians take some personal time to help support their multiple addict adult children and maybe, just throwing this out there, to also do some self-reflection on where one’s parenting might have gone wrong. Again, totally just throwing this out there for anyone to whom it might be beneficial.

So, all that being said, Harris is now reportedly under investigation for the role she played in selling the diary to Project Veritas, the latest legal milestone in a long investigation on the part of the federal government to uncover how Ms. Biden’s diary got into the hands of the conservative group.

Harris, who the Times noted appeared to have been a supporter of former President Donald Trump, is said to have worked with one Robert Kurlander, a convicted money-launderer, to sell the diary which as you can imagine would have been a rather juicy tidbit circa fall 2020.

Last year, the president of Veritas, James O’Keefe, was cuffed in his underwear by FBI agents as they conducted a pre-dawn raid on his residence.

“The feds now aren’t saying it was illegal to find the diary,” a source told the Mail of the probe into Harris. “Nor are they saying Aimee stole anything.”

“But it’s her selling the property of another that could be considered a crime. And the fact Ashley is the president’s daughter kicks it to a different legal level,” the source reportedly said.

According to the Mail, Kurlander and Harris brought the diary to a GOP fundraiser hosted by businesswoman and Trump associate Elizabeth Fago. It was Fago’s daughter who reportedly contacted Veritas, which ultimately met with Kurlander and Harris and secured the rights to publish the diary for the hefty sum of $40,000 which was split between the two schemers.

It’s incredible that the same federal law enforcement apparatus that has all but entirely ignored everything that Hillary Clinton and the DNC were doing in 2016 (nay, played a major role in the aforementioned party’s shady dealings) is zeroing in on a single mother who saw an opportunity to make some money by selling a diary which revealed that a man running for president at the time once showered with his daughter.

Read more…

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: “Hyper-Sexualized At Young Age.”: Perverted Joe Biden SHOWERED With His Young Daughter Ashley Biden

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.