MINNESOTA: Dem Ilhan Omar Booed off Stage by 10,000 Somalis at Concert, ‘Go Home!’ ‘Shut The F*** Up!’

/in , , , , , , /by

It appears that Ilhan Omar has fallen out of favor with her own people. On June 7th, 2022 Robert Spencer reported that Muslims accused Ilhan Omar of unbelief, calling her a ‘disgrace to the hijab’ because of her Pride Month tweet.

A hadith depicts Muhammad specifying the punishment for homosexual activity,

“The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.’” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4462)

Her appearance at the July 3rd, 2022 Somali Independence Day concert attended by 10,000 Somalis is proof of the political mess she is now in.

She is up for reelection and has a primary opponent Don Samuels who said that now is the time to run for Congress because he’s concerned about the direction of the country — and because he believes Omar’s style is “not compatible with the needs of the moment.” If Omar’s appearance at the concert is any indication then Omar may be primaried out.

In a MinnPost.com column reports,

The race for Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District seat, currently held by U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, is shaping up to be one of the state’s most interesting in the 2022 midterms. Omar is already facing several Republican candidates — Royce White, Cicely Davis and Shukri Abdirahman — but as of this week, Omar has a new challenger from her own party.

Don Samuels, 72, a community organizer who previously served as a member on the Minneapolis City Council and the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education, announced this week that he would be running to unseat Omar in the DFL primary.

Read more.

Here are just a few of the tweets showing the Somalis’ anger at her. They wouldn’t even allow her to speak.

WATCH: Ilhan Omar Booed Off Stage By 10K People At Concert in Minneapolis, They Won’t even Let Her Speak “Go Home!” “Shut The F*** Up!”

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Farmer Uprising in The Netherlands

/in , , , , , , , /by

Tomorrow, on the 4th of July, there will be massive protests by Dutch farmers against the Dutch government.

The Dutch government led by Prime Minister Mark Rutte (a fake conservative) wants to drive large numbers of farmers off their lands. Dutch farmers are among the best in the world and they supply the Dutch population with high quality food, every day.

The reason that the government needs to intervene is supposedly to save Nature. They claim that the farmers and their cattle produce too much Nitrogen.

In reality; they want their land to build houses on for mass numbers of immigrants from Africa and the Middle East. Mostly Muslims.

Explained: Why are Dutch farmers protesting over emissions?

Some 40,000 farmers gathered last week in the central Netherlands’ agricultural heartland to protest the government’s plan to slash emissions of damaging pollutants. What is the government proposing, and why are farmers protesting?

By: AP | The Hague | Updated: July 3, 2022 10:01:39 pm

Farmers protested around the Netherlands as lawmakers voted Tuesday on proposals to slash emissions of damaging pollutants, a plan that will likely force farmers to cut their livestock herds or stop work altogether.

The government says emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia, which livestock produce, must be drastically reduced close to nature areas that are part of a network of protected habitats for endangered plants and wildlife stretching across the 27-nation European Union.

As tractors gathered outside the parliament building, Prime Minister Mark Rutte said farmers have the right to protest but not to break the law.

Read more.

Si vis Pacem para Bellum

©Matthys van Raalten. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ENOUGH! Holland On The Brink Of Civil War After Left-Wing Government Bans Farming

The Netherlands seems to be ‘sliding into dictatorship’

Dutch rules on emissions affecting farmers threaten food security

Dutch Government acts out against Dutch Farmers who they have illegally disenfranchised in the name of AGW

Breaking: Frustrated Farmers Battle With Torches and Pitchforks

The America I Grew Up In

/in , , , , , /by

“I can’t imagine there has ever been a more gratifying time or place to be alive than America in the 1950s.  No country had ever known such prosperity.” —  Bill Bryson – non-fiction author

“Our flag honors those who have fought to protect it, and is a reminder of the sacrifice of our nation’s founders and heroes. As the ultimate icon of America’s storied history, the Stars and Stripes represents the very best of this nation.” — Joe Barton – Texas Congressman 1985-2019

Yes, I grew up in the 1950s, and graduated from eighth grade in 1960.  Those were some wonderful years in America.  The war was over, the future was bright, and hard work promised prosperity.

Television was brand new and still pretty sweet.  The cartoons of those days were so much fun.  Mighty Mouse, Road Runner and Tom and Jerry were some of my favorites. And those Saturday morning programs…The Lone Ranger, Sky King, Adventures of Superman, Flash Gordon, Rin Tin Tin, Gene Autry, Roy Rogers and Dale Evans, The Cisco Kid, Andy Devine with “Plunk your magic twanger froggy.”

Famous evening shows I remember were Gunsmoke, Rawhide, Yancy Derringer, Cheyenne, the Rifleman, Lassie, Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone, Peter Gunn, Bonanza, Sea Hunt with Lloyd Bridges, father of Beau Jeff Bridges, and Paladin.

There were so many more, and I know readers born in the early baby boomer generation can name all their favorites from those marvelous days in America.

I miss those days.  I want them back.  And I want back the wonderful and patriotic American actors and actresses of that era.  Here is one of our favorites, John Wayne and the celebrity ensemble.  In the second half, they all share in singing God Bless America.  Surely, you’ll fondly remember those stars who have long since passed on, but there are a few who are still with us.  Each of them has a special place in my heart, but Duke was and is always at the top, right along with Bob Hope and Bing Crosby.

Before you start the barbeques and fireworks, watch this six-minute video, and ask the Lord for help in resurrecting the marvelous America we once had.  Won’t you take just a few minutes every day to bend your knees to the Lord and ask for Him to give us wisdom and guidance in saving our beloved country?

Then take six minutes to listen to the heroes and heroines of the past.

 

New York Times, CNN & J6 Committee, ‘We Must Get Trump’

/in , , , , , , /by

Good day Kahny,

I hope today finds you well, at your desk as Executive Editor of The NY Times. That is quite the achievement, my friend. It is ultimately you who has the last say in what is published in your esteemed tabloid. As usual, your ace reporters are spot on with their highly moral, factual, and prevalent reporting. As you already know, those radical right wing lunatics are at it again, calling your tabloid one level below the National Enquirer and Pravda….even below CNN, if you can believe that! Let’s see what has been going on lately, news that you are laser focused on.

We Must Get Trump!

It seems that elected President Trump is still at the forefront of your news coverage. Conservatives are shocked that there is rarely a mention of Brandon, the installed resident at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. I myself find it a bit odd also, with all Joey has accomplished in such a short time—that your front page wouldn’t have wall to wall coverage of his monumental accomplishments. It’s almost….almost mind you, as if you are intentionally trying to divert attention away from Joey. Now why would that be Kahny?

Well, let’s get back to what is most important—to get elected President Trump! I understand the highly unbiased, partisan 1/6 committee investigating Trump was not doing well in the rating department. That is until recently, that is. Things have taken a dramatic turn since the very reputable Cassidy Hutchinson, former White House aide appeared before the committee.

Sharing stories of President Trump lunging and choking secret service agents, then trying to grab the wheel and commandeer the vehicle commonly called, “the Beast.” I know Kahny, this name is sometimes confused with Hillary Clinton, who went by the same moniker while occupying the White House with Bubba. I am actually terrified just hearing these stories. Those poor secret service agents, I hope they didn’t experience PTSD. The horror! Of course, I’m referring to working with Hillary.

More Witnesses to Come Forward

This is just the tip of the iceberg Kahny. Unnamed sources (old WAPO trick), have said there would be more witnesses coming forward in the upcoming weeks. From what I’m told, these witnesses will be the final nail in the coffin for President Trump.

This first witness was also in the President’s car. It seems that when no one was paying attention: President Trump put on war paint and a full length Indian headdress and, armed himself with a crossbow. He started screaming, “that he wanted to lead the violent INSURRECTION, and to drive the Beast (not Hillary) to the Capitol steps. The Secret Service tried to dissuade the President, saying that this wouldn’t be in his best interest….but to no avail. That’s when President Trump started to shoot arrows at the driver, demanding he change course. If not for the agility and dexterity of said agent, this would have been a very different story.

One of the arrows pierced the windshield, so they had to pull over naturally and call one of those mobile windshield places to come replace it. Reportedly, they have video of this, but Chardonnay Pelosi has refused to release the tapes again. We reached out to her office, but it was visiting day at Betty Ford, and she was out there visiting Big Paulie. She also had to give him some information on some stock trades he needed to make…….before the information goes public of course.

Well, once the vehicle stopped to have the windshield replaced; President Trump made his move, he bolted from the beast (not Hillary) and made a beeline towards the Capitol. What a horrifying account! It was later revealed that the witness is Adam Schiff’s chief of staff.

It Gets Worse!

Now, the President was on the loose, and nowhere to be found. This is why we can’t understand why Chardonnay will not release those videos, it would clean up so many unanswered questions. Like the pesky question: why wasn’t FBI agent Ray Epps (inciting the crowd to storm the Capitol), not arrested for his part in the INSURRECTION? Any idea Kahny?

Back to President Trump. It seems he was next seen running through the halls of the Capitol. He was dressed like Rambo and shooting an M-16 haphazardly screaming “where’s AOC’s office, I want to date her.” Little did President Trump know, but AOC was nowhere near her office hiding under her desk as she originally claimed. Her whole story was later debunked. Possibly her head was foggy as she had a bartending gig the night before, and had to close. Once again the President got away before he could be contained. This witness is reportedly Liz Cheney’s secretary.

The Worst Account Yet!

Well, during all this pandemonium the President was spotted once more. It seems he now was wearing a giant MAGA hat and was carrying a noose and some bleach. He was screaming at the top of his lungs, “that this is MAGA country.” Oh, the humanity.

This unnamed source said this witness was actually Jussie Smollett. It seems he had taken a wrong turn and got lost while going out for a sandwich again. I mean what are the chances Kahny? That the identical racist attacks would be perpetuated against the honorable Jussie, twice? I mean the odds are astronomical. He should start to use door dash or grub hub, for his sandwich runs to avoid this happening again.

Where is the News Coverage of Brandon?

Now I’m starting to understand why President Trump is plastered all over your front pages, and not Brandon. I mean who can cast doubt on any of these witnesses. Hopefully you will give them the same over the top notch coverage that you are giving the the highly moral and reputable Cassidy Hutchinson.

Don’t let the radical right drag you down Kahny. How soon they forget about Russian collusion and the Steele Dossier. On second thought, maybe we should forget that one Kahny, seeing as though that dossier was bought and paid for by Hillary (aka, the beast). Hey, do you think Hillary may have paid off Cassidy, from contributions to her charity organization (wink, wink), the Clinton Foundation? Oh, that Killery, that scamp!

So Kahny, we have to go into overdrive with this fairytale INSURRECTION coverage. I mean Bidenflation’s approval rating is in the mid 30’s. I understand Jimmy Carter recently sent him a thank you card, for assuming the spot of worst President of all time. All in 18 months…..quite the accomplishment.

Better Call Pelosi

I understand Joey wants to get to his beach estate in Rehobeth Beach as soon as possible. It seems he has entered a soapbox derby with the other neighborhood kids. Joey’s car has been fitted with training wheels due to recent bike riding mishaps. Well, they are planning to introduce all the contestants on a stage before hand and there is this 11 year old neighborhood kid that always gives Joey problems at these events. Joey tried to have him banned by saying he participated in the INSURRECTION! Sadly, this didn’t pan out.

But the always innovative Brandon knew just what to do. He called up Chardonnay and said he needed some help. So ole Chardonnay sharpened up her elbows, hopped on her broom and headed to the beach (with some flying monkeys as escorts). We are told Big Paulie broke out of Betty Ford when he heard the news, and was heading out to a ladies night at a local tavern (by himself of course…..wink, wink). Hopefully, he or she calls Uber this time. Well when she got there, she lined up with the other kids and Beijing Biden. Then at the just the right moment, she pointed behind the crowd and screamed, “look, it’s President Trump with an axe!” When the crowd looked away ole Chardonnay drove her elbow into into the 11 year olds neck (Joey’s nemesis), driving him off the stage.

When video of the incident made the news, Chardonnay’s staff said she was trying to get the child in the picture. As the child was being loaded into the ambulance, Chardonnay and Brandon were seen eating waffle cones. Reportedly the child will be wheelchair bound for life. Brandon later blamed this incident on President Trump, Putin and corporate greed.

Pravda at its Best

Well Joey Kahn, it’s time for you to get off the office floor, put your shoes on, and put down that China Communist Party coffee cup of yours, and get to work. Remember, we must get President Trump. To Hell with runaway inflation, violent crime out of control (evidently this is due to legal gun owners), the invasion of our country at the southern border, attack on fossil fuel companies by the Vegetable-in-Chief and more importantly….his handlers, moronic military decisions, encouraging harassment against Supreme Court Justices, ridiculous revolving door no bail policies, etc., etc. From all these disastrous policies we can only conclude one thing—President Trump is a racist! We must get Trump!

Yep, Joey Kahn your journalistic integrity is sure on display here. I guess those Ivy League schools you attended didn’t promote too much of that, huh? I want to say Happy 4th of July to you, except I hear you have a CCP flag in your office, instead of the American Flag.

To those true Patriots—Happy 4th of July!

And to our Liar-in-Chief……FJB!

Sincerely,

Chris Cirino

©Christopher Cirino. All rights reserved.

Neil Gorsuch Takes a Stand Against the Tyranny of Unaccountable, Rogue Bureaucracy

/in , , , , , , , , /by

“The framers believed that a republic—a thing of the people—would be more likely to enact just laws than a regime administered by a ruling class of largely unaccountable ‘ministers.’”

Without a doubt, Neil Gorsuch is the most libertarian Supreme Court justice of my lifetime. He just proved his constitutional, limited government bona fides yet again with a powerful concurrence inveighing against the tyranny of unaccountable, rogue bureaucracy.

The case in question is West Virginia v. EPA, which was decided Thursday in a 6-3 ruling against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) along the justices’ typical ideological lines.

At issue was the Obama-era Clean Power Plan, a 2015 regulatory scheme devised by the EPA. The plan sought to reinterpret a decades-old statute to discover new authority for the EPA to forcibly transition the energy sector so that new coal power plants could not be built.

The Clean Power Plan never actually went into effect as it was caught up in legal battles. Then, in 2019, the Trump administration sought to repeal the rule and was itself sued. So, it remained a live question: Could the EPA take unilateral action to restructure the energy industry without congressional approval?

The Supreme Court sought to answer this question in its decision. The majority, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, ruled in favor of West Virginia and against the EPA, but did not go so far as to overturn long-held doctrines enabling wide bureaucratic discretion.

Gorsuch, for his part, wrote a concurrence perfectly explaining why rogue bureaucracy must be further reined in. (Full credit to the Brownstone Institute’s Jeffrey Tucker for first highlighting Gorsuch’s concurrence + quotes).

“Vesting federal legislative power in Congress [rather than bureaucrats],” Gorsuch writes, “is vital because the framers believed that a republic—a thing of the people—would be more likely to enact just laws than a regime administered by a ruling class of largely unaccountable ‘ministers.’”

But what about those, like dissenting Justice Elena Kagan, who say that federal bureaucrats need wide latitude because Congress is failing to, in their view, adequately address climate change?

“Admittedly, lawmaking under our Constitution can be difficult,” Gorsuch acknowledges. “But that is nothing particular to our time nor any accident.”

“The framers believed that the power to make new laws regulating private conduct was a grave one that could, if not properly checked, pose a serious threat to individual liberty….” he said. “As a result, the framers deliberately sought to make lawmaking difficult by insisting that two houses of Congress must agree to any new law and the President must concur or a legislative supermajority must override his veto.”

With an empowered, unelected bureaucracy, “agencies could churn out new laws more or less at whim,” Gorsuch adds. “Intrusions on liberty would not be difficult and rare, but easy and profuse.”

This isn’t hypothetical speculation—it’s exactly what we’ve seen under the status quo.

For a glaring example, just consider the Centers for Disease Control’s pandemic-era “eviction moratorium.” The federal agency unilaterally declared that evictions nationwide were prohibited in many circumstances by citing an old statute that gave the CDC director the ability to order in specific places “such measures to prevent such spread of the diseases as he/she deems reasonably necessary, including inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, and destruction of animals or articles believed to be sources of infection.”

They went from that to a nationwide “eviction moratorium.” Stretch, much?

That’s right: Unelected government officials effectively commandeered the nation’s rental market, which caused tremendous dysfunction, trampled over property rights, and sabotaged the supply of rental housing. (For which prices are now surging. Shocker!) And, it was years before the courts finally stopped them and struck down the “moratorium.”

The stakes of this issue are high.

Most Americans might not realize it, but the federal government is actually the biggest employer in the US. Yup: more people work for the feds than any private company. The scope of the administrative state is genuinely hard to grasp.

Tucker describes the administrative state as “the effective governing apparatus of the US,” and a “vast and permanent bureaucracy of 432 agencies and 2.9M bureaucrats who are unreachable by any standard of personnel management.”

He’s exactly right.

The federal government’s vast bureaucracy continues to grow and exercise more power over our daily lives. But the average American has no say in what they do, no recourse if their decisions harm us. At least with Congress or the president, as deeply flawed as they may be, they’re ultimately accountable to voters every 2, 4, or 6 years.

If we want to preserve our freedoms and protect our prosperity over the long run, we need to follow Neil Gorsuch’s lead and rein in the administrative state—before it’s too late.

WATCH:  Brad Reacts to Dumb Tweets About High Gas Prices (CRINGE)

AUTHOR

Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Company Contrast: Christian Brothers Automotive

/in , , , , , /by

Each week 2ndVote takes a look at popular companies that either score well or score poorly  and then try to provide alternatives that either better align with the 2ndVote values or should be avoided to the best of your ability. This series is called The Company Contrast, and the company we will be focusing on this week is Christian Brothers Automotive (4.08).

With all the summer festivities amping up, the last thing we want our 2ndVote supporters to worry about is where to take their vehicles for maintenance. Which is why we have picked an automotive company that aligns with our values, and we think it’ll align with yours too! Christian Brothers Automotive is our top recommendation to ensure you have all the fun this summer instead of those pesky car troubles. The automotive company has been running since 1982 and prides themselves on the customer service they continue to provide. The company is led by the Christian principle of “love your neighbor as yourself” – Matthew 22:39. Not only will they ensure your car is handled with care, but they will also give you peace of mind while aligning with your values. Christian Brothers Automotive scores a 4.08 here at 2ndVote, and for good reason. The company donates and partners with organizations that support one of our core values, life. They also show support for fighting the ongoing issue of human trafficking by providing anti-human trafficking organizations with donations. They are an openly Christian organization founded on Christian values. Christian Brothers Automotive cares for you, your vehicles, and your values. Plan your next summer outing with ease knowing this repair shop is right around the corner. Check out our website to find out more information about Christian Brothers Automotive and why they score so well with 2ndVote!

At 2ndVote, we know it can be overwhelming to keep track of day-to-day activities. Especially vehicle maintenance. It is our goal to help you spend your time and hard-earned money where your values are met firsthand. That is why we do not recommend O’Reilly Auto Parts (2.96) to you when you are in need of vehicle maintenance! They  scored low on life, one of our key values.  O’Reilly Auto Parts has made donations to organizations that directly fund or support Planned Parenthood. They have made donations to the United Way, a known organization that also supports common core. Supporting proper education for the future generations is something we value. O’Reilly Auto Parts donation history can be found on our website as well as the research and information behind its score. Our 2ndVote supporters can make a change, reach out to O’Reilly Auto Parts and voice how they can improve their donation patterns!

EDITORS NOTE: This 2ndVote column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

New York’s Dem Governor Urges Biden To Use Military Bases For Abortions

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Friday urged the Biden administration to consider opening up military bases for abortions to women living in states that heavily restrict the procedure, ABC News reported.

Since military bases are considered federal lands, Hochul argued in a virtual meeting with President Joe Biden that federal law would allow them to override state bans, according to ABC. Her suggestion heeds widespread outcries from  Democratic politicians about loss of women’s rights following the Supreme Court’s decision on June 24 overturning Roe V. Wade.

“Veterans hospitals, military bases and other places where the federal government controls the jurisdiction in some of the states that are hostile to women’s rights” could “make sure that those services can be available to other women” not publicly employed, Hochul said, according to ABC.

Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, also in the meeting, floated the idea of using Indian Health Service clinics and tribal territory, where state law does not govern, as alternatives to private abortion facilities, ABC reported.

Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren stated that the U.S. government should plant abortion facilities on the outskirts of national parks on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” Sunday and in a Washington Post interview Monday.

Health and Human Services secretary Xavier Becerra said Tuesday that “every option is on the table” regarding abortion access, but the agency would “have a conversation with the president to make sure we implement his directives”

The White House, while agreeing with the Democratic leaders on the supposed need for comprehensive reproductive healthcare availability for all, said on Tuesday putting abortion centers on government-owned property could have “dangerous ramifications.”

Currently, however, federal facilities, including military bases, can only perform abortions in the case of rape, incest or where the life of the mother is in danger due to the Hyde Amendment, which prevents taxpayer dollars from funding elective abortions.

The House Appropriations Committee approved amendments to the fiscal year 2023 funding bill Thursday that would repeal the Hyde Amendment, allowing federal medical centers to perform abortions to the degree Congress decides, according to a press release.

“The bill eliminates the Hyde and Weldon amendments, a long-standing discriminatory policy that denied low-income women their legal right to an abortion,” the bill summary stated.

Hochul’s office and the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

MICAELA BURROW

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Just Days After Roe Reversal, Abortion Is Already Banned In Almost A Quarter Of America

ESPN’s Elle Duncan Pushes Fathers To Be Pro-Abortion To Support Their Daughters

‘We Need Two More Votes’: Biden Calls Out Manchin And Sinema For Not Rolling Over On Filibuster

‘All They Do Is Virtue Signal’: Daily Caller’s Kay Smythe Says Politicians Are ‘Failed Actors’ Seeking Popularity

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

VIDEO: Biden Adviser Defends ‘Liberal World Order’

/in , , , , , , , , /by

They’re not hiding it any more.

Video of Biden Adviser Defending ‘Liberal World Order’ Viewed Over 1M Times

By Zoe Strozewski, July 1, 2022:

A video of Brian Deese, a political adviser serving under President Joe Biden, speaking about the “liberal world order” in the context of gas prices has racked up 1.4 million views on Twitter.

While in Madrid for the NATO summit on Thursday, Biden was asked by a reporter: “How long is it fair to expect American drivers and drivers around the world to pay that premium for this war?” in reference to Russia’s war in Ukraine, which Biden has blamed in part for rising U.S. gas prices.

Biden said: “As long as it takes” and stressed that Russia could not be permitted to win the war.

Deese, who is the director of the National Economic Council, was being interviewed Thursday by CNN’s Victor Blackwell, who referenced Biden’s comments when asking what he would say to American families who can’t afford to pay gas prices such as $4.85 a gallon for the months or years it takes the Russia-Ukraine war to end.

“Well, what you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes,” Deese said. “​​This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm. But at the same time, what I would say to that family and Americans across the country is you have a president and an administration that is going to do everything in its power to blunt those price increases and bring those prices down.”

The Biden administration has been facing heavy pressure to combat U.S. inflation, which hit a 40-year high in May and has elevated costs for products like gas, food and clothing. Though Biden has partly attributed rising costs to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, a Newsweek fact check determined that while the conflict has impacted inflation, it was not the trigger.

According to World101, an online course from the Council on Foreign Relations think tank, the “liberal world order” refers to a “series of international organizations and agreements to promote global cooperation on issues including security, trade, health, and monetary policy.” It was created by world leaders in the wake of World War II in an effort to prevent the world from devolving into such violence again, and the U.S. has “championed” the system since, according to the explainer.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Survey: More Than 750,000 Dead, 30 Million Injured Because of Covid Vax

Here’s Why Officials Are Desperate to Get COVID Vaccine on Childhood Schedule Before ‘Emergency’ Ends

Brazil’s President Bolsonaro Tells Tucker Carlson Left-Wing Lula Win Will Sever Alliance With America’s Last Remaining American Ally In Latin America

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Arizona Democrats Promote ‘F**K The 4th’ Event

/in , , , , , , /by

The enemy among us. And in power.

The Democrat party hates this country. Their hatred and bigotry will devolve into civil war (like the last time their hatred and bigotry devolve into civil war). Perhaps that is what is necessary. We should not be forced to live under the boot of these destroyers.

Arizona Democrats promote ‘f–k the 4th’ event to ‘mourn’ Supreme Court abortion decision

One Arizona Republican candidate for governor said that the Democratic Party’s tweet is an example of the ‘modern Democratic Party’

By Adam Sabes | Fox News

A local Arizona Democratic Party deleted a tweet promoting an event called “F–k the Fourth.”

The event, which the now-deleted tweet said was being hosted by the Tucson Women’s March, was promoted by the Pima County Democratic Party on Twitter.

“F–k the Fourth. See you at Reid Park,” the tweet stated.

A local Arizona Democratic Party deleted a tweet promoting an event called “F–k the Fourth.” (Pima County Democratic Party/Twitter)

“Bring comfortable shoes, water, lawn chairs, posters, and your anger,” the event description reads.

After Fox News Digital reached out for comment, the Pima County Democratic Party deleted the tweet.

In a follow-up tweet thread, the Pima County Democratic Party said that posting the graphic was a “mistake,” but said it still supports the “F–k the 4th” event.

“PCDP posted a graphic advertising a women’s march which, we agree, was in poor taste. We were eager to share the event, and in our haste we used the graphic provided by the event organizer. That was a mistake, and we will do better,” the Pima County Democratic Party tweeted. “Make no mistake, however. We support the event which will be on July 4 at 7 pm at Reid Park. The event was organized to help women in our community grieve for the loss of their bodily autonomy, which we consider an elemental right.”

They also said that while the graphic “upset some people,” the outrage should be saved for “the women in this state who will die of botched abortions.”

“Our posting of the graphic upset some people. We urge you to save your outrage for the women in this state who will die of botched abortions. Arizona is not a good place to be a woman right now,” the group said.

The Tucson Women’s March has posted multiple retweets of other users tweets with the hashtag “#F–kthefourth.”

“This July4th won’t be the same, it will be a solemn occasion. We have lost rights,” one retweet states.

“I will not celebrate a country that doesn’t recognize my rights to my own body,” states another.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: WATCH: 10 Minutes of Democrats Denying Presidential Election Results (2000, 2004, 2016)

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Supreme Court Overturns 2nd Amendment Decisions in 4 States

/in , , , , , , /by

The Second Amendment is the last line of defense for each and every one of us. The Supreme Court ruling on gun rights reiterated our fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution.

“Our Founding Fathers didn’t give us the Second Amendment for duck hunting or simply for self-protection in a country that at the time had a vast and yet unknown frontier. They bestowed it upon us so that we could protect our precious nation from devolving into tyranny as so many others have done.”

There are historical lessons of totalitarian governments that rule because citizens have been deprived of their weapons.

The Nazi policy

In Nazi Firearms Law and the Disarming of the German Jews, page 537, Stephen P. Halbrook observed:

“The record establishes that a well-meaning liberal republic would enact a gun control act that would later be highly useful to a dictatorship. That dictatorship could then consolidate its power by massive search and seizure operations against political opponents, under the hysterical ruse that such persons were ‘Communist’ firearm owners.”

“It could enact its own new firearms law, disarming anyone the police deemed ‘dangerous’ and exempting members of the party that controlled the state. It could exploit a tragic shooting of a government official to launch a [sic] pogrom, under the guise that Jewish firearm owners were dangerous and must be disarmed.”

“This dictatorship could, generally, disarm the people of the nation it governed and then disarm those of every nation it conquered.”

The USA’s fundamental rights

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“In the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the ‘Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.’” Reported by the Legal Information Institute of the Cornell Law School.

“The above experiences influenced perceptions of fundamental rights in both the United States and Germany,” Halbrook explained: “Before entering the war, America reacted to the events in Europe in a characteristic manner. Seeing the Nazi threat and its policies, Congress passed the Property Requisition Act of 1941 authorizing the President to requisition certain property for defense, but prohibiting any construction of the act to ‘require the registration of any firearms possessed by any individual for his personal protection or sport’ or ‘to impair or infringe in any manner the right of any individual to keep and bear arms.’” Nazi Firearms Law, pp. 536-37.

“Remember that registration of firearms is only the first step,” stated the Requisition Act’s sponsor, Rep. Paul Kilday (D-TX). “It will be followed by other infringements of the right to keep and bear arms until finally the right is gone.” Nazi Firearms Law, p. 537, fn. 289.

Analysis

A secret Nazi Gestapo Order (1941) is compared to Pennsylvania’s Firearm Registration bill (2019) in this side-by-side chart. Pennsylvania’s bill has more requirements than the Nazi’s order. In Pennsylvania, if the bill becomes law, a gun owner will be required to provide more information than a person who registers to vote.

For the right of self-defense, a person would be required annually to self-report ownership of each gun and describe it in detail. A certificate or renewal is not guaranteed because the State Police could deny the application. Partisan bureaucrats may not appreciate an applicant’s conservative politics: Allegiance to the Bill of Rights and limited government. Far-fetched? Just ask Tea Party organizations who were delayed or denied non-profit status by Obama’s IRS.

The State Police’s database could be released for official or nefarious purposes: The Pennsylvania Legislature under the guise of oversight. Freedom of Information requests by liberal media and advocacy groups.

Anti-gun zealots could dox persons who own guns. New York’s concealed weapon permit holders were posted via a map on the internet. There was proposed a multi-state map. Liberal news agencies and the social media mob have harassed law-abiding, private citizens. Identification of gun owners is not likely to deter criminals, who may have a shopping list for gun collections.

An enemy could learn that you own a gun. A related “red flag” law may be used for a fraudulent claim against you. The police will confiscate your gun pending a court hearing. Meanwhile, an enemy has an opportunity to cause injury or murder of you.

Law-abiding citizens’ registration of guns will not prevent criminals from obtaining unregistered guns. No lives will be saved. Note the bill’s absence of “whereas” clauses of findings of facts to support unidentified benefits. Also, the absence of redeeming press releases of the bill being introduced by Democrats: Angel Cruz, Mary Jo Daley, and Mary Louise Isaacson; and Democrat co-sponsors: Joseph C. Hohenstein, Joanna E. McClinton, and Benjamin V. Sanchez. The bill failed in 2009-10, 2011-12, 2013-14, 2015-16, and 2017-18.

This proposed law could be enforced only if the government is aware that you own a gun. Will the police conduct a search for guns, literally door to door?

If you are forced to use a gun for self-defense, but fail to comply with registration, could your defense effectively be an infringement of the Fifth Amendment?

Fail to register a gun, then risk a criminal penalty of 90 days in jail. The government likely will confiscate your gun; You likely will not be eligible to possess another gun; and you likely will be limited to lesser forms of self-defense.

Gun registries will lead to gun confiscation, as illustrated by Australia, Canada, and Germany; as well as the United States: California, Illinois, and the heart of liberalism: New York City.

National gun confiscation has been proposed by liberals including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA; 2018); the NAACP (2018); and Hillary Clinton, presidential candidate (2016).

Admit it, liberals, you really do want a total ban on firearms.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, suggested that a Democrat President could declare gun violence as a national emergency.

Conclusion

Have we not learned the lesson of the Nazi policy to disarm, and then control, its citizens? Nazi gun laws facilitated the murder of political enemies, specifically the Holocaust of more than six million Jews.

What part of the Second Amendment’s independent status, “shall not be infringed,” did these legislators, some attorneys, not understand? The U.S. Constitution trumps a state statute. A first-year law student learns this principle.

Liberals ignore constitutional law in favor of an agenda of a gun-free society. Liberals use safety as subterfuge for registration leading to confiscation of guns.

I appreciate our Founding Fathers’ wisdom that the Second Amendment is a guard against tyranny, whether the enemy is foreign or domestic.

Since self-defense is a God-given right, I believe in the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: Should gun registration become law by an act of either a state or federal government, such a law would classify this patriot as a criminal.

Read relevant documents:

Law Comparison

Pennsylvania HB768: Firearm Registration Act

Pennsylvania Summary Offenses

Nazi Firearms Laws

Nazi Gestapo Order

Gerald Lostutter is a Florida licensed attorney, college professor, journalist, and patriot life member (endowment level) of the National Rifle Association

Supreme Court Overturns 2nd Amendment Decisions in 4 States

The Supreme Court followed up its June 23 landmark ruling that for the first time recognized a constitutional right to carry firearms in public for self-defense, by issuing a series of rulings June 30 reversing federal appeals court decisions that upheld gun restrictions in California, New Jersey, Maryland, and Hawaii.

Courts will find it difficult to uphold the firearms laws in question after the high court’s June 30 and June 23 rulings.

In unsigned orders, all four cases were remanded June 30 to lower courts “for further consideration in light of” the Supreme Court’s June 23 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. In that 6–3 ruling, the high court invalidated New York state’s tough concealed-carry gun permitting system.
Epoch Times Photo
Lisa Caso sells guns at Caso’s Gun-A-Rama store in Jersey City, N.J., on March 25, 2021. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The Supreme Court has been strengthening Second Amendment protections in recent years. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court held the amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” and in McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), that this right “is fully applicable to the States.”

It makes no sense to recognize Americans’ right to defend themselves in their homes while denying them the ability to defend themselves outside their homes, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote June 23 in the court’s majority opinion.

“After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an ‘individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,’ and confrontation can surely take place outside the home. … Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it,” Thomas wrote.

In the new orders, the Supreme Court summarily disposed of the four pending cases, simultaneously granting appellants’ petitions seeking review while skipping over the oral argument phase. Some lawyers call this process GVR, standing for grant, vacate, and remand.

In the Maryland case, Bianchi v. Frosh, court file 21-902, a coalition of 25 states led by Arizona challenged Maryland’s Firearms Safety Act of 2013. The statute, which was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in September 2021, required pistol purchasers to seek a license, complete safety training, and be fingerprinted. Maryland bans popular weapons such as the AR-15 and similar rifles and limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds.

Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh, a Democrat, was defiant after the remand order. Military-style firearms “pose grave risks to public safety, as recent mass shootings in other states have made clear,” Frosh stated. Despite the Bruen ruling, the state’s law remains in effect, he said. “Marylanders have a right to be protected from these dangerous weapons.”’

The California case, Duncan v. Bonta, court file 21-1194, challenged the state’s ban on magazines containing more than 10 rounds. The ban went further, requiring the confiscation of such magazines, which had previously been lawful to own. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the ban in November 2021.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, is currently scrambling to deal with the fallout after his office leaked sensitive personal information, including the names and addresses of every concealed-carry permit holder in the state. Some holders say they now fear for their lives.

The New Jersey case, Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs Inc. v. Bruck, court file 20-1507, is similar to the California case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit affirmed the New Jersey law in December 2021.

Petitioners challenged the state law that bans 10-round magazines and requires that owners surrender such magazines to law enforcement. The law also forbids the transfer or sale of these magazines but allows owners to keep them if they modify them to reduce how many rounds may be held. Failing to comply with the law is a crime that can be punished with a sentence of up to 10 years of imprisonment and $150,000 in fines.

 

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: After the Guns Were Confiscated, the Killing Fields Began

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Antisemitic Remarks Sink Biden Ambassador Nominee

/in , , , , , , , /by

Elizabeth Frawley Bagley was recently nominated by the Biden Administration to be our next ambassador to Brazil. Then someone – clearly not a member of the Biden State Department – looked into her recorded remarks and was most disturbed to discover that in the past, Bagley in an interview had complained about “Jewish money” and its influence on American political life. She also said that moving the American Embassy to Israel was “stupid.” Word spread; she was questioned about those remarks by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and when the vote on her nomination came up, it was a 11-11 tie, insufficient to permit her nomination to go forward. A report on this contretemps and the warning it sends to others with evidence of antisemitism in their past, is here: “Senate blocks Biden’s Brazil ambassador nominee due to antisemitic remarks,” by Dmitriy Shapiro, JNS, June 29, 2022:

The Biden administration’s pick for ambassador to Brazil was blocked by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee after a party line 11-11 vote on Thursday, with Republicans on the committee uniting to oppose her.

Nominated for the position in January, the ascension of longtime diplomat and Democratic donor Elizabeth Frawley Bagley appeared uncontroversial until the Washington Free Beacon reported an interview with Bagley from 1998. In the interview, she said that money was the reason American lawmakers support Israel and the idea of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem was “stupid”. The article galvanized Republican opposition to her nomination.

According to the Free Beacon, Bagley’s statements were from an interview for an oral history project at the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, where questions from the interviewer prompted her to speak on the effects Israel advocacy supposedly has on American politics.

“There is always the influence of the Jewish lobby because there is major money involved,” Bagley said about the Clinton administration. “But I don’t remember any major issues coming out on that, besides the usual ‘make Jerusalem the capital of Israel,’ which is always an issue in the campaign.”…

“Bagley characterized the interview as a free flowing conversation and said that she regretted her “poor choice of words.”

“I’m very sorry about that choice of words and none of them reflect any of my thinking then or now,” she said.…

“I’m very sorry that we ever had the interview. [It] didn’t really make sense to do. It was an oral history. But it certainly does not reflect my views on Jewish Americans or Cuban Americans or anyone else,” Bagley said. “I absolutely, strongly support the right of Jewish Americans, Cuban Americans, Irish Americans, all Americans to be part of the political process, to be politically active, to raise money, give money to those that they support, as I have done myself.”

Don’t be silly. Of course those remarks reflect your views. Had they not done so, you might yourself have brought them to the attention of the committee, owned up to having said them, and explained that you now deplore them. Instead, you hoped they would stay hidden. You see that you were wrong. And it is only now, when caught out, that Ms. Bagley claimed that those interview answers “do not reflect my [current] views.” I don’t believe her.

Before the vote on Thursday, the Republican Jewish Coalition called on the Biden administration to withdraw Bagley’s nomination or, if it does not, for the senators to reject her nomination.

What is wrong with the Biden Administration? Why couldn’t they have done due diligence, and found out what some reporter for the Washington Free Beacon found out? And once that new information had been revealed, why didn’t they withdraw her nomination before the vote was taken? Was it because Elizabeth Bagley has been a major contributor to the Democratic Party, just like her late husband, Smith Bagley, heir to the R.J. Reynolds tobacco fortune, and the Bidenites weren’t going to abandon such a deep-pocketed donor over some antisemitic remark? And Elizabeth Bagley has rich and powerful friends, in the same Georgetown-and-Nantucket set of limousine liberals, or salon Bolsheviks, the people whom Wikipedia demurely describes as “philanthropists.” Amusing, isn’t it, that here we have Bagley, who owes her diplomatic career, including what would have been her ambassadorship to Brazil, not to merit, but to the amount of money she and her husband contributed to the Democrats, , raising the issue of “money” — that is, “Jewish money” which for some reason is particularly to be deplored — in politics.

There are only two possibilities to explain why the Biden Administration decided to nominate Bagley and to stick with her, even when her disqualifying remarks were made public. The first, that they simply didn’t do their due diligence. They failed to look into Bagley’s past remarks, didn’t care enough to find out what in her past might have been worrisome. She was a deep-pocketed contributor to the Democratic Party, and her husband had been not only a contributor himself but a Democratic fundraiser for decades. The second, that they knew perfectly well about Bagley’s antisemitic remark — “There is always the influence of the Jewish lobby because there is major money involved” — but it didn’t bother them. And even after Democratic Senators, including Robert Menendez and Ben Cardin, both on the Foreign Relations Committee, had grilled her, and deplored her statement, the Biden people still applied pressure on all eleven Democratic Senators, including Cardin and Menendez, so that they swallowed their reservations and voted for her anyway.

Ms. Bagley’s disgraceful, antisemitic comments are absolutely disqualifying; her outrageous slurs include suggesting the ‘Jewish lobby’ influences elected officials with ‘major money’ – an age-old antisemitic stereotype,” RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks wrote in a news release. “It is sad and troubling that this isn’t the first time the Biden administration has put forward a nominee who is hostile to Israel and the Jewish people.”

Morton Klein, the national president of the Zionist Organization of America, said that his organization was deeply concerned about the nomination of another person apparently hostile to Jews by the Biden administration and praised the committee members for voting against her nomination.

The vote came down to 11 for the Bagley nomination, all of them Democrats, to 11 against, all of them Republicans. In the end, the Democrats on the Foreign Relations Committee succumbed to the Administration’s pressure, and decided unanimously not to vote against someone who had been so generous to the Party in the past and, if they voted right this time, even if those votes would not be enough to get her nomination out of the committee, would no doubt continue to be as generous in the future. Bagley’s nomination, and the Democrats’ vote to confirm, were both “all about the Benjamins.”

AUTHOR

HUGH FITZGERALD

RELATED ARTICLES:

Presbyterian Church USA declares Israel an ‘apartheid state,’ creates ‘Nakba Remembrance Day’

UN agency suspends six staffers for calling for Jews to be murdered

Greece: Muslim migrant student displays knife in school, others make ISIS salute

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

INDEPENDENCE DAY 2022 VIDEO: Staying True to the Revolution!

/in , , , , , /by

The Potomac Tea Party posted the video below titled Staying True to the American Revolution stating,

We hear from five strong American voices around the country as to what ‘Staying True to the Revolution’ means to them – mooring ourselves in public and private virtue, preserving the proper balance of our Constitutional order, emphasizing what brings us together in national unity and purpose, and more. Happy 4th of July, everybody!

WATCH: Staying True to the Revolution.

Joe Fieldus from the Republican Executive Committee of Volusia County, Florida in a email titled “They want to silence U.S. but we will not be silenced” wrote,

“Those who seek to erase our heritage want Americans to forget our pride and our great dignity, so that we can no longer understand ourselves or America’s destiny. In toppling the heroes of 1776, they seek to dissolve the bonds of love and loyalty that we feel for our country, and that we feel for each other. Their goal is not a better America, their goal is the end of America. It is time for our politicians to summon the bravery and determination of our American ancestors. It is time.

It is time to plant our flag and protect this nation, for citizens of every race, in every city, and every part of this glorious land. For the sake of our honor, for the sake of our children, for the sake of our union, we must protect and preserve our history, our heritage, and our great heroes.

Before the eyes of our forefathers, Americans must declare again, as we did 246 years ago: that we will not be tyrannized, we will not be demeaned, and we will not be intimidated. It will not happen. We will proclaim the ideals of the Declaration of Independence, and we will never surrender the spirit and the courage and the cause of July 4th, 1776.

Upon this ground, we will stand firm and unwavering. In the face of lies meant to divide us, demoralize us, and diminish us, we will show that the story of America unites us, inspires us, includes us all, and makes everyone free.

We will state the truth in full without apology. We declare that the United States of America is the most just and exceptional nation ever to exist on earth. We are proud of the fact that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles and we understand that these values have dramatically advanced the cause of peace and justice throughout the world. We know that the American family is the bedrock of American life.

We recognize the solemn right and moral duty of every nation to secure its borders. We remember that governments exist to protect the safety and happiness of their own people. A nation must care for its own citizens first. We must take care of America first. It’s time. We believe in equal opportunity, equal justice, and equal treatment for citizens of every race, background, religion and creed. Every child of every color, born and unborn, is made in the holy image of God.

We want free and open debate, not speech codes and cancel culture. We embrace tolerance, not prejudice. We support the courageous men and women of law enforcement. We will never abolish our police or our Second Amendment, which gives us the right to keep and bear arms. We believe that our children should be taught to love their country, honor their history, and respect our great American flag. We stand tall, we stand proud, and we only kneel to Almighty God. This is who we are.”

Narrative by J.J. Sefton . ‘Ace of Spades’

©Christopher Wright and the Potomac Tea Party. All rights reserved.

A 20 Megaton Atom Bomb Is Going To Drop on Elections in America Soon

/in , , , , , , /by

As we pause to celebrate our freedoms this July 4th, I believe our Forefathers would be appalled at how the gift of this exceptional Nation they sacrificed and fought for has so radically changed from what they presented. They would, however, recognize a fighting remnant developed to expose the corruption and far-reaching tyranny that has become the norm. Our founders would further recognize the ferocious assault on America’s freedoms has diabolical dimensions, and a great spiritual conflict is raging across the Land. The church at-large is silent, Christians across the country are weak and unprepared to stand against such growing darkness, but a fighting remnant is developing. I believe our nation was founded by God with a special calling, and the original settlers and colonists, for the very most part, knew in their hearts that they were to live in submission (cooperation) to God, not walk blindly to the call of government. We were to truly become “one nation under God.” I further believe we are in such serious trouble because we have forgotten this covenant; in fact we have become even cynical about it, and we, as a people, have thrown away our Christian heritage.

The below link will take you to the Pete Santilli Show with his guest Arizona State Rep. Mark Finchem, one of the remnant that has developed. Rep. Finchem has fought the good fight to expose the very sophisticated and nefarious corruption in the 2020 national election. A growing remnant has come along to join the fight and expose the heinous acts of corporate, political and community members who deliberately under-minded our founders great gift of free elections and truly people representative government. But then the same cabal has fought to cover-up any evidence, and then going further, has spun a horrific story of doubt and confusion, fairy tale and lies to bring further division and confusion, and time to hopefully get away.

The interview below will open your eyes to the sobering forces at work, many still invisible but prayerfully the Lord will redeem our country from falling off the cliff. We are surely being humbled with more coming, but I also choose to believe if God’s People will humble themselves, seek Him and cry out for forgiveness, turn from our selfish and secular ways back unto the Lord who founded this nation, I believe He will hear from Heaven.

WATCH: BOOM! A 20 Megaton Atom Bomb Is Going To Drop on Elections in America Soon on the

Please consider purchasing my quick reading booklet, “Our Forefathers Truly Appealed to Heaven.” If you feel so led, please consider purchasing two or three to give away. If you can donate a bit more, please prayerfully consider such.

Please visit our Arizona Today website to learn more.

©Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Supreme Court Accepts Historic Case That Would Reshape Powers of Legislatures To Set Election Rules

Independence Day Shocker: 42 Years After The Most Memorable Sporting Event In U.S. History, Patriotism Dropping Like A Rock

/in , , , , , , /by

In 1980, nearly every American was filled with unbridled national pride when the heavy underdog US Olympic hockey team of college boys defeated the powerful team of the Soviet Union. Before reading further, please watch the two videos linked to below. If you love your country, they will give you goose bumps, guaranteed.

A short clip from “Miracle on Ice,” the feature-length Kurt Russell film about the most memorable hockey game in Olympic history.

Do you believe in miracles? Al Michaels’ immortal call of the electrifying last minute of the 1980 USA vs. USSR hockey game.

So what has happened on the patriotism front since that epic game? What’s

transpired in that regard will come as depressing news for Americans who love their country. Some of what’s been happening in recent years:

In May 2019, Gallup found that 70% of Democrats surveyed self-identify as socialists, up from 58% just six months earlier. Socialist/communist ideology is anti-American in the most profound meaning of the term.

In October 2018, the New York Times reported that 69% of progressive Democrats are ashamed of being American.

A Gallup survey a year earlier found that less than a third of Democrats are extremely proud to be American. Less than a third, and trending sharply down.

Having quietly turned decades ago to the side of the hammer and sickle, the post-1960s Democratic Party and its America-loathing allies in the popular culture have been remarkably successful at driving down love of country, and it hasn’t happened by accident. More of what’s been happening:

Forty-one years after the most unifying sporting event in American history, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that an astounding 72% of Democrats support millionaire athletes taking a knee during the National Anthem.

Mara Gay, an MSNBC contributor and a member of the New York Times editorial board, recently said she found the sight of American flags “disturbing.” 

Grammy winner Macy Gray openly called for replacing the U.S. flag with one that represents black people, as if the current flag doesn’t represent all Americans, including those of African descent.

In 2018, a Democrat elementary school principal in Georgia moved to replace the Pledge of Allegiance with an “Oath to Our Global Society.”

To protect students who might be “triggered” or “harmed” at the sight of hundreds of miniature American flags at a 9/11 memorial display on center-campus, Democrat administrators at Southern Methodist University ordered the display moved to a remote location.

CNN reported in 2018 that New York governor Andrew Cuomo, one of the most admired leaders of the modern Democratic Party, said in a televised address that “America was never that great.”

In Democrat strongholds across America, calls are being made for end to the 4th of July as a national holiday under the fallacious premise that “all Americans are not free.”

In our schools and colleges, Democrat “educators” are indoctrinating impressionable young minds with the poison of Critical Race Theory and its pernicious offshoots—white privilege, Black Lives Matter, intersectionality, multiculturalism, defund the police, cancel culture, political correctness and wokeness on steroids. Each of these components of CRT are actively being used to teach tomorrow’s voters to hate their country.

As every unpatriotic happening cited above unfolded, America’s most prominent Democrats—Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer—stood by and smiled.

RELATED VIDEO: House Armed Services Committee member Rep. Michael Waltz reacts to a poll that says fewer Americans are proud of the U.S. under Biden.

A free nation can take only so much pounding before it falls from within to the unrelenting tyranny of single-party socialist-cum-communist rule. America is now on that doorstep. The question is whether those of us who love this country will forcefully speak out while there is still time. If we fail to act, future generations will never know the taste of freedom, and iconic movies like “Miracle on Ice” will be erased from America’s history, along with its flag and National Anthem.

We are living in perilous times. What will we do?

©John Eidson. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLE: The Communist Plan To Overthrow America From Within

Supreme Court Accepts Historic Case That Would Reshape Powers of Legislatures To Set Election Rules

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

It will determine the future of our Constitutional Republic, solidifying Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution giving State legislatures primary responsibility for setting election rules and deciding validity Elector Slates.

Supreme Court accepts historic case that could reshape powers of legislatures to set election rules

Case was brought by North Carolina’s GOP House speaker

By: Just The News, June 30, 2022:

The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to hear a major election case regarding North Carolina GOP lawmakers having the authority to draw a partisan election map without state judges’ interfering.

The decision could impact future congressional and presidential elections. The high court will take up the case when its next term begins in October.

The, case of Moore vs. Harper, asks the court to uphold the concept – known as the “independent state legislature” theory – that state legislators have the sole and “independent” authority to set rules for federal elections in their states, without interference or oversight by the governor or the state judges.

North Carolina GOP House Speaker Timothy Moore asked the high court to consider the case on appeal of his own state Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year to strike down the theory relating to a gerrymandering case.

Critics of the theory argue that it would reduce judicial oversight of election rules.

The theory “would give state legis­latures wide author­ity to gerry­mander elect­oral maps and pass voter suppres­sion laws,” according to the liberal-leaning Brennan Center for Justice think tank.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTILE: Texas Republican Party Declares Homosexuality An ‘Abnormal Lifestyle,’ Calls On SCOTUS To Overturn Obergefell v. Hodges

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.