Pentagon Negotiating Deal to Save 9/11 Mastermind From Death Penalty

Pentagon Negotiating Deal to Save 9/11 Mastermind From Death Penalty

  • Pentagon prosecutors are reportedly in talks with attorneys for alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants about a plea agreement that could eliminate the prospect of the death penalty.
  • Prosecutors instigated discussions with the terrorist’s defense teams, proposing they discuss “whether pretrial agreements are possible in all five cases.” Defense attorneys listed the removal of the death penalty as a requirement for guilty pleas.
  • The al-Qaeda terrorists have been charged with terrorism, hijacking aircraft, conspiracy, murder in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians and more.

ISIS Militant Goes on Trial

  • The trial of former Islamic State (ISIS) militant El Shafee Elsheikh, 33, is set to begin in a Virginia federal court.
  • Elsheikh is one of the four ISIS militants accused of the killings of U.S. journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, and aid workers Peter Kassig and Kayla Mueller.

Exclusive: Clarion Reports ISIS Supporters to Police

  • The Clarion Intelligence Network has recently identified several supporters of the terrorist group ISIS and has reported them to our law enforcement partners.
  • Clarion has uncovered an ISIS supporter living in Florida who uses his social media to call for a Caliphate and talks about buying land to build an “off the grid” compound.
  • Help us identify and track more extremists on American soil by donating here.

RELATED ARTICLE: U.S. Releases 20th Hijacker

EDITORS NOTE: This Clarion Project column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Team Biden’s Endgame – “No USA At All”?

“No borders. No walls. No USA at all.” That’s the rallying cry – and the agenda – of the radical leftists who have worked with fellow travelers in the Biden administration to open America’s southern border.

Now, they are celebrating the announcement that Team Biden is going to remove at the end of May the last significant impediment to illegal entry to this country. A Covid-19 pandemic-related provision known as Title 42 will be dispensed with, clearing the way for millions of single men, many of them military age, to join the invasion now well underway.

Government officials from President Biden on down are violating their oaths of office. Far from protecting our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, they are actively collaborating in those enemies’ efforts to ensure there is no USA at all. Will the rest of us tolerate such betrayals?

This is Frank Gaffney.

The Secure Freedom Minute – the most interesting, informative and life-saving 60 seconds of your day 

EDITORS NOTE: This Center for Security Policy podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Our Disastrous Failure to Follow the Science

Anthony Esolen: The Church might join her voice to our cultural madness, except that her divine Founder will not permit her to, despite prelates who worship at the altar of Belial.


Consider these statements:

“The earth revolves around the sun.”
“Women, as a group, do not possess the physical strength to make good soldiers.”
“The earth rotates upon its axis.”
“It is a biological absurdity to pretend that a man can marry a man, or a woman a woman.”
“The tilt of the earth on its axis is responsible for the seasons.”
“A child needs a father and a mother.”
“The orbit of the earth around the sun is an ellipse.  In summer in the northern hemisphere, the earth is at its farthest from the sun.”
“It is wrong to do the child-making act if you are not married and thus prepared to take care of the child, providing him with a well-established family for the rest of his life.”
“Venus shines upon earth in phases, like the moon.”
“Boys naturally gravitate toward rough and sometimes dangerous or destructive play, while girls do not.”

I have heard all my life what a great sinner against the truth and scientific inquiry the Church has been, because she comported herself poorly in the Galileo affair, sentencing that irascible genius to house arrest in a posh villa in Florence.  If anyone has the means, my family and I would be pleased to know which crime against a consensus opinion I must commit to earn a similar sentence.

For the American academy commits more crimes against the truth, and more egregiously, in a single week than the whole Church committed in the entirety of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.  An exaggeration?  Let us think about the matter.

Galileo had no proof for his heliocentric thesis.  One of the arguments he adduced, that the revolution of the earth around the sun was responsible for the tides, was feeble, and the pope’s astronomers knew better.  What Galileo insisted upon could not be seen.

None of the astronomical assertions I have made above is obvious.  Indeed, I have found that very few college students can explain to me why the sun appears, to us northerners, in the southern hemisphere. Or where the sun will be at noon on the equinox, given that they are standing on the earth at a particular latitude. Or what the elliptic orbit has to do with the speed of the earth’s revolution. Or that the earth does not move at a constant speed. Or why Venus shows in phases if you view it in a telescope, but Mars does not. Or what the position of Polaris has to do with where you are, and so on.

They do not know that the main argument against the heliocentric position had to do with parallax – the apparent shift in the relative positions of objects depending upon the angle of your vantage point, so that if the earth moved around the sun, the stars should seem to alter their pattern slightly from spring to autumn, unless those stars were so tremendously far away that the parallax could not be discerned.  Nor was there at that time any clear reason to suppose that the stars were so distant.

But the things I have said regarding men and women, and boys and girls, will lose you your livelihood if you say them almost anywhere in academe in the decadent western world.  Dare anyone deny it?  Those who are angered by what I am saying about current sins against truth will be the first to denounce you and drive you out of the academy if you say them in a classroom, or a faculty lounge, or on social media.  Perhaps you can say them alone in your bathroom, for now.

There is more.  Those things about the sexes were uncontroversial until a few cultural and historical seconds ago. That is because they are immediately obvious. Boys grow to be men, and girls grow to be women.

The boys have bodies that cry out for action and rough play – the metabolism, the endocrine glands, and the musculature determine the direction of play, in boys as in other physical creatures.  The girls have bodies directed toward the bearing and the nurture of children.  Everyone knows it.  That is why it must be energetically and vociferously denied, with obvious and severe punishments for anyone who would deny it.

If a man lies bleeding on the battlefield, the female soldier next to him, except in the rarest of circumstances, will not be able to lift him up and carry him away.  Even if she could, because of an exceedingly lucky combination of a big-boned woman and a man of small stature, he still must pay a price for the absurdity, because another man would be able to carry him more readily and make quicker work of it.

And here we are talking about only one of a thousand ways in which the greater strength of men, and their greater speed afoot, and their more fully oxygenated blood come into play in war.

It is a clown show that a man pretending to be a woman should compete against women in swimming – a sport in which the woman’s greater percentage of body fat makes her naturally more buoyant, so that she has to do less work to move the same weight than the man does. It is a perfect bedlam of drunken raving clowns to send the same women into combat against men; of no military advantage, and a harm to both sexes, not to mention to the unborn children those women may be carrying.

In many places, the Church hangs by a thread of sanity and commitment to the truth.  She would join her voice also to the madness, and cheerfully go on persecuting people who tell the truth, except that her divine Founder will not permit her to, regardless of the superstitions of those prelates who believe that one more round of worshiping at the altar of Belial will bring happiness instead of confusion, cultural decay, infidelity, and death – betraying men and women, and making a holocaust of children.

You may also enjoy:

Robert Royal’s Science and Religion, Rightly Understood

Fr. Timothy V. Vaverek’s Mixed Messages from the Vatican and Bishops

AUTHOR

Anthony Esolen

Anthony Esolen is a lecturer, translator, and writer. Among his books are Out of the Ashes: Rebuilding American Culture, and Nostalgia: Going Home in a Homeless World, and most recently The Hundredfold: Songs for the Lord. He is a professor and writer in residence at Magdalen College of the Liberal Arts, in Warner, New Hampshire.

EDITORS NOTE: This The Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. © 2022 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

‘The Gods of the Copybook Headings’ by Rudyard Kipling.

The Gods of the Copybook Headings” is a poem by Rudyard Kipling, characterized by biographer Sir David Gilmour as one of several “ferocious post-war eruptions” of Kipling’s souring sentiment concerning the state of Anglo-European society. 


Last weekend my wife and I were invited to our old friends Joe and Debbie Clarks lovely home in Plant City. They were members of the original Save America Foundation of which I was president. They drove a good distance to attend our monthly meetings in Clearwater, Florida. After an incredible dinner (Pig! Never saw one I didn’t wanna eat!) he bought the following out for me to read. Needless to say I was fascinated and was impressed with the work this patriot had done. I asked him if I could publish it and he gracefully agreed I could. I hope all of you who take the time to read the poem and the analysis that is enclosed within the blog and enjoy it as much as I did. Great job Joe!

“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere” – Voltaire

Interesting and relevant to the world today, this analysis of Kipling’s poem, the work of myself and several other individuals who also see it as a prediction of inevitable hills and valleys in the future of mankind. Written a hundred years ago but could have been written today about the United States.

The Gods of the Copybook Headings by Rudyard Kipling

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,

I Make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market-Place.

Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn

That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:

But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,

So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,

Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market-Place.

But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come

That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch

They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch

They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings.

So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.

They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.

But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,

And the Gods of the Copybook Heading said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life

(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)

Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,

By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;

But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew,

And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true

That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four —

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man —

There are only four things certain since Social Progress began —

That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,

And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire —

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins

When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins

As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn

The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

Kipling, astute in his observation of human nature, in this poem he captures the past and future of the human race should man continue to arrogantly ignore the lessons learned by past generations and cast aside by the newest generation who are intent on destroying what past generations have built because future generations have always and will always see themselves as more intelligent and more educated than the forbearers who built the civilization they view with contempt.

The “Gods of the Copybook Headings” refer to the tradition of writing words of wisdom and morality on the top of pages of 19th century student notebooks.  These headings were used to practice penmanship, spelling, punctuation, vocabulary, comprehension and instill time tested wisdom and values in the student.

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,

I Make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market-Place.

Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

An important thing to note as we begin is that the “Gods of the Market Place”,  are the latest progressive thoughts viewed by present day elites/intellectuals as more advanced, more intelligent than the old-fashioned  time proven principals that guided past generations to productive, fulfilling lives.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn

That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:

But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,

So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

This clearly describes the tendency among newer generations to quickly abandon the source of knowledge, and fall into the trap that leads us to the conclusion that we are more intelligent than those who proceeded us and the standards that they used to achieve an elevated culture have become obsolete and no longer useful.  Instead of pursuing deeper studies of the world and history, we abandon proven dogma for the more  “visionary”.  The applications of this to modern society are uncountable.  The number of educators who insist on abandoning classical education that focuses on “How to Think” for the newest and popular educational fad, “What to Think”,

The “March of Mankind” humanity as a constant necessity to “progress” to some new stage, throwing out values and knowledge gathered by passed generations and recycling the destructive concepts of Marxism and Fabian socialism concepts that have proven over and over again to be destructive but for some reason never loose their allure.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,

Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market-Place.

This is evidence that this poem is about the cycle of civilizations, and how it’s all very predictable.  As a society reaches increasing heights, it becomes more and more likely to lose touch with the fundamental values upon which it was built.  The story of 20th century United States is very telling.  The conclusion becomes that the basic knowledge of how societies work, while during long periods being forgotten, always returns, but not until a civilization has died, and a new one emerges.  We are currently living immediately prior to the period when the empire falls, and Western civilization ends.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch

They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch

They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings.

So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

Again, a reference to how culture goes from a dedication to the values that are the foundation of society, and how these traditions and values become “utterly out of touch”.  Instead people begin pursuing narcissistic dreams and fancies, completely ignoring the fundamentals that has enabled them to do so.  And along always comes politicians, the intellectuals, the merchants of ignorant dream-fulfillment and the lies that the masses want to hear.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.

They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.

But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,

And the Gods of the Copybook Heading said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

The Cambrian Measures, the first period of the Paleozoic Era, another reference to the beginning of the principals that would bring success to human interaction.

This is an astonishing verse, which quite obviously refers to the fact that every time a brutal dictatorship like Nazi Germany, the Italian fascists or something similar has emerged, the first thing they do is take away the peoples means of protecting themselves (even though these two specific examples lie into the future when this poem was written),  Without guns, there will be no violence is what we are told.  They forget to tell us that the violence we should most fear is that which comes from the governing class.  Without the means to protect itself, a population will always be at risk of being sold into slavery by its masters.  The price we pay for avoiding being enslaved by the system, is having to face the possibility of every man being armed.  Freedom is not free, it requires that you are willing to take risks.  A promise of safety is a promise of future slavery.

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life

(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)

Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

Geological Time

The idea of social communism, where everyone shares everything, inevitably ends with you have to share even you wife.  This was in fact how Plato saw the ideal society, a communist state where all property was communal, including wives.  Another interpretation is how the idea that all should be shared and everyone equal, ends with nothing but more of the jealousy and moral decay that it was intended to stop.  Man is by birth a property of owner, claiming exclusive ownership of his own body.  Any negation of the principle of ownership negates the existence of a free society.  And being free to create and homestead all that which is previously unowned, man will in the end find himself not among equals, rather among other men which own in accordance to their capabilities, and their willingness to work.

The second last sentence is of great interest-“Till our women had no more children and the most lost reason and faith”.  This is in fact the stage that the West had found itself in.  Thanks to the destruction of traditional values, women are having fewer and fewer children.  Our dying western culture is becoming barren, and our homes are being taken over by other cultures.  Meanwhile the “men lost reason and faith”, which hardly needs any explanation if we simply look at how much honest work is being done, and how many dedicate their life to crime, destruction or decadent behavior and all becomes acceptable behavior by society.  Through the loss of our cultural heritage, we have lost that which makes us civilized, and the spiral downwards will continue.

Society, as we know it, is dying.

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,

By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;

But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

The reference to socialism hardly needs any further explanation.  What is interesting is the interpretation of “though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy”, which is a very astute observation of what happens when less and less or real value is produced.  Whether of not Kipling foresaw a future where money would become worthless paper is maybe a bit unclear, but the fact remains that many experiments with flat paper money had been made long before his time, and they all ended in monetary destruction.  A clear sign of decadence is when money is decoupled from value, and the control of it is given to the political class.

The final sentence brings a message that is the essence of what I am trying to say.  All those dependent on the effort and money of others, to be given to them by the State, are going to find themselves destitute and starving, unless they again learn to work.  When things come crashing down, there is no wealth to redistribute.  There will be no “social security” or “welfare”.  When everyone finds themselves impoverished, only a fool will expect to be handed free sustenance.  Those of us able and willing to work  will survive, others may not.

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew,

And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true

That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four —

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

Inevitably, reality sets in.  The “Gods of the Market” will tumble, and their smooth talk and chicanery will be for naught.  They will head for the door, tail between their legs, desperately preparing to dodge any bullets, as the common man reaches for his gun.  And finally, as all that most held dear and everlasting has come crashing down, old wisdom returns, slowly and steadily.

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man —

There are only four things certain since Social Progress began —

That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,

And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire —

History inevitably repeats itself, and “Social Progress” is always a progression first towards ever-increasing wealth and prosperity, and as the people become complacent and decadent, a likewise inevitable collapse and reset of the system.

From the Proverb Peter 2:22, The Dog returns to his vomit and the Sow returns to it mire, after being cleansed by a higher standard of behavior we will eventually return to the vile behavior that we originally abandoned in search of a better life.

The burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wobbling back to the Fire.  Man is destined to repeat his mistakes, and our efforts to root out of society ignorance and foolishness will never be completely successful.  Civilization will continue to come, and go, and when the book on mankind is finally closed, our experience will be nothing but a small blot of ink, among the innumerable pages that have been written.

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins

When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins

As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn

The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

The “Brave New World”, inevitably turns into the “Decadent Old World” once more.  Another reference to socialism is rather clear-cut.  What “no man must pay for his sins” means needs no explanation, taking it literally will move straight into the early 21st century.  And 

The Gods of the Copybook Headings…….with Terror and slaughter return.

©Fred Brownbill. All  rights reserved.

CHILD ABUSE: New Emails Show CDC Was Corrupted by Political Coordination with Teacher’s Unions and Activist Groups

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ignored the science that showed children are at statistically insignificant risk from Covid.”

Unimaginable child abuse on a monumental level – the repercussions to be suffered for decades to come.

New Emails Show CDC Was Corrupted by Political Coordination with Teacher’s Unions and Activist Groups

By: Becker News, March 30, 2022:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ignored the science that showed children are at statistically insignificant risk from Covid and issued policies based on close consultation with political activists in teacher’s unions, Republican lawmakers assert in a revealing new report.

The CDC’s guidance was used as the basis for closing schools and forcing children to wear masks throughout the Covid pandemic. An exclusive Fox News report on Wednesday provides yet another glimpse of the CDC’s politically motivated coordination with teacher’s unions.

“Republican lawmakers who sit on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis are releasing a report Wednesday revealing a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) official’s testimony claiming that the agency coordinated with teachers’ unions at an extraordinary level in crafting its school reopening guidance, despite the agency’s earlier claims that such coordination was routine and nonpolitical,” Fox News reported in its exclusive…

[Emphasis added]

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

California Democrats To Cut Gas Tax For 3rd Time, Raise Taxes Instead

The brutalist party HATES you.

They actually raised taxes on gas suppliers to use as rebates (Fox 40). From Republican Vince Fong:

California Bill to Cut Gas Tax Fails 3rd Time

By Vanessa Serna, The Epoch Times, March 29, 2022:

SACRAMENTO—The effort to temporarily halt California’s 51-cent gas tax failed for a third time in a state assembly committee as lawmakers instead proposed changing the bill completely by adding a new tax on fuel suppliers to feed a rebate program for gas consumers.

Assembly Bill 1638 by Assemblyman Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin) was accepted to be heard on a last-minute basis by the state Transportation Committee on March 28, after being shut down by lawmakers on March 14 and March 24.

Assemblyman Alex Lee (D-San Jose) opposed Kiley’s bill while blaming the high gas tax on fossil fuel corporations—such as Chevron and Vallero—which he said pocketed billions in a record profit last year.

“I definitely sympathize and I understand how hard it is right now, and how hard it is at the pump,” he said. It’s not because we are paying for roads. It’s because there are corporations out there who are fracking the hell out of this planet.”

Lee further highlighted the funds from the gas tax that go towards fixing roads while claiming the surplus can not ensure these projects continue to proceed if the gas tax is suspended.

“If we are to find ourselves in [an] economic deficit, the money that goes directly to constituents and roadways and transportation can evaporate,” he said.

Rather than simply voting on AB 1638, Lee decided to strike out all current contents of the bill and fill in multiple amendments, including taxing fuel suppliers more to offset their “windfall profit” and turning that tax revenue into gas rebates for consumers.

At this point, it is still unclear whether Lee’s “vehicle fuel windfall profit tax” would affect the gas prices at the pump for consumers and how the proposed rebate program would look.

While Lee urged for his amendments to be made, he refused to add his name as an author to the bill.

Assemblyman Vince Fong (R-Bakersfield) opposed Lee’s amendments, questioning the motion that would raise taxes on residents rather than providing relief.

“A bill to temporarily suspend the state’s tax for six months [and] provide immediate relief to Californians is being hijacked … to raise taxes even more,” Fong said.

Assemblywoman Janet Nguyen (R-Huntington Beach) echoed her disappointment in Lee’s decision to drastically attempt to amend the bill rather than simply vote no.

“Why are we just being silent and prolonging this pain for all these families?” Nguyen forcefully questioned. “Putting more taxes on Californians is the wrong thing to do.”

RELATED TWEETS:

RELATED ARTICLE: 21 states sue to block mask mandate on public transportation from happening again

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

The Abraham Accords Have Outpaced the Most Optimistic Predictions

Since 2020, when four Arab states – the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan – joined the Abraham Accords and normalized ties with Israel, there have been major developments in the economic ties between the Jewish state and these Arab members of the Abraham Accords. Business deals, involving trade, technology, tourism, and agriculture have been signed. With the UAE alone – which has enthusiastically engaged with the Jewish state — Israel has signed deals worth $675 million. Israel’s Minister of Intelligence, Eli Cohen, has said that annual trade between Israel and the UAE is expected to reach $4 billion in three to five years. The UAE ‘s Minister of Trade, Abdulla Bin Touq, said that Abu Dhabi was projecting to grow economic ties with Tel Aviv to the tune of $1 trillion over the next decade.

The UAE has also been discussing buying weapons from Israel, now deciding between the Barak 8 or Spyder air defense missile systems, as well as the Iron Dome anti-missile defense systems. The UAE’s buying spree of weapons seems likely to end with the lion’s share of its purchases – save for the 80 Rafale fighters it has bought from France – coming from Israel.

Trade between Israel and Bahrain reached close to $280 million in 2021. Israel has so far been exporting diamonds and refined metals for chemicals to Bahrain and importing oil and aluminum from Bahrain.

In early February, Israel signed a security cooperation agreement with Bahrain, the first such agreement it has signed with a Gulf state. Israel has agreed to sell weapons to Bahrain.

Israel has also signed trade and tourism deals with Morocco. More than a million Israelis claim descent from Moroccan Jews, and many are eager to return as tourists. Bilateral trade between Israel and Morocco is growing quickly, especially in the agritech and health care sectors. From trade worth less than $30 million in 2020, according to Aviv Baruch, the chairman of the Israel Export and International Cooperation Institute, “the target now is to exceed over $1 billion in trade over the next three years.”

Morocco principally exports clothing and textiles, fruit, electric components and inorganic chemicals. Israel’s exports to Morocco center on agriculture, water technology, machinery, healthcare, and security. Israel has signed an agreement to sell drones and “advanced weapons” to Morocco.

Deals between Israel and Sudan, the fourth Arab member of the Abraham Accords, have so far been less impressive, limited to Israel sharing its knowhow in wastewater management, drip irrigation, desalination, and water production from the air. Future trade is likely to continue to focus on agriculture.

What all this means is that the Abraham Accords have outpaced the most optimistic predictions, and Israeli trade will continue to grow, and there will be more sales of Israeli weapons to the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, as well as greater cooperation on intelligence with the UAE and Bahrain on Iran, and with Morocco on the Muslim Brotherhood.

As time passes, and the benefits of belonging to the Abraham Accords become ever more evident to other countries, one can expect more Arab and Muslim states to join. King Salman of Saudi Arabia is not in favor of joining the Accords, “as long as there is no Palestinian state,” but he is 86 and in poor health. Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman, who will soon succeed him, has signaled that he looks with favor on Saudi Arabia’s adhesion to the Abraham Accords. Other likely candidates include Oman and the most populous Muslim nation, Indonesia.

Every year brings improvements in Israel’s defenses against terrorist attacks. Time in this, as in so much else, is on Israel’s side. Israel won all its wars, big and little, learned to defeat terrorist groups, and discovered how to locate and destroy the terror tunnels built by both Hezbollah and Hamas. Israel built a security fence separating Gaza from Israel. In December 2021, Israel announced the completion of the Gaza barrier. It is 40 miles long, and cost an estimated $1.11 billion to build. The barrier features a sensor-equipped underground wall to prevent terrorists from digging tunnels into Israel. It also has a nearly 20-foot high above-ground fence with remotely controlled weapons systems and an array of radar systems with cameras that cover the entire territory of the Gaza Strip. In addition, a barrier at sea has sensors to detect incursions from the water. It will be nearly impossible for terrorists to enter Israel from Gaza.

Similarly successful has been the security wall that Israel built between the Green Line – Israel’s pre-1967 border –and the West Bank. In 2002, there were 452 Israeli fatalities from terrorist attacks. Before the completion of the first continuous segment (July 2003) at the beginning of the Second Intifada, 73 Palestinian suicide bombings were carried out from the West Bank, killing 293 Israelis and injuring over 1,900. After the completion of the first continuous segment through the end of 2006, there were only 12 attacks based in the West Bank, killing 64 people and wounding 445. Terrorist attacks declined to 9 in 2010.

Israel, the Start-Up Nation that has never lost a war, has suffered assorted slings and arrows in one theatre of conflict – the kangaroo court of the United Nations.

In the U.N., Israel continues to be attacked in the General Assembly and, especially, in the U.N. Human Rights Council. At every session of the UNHRC, the group takes up the permanent Agenda Item #7, which is devoted to the “human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories.” More UNHRC resolutions have condemned Israel than have condemned the remaining 192 states put together. This past December, the General Assembly approved the establishment of an open-ended commission by the UNHRC to investigate Israeli “war crimes.

While the UN can pass all the anti-Israel resolutions it wishes, they have had no practical effect on Israel’s wellbeing or determination to prevail over those who wish it ill. In the Middle East, at the very same time as these UN condemnations are passed, the Jewish state has broken out of its isolation, not only with the Abraham Accords, but in a warming of relations with both Egypt and Jordan, the two countries with which it has peace treaties but only a “cold peace.” It is no longer startling to read of Israeli ministers signing trade agreements in Abu Dhabi or Rabat, or meeting with counterparts in Manama or Khartoum. Israelis are pleased, but no longer surprised, that the history of the Holocaust will be taught in Emirati schools, or that Jewish history will now be taught in Moroccan schools. Meetings between Israeli ministers and their Arab counterparts are now a regular feature of Middle Eastern diplomacy. Israel is now being accepted. Time is in its favor.

The same oil producers who during the Yom Kippur War, by cutting production and issuing threats caused a quadrupling of oil prices, managed to use oil as a weapon to weaken foreign support for Israel, are now looking to Israel as their most effective ally in defeating a malign Iran, bent on establishing its hegemony in the Middle East. In the four campaigns Israel fought with Hamas in Gaza, and the three wars it fought in Lebanon – one against the PLO, and two against Hezbollah – Israel emerged the victor every time. The IDF also defeated the Palestinian terrorists who killed hundreds of Israeli civilians, as well as Israeli soldiers, during the five years (2000-2005) of the Second Intifada. Palestinian casualties outnumbered Israeli casualties three to one. The Palestinians were forced to sue for peace. Now the destruction of the terror tunnels from both Gaza and Lebanon, the completion of the security fence with Gaza and the security wall with the West Bank, and the extensive network of Arab informants whom the Shin Bet has enlisted, has brought terror attacks on Israelis to a historic low.

While votes against Israel at the UN annoy, they have had no real effect on Israel’s standing among the Western powers – the U.S., Canada, Australia, the U.K., Germany, and France – that count the most. Israel’s display of military prowess in the May war with Hamas reinforced respect for Israel, as did the performance of its Iron Dome anti-missile system, which intercepted 90% of the rockets Hamas hurled at Israel. Other countries have indicated their desire to buy this Israeli defensive marvel, that has proven itself in a real war.

They might want to wait. There is another defensive weapon that Israeli scientists have now come up with — a laser-based anti-missile system that is an astounding breakthrough. The laser-based interception, which is silent and invisible, is based on electric laser technology rather than the chemically based lasers used up to now. The cost is less than 10 shekels (about $3.50) per interception, in contrast with Iron Dome, which costs about 170,000 shekels ($49,000) per interception. This system will be operational later in 2022. Israeli innovations in weapons, offensive and defensive, keep being announced. And the world is impressed.

Israel also continues to amaze with its endless parade of high tech companies. Israel has more companies listed on Nasdaq than any foreign country except China. Israelis have more U.S. patents than any foreign country except Japan. The aggregate value of Israeli companies traded on Wall Street is more than $300 billion. It earns its title – “the Start-Up Nation” – every day. And Israeli entrepreneurs and inventors show no sign of slowing down. When it comes to innovation and market value, time is on Israel’s side.

And time is not on the side of the Palestinians. The Arabs of the four states that joined the Abraham Accords have demonstrated a willingness to pursue their own national interests and to ignore the demands of the Palestinians. Egypt and Jordan have yet to join them, but both countries have warmed up their previously “cold peace” with Israel. Egypt, In particular, does not hide its resentment of Palestinian ingratitude; the Egyptians, after all, fought in all three major wars against Israel – in 1948, 1967, and 1973 – and was defeated in all three, losing men, materiel, and money. Egypt has no intention of going to war with Israel again. Instead, Israel and Egypt are now collaborating on security in the Sinai, against regrouped fighters from various jihadi groups, including the Islamic State, and against the Muslim Brotherhood, to which Hamas belongs.

The other main historic threat to Israel has been Syria. But ten years of civil war have been catastrophic for Syria’s military. 200,000 Syrian soldiers have been killed. In 2011 Syria had 555 fixed-wing aircraft; now it has fewer than 200. More than 3,800 armored vehicles have been destroyed. Five million Syrians are internally displaced, and six million have fled the country. It will take $400 billion just to replace the infrastructure destroyed in the decade of war; Syria, meanwhile, is broke. It is hard to imagine it will ever again be a threat to Israel. The Golan, from which Syrian gunners used to rain down fire on Israeli farmers in the valley far below, has since 1981 been annexed by Israel; now Prime Minister Bennett has announced his intention to quadruple, from 25,000 to 100,000, the number of Jews on the Golan, to secure Israel’s hold on the area. Time is on Israel’s side.

But time has most definitely not been on the side of the Arabs. The source of the enormous wealth some Arab states have accumulated is entirely the result of oil sales. But the entire world is now mobilized to decrease the use of fossil fuels – which of course means, along with coal and gas, oil. The signs of such a decrease are everywhere. There were 17 million electric vehicles on roads in 2021, double the number in 2020. By 2025, analysts predict 20% of all cars sold in the world will be electric vehicles. There are 92.7 million solar panels now installed all over the world, with tens of millions now being added every year. The cost of solar power has decreased by 80% since 2010. As a result of the enormous and unforeseen increase in the use of electric vehicles and solar power, demand for oil continues to inexorably sink.

British Petroleum analysts believe demand for oil will decline substantially through 2050, due to government climate policies such as carbon pricing. According to BP, global oil demand could fall from about 100 million barrels/day in 2020 to a range of 30-55 million barrels/day by 2050. Meanwhile renewable energy will rise rapidly. Looking ahead, oil consumption as low as 30 million barrels/day in 2050 would mean a 70% drop-off from 2020. The world could manage quite well at that point without buying a single barrel of Arab – or Iranian – oil. Time is…well, you know.

Time is definitely on Israel’s side, once that problem called Iran is dealt with. And it will be dealt with, by Israel, with others if possible, but if necessary, all alone — like Gary Cooper in High Noon. If Israel were a stock, it would be a permanent “Buy.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

TRUMP PEACE: ‘Time to change the narrative,’ UAE foreign minister says at historic summit in Israel

Saudi editor: Biden’s Iran nuke deal is ‘assault on the regional order that the US established after World War II’

Mosques in Judea and Samaria and Gaza Strip scream ‘Allahu akbar,’ celebrate jihad murders of Jews

Israel: Muslims murder 11 people in three jihad terror attacks in one week

Israel 2016: Judge gives ‘remorseful’ jihadi a reduced sentence. 2022: ‘Remorseful’ jihadi murders two people.

Iraq is building a concrete wall along its Syrian border to keep out Islamic State jihadis

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Self-Oppression of Identity Politics

Which story will define and inform your lives?


In today’s world of exponentially less systemic discrimination, claiming its continued existence effectively compromises more crucial mental and spiritual freedoms.

“The mind moves in the direction of our currently dominant thoughts.”

Earl Nightingale, American radio-show speaker, author, human-potential pioneer

Who amongst us hasn’t attained some goal in life—from getting your first bicycle as a kid, to landing our dream job, and everything in between—by single-mindedly focusing on its realization? We all have. In fact, that exercise, embodied by the above quote, is at the heart of virtually every self-help prescription—mantras, affirmations, visualization, positive thinking—for improving one’s life in any number of arenas.

With the above Nightingale quote in mind, let’s look at identity politics, defined as:

“A tendency for people of a particular religion, race, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.”

The appeal of identity politics is undeniable and understandable. For members of groups that, historically, have been oppressed or marginalized to any extent, it’s sensible (not to mention downright heady) to join forces with like-minded souls, and fight to end that oppression. Over the past half-century, minorities, women, and gays have made enormous progress precisely because they systematically organized and fought against proactive discrimination.

As such, no one could seriously argue that the above groups aren’t far freer and have far more possibilities and opportunities than they did prior to the 1960s. Because of their efforts, there are bodies of law in place expressly prohibiting discrimination based on race, gender, religion, national origin, and sexual orientation. As well there should be.

So, what happens when an identity-politics mindset encounters a society that has made enormous strides in eliminating institutionalized forms of discrimination—i.e., Jim Crow laws, red-lining practices in real estate; racial/sex discrimination in businesses, restaurants, public transportation, clubs, organizations, etc.? Does it become a movement subject to the law of diminishing returns?

Consider the underlying sentiment expressed by most practitioners of identity politics: “I am not free to fully succeed in life, and if I indeed don’t succeed, it’s because I am surrounded by people and institutions committed to keeping me down.” In the not-too-distant past, for the above groups, that sentiment was a statement of fact.

But, in our vastly different times today, does such a mindset simply become a reliable path to victimhood?

It’s one thing to fight against true oppression, where there are activecodified, societally accepted measures that prevent you from realizing your dreams, but in a much freer society, where the laws are now on your side to a far greater extent, what does one end up fighting against?

Yes, there is, but that racism exists far more in the realm of personal beliefs and prejudices held by individuals, as opposed to institutionalized policies to keep people down. Shelby Steele, acclaimed black author, columnist and filmmaker, in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece, obliquely underscored this point (emphasis mine):

“Of course this does not mean there is no racism left in American life. Racism is endemic to the human condition, just as stupidity is. We will always have to be on guard against it. But now it is recognized as a scourge, as the crowning immorality of our age and our history.”

Racism is endemic to the human condition. A bold statement on its surface, yet, given the history of human behavior across millennia, and the hard-wired tendency of groups—regardless of culture, race and nationality—to consider themselves superior to those different from themselves (i.e., the essential quality of “racism”), were truer words ever spoken?

So, given all the above, and particularly the personal (vs. systemic/institutional) nature of most racism today, if your goal is to “eliminate racism,” you’d need to enter the realm of mandating proper speech and thought. And one look at the insanely PC-driven attempts to curtail free speech at many of our universities (just one venue for this awful trend) is all it takes to see how dangerous and unconstitutional that exercise is.

Let’s try a thought experiment. Imagine two gay black women—people who are part of multiple “identity” groups.

One says, “Yes, I’m a gay black woman, but nothing and no one can stand in the way of my living my ideal life, and realizing my dreams.” In this day and age, with far more freedom to thrive than at any other time in history, is it even remotely far-fetched to imagine that this woman, if she worked hard enough, would, in fact, realize her dreams?

On the flipside, let’s take another gay black woman, who, immersed in the world of identity politics, aligns herself with other similar folks. To them, the world is a hostile place, replete with systemic oppression and institutionalized racism standing between them and what they want.

If those are the two respective worlds these two women inhabit, which of them is more likely to succeed? Who has more “agency”?

I can hear it now: “But you’re a straight, white male. What do you know about oppression?” Not much. But, what does my reality and opinion (ignorant and naïve?) have to do with your journey? Nothing. Given the extraordinary progress these groups have made, the far more relevant question for them is, “Which story will define and inform your lives?”

Will it be the one that essentially says, “The deck is stacked, and if I fail, it’s not my fault”? Or the one that says, “Sure, there’s still ignorant, bigoted, racist, sexist, homophobic people out there, but they no longer have the power to stop me from realizing my dreams. And if they try, I’ve got the law on my side”?

We’re all aware of plenty of people who are members of “aggrieved” groups, who’ve succeeded in life—some enormously—despite countless obstacles and hardships. By the same token, we all know of plenty from those same groups who haven’t.

Doesn’t the existence of that real-world dichotomy argue far less for discrimination, and far more for the incandescently self-evident fact that human beings are endowed with widely varying levels of intelligence, initiative, ambition, drive, vision, motivation, etc.?

We should all be prepared to push back against cases of real racism when we encounter them. But in a world that, legally, is far freer for all its citizens than at any point in history, more often than not, invoking identity politics amounts to little more than arguing for a life of limitation. And who would consciously choose that?

AUTHOR

Peter Bowerman

Peter Bowerman is an Atlanta-based freelance writer, and author of the acclaimed Well-Fed Writer series on commercial freelance writing.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Socialism Discourages Work and Creates Poverty

Socialism diminishes people’s incentive to work to improve their circumstances by depriving them of the fruits of their effort.


Advocacy for “socialism,” which the Socialist Party USA defines as a “social and economic order in which workers and consumers control production,” has made a comeback in American politics in recent years. Public figures such as Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders sing its praises. But the truth is that socialism deeply undermines people’s ability (and motivation) to improve their own living conditions. The misery socialism has caused for millions of people refutes its promises—horrifically.

Socialism, advocates claim, will bring prosperity and better living conditions for everyone, a claim also made for communism, in which the government controls the means of production and the distribution of the results. British philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote that socialism is “calculated to increase the happiness, not only of proletarians, but of all except a tiny minority of the human race.” As have its advocates throughout history, the now-defunct Socialist Labor Party of America depicted socialism as utopian, writing: “Under socialism our farmlands would yield an abundance without great toil; the factories, mines and mills would be the safest, the most modern, the most efficient possible and productive beyond our wildest dreams—and without laborious work.” The website doesn’t specify how such magic would occur.

The website further insists that socialism would improve virtually every aspect of life, stating: “Our natural resources would be intelligently conserved. Our schools would have the finest facilities and they would be devoted to developing complete human beings, not wages [sic] slaves who are trained to hire themselves out for someone else’s profit. Our hospitals and social services would create and maintain the finest health and recreational facilities.”

But socialist policies, when enacted, have catastrophic effects on the lives of the people living under them. To enforce such policies, governments must take control of people’s property—whether by fully nationalizing businesses, mandating what and how much a company must produce, or seizing and distributing their products—thereby violating people’s right to the product of their own effort. The victims include entrepreneurs who have built or purchased businesses, landlords who maintain and manage properties, and everyone who earns a wage, from construction workers to artists.

By violating these rights, socialism diminishes people’s incentive to work to improve their circumstances by controlling or taking away the results of their effort. However hard you work, whatever you achieve, whatever value you create—it won’t be reflected in your earnings.

The novelist Ayn Rand dramatized the effects of such a doctrine in her magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged. In the novel, a small town factory enacted Marx’s slogan “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” as policy, so that each person’s pay depended on what managers considered as their level of need compared to their colleagues’. They did this based on such factors as the number of children the employees supported, family members’ illnesses, and so on. People began to spend more time sharing their woes with the management than working, and many of the best employees left the company entirely. Within four years, the factory closed. One character explained the hopelessness the policy created: “What was it we were supposed to want to work for? For the love of our brothers? What brothers? For the bums, the loafers, the moochers we saw all around us? And whether they were cheating or plain incompetent, whether they were unwilling or unable—what difference did that make to us? If we were tied for life to the level of their unfitness, faked or real, how long could we care to go on?”

He explained that the company had once been a thriving one that people were proud to work for, but now hard times were the status quo: “We were beasts of burden struggling blindly in some sort of place that was half-hospital, half-stockyards—a place geared to nothing but disability, disaster, disease—beasts put there for the relief of whatever whoever chose to say was whichever’s need.”

This story, although fictional, points to an important fact about human nature: If people can’t change their situation, they won’t try to. Knowing the outcome in advance, they will feel no motivation to make Herculean efforts for miniscule or nonexistent rewards. As economist Ludwig Von Mises put it:

To make a man act, uneasiness and the image of a more satisfactory state alone are not sufficient. A third condition is required: the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness. In the absence of this condition no action is feasible. Man must yield to the inevitable. He must submit to destiny. [emphasis added]

Socialist policies severely restrict individuals’ ability to improve their conditions, so productivity suffers and living conditions plummet. Historical examples of socialism, as well as modern-day Venezuela and North Korea, show the misery that results.

In Soviet Russia, the government attempted to distribute the results of sixty years of steady GDP growth equally by seizing personal fortunes and dictating wages. But buying power for the average person dropped sharply, and whether a person could actually spend his or her wages was largely dependent on knowing the right people. Economist Mark Harrison explains: “The distribution of consumer goods and services was characterized by shortage and privilege. Every Soviet adult could count on an income, but income did not decide access to goods and services – that depended on political and social status.”

People who lived under the Soviet regime and now live in modern Russia appreciate that they have more opportunities to improve their lives than they used to. Back in 2007, interviewers asked Russians about their memories and opinions of life under the Soviet regime; many of them recalled that the USSR had “fewer possibilities.” One respondent explained, “Now there are so many chances. You can earn enough money even to buy an apartment. Certainly it is very, very difficult, but possible.” Another participant elaborated, “Now I can earn money and there are many ways of doing so. . . . In the Soviet Union, engineers and other technical employees of middle and high rank did not have [a] right to a second job. People who had the time and energy and wanted to provide more for their families could not do it.”

In other words, people were willing to work extremely hard to improve their conditions—but weren’t allowed to.

In Venezuela, socialism has driven a once-prosperous country into the ground. University professors juggle multiple jobs to keep food on the table. Others try to escape a desperate situation; more than six million have fled in recent years, and in 2017 the suicide rate was nearly double the global average. Venezuelans are willing to work to improve their circumstances—but the socialist regime’s oppression and economic destruction consistently frustrate their efforts.

North Korea was conceived as a communist nation following the Second World War, but formally switched to a form of “self-reliant” socialism following the Korean War. The leadership of the Worker’s Party of Korea has brought widespread misery in the form of horrific rights violations, including torture, severe censorship, forced labor, and arbitrary detention. Their policies have also led to nearly half the country suffering from inconsistent access to food and water—in stark contrast to their far more capitalist neighbor, South Korea, which has flourished in recent decades.

Advocates of socialism protest that historical examples of socialism were not “true socialism” or “the right kind of socialism.” But it is socialism—people giving government control of producing things—that undermines people’s ability and willingness to produce and provide for themselves in all these examples.

With free markets, by contrast, people are free to own private property and run businesses without the government dictating production or distribution. People are rewarded for their hard work and ability. By innovating, excelling at work, and creating more and better products or services, they can make more money, which they can use to pay for better living quarters, education, electronics, travel, or other life-improving goods or services produced by others. Hence, in mostly free and capitalistic countries, such as the US, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Hong Kong, people have enjoyed massive economic growth, which has corresponded with a major increase in average living standards.

When human beings struggle, create, and innovate, but their efforts do not improve their own circumstances, they burn out or give up. Marx, Russell, Sanders, and other proponents of socialism and communism claim that their preferred systems are “for the people”—but the truth is that they work against the nature and needs of human beings.

AUTHOR

Angelica Walker-Werth

Angelica Walker-Werth is an Ayn Rand Fellow with FEE’s Hazlitt Project and a recent graduate of Clemson University. She is an assistant editor and writer at The Objective Standard and a fellow and research associate at Objective Standard Institute. Her hobbies include gardening and travel.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bernie Sanders Just Proposed a 95% Business Tax. Here’s Why That’s So Absurd

RELATED VIDEO: DeSantis Says That Americans Are Fleeing “Dumpster Fire States”

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Abortion and Biden’s SCOTUS Nominee

WATCH: An anti-abortion activist testifies against Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination. Eleanor McCullen, an anti-abortion activist, delivered testimony in opposition of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination, on the final day of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

With a bang of a gavel in 1973, 63 million fellow Americans were condemned to die. And the number keeps growing.

Now if the Senate confirms Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, another pro-abortion justice will be added to the Supreme Court.

Last week, Judge Jackson, nominated by Biden to the Supreme Court, faced four days of hearings in the Senate. South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham raised an intriguing point to her: “Every group that wants to pack the court, that believes the court is a bunch of right-wing nuts who are going to destroy America, that considers the Constitution ‘trash’—all wanted you picked. That is all I can say. That so many of these left-wing radical groups who would destroy the law as we know it…supported you is problematic for me.”

Jon Schweppe of the American Principles Project noted, “On abortion and religious liberty, it’s clear where she stands. Jackson co-authored an amicus brief for the Massachusetts NARAL chapter characterizing pro-life sidewalk counselors as ‘indisputably harmful’ and supporting the notion that they should not be allowed anywhere near an abortion clinic.”

He adds, “Why would leftist groups like American Atheists, the Human Rights Campaign, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, the National Education Association and the Southern Poverty Law Center push the White House to nominate Jackson and the Senate to confirm?….Ketanji Brown Jackson is a woke Trojan horse, as the preponderance of evidence suggests.”

When asked to define what a woman is, Judge Jackson declined, claiming she’s “not a biologist.” When asked when human life begins, she said to Louisiana Senator John Kennedy: “Senator, um… I don’t know.”

Gary Bauer responded to her answer: “Of course, this well-educated, Harvard graduate knows life begins at conception. The problem is that she’s all in on abortion on demand.”

The Supreme Court decisions Roe v. Wade (1973) and Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992) established by judicial fiat a right to abortion. Thus abortion, said Judge Jackson, is “settled law of the Supreme Court concerning the right to terminate a pregnancy. They established a framework the court has reaffirmed.”

One Constitutional authority had some criticisms of Roe v. Wade as a legal opinion. She said that Roe “tried to do too much, too fast—it essentially made every abortion restriction in the country at the time illegal in one fell swoop—leaving it open to fierce attacks. ‘Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped…may prove unstable.’”

Who was this radical anti-abortion activist that would dare criticize the left’s most beloved decision? It was Ruth Bader Ginsburg–before she became a justice on the high court who did everything in her power to preserve Roe v. Wade.

Writing for Lifenews.com, Micaiah Bilger observes that Judge Jackson has called peaceful pro-life sidewalk counselors at abortion clinics “hostile, noisy and in your face” people.

Bilger added, “Jackson has the support of NARAL Pro-Choice America, which advocates for abortions without limits up to birth…She also ruled against the Trump administration’s efforts to defund the billion-dollar abortion chain Planned Parenthood, and she clerked for pro-abortion Justice Stephen Breyer when he issued an opinion against the partial-birth abortion ban.”

I believe abortion is the single most important political issue of our time. It’s not complicated. Abortion takes a human life every time.

When judges rule in favor of abortion, they are playing God. I find it amazing that the left constantly decries bullying, yet they favor abortion rights. What could be more bullying than dismembering a defenseless, unborn child limb by limb because it is perceived as somehow inconvenient?

Some critics on the left, like Bill Maher, say that the only reason conservatives oppose Judge Jackson is because she’s black. But people need to remember that the founder of the nation’s leading abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, was Margaret Sanger, who spoke at a Ku Klux Klan meeting. She wrote a letter to one of her board members (Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, 12/10/1939): “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” No wonder the majority of abortion facilities are in urban areas—to this day.

In our nation’s birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence, our founders said that our rights come from the Creator—and first among these rights is the “right to life.” Indeed, if you’re dead, how can you enjoy any other right?

The Constitution, which is predicated on the Declaration, notes in the preamble that one of its purposes is: “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Our posterity? That is, the yet to be born.

To paraphrase Dr. D. James Kennedy, Judge Jackson should get down on her knees and thank God that her mother wasn’t “pro-choice.”

If you get abortion wrong, you tend to get everything else wrong too.

Alternatives to Woke Corporations

Disney vowed to keep fighting Florida’s new parental rights law that prevents the sexualization of very young children in public schools.  It gets worse.  Disney’s president of entertainment said she supports having “many, many, many LGBTQIA characters in our stories” and wants at least 50 percent of characters to be LGBTQIA and racial minorities.  An executive producer at Disney said it’s no secret the company is regularly “adding queerness” to children’s programming.  [More at Dr. Rich Swier] In fact, Disney is creating a new task force to make more LGBT-aware content for what it calls ‘family entertainment’.  Oh, and I don’t know if you caught this:  Disney employees were arrested in a prostitution, human trafficking, and child predator sting in Florida not too far from Orlando.

This company has gone off the rails.  The problems go back decades when Disney animators started making pornographic versions of Disney cartoons on the sly.  I don’t know why any parent would invite Disney into their living room now that Disney’s political agenda to sexualize young children is out in the open for all to see.  My advice is: don’t.  There are plenty of wholesome entertainment alternatives out there.  One alternative is Angel Studios, creators of the Tuttle Twins animated series.  Another is Sony’s Affirm division which makes faith-based films.  Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire is getting into entertainment, with the Run Hide Fight thriller set in a high school.

Daily Wire is also one of the news sites in the thriving ecosphere of new outlets on the political Right set up as an alternative to the corrupt big media sites which have no problem, for example, hiding the Hunter Biden laptop story to swing the election.  Rumble is a credible alternative to YouTube which censors conservative speech.

I ask people on the Left whether it’s important to get both sides of the story and they invariably say ‘yes’.  I ask them what sources on the Right they consult to get the other side of the story, and they tell me ‘none’ because they’re all ‘fascistic and reactionary’.  Then I confound them by recommending Just the News, which they’ve never heard of and can’t criticize.  Just the News will give you stories you won’t see in the Left-wing media and begin to reverse the damage the Left has done by manipulating half of America into disregarding out of hand everything the Right says, like this was the Soviet Union, or something.

There are alternatives to Amazon for buying books.  I like the independent book sellers on eBay who almost always have everything I want.  Of course there’s Barnes & Noble, and I’ve just discovered World of Books at wob.com.  No reason to give your money to Jeff Bezos who keeps the insufferably liberal Washington Post on life support.

Back to Ben Shapiro for a moment. Harry’s Razors stopped advertising on the Daily Wire because the publication dared to tell the truth about transgenderism.  So they fought back, starting their own razor company to compete with Harry’s. The introductory video is a scream, with Jeremy of the new company Jeremy’s Razors taking a blowtorch to Harry’s products.  Over 10 million people have seen the video, so far.

Bye-bye, Harry’s. Go Woke, Go Broke.

Finally, there’s no reason to keep giving your money to Big Charities like the United Way that funds the abortion business, or the Girl Scouts which supports transgenderism.  The best answer is to contribute to local charities you know don’t have a political axe to grind, but there are some national charities suggested on my Potomac Tea Party website.  A couple of them run guide dog schools for the blind, and there are several others to choose from.

So if you’re tired of giving your money to people who hate you – who hate America and are trying to destroy your children – vote with your pocketbook and try the alternatives I’ve suggested here today.  If you discover more, please let me know at tips@liberato.us and I will publicize them.  We can do this thing, and make the likes of Twitter – which has canceled me – come groveling back to us.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wrights. All rights reserved.

Thomas More Law Center to U.S. Supreme Court—Stop NY Governor From Dictating Which Religious Beliefs Are Allowed

ANN ARBOR, MI — The Thomas More Law Center (“TMLC”), a national nonprofit public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, representing over 400 Physicians, Surgeons, Nurses, and Medical Professionals, filed a brief last week in the U.S. Supreme Court opposing New York’s vaccine mandate for healthcare workers. From the beginning COVID-19 pandemic, these healthcare workers courageously manned the front lines.

Nevertheless, an ungrateful state government, which permits secular exemptions from the vaccine mandate, disallows any consideration for religious accommodations.  These healthcare workers share sincerely held religious beliefs that prevent them from obtaining the presently available COVID-19 vaccines.  Many have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies to the illness.  All have faced persecution and scorn for their religious beliefs on this issue.

Erin Mersino, TMLC’s Chief of Supreme Court and Appellate Practice authored the brief.  She highlighted the precarious position of New York’s Governor Hochul—who instructed New Yorkers that “God wants” everyone to use these vaccines, and that individuals who have decided not to undergo COVID-19 vaccination “aren’t listening to God and what God wants.”  Governor Hochul published these statements on New York’s official state website. (https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/rush-transcript-governor-hochul-attends-service-christian-cultural-center).

Since the Governor claims to be the authority on what God wants, she removed all religious accommodations from the vaccine mandate.  However, many individuals sincerely hold religious beliefs that prohibit them from using the three COVID-19 vaccines on the market today and call for alternatives that have no connection to aborted fetal cell lines.  The Governor failed to consider the spectrum of diverse religious views allowed under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.  The brief explains that such an exercise of authority from the State endangers the principle of pluralism upon which our nation is built and ignores our constitutionally protected autonomy to make such religious determinations for ourselves. TMLC explains in the brief that “The mandate is premised on the false presupposition that the Governor can use the powers of the State to answer theological questions pertaining to religious conscience.”

TMLC also highlights the unequal and punitive nature of New York’s mandate.  New York decided to exempt individuals from its vaccine mandate for secular purposes, but intentionally left off an exemption for a religious purpose.  TMLC contends this double standard violates the Constitution.  Lastly, the brief addresses New York’s decision to withhold unemployment benefits to healthcare workers who lose their jobs due to their religious opposition with New York’s mandate.  This additional punishment adds insult to injury.

In the brief, TMLC remarks, “The severity with which New York’s vaccine mandate treats religious objectors is so extreme that it almost seems implausible. The undisputed record, however, presents statement after statement from [New York’s Governor] establishing that no cause for such denial exists—it really is as bad as it seems.”

TMLC’s Amicus Curiae brief,  which urges the U.S. Supreme Court to accept the case at the earliest possible time to protect the religious freedom of New York’s healthcare workers and to prevent other states from enacting similar mandates, can be found here.

Copyright © 2022 Thomas More Law Center, All rights reserved.

Hunter Biden’s laptop and how Twitter tipped the scales of the 2020 election

The ‘New York Times’ has finally admitted that the laptop’s emails were genuine.


It is well known that Twitter makes a sport of censorship. There’s even a Wikipedia page dedicated to the topic.

Typical of previous years, the 2022 log of Twitter suspensions is mostly a list of conservative commentators and Republican politicians — though refreshingly, a deranged Middle East dictator, one Ali Khamenei of Iran also made the cut this year.

Sharing “Covid-19 misinformation” (or at least what is presently considered such) is one of the more likely sins to get you banned in 2022, as is — gasp — calling male swimmers “men”.

What Twitter deems a transgression changes slightly from year to year but the themes and the political partisanship is consistent.

In 2020, what really put a bee in Twitter’s bonnet was sharing factual stories that threatened Joe Biden’s entry into the White House. Yes, Twitter interfered in the 2020 election. Egregiously.

The New York Times’s recent, glaring admission that Hunter Biden’s laptop is authentic, though 18 months late, has brought this fact to the fore once again.

We are yet to fully come to terms with Twitter’s misdeeds in those closing weeks of the 2020 contest, and the precedent they have set for public discourse in the West.

But first some background, if you are unfamiliar with what happened.

With all of America on seat’s edge and the world tuned in to the Trump-Biden contest, the New York Post broke a bombshell report on October 14, 2020.

Through intriguing circumstances, a laptop belonging to Joe’s son Hunter had made its way to the Post. On that hard drive were emails indicating that when the senior Biden was Vice President, he massaged US foreign policy in Ukraine to the benefit of his son’s business ventures there.

follow-up story intimated that Joe Biden himself was making a ten percent cut from Hunter’s overseas dealings, despite Joe previously denying any knowledge of what his son was up to abroad.

The evidence strongly suggested that the millions in profit flowing to the Biden family estate from Ukraine, China and Russia were only made possible by the exclusive White House access it granted Hunter’s contacts in those countries.

Additionally, the laptop harboured a trove of debauched images and videos revealing Hunter’s prostitute- and drug-fuelled lifestyle — factors that made the Biden family more vulnerable to blackmail and other clandestine political influence.

So much for the story — what of the censorship?

Infamously, Twitter immediately locked two accounts: the New York Post’s, and that of Trump’s press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, who had tweeted out the report. Anyone else who tried to share the story were either suspended or unable to tweet the link, myself included. As Brendan O’Neill of Spiked has described that “truly extraordinary moment“:

Here we had the spokesperson for the democratically elected president of the United States and the oldest continuously published daily newspaper in America being cast out of social media for the crime of sharing a story that was true.

Not only was the story true — revelations of endemic Biden family corruption would doubtless have swung many undecided voters back to Trump in those dying days of the 2020 race, had they had access to it. This is a hypothesis made even more likely by poll after poll unearthing post-election Biden voter regret.

Twitter was the most flagrant partisan operative in the Hunter laptop saga, but far from the only one.

Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s piece until its “fact checkers” had a chance to assess the report. They never did. And they never apologised. In the years previous, however, Facebook did give free rein to flat-out lies about a Trump “pee-pee” tape and his being a Russian asset.

The conspiracy of the corporate press was one of silence. Had the same revelations emerged about Donald Trump Jr, there is no question the media would have reigned fire and brimstone on the Trump family.

But even a generous bribe wouldn’t have tempted most media outlets to report accurately on Hunter’s toxic laptop with a presidential election just around the corner. “The media world has largely ignored the Post’s Hunter Biden story,” one CNN reporter bragged at the time. “We don’t waste our time on stories that are not really stories,” taxpayer-funded NPR likewise scoffed.

Then came 50 former intelligence officials to denounce Hunter’s laptop as a Russian plant, part of a disinformation campaign to get Trump re-elected. They didn’t have any evidence for this, they admitted, just the feels. Now the media had its angle, one they amplified endlessly until Biden’s victory was secured.

With Hunter’s laptop now authenticated, the New York Post recently chased down every one of those 50 intelligence figures for a retraction. Most didn’t respond. A few couldn’t be reached. Several dug their heals in. Not one walked back their perfidious story. “Intelligence”?

Now, with the Russia-Ukraine war in full swing, even more Biden family misdeeds are coming to light. The Daily Mail reported just this week that, per emails on his laptop, Hunter helped secure millions in funding for a US contractor specialising in deadly pathogen research in Ukraine biolabs. The same company has also partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, now acknowledged as the most likely source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

What else don’t we know about the Bidens? What else are we about to find out?

Most importantly, what is the future of political discourse in the West? Our democracies are rendered hollow if elites in Silicon Valley and on America’s coasts decide before an election what information can and cannot be seen by the public.

There has never been a more pressing need for regulation that will rein in Big Tech’s political partisanship and election interference. And never have everyday people needed more discernment as they assess the news stories put before them.

AUTHOR

Kurt Mahlburg

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate… More by Kurt Mahlburg

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Is TikTok dangerous for teens?

Parents need to monitor how their kids use the world’s #1 most downloaded app and the #1 most visited website.


How much do you know about TikTok? Maybe you’ve heard of it but haven’t used it. Or if you have used TikTok, you may think of it as an app for sharing videos of teens doing funny dances or cute pets doing tricks, which it is. But it is more than that.

For starters, TikTok is now the world’s most downloaded app and the world’s #1 most visited website, ahead of Google (#2) and Facebook (#3). Every day, more than one billion different videos are viewed on TikTok. Experts agree that the key to its success is its unique algorithm. When you join TikTok, you are asked some questions about your interests and what sort of things you’d like to see. TikTok then offers you some of the most popular videos that match your interests and starts monitoring what you do. It takes note of which videos you watch and—crucially—how much time you spend watching them, and which videos you watch more than once. The algorithm then hones your preferences. Within hours, or even minutes, your videos become more specific, more customized to your interests.

The results are uncanny. “TikTok can read my mind” is a common refrain among young people, as the app soon starts serving up videos that are precisely what the viewer was hoping to see: whether it’s a funny cat video, or a video of synchronized swimming, or one about applying glitter make-up, or a video of a pretty girl dancing in a way that appeals to a particular teen boy and wearing precisely the outfit that boy finds most arousing, doing exactly the moves that the boy finds most irresistible. And the same is true of sexual variations. “TikTok knew I was bisexual (or gay, or trans) before I did” is a common trope online.

Is TikTok Harmful?

TikTok is customized. It can be addictive. But is it truly harmful to teens?

That depends on how a teen uses it.

Adolescence can be confusing. Young people are struggling to figure out who they are. Increasingly, they are looking online for clues and for guidance. Doctors at Texas Children’s Hospital used to see one, maybe two teenagers a year presenting with new-onset Tourette syndrome. Between spring 2020 and autumn 2021, that number skyrocketed to about 60. Psychiatrists worldwide—from the South Atlantic island of St Helena, to New Caledonia in the South Pacific, to almost anywhere on the planet where kids have access to the Internet—began reporting a surge of teenage girls self-diagnosing with Tourette syndrome. Many of these girls are shouting out “beans!” at unpredictable intervals. Psychiatrists in England call these girls “Evies” because their behavior resembles that of Evie Meg Field, whose TikTok videos have earned her more than 14 million followers and more than 500 million likes. In a characteristic video, Evie shouts out “beans” uncontrollably. In an earlier era, the sudden appearance of myriad teenage girls shouting out “beans” might have been called mass hysteria. Today, the preferred term is “social media induced illness.”

Other issues can lead quickly down a rabbit hole. Go to TikTok and type “how can I lose weight?” and it will offer many options. The TikTok hashtag #diet has had over 11 billion views. There, you will find videos encouraging viewers that simply doing some planks and leg lifts will result in becoming slim in just 16 days (that particular video has had over 32 million views). Scrolling through the videos, it’s easy to be drawn into a spiral of more videos that speak directly to an individual situation. Alyssa Moukheiber, a dietitian at a residential treatment center for eating disorders in northern Illinois, says, “The TikTok algorithm is just too freaking strong.” The algorithm sucks girls into a world that promises physical perfection for just trying a little harder.

Girls who post videos on TikTok soon discover that their online popularity is linked to their sexuality. Newport Academy is an Atlanta-based treatment center for eating disorders. Crystal Burwell, the program’s director of outpatient services, recently noted that 60% of the girls treated since last summer have posted “sexually inappropriate” videos on TikTok. A similar observation comes from Paul Sunseri, director of the New Horizons Child and Family Institute in El Dorado Hills, California, who is concerned about the growing number of girls who are posting sexualized videos on TikTok. “For a young girl who’s developing her identity, to be swept up into a sexual world like that is hugely destructive,” he says. “When teen girls are rewarded for their sexuality, they come to believe that their value is in how they look.” Sunseri estimates that about one-quarter of the girls at his clinic have posted sexualized content on TikTok.

Boys are not immune. A growing number of teen boys are getting sucked into TikTok’s algorithm, which often means they are seeing TikTok videos of young men who are bigger, more muscular, than they are. That can lead to “bigorexia,” boys becoming obsessed with acquiring the muscle-bound look exemplified by The Rock and the entire cinematic Marvel universe of he-men.

Advice for parents

So, what’s a parent to do about TikTok?

The first step is for parents to have a frank conversation with their daughters—and their sons—about the dangers of TikTok. I have heard teen girls say, “I saw it on TikTok” with the same air of authority as a middle-aged woman a few years back might have said, “I heard it on Dr. Oz.” In both cases, the speaker is citing an authority they believe to be unchallengeable. Parents, make sure your kids understand that a TikTok video is not authoritative, even it has 10 million likes.

At what age should a child be allowed to be on TikTok? Jean Twenge, our nation’s leading researcher on how social media impacts child and adolescent development, recommends that no child under 13 should be on any social media, including TikTok. And I would add that many 13-year-olds aren’t ready. TikTok offers a curated version of their app for under-13s. Don’t use it. That watered-down version is designed to fuel interest in the grown-up version. Twelve-year-olds don’t like to be on the kiddie version of anything. And tweens quickly figure out that if they lie about their age, they can easily access the full version.

As with any social media, the parent must limit, govern, and guide their teen’s use. At this time, we don’t have evidence that 10 or 15 minutes a day on TikTok, or social media in general, is harmful. One study of more than 220,000 teens found that the risk of bad outcomes began to increase after more than 30 minutes of social media a day, on average (see, for example, Figure 3). However, that study was published in 2019, based on data gathered before TikTok became the most-viewed social media for teens. An hour a day on TikTok is definitely too much. Kids have better things to do with their time than spending an hour a day on TikTok. So I advise parents to install parental monitoring apps to limit how much time kids are spending on TikTok.

That’s where many parents push back. One parent told me: “I think it’s important to show my daughter that I trust her. Installing a monitoring app implies that I don’t trust her. Besides, I already use the TikTok Family Pairing option, so that I can see what my daughter is doing in the app.” I remind parents that I see many teens who have created two TikTok accounts. One is the “clean” account which they show to their parents and which their parents follow on the Family Pairing option. The other is the real account, where the daughter is watching, or posting, the videos she doesn’t want her parents to see.

Then the parent says: “My daughter would never create a secret account just to deceive me.” I explain that if all the girl’s friends are doing it and advising her to do it, what is that girl supposed to say to her friends? It’s not reasonable to expect a modern American girl to say, “I know all you guys are doing it, but I won’t do it because I don’t want to deceive my parents.” The parent needs to allow the daughter to tell her friends, “I can’t do that, because my parents have installed this evil monitoring app that sees everything I do!”

Anne Sena is Director of Technology at St David’s School in Raleigh, North Carolina. She recently told me that she uses the Bark parental monitoring app to monitor and limit her teen’s online activities across social media, email, web browsers, and YouTube. She likes that Bark installs a VPN so that the controls are in place when her teen is outside of the home network, for example at a friend’s house or using a network provided by a cell phone. In Sena’s own home, she uses the Circle Home Plus device as well as the Apple’s screen time controls and Microsoft Family Safety to enforce time limits and provide an added layer of search protection on the family’s home computers. There are other similar monitoring and filtering programs out there, including the Canopy app, for parents to choose from.

“That sounds like a lot of work,” one mother told me the other day when I suggested that she follow Sena’s example. And it may be, especially for those of us who are not as knowledgeable about VPNs and screen time controls. But if taking these steps decreases the risk of more teens becoming anxious and/or depressed, I think the extra effort is worth it.

I recently spoke with a young woman who is a senior in college. She admits that she used to spend up to four hours a day on TikTok. But one of her professors inspired her to take control of her time, and she now spends 5 minutes a day, or less, on the app. She says she has reconfigured TikTok to show her only those videos that are closely related to her professional interests. She gives her professor the credit for inspiring her to cut back. I am inclined to give her the credit for finding the courage to govern herself—even when many of her peers can’t, or won’t.

This article has been republished from the Institute for Family Studies blog.

AUTHOR

Leonard Sax

Dr. Leonard Sax MD PhD attended public schools in Shaker Heights Ohio from kindergarten through grade 12. He enrolled in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge Massachusetts in the… More by Leonard Sax

RELATED ARTICLE: Keep your kids safe online: All you need to know about internet safety at school and home

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEOS: Warning — Disney Now Adding ‘Queerness’ to It’s Films like ‘Lightyear’

UPDATE: Governor Ron DeSantis questions Disney’s activism against a new law protecting elementary school children:

“To have transgenderism injected into kindergarten classrooms? Or woke gender ideology injected into second grade classrooms? Why is this the hill [for Disney] to die on?”

WATCH: 


Recently four Disney employees were arrested in human trafficking operation.

Now we have Disney corporate president Karey Burke says she supports having “many, many, many LGBTQIA characters in our stories.” And Burke wants 50% of Disney characters to be LGBTQIA and racial minorities.

It also appears that Disney doesn’t care for certain pronouns like: ladies, gentlemen, boys and girls. No know those ladies, gentlemen, boys and girls that go to Disney parks. I wonder if Disney can define what a woman is???

On August 15th, 2021 reported:

Lifelong family-oriented supporters of the Walt Disney Company will be sad to learn that Disney is no ally to traditional social values.  2ndVote currently scores the Walt Disney Company at a measly 1.67 — and we’re not optimistic about that score improving in light of the company’s brainwashing of little children with an episode of their famed Muppet Babies television show promoting gender confusion.

There are several problems with Disney’s decision. First, biologically, there are just two sexes. Second, Disney should focus on wholesome entertainment, not overtly political social activism. Third, Disney has actively engaged on the issue of gender identity in a way which attempted to restrict the rights of millions of Americans.

We’ve been tracking Disney’s actions against traditional American values for years. In 2016, the company stood against North Carolina bill HB2, claiming that allowing business owners to choose their own bathroom policies was bigotry. Disney canceled events, costing local business owners a lot of money. More recently, Disney endorsed the Equality Act – a bill that has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with pushing a very specific cultural agenda. Religious organizations would be under threat because of the Equality Act – a clear violation of Basic Freedoms found in the First Amendment.

When Disney puts its financial resources behind movements that seek to compel anti-American values, Americans suffer.  These movements are potentially harmful to everything from freedom of speech to religious liberty.  The next time you’re looking to enjoy some family-style entertainment, consider an alternative to Disney which won’t play against your traditional values.

The trick to the entertainment industry is that Hollywood Studios (owned by Disney), Universal Pictures (1.00), Netflix (2.29), and other top entities also rank poorly on the 2ndVote scale. They simply don’t support America’s constitutional and human freedoms of religion, speech, firearms, etc. Therefore, we encourage you to support regional theme parks like Kentucky Kingdom (3.00) and Six Flags (3.00) instead. As for digital entertainment, organizations like PureFlix (3.73) have the kind of wholesome, fun entertainment that Disney used to prioritize. We urge you to spend your hard-earned money with those organizations, and contact Disney and urge them to return to entertainment, not left-wing politics.

Now we learn that the Disney Company has made it their mission to push the radical LGBTQ+ agenda in their films and products.

We have written about how Disney has been grooming your children to be gay. Now we have videos of key Disney staff members discussing “adding queerness” to their films, like “Lightyear.”

reported on Florida’s  “Parental Rights in Education Bill,” which prohibits public schools from indoctrinating children grades K-3 with pro-gay, pro-transgender propaganda:

Disney CEO Bob Chapek initially said his company would not take sides in the [Parental Rights in Education Bill] controversy. Then came the loud, expected rhetoric from the rabid LGBTQ left, with their nasty accusations that Disney was anti-gay and hateful for not vocally opposing the law.

Again, the Florida law is simply designed to protect the youngest grade-school children from being taught lies, such as their birth gender might possibly be a freak of nature and that they can change it.

As a result, Disney quickly abandoned its neutral position for one of total surrender. Chapek apologized to his employees in a letter, telling them, “You needed me to be a stronger ally in the fight for equal rights and I let you down. I am sorry.”

As a result, and to the delight of homosexual activists everywhere, Disney has announced it will restore a previously cut lesbian kissing scene in its June Pixar release of the kid’s movie “Lightyear.”

Disney doesn’t think you will care, nor does it think Christian parents and grandparents will take a stand for their children and grandchildren. I think you will.

I encourage you to join with me and other parents in telling Disney you’re not buying what they are selling.

Sign our pledge, committing to boycott Disney Pixar’s movie “Lightyear” when it is released in theatres and streaming avenues.

Watch this series of video discussions from Disney’s All-Hands meeting between Disney executive producer Latoya Raveneau, Equality Florida and Disney’s activism partner Nadine Smith:

Here’s a response to all of this insanity from Florida Governor Ron DeSantis:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Disney exposed: leaked videos show officials pushing LGBT agenda, saying DeSantis wants to ‘erase’ gay kids

Florida Republicans condemn ‘Woke’ Disney, urge more boycotts by Conservatives against ‘Activist Machine’

Texas Teacher Claims 20 Fourth Graders Out Of 32 Students Identify As LGBTQ

White House omitted light Jackson child porn sentence in document given to senators, GOP says: ‘Cover-up’

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.