The Hidden Depths of the Deep State

At the outset of information of the existence and operation of the Deep State, the general mindset was that this was only a part of the FBI that was working to put together false information to implicate President Trump in dealings which would help result in his impeachment.

However, subsequent events, as well as results from the research of many individuals, have revealed that this was only the tip of the iceberg as far as the depth and breadth of the Deep State’s operation goes.

It is now completely evident that the Deep State is involved in practically everything related to changing America into a Socialist/Communist state. We are currently finding that most conservative organizations are heavily saturated.  And if they’re not actually staffed with those connected to it their top leaders are directing the show.  This, of course, results in those organizations either doing nothing, or doing the wrong thing.

How has this come about? A good example would be the selections of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett as President Trump’s three chosen supreme court justices.

Conservatives were led to believe that all of them were/are Constitutional Conservatives.  However, subsequent observations refute this. According to a recent article by Kelleigh Nelson, anyone still believing that these justices are true Constitutional Conservatives hasn’t been paying attention to how they vote.

Nelson states, “Not one of them even follows the U.S. Constitution. What is so discouraging is that they take turns being on the side of those who vote against our Constitution and against American citizens. Watch how they vote, and you’ll notice that one of the three will always side with Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer.”

I had noticed this prior to reading her article. Also, I had noticed that Justice Roberts did the same; If an issue came up that was practically insignificant, even though it might lean to the conservative side, he would vote with the conservatives, but if it was a key issue leaning to the left, he would support it.

I highly recommend this article by Kelleigh Nelson. Not only will one be enlightened concerning the things going on now, but also the many traitorous activities extending back to the Reagan years. And please go to the highlighted links which will give you a good beginning for a political science education in addition to a better understanding of how, and why issues which begin with being promoted as, Conservative and pro-American, turn out to be exactly the opposite.

This has come about, largely and in part, by the fact that most conservative organizations Americans are influenced by, like the Heritage Foundation and many others, are saturated, and to some extent staffed by those whose agenda is completely opposite of that claimed by the organization.

The Heritage Foundation has, for many years, been the epitome of influence for what was considered, “conservatives in the know.” This, of course, and as it was intended, resulted in many lesser conservative organizations and their adherents’ becoming satellites of the Heritage Foundation. So, what Heritage promoted, or stood behind was greeted with favor as it was presented to the conservative base.

But let’s look at a few examples of what it supported and promoted. I’ve already touched on the planting of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in the Supreme Court; this resulted in the Court being, possibly the enemy of America for the remainder of time. In addition, the list of justices which Heritage submitted for President Trump to choose from to be candidates for Justices of the Supreme Court contained close to 20 lower court judges of which only two of them were Pro-Life.  The remainder were all pro-abortionists. So, in view of this alone, we can deduce conclusively that esoterically speaking, the only thing conservative about the Heritage foundation is its purpose to keep things as they are, i.e., to support and promote issues which are diametrically opposed to American principles.

What can we say about those individuals and organizations who support Heritage in the way of donations? Well, I would say most individuals continue to perceive it to represent the epitome of conservative thinking. In view of that, they think they’ve done their patriotic bit by donating a few dollars from time to time. However, it is quite evident that probably at least 90% of them don’t have the foggiest idea of what Heritage’s purpose and goals are.

That is only for individuals; for organizations and corporations…well, that’s a different pot of beans.

There may be a few small conservative organizations that have not succumbed to Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) connections, that continue to think Heritage is what it says it is. But for most of the larger so-called conservative organizations and corporations, and wealthier individuals, I believe that they are aware of the real Heritage agenda. For information on this part, I suggest the article by Kelleigh Nelson, which I referred to earlier.

The Deep State deepens with Vice President Michael Pence!

Trump thought he was the “trustworthy” and devout “Christian” Vice President that was more than willing to tell the politically naïve President that Heritage was a conservative think tank who would guide him to constitutionally conservative judges for the Supreme Court.

This, of course, identifies the former VP as an agent of the Deep State, which to all practically thinking makes him a traitor, in my opinion. But he’s only one; there are many more throughout the Republican Party, who are referred to as Trotskyites, Neo-cons and RINOs. All of these have their part in aiding the Deep State.

I marvel at the amount of intelligence my friend, Kelleigh Nelson, has disclosed in this article. Considering the number of articles of quality, she writes throughout the year, it just seems impossible that she, in such a limited amount of time, would be able to unveil so much that was practically hidden from the public.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, I began to have suspicions about Pence. I had noticed some remarks he had made to the effect that he was for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). This was at the time in which Trump had let it be known that he was against it. Subsequently however, Pence became silent about the issue.

Practically all Kelleigh reveals in this single article plays into what the title of this article is all about. However, this article will be directed at the transitions over the last hundred plus years which set the table making it possible for the enemies of liberty to bring about what we are witnessing today.

We now know that the deep state didn’t just suddenly come into being for the purpose of helping to concoct lies about former President Donald Trump. Its beginnings started before I was born, a little over 94 years ago.  It all goes back at least to 1776 with the advent of the Illuminati. But the pot was beginning to boil even prior to that, with some financial interests starting to get both financial and political things arranged to set the table for future developments toward the goal of world government.

Skipping over the following 150 years with all the events of that time to World War I, the agenda for world government attempted to use the war for an impetus to aid them in instituting the League of Nations. However, the U.S. senators at that time read the Charter which resulted in the rejection of the League of Nations.

The failure to bring forth the League of Nations resulted in the agenda having to begin again. They accomplished this with the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1921. To show the position of its agenda and sphere of influence, John Foster Dulles, the former U.S. Secretary of state, was its president. At the very outset, he began recruiting men of an international bent, both in government and high-up financial affairs. By the year 1939, the agents of the CFR descended upon Washington, DC to begin taking over the U.S. State Department on September 12, 1939.

For more information relative to the above events, go to my previous article, “Path to Understanding, Part 3.”

By 1950, the CFR’s membership totaled approximately one thousand, at which time it became the invisible government. Dan Smoot, Assistant to J. Edgar Hoover, wrote a book titled, “The Invisible Government”, wherein he described much about the CFR.

Here then is a partial outline of the development of the main planning and coordinating force behind everything that is happening today.

Probably the most significant thing the CFR was able to achieve towards progress related to its goal of world domination was its success in getting the United Nations accepted and set up, as well as getting it acknowledged as an “institution of peace.” However, we are at last seeing that the strive for world peace is only esoteric, which is to say the peace it is working to achieve is when it is in complete domination of the world where no resistance exists from anyone.

The following are prime examples of how the CFR gets things done through the power of government.

According to James Perloff, Author of “Shadows of Power,” in 1953 the Bricker Amendment was introduced in Congress. It stipulated that no treaty signed by the U.S. could override the Constitution or infringe on the rights guaranteed Americans. It was born out of painful retrospect of Yalta and the U.N. Charter. Foreign Affairs, the official publication of the CFR, ran a 19-page denunciation of the Bricker Amendment as its lead article in October 1953.  President Eisenhower towed the CFR line calling the Amendments’ backers “nuts and crackpots.” Biographer Ambrose writes, “Eisenhower used all his persuasive powers – at stag dinners, at meetings, in private, in correspondence, even on the golf course, to kill the amendment. And killed it was.”

Mr. Perloff also states, “In the fall of 1953, Norman Dodd, Director of Research for the Reece Committee, was invited to the headquarters of the Ford Foundation by its President, H. Rowan Gaither (CFR). According to Dodd, Gaither told him, “Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making-level have had experience, either in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) or the European Economic Administration, with directives from the White House. We operate under those directives here. Would you like to know what those directives are?”  Dodd replied that he would. Gaither said, “The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power to alter our life in the United States that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union.”

These two events confirm that Eisenhower was a secret agent of the CFR. It has been reported that he was a member of the organization which was possible and likely. This could have played into him being bumped from a Lt. Colonel to a 5 star General. So, we can readily see that all this resulted in a useful hidden depth of the Deep State. For more on this see my article, “The Enemies of Our President, Part 3.”

The membership of the CFR possibly stands now at between six and seven thousand with about five or six hundred in government departments. We can be sure they are continually striving to bring to fruition the entire agenda of the CFR. Each of them, I’m sure, are connected to those who are their personal satellites which aid in spreading the CFR narrative – world government via the Great Reset, but the CFR will not be referenced anywhere.

There are those who might say, “I’ve never seen anything attributed to the CFR as being involved in what is happening now.”  Of course not, it is practically never out front; it works from behind the scenes through others.

©J.W. Bryan. All rights reserved.

The Missing Link in the Whoopi-Holocaust Story

The Holocaust is a 77-year old story. Yet Whoopi Goldberg got in trouble last week for getting a major aspect of it wrong.

On January 31’s edition of “The View,” Goldberg said that the Holocaust was not about race.

The context was a discussion about the book, Maus, being banned by a Tennessee public school board because of nudity and profanity. Goldberg said: “I’m surprised that’s what made you uncomfortable, the fact that there was some nudity. I mean, it’s about the Holocaust, the killing of six million people, but that didn’t bother you? If you’re going to do this, then let’s be truthful about it. Because the Holocaust isn’t about race. No, it’s not about race.”

She has been suspended from the show for two weeks.

Hours after the program, she tweeted an apology to those offended by her remarks: “On today’s show, I said the Holocaust ‘is not about race, but about man’s inhumanity to man.’ I should have said it is about both. As Jonathan Greenblatt from the Anti-Defamation League shared, ‘The Holocaust was about the Nazi’s systematic annihilation of the Jewish people—who they deemed to be an inferior race.’ I stand corrected.” Greenblatt accepted her apology.

I asked Rabbi Daniel Lapin, President of the American Alliance of Jews and Christians, for a statement on this story. He told me that he disagrees with her often, but does not agree with the suspension: “Stuffing a gag into people’s mouths and trying to harm their careers doesn’t win the argument. It actually prolongs it by breeding anger and resentment.”

He added, “By the time the left has silenced the right and the other way around, and by the time secular and religious have silenced one another and by the time blacks and whites have silenced one another, we’ll all be living in a dull, silent, monotonous and resentful world.”

Interestingly, the very next day after this broadcast of “The View” came the release of a book, Darwinian Racism: How Darwinism Influenced Hitler, Nazism, and White Nationalism. This is the latest book by Dr. Richard Weikart, author of, From Darwin to Hitler. Weikart is professor emeritus of history at California State University, Stanislaus and a Senior Fellow with the Discovery Institute.

I’ve been following Dr. Weikart’s research for years. In 2006, I traveled to his college to interview him for our television production on the impact of Darwin on devaluing human life for D. James Kennedy Ministries, “Darwin’s Deadly Legacy.”

I asked Weikart if there was a link between Darwinism and what Adolph Hitler and the Nazis did. He told our viewers, “Among German historians, there’s really not much debate about whether or not Hitler was a social Darwinist; he clearly was drawing on Darwinian ideas.”

Weikart added that Darwin wasn’t anti-Semitic, but his ideas were used by the anti-Semites to do away with those viewed as sub-human.

Recently, Weikart wrote an op-ed initially called “Whoopi Goldberg, the Holocaust, and Race” to address her “misguided comment…that the Nazi Holocaust was not about race.”

Weikart notes that historically Jews were viewed as a religious group in Germany, but with the widespread acceptance of Darwinism came the acceptance of “biological determinism.” He writes, “Biological determinism taught that human traits, including behavioral traits, were determined by one’s heredity, not by one’s education and upbringing. When applied to Jews, this meant that the common stereotypes of Jews—that they are greedy, deceitful, sexual immoral, etc.—were allegedly biologically ingrained traits.” By the time of Hitler’s Third Reich, this view was widespread and Jews were viewed more in racial terms than in religious terms

So indeed the Holocaust was about race. It was all about achieving the so-called Master Race and eliminating those viewed as subhuman. The Jews were the largest group killed. Said Weikart, “For them, the killing of Jews was all about race.” The Nazis also killed Gypsies and Slavs for racist reasons.

Weikart said that in the Nazis were putting into practice genetic selection in the concentration camps—deciding who would live and who would die: “Natural selection was a guiding idea for Hitler and the Nazis…. and the term was related directly to Darwinian terminology….They were selecting this person to survive and this person to go to the gas chambers.”

On a recent radio segment, Weikart told me, “Hitler saw this life as a struggle for existence among many races opposing his so-called Aryan (or sometimes he’d use the term Nordic) race, and he framed it as a Darwinian struggle for existence.”

So what was the Holocaust all about? Said Weikart, “Adolph Hitler was clearly trying to speed evolution along.” Hitler believed that the evolutionary survival of his “master race” required the extermination of Jews.

Darwinian evolution is the missing link in Whoopi Goldberg’s verbal mistake last week.

©Jerry Newcombe. All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Stop Democrats from turning the United States of America into the Islamic States of America

TAKE ACTION: Send an email to U.S. Senate Leaders and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations to oppose the Combatting International Islamophobia Act (S3384)


A reader from Amsterdam, the Netherlands, sent us an email titled “greetings from far away.” In the email the reader wrote:

Dear American friends,

How are you doing? Enjoying your last days of the freedom era?

I sadly noticed that FOX News is boycotting anyone who speaks out against the danger of Islam. Till a few years ago, Frank Gaffney, Robert Spencer, Clare Lopez, Pamela Geller were regular guests on this network.

No longer. And politicians like Cruz and Trump, who do a great deal of good things, refuse to speak out on Shariah, Hudud et cetera.

Tucker Carlson and his friends are too afraid to touch upon the subject.

You need a new news network!!

Is there already a new generation of counter jihadists to be found in the US? Or are we elder people the only ones..

We replied,

“To many are believers of the myth that Islam is a religion of peace.”

After receiving this email we learned that Democrat House Members unanimously voted to empower a Sharia Law edict that prohibits any criticism of Islam.

Democrats want to give, by U.S. law, special protections to Islam over all other religious beliefs.

Amendment 1 to the U.S. Constitution reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

If Combating International Islamophobia Act S3384 is passed by the Senate and signed into law then, in effect, it will establish the Islamic religion in America. America will then  become the Islamic States of America.

Florida Family Association sent out the first email alert on this issue on January 4, 2022 stating:

Thankfully, this Sharia authorization bill has not been heard yet in committee yet.  The last action on S3384 was that it was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.  Please consider sending an email to the senators on the Committee on Foreign Relations if you have not done so already or if you would like to send another email.

Understandingthethreat.com wrote the following regarding legislation that will give Sharia law’s prohibition of criticizing Islam superior authority over the First Amendment protection of legitimate criticism of the harsh, inhumane and violent provisions of Sharia law and fatwas.

On December 14, 2021, 219 democrats voted in favor of House Resolution 5665 which establishes the Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia and addresses related issues inside the U.S. Department of State.  This is the culmination of over 20 years of work by the Global Islamic Movement to impose the Islamic Law of Slander on Americans.  In Islam, Slander is a capital crime and is legally defined as to say anything about Islam/Muslims that a Muslim would “dislike.”  The bill was authored by jihadi Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.

The entire Islamic world under the banner of the OIC – the largest voting block in the UN made up of every Islamic nation on earth – approved The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in 1990 and served it to the UN 3 years later.  The Cairo Declaration legally defines “Human Rights” as the ‘Imposition of Sharia’ and the OIC’s 2005 10-Year Plan calls for the criminalization of “Islamophobia” which is defined as “Slandering Islam.”   Now, 219 democrats have done the will of the Global Islamic Movement.

The legislation, Combating International Islamophobia Act S3384, is now in the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

Tragically, the Combating International Islamophobia Act only protects Islam, the religion most noted for acts of violence worldwide, while ignoring the fact that Jews are the largest target of hate crimes in the United States.

Jews are targeted with hate far more often than Muslims. The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s 2020 hate crime statistics reports that crimes targeting Jews comprised 54.9% of all religious bias crimes last year.

Additionally, 34 of the top 50 countries in which persecution of Christians has been documented to be the worst are Islamic.

Followers of Sharia law and Islamic fatwas commit more violent acts of hate than any other religion.

Thereligionofpeace.com documents that “Islamic Terrorists have carried out more than 40,600 deadly terror attacks since 9/11.”

Hypocritically, the Combating International Islamophobia Act is sponsored by the most notable anti-Semite in congress, Ilhan Omar. More hypocrisy, the Council on American Islamic Relations, the organization sponsoring the Combating International Islamophobia Act, was added to the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s ‘Global Anti-Semitism’ List on December 27, 2021.

Furthermore, there are well documented reports regarding the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) terror-links and terrorist apologetics.  CAIR sued the Department of Homeland Security on April 5, 2016 with the demand that the Terror Screening Database be ruled unconstitutional.  The 4th US Circuit Court of appeals unanimously ruled against CAIR’s claim.  CAIR filed another lawsuit that is challenging The No Fly List which is part of the United States Quiet Skies program which aims to protect the millions of Americans that travel by air, rail and bus every day.

So Americans are faced with the most notable anti-Semite in congress and anti-Semitic CAIR wanting legislation to “combat” “Islamophobia” to protect Islamists from criticism.

No definitions give open ended enforcement to combat Islamophobia.  The Combating International Islamophobia Act does not define “Islamophobia” or “combating.”

The lack of a definition for “Islamophobia” means:

  • Christians, Jews and Infidels at large who dare discuss or report about the barbarism, inhumanity and incivility of certain Islamic edicts and fatwas may be subject to the “combating” arm of the Department of State which legislatively includes every branch of government.
  • Education organizations, churches, synagogues, publishers, websites, bloggers, talk show hosts and the media may no longer be able to educate, discuss or report the association between Islamists and Islamic terrorism.
  • Islamist hate for Jews and Christians will be emboldened because Jews and Christian’s legitimate criticism of Islamist hate could be considered Islamophobic and combated against by the State Department and other federal agencies it enlists in their Sharia fight.
  • People who defend and aid Muslim women from Islamist oppression could be combated against by the United States Government.

According to Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, should the USCMO succeed in its goal to see a special envoy to “monitor and combat Islamophobia” in America, the systematic hunting down and cancelling  of organizations, websites, and individuals who criticize or offend Islam would be in order.

Creating a federal task force to enforce the Sharia law edict that prohibits truthful criticism of Islam would violate the First Amendment, Establishment Clause and equal protection of the law. Many people and organizations, including other religions, rightfully educate others and express concern regarding the barbarism, inhumanity, incivility and violence associated with certain edicts and fatwas of Islam. No one religion should be given special treatment by government tasking a special squad to enforce the religious laws of that one religion to censor truthful criticism.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to encourage US Senate leaders and members of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations to oppose the Combating International Islamophobia Act S3384.


TAKE ACTION: Send an email to U.S. Senate Leaders and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations to oppose the Combatting International Islamophobia Act (S3384)


©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Biden’s Mask Mandate War on We The People

“For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong.” – H. L. Mencken, American journalist, essayist, satirist, cultural critic.


Government mandates on getting vaxxed and wearing masks has been a contentious issue from the start. It is now coming to a head in Canada with the truckers Freedom Convoy and across America as well.

The Daily Mail’s Ronny Reyes, in anBlue surgical face masks are only 10% effective in preventing COVID infection, new study finds”  wrote:

  • University of Waterloo researchers find most cloth masks are only 10% effective
  • Researchers warn most cloth masks do not cover the face properly  
  • N95 or KN95 masks were found to be the most effective at filtering aerosols
  • Study also found that even ‘moderate ventilation’ matches the best of masks in terms of protection against COVID-19
  • Mask debate remains contentious in the country as delta variant spreads 

Masks and mask mandates

Masks have now become a big issue and Biden administration/CDC guidelines on wearing masks are coming into question.

It seem that governors of blue states are now gradually unmasking their people. It appears that their people have had enough and with the midterm elections on the horizon that Biden, CDC and the Democrats masking of America has fallen out of favor. Why, because it is impacting the economy, culture and health of Americans.

But Biden isn’t backing down, he’s doubling down on mask mandates.

During the February 9th, 2022 White House press conference Jen Psaki was asked about the White House’s COVID-19 policies. Watch the entire February 9th press conference:

Psaki was questioned about the economy, Covid restrictions and about blue states, like New York, lifting their mask mandates and a return to normalcy. The first question ask:

And if I could ask a question about — New York, today, was the latest to work on their mask mandates.  Several states are now, it seems, well ahead of the federal government in explaining the path out of the pandemic.  Is the President now falling behind states in explaining to Americans how are — we all can, sort of, resume our normal lives and get back to normalcy?

When asked if citizens should follow the CDC mask guidelines Psaki said,

“Yes. This is where we would advise any American to follow the CDC guidelines … no parent who wants to send their kid with a mask should be penalized. No teacher who wants to wear a mask should be penalized, or school district who makes that choice should be penalized.”

Question:

Jen, quick follow-up on that.  Does the administration risk looking out of touch with where the country is heading, in terms of lifting these mask mandates, if the CDC doesn’t revise its guidelines?

Answer:

Well, again, we understand where the emotions of the country are, right?  People are tired of masks.  I would say not even — if you look at the polling though, there’s also a huge chunk of people who still want masks.  Right?  So, it’s not even that specific.  It’s just that, as you noted, there are some states that are moving towards rolling back or giving more choice to local communities about how they will implement these requirements.

But, again, from the federal government, what our responsibility to do is to abide by what the President committed to on the campaign, which is to listen to scientists, listen to data.  That doesn’t move at the speed of politics; it moves at the speed of data.  And they — Dr. Walensky committed to — conveyed — or, I should say, confirmed that they were evaluating this at the CDC.

Following the data, not the politics

Psaki’s February 9th, 2022 statement is at best a lie and at worse a myth. To repeat Psaki said, “But, again, from the federal government, what our responsibility to do is to abide by what the President committed to on the campaign, which is to listen to scientists, listen to data.  That doesn’t move at the speed of politics; it moves at the speed of data.”

But the data is already in on the usefulness of masks.

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, Director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases said on January 31st, 2020,

We don’t routinely recommend the use of face masks by the public to prevent respiratory illness. And we certainly are not recommending that at this time for this new [Covid] virus.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said,

[T]he average American does not need a N95 mask. These are really more for health care providers. He was echoed by Robert Redfield, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that there ‘is no role for these masks in the community’.

A 2011 randomized clinical trial found that medical masks offered no protection at all.

A 2015 study concluded rates of infection were especially high in cloth masks, finding particle penetration in nearly 97 percent of them.

A 2016 paper that analyzed six clinical studies found that N95 respirator masks fared no better than medical masks in preventing respiratory infection.

As recently as April 7, a paper analyzing data from 15 randomized trials concluded that,

“[C]ompared to no masks there was no reduction of influenza-like illness cases for influenza for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.”

Perhaps similar reasoning guided the CDC’s about-face in April when it issued guidance recommending the use of cloth face coverings for healthy individuals (though the World Health Organization still advises against them).

The Bottom Line

Masking America isn’t about science or data. Masking Americans is purely politics and all about control. How do we know? Because 221 House Democrats voted to block the  “Unmask Our Kids Act.”

The Daily Callers’ Nicole Silverio in an article titled, “White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday there is a “distinct difference” between Democratic governors scrapping mask mandates and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ handling of COVID-19” reported:

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday there is a “distinct difference” between Democratic governors scrapping mask mandates and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ handling of COVID-19.

“We had another state today drop the indoor mask mandate as the CDC is confirming that their guidance is not changing. But these decisions that are being made at the local level… are out of step with the science,” one reporter began. “So, why are we not hearing the same messaging criticizing states that are, you know, making these moves like we heard previously with, for instance, Ron DeSantis?”

“I would say there is a distinct difference between standing in the way, which Ron DeSantis did — or, Governor DeSantis, I’ll give him his full title — of teachers, school administrators and others taking steps to protect the students and their school communities,” Psaki answered. “There’s a difference between standing in the way of it — threatening to pull back funding — and allowing for local school districts to make choices, which is what a number of these states are doing.”

The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) wrote:

In a sense, the mask craze is largely about managing our fears. As my colleague Sean Malone recently observed, when people are afraid they’re much more willing to accept anything they believe might make them a little safer. Even really bad policies and ideas.

The illusion of safety. It’s a powerful thing. For both humans and governments, it would seem.

John F. Kennedy said, “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.”

Masks don’t make us safer according to the data and science. However, the myth that they do is driving individuals, communities, government at all levels force We The People into believing that masks work.

What we are witnessing is mass formation psychosis.

Biden’s mask mandate war on we the people will continue and we the people will either succumb or fight back.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: GOP’s Youngkin Was Villain for Lifting Mask Mandate. Dem Phil Murphy a Hero for Doing the Same.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden May Permanently Ban Air Travel for People Who Had a Mask ‘Incident’ While Airborne

221 House Democrats Vote to Block “Unmask Our Kids Act”

James Carville Wants to Punch Unvaxxed in the Face: ‘You’re a Piece of Sh*t’

Pfizer Quietly Adds Warning That ‘Unfavorable Pre-Clinical, Clinical, or Safety Data’ May Impact Business

Blue States Back Down on Mandates

‘Mass Formation Psychosis’

Over-the-Counter Ivermectin? It Could Be Coming to a State Near You—Despite FDA Concerns

The ivermectin controversy has sparked a wider debate about medical freedom.


A new bill recently introduced in New Hampshire would allow residents to get ivermectin from pharmacies without first getting a prescription or approval from a doctor. The legislation, titled House Bill 1022, is still in committee, but the state House of Representatives is slated to vote on it in the coming weeks.

The purpose of the bill is to provide wider access to ivermectin for those who want to take it as a treatment for COVID-19. Thus far, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved the drug for treating COVID-19, but many believe it is an effective treatment and are eager to have it on hand should they be infected with the virus.

Though the FDA has not weighed in on this bill in particular, the agency has made it clear that they have serious concerns about the use of ivermectin for this purpose.

“The FDA has received multiple reports of patients who have required medical attention, including hospitalization, after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for livestock,” they write on their website. “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19,” they continue. “There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. It is not okay.”

The caution isn’t only coming from the FDA, however. As Newsweek reports, “a number of medical experts testified in opposition to the bill during a legislative session [in January].”

Part of the opposition is undoubtedly due to concerns about safety and efficacy, but there are also concerns about what the bill specifically allows and requires. To address these, the House committee is considering certain bipartisan amendments, such as “requiring that patients who receive the drug are informed that its use for COVID-19 is ‘off-label’ and setting guidelines for tracking any adverse effects.”

Though ivermectin received very little attention when the pandemic first broke out, its use in treating COVID-19 has become increasingly well known, and, in recent months, polarizing. In particular, the drug garnered significant public attention when comedian and podcaster Joe Rogan disclosed in September that he was using it to treat COVID-19 after getting a prescription from his doctor.

Rogan’s announcement led many CNN commentators to claim he was taking “horse dewormer”, since the drug is often used to treat parasites in horses and other livestock. This was misleading, however, since the drug is also approved for human use to treat certain infections.

The whole spat came to a head when Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent, in October. “Does it bother you that the network you work for out and out lied, just outright lied about me taking horse dewormer?” Rogan asked Gupta. “They shouldn’t have said that,” Gupta replied. “Why did they do that?” Rogan pressed. “I don’t know,” Gupta responded.

CNN’s rhetoric aside, the question of whether it’s appropriate to prescribe ivermectin to COVID-19 patients remains divisive. A doctor in Virginia, for instance, recently resigned from his position at a medical school after losing a court battle over whether he could prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19. Meanwhile, a doctor in Minnesota who recently served in the Minnesota Senate and is now running for governor is under investigation for prescribing the drug to COVID-19 patients. And in Canada, a doctor has had his medical license restricted because of his views on COVID-19, and one of the restrictions is that he is not allowed to prescribe ivermectin.

Despite the pushback, many doctors in the US continue to prescribe the drug for COVID-19. One such physician is Dr. Joseph Varon, who is the chief medical officer at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston. “My love for [ivermectin] is based on my personal use and good outcomes my patients have had,” Dr. Varon told the Houston Chronicle back in August. “Once you see it work, it is difficult to deny its usefulness.”

But while many doctors support the treatment, many others are strongly against it. For instance, Dr. A. Clinton White, a professor of infectious disease at University of Texas Medical Branch, has said many of the trials that seem to show the benefits of ivermectin were “deeply flawed and likely reflected biases.”

This statement about the trials is worth noting, because it gets at one of the core problems with the whole debate. The problem is that the safety and efficacy of this treatment is fundamentally an empirical question, one that most of us simply aren’t qualified to speak to. Typically, the solution to this problem is to rely on experts who can interpret the data for us. But when the experts themselves disagree, there’s not much we can do except hope that the results of future trials will be more conclusive.

But while the jury may be out regarding the empirical data, the ethics of making this drug available are a completely different question, and this is a question lay persons can weigh in on.

The argument for allowing people to access ivermectin, or any drug for that matter, rests on the principle of self-ownership. As Murray Rothbard explains in For a New Liberty, “the right to self-ownership asserts the absolute right of each man, by virtue of his (or her) being a human being, to ‘own’ his or her own body; that is, to control that body free of coercive interference.”

This may sound simple enough, but it has profound implications. If you really own your body, that means you and you alone have the right to decide what goes in it and what doesn’t. If someone coercively prevents you from taking a drug, they are effectively saying they have a higher claim on your life than you do. And that holds true whether that someone is acting by themselves or on behalf of a government.

“When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us,” said Ron Paul, “we in essence accept that the state owns our bodies.”

Another phrase that’s often used for the self-ownership position is bodily autonomy. Notably, the word “autonomy” comes from the Greek words auto, which means “self”, and nomos, which means “law.” So in essence, autonomy is about having a “self-law” or being “self-governing”.

Now, many people give lip service to the idea of bodily autonomy with phrases like “my body, my choice.” But holding that principle consistently means removing all restrictions about what people can do with their body. After all, you can’t be “self-governing” if you’re simultaneously being governed by other people.

Of course, some people will use their freedom to make bad choices and will have to suffer the consequences, but this is nothing new. We let people take all sorts of health and safety risks out of respect for their autonomy, such as with diet, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, and extreme sports.

And while some people may use their freedom to make bad choices, many others will use it to make good choices that the government is currently preventing them from making, such as taking drugs that could save their life.

Now, whether ivermectin is one of those lifesaving drugs is currently up for debate. But what shouldn’t be up for debate is each individual’s right to make their own medical decisions.

COLUMN BY

Patrick Carroll

Patrick Carroll has a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Waterloo and is an Editorial Fellow at the Foundation for Economic Education.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ALERT: Israel Proves Covid ‘Vaccines’ are Ineffective and Dangerous – Boosters Must Stop!

INFOGRAPHIC: Approved and Non-FDA Approved COVID-19 Treatments

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: ESPN Whistleblower Exposes ‘Blatantly Racist’ Workplace Environment

*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


Project Veritas released a new undercover video today recorded within ESPN that revealed what appears to be a workplace environment full of toxic racist tension.

Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:

  • Whistleblower-recorded audio and video show numerous ESPN employees discussing what they see as a toxic, racist workplace environment which directly contradicts the image that ESPN tries to project.
  • In one clip, a black studio operator discusses, “the racial shit that happens in here all the time.” In another clip, a black woman working as an audio communications specialist says “that’s not how it is” when addressing the difference between ESPN’s workplace environment and social justice image.
  • On-air talent Alyson Lang, who covers the SEC for ESPN: “I know the comments that have been made to me at work and the conversations that have been had in front of me at work, like, I mean just blatantly racist sh*t. Just blatantly, like, complaining to me that we have three white hosts, and I’m like, ‘What do you want me- do you want me to leave?’”
  • On-air talent Matt Schick, who’s been with ESPN since 2012, said, “It has different connotations now,” when talking about what it’s like to tell people he works for ESPN. In the next soundbite, he calls ESPN, “a global entity of forced thought.”
  • The whistleblower, ESPN Studio Operator Trevor Adams, sent a company-wide email outlining these concerns and was subsequently identified by the company as a “threat” which resulted in law enforcement being sent to his home. He was terminated soon after an attempt from Project Veritas to obtain a comment from Human Resources.

You can watch the full video HERE.

 What is going on inside ESPN?

With just days until the Super Bowl, sports fans should get answers from the Disney-owned network. Better yet, ALL Americans deserve answers on this.


*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


EDITORS NOTE: This Project Veritas video is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Abrams Required Schoolkids to Mask Up So She Could Go Maskless

President-wannabe and voter fraud enthusiast Stacey Abrams, who sparked controversy by appearing maskless among dozens of masked-up children during a recent visit to a Georgia elementary school, did so “on the condition that everyone around her” wore a face covering — including the children, her campaign said.

Over the weekend, a photo surfaced showing the failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate grinning amid dozens of children at Glennwood Elementary School in Decatur. City Schools of Decatur mandate masks for students and employees. Nationwide outrage ensued.

“Her campaign said she wore a mask to the event and only removed it so she could be heard by students watching remotely and for a handful of photos on the condition that everyone around her was wearing face-coverings,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

Georgia gubernatorial candidate, former Sen. David Perdue (R-GA), slammed Abrams and other Democrats in an “Unmask Our Kids” digital ad, and changing his Twitter header to the now-infamous image of the unmasked Abrams surrounding by masked-up elementary school children. The photo includes the caption, “Unmask Our Kids.”

“In so many ways,” tweeted former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, “this picture embodies the elitism, arrogance, cruelty, science denial, and glib authoritarianism of Joe Biden’s Democrat Party.

He left out “blatant hypocrisy,” but otherwise, Miller’s message was spot on.


Stacey Abrams

32 Known Connections

Condemning America’s “Systemic Racism”

In July 2020, Abrams told The Washington Post:

“[W]rit large, our challenge in America is that justice does not get meted out equally. In fact, it doesn’t even humanize many blacks who are killed, particularly by those who are sworn to protect them. And so I think this racial moment we are having begins with this conversation of extrajudicial killings, but it cannot be divorced from the disproportionate number of deaths by black Americans based on COVID-19, the disproportionate effect of infection rates, and the economic collapse that is hurting black and brown communities at higher rates than anyone else, and the lack of attention being paid to the disproportionate number of people of color who also face voter suppression. The systemic racism that we see in our society is wrapped into everything from our environment to criminal justice to the application of justice, and the moment we try to say that these things are separate, we set ourselves up once again for the kind of protest and demonstrations we see now. But the extent to which we acknowledge that these are interwoven, through systemic racism, systemic inequities, and systemic injustice, then we can begin to start to address them.”

To learn more about Stacey Abrams, click here.

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Over Half Of Americans Don’t Think Schools Need To Teach About The Ongoing Impact Of Slavery And Racism

This is what’s happening in public schools!


  • Over half of Americans don’t think schools have a responsibility to teach students about the ongoing impact of slavery and racism, according to according to a poll released Monday by the McCourtney Institute for Democracy at Penn State University in partnership with APM Research Lab.
  • Two-thirds of Republican respondents and almost half of Independents said educators should only teach the history of slavery, according to the “Mood of the Nation” poll. Only one-fifth of Democratic respondents said exclusively the history of slavery should be taught.
  • Most respondents said they didn’t think governors and state legislators should have a “great deal of influence” over how concepts such as racism, slavery, creationism and sex education are taught in public schools and responded in favor of parents having the greatest influence on those topics.

Over half of Americans don’t think schools have a responsibility to teach students about the ongoing impact of slavery and racism, according to according to a poll released Monday by the McCourtney Institute for Democracy at Penn State University in partnership with APM Research Lab.

Two-thirds of Republican respondents and almost half of Independents said educators should only teach the history of slavery, according to the “Mood of the Nation” poll. Only one-fifth of Democratic respondents said exclusively the history of slavery should be taught.

The survey polled 1,200 people over the age of 18 starting in late November 2021, and the results generally varied depending on political affiliation. That said, the poll showed that 90% of respondents believed schools have a responsibility to teach about the history of slavery and scientific evolution.

Most respondents said they didn’t think governors and state legislators should have a “great deal of influence” over how concepts such as racism, slavery, creationism and sex education are taught in public schools and responded in favor of parents having the greatest influence on those topics.

Almost half of respondents said that the biblical stance on creation should be taught alongside scientific evidence of evolution, according to the poll. Respondents with a bachelor’s degree, higher incomes and Democrats were the most likely to take the position that exclusively the scientific evidence of creation should be taught.

Respondents 45 and older were the most supportive of parents having the greatest influence in how evolution is taught.

“It depends on a person’s religious belief,” a 61-year-old Black Democratic woman from Florida who identifies as a born-again Christian said in the survey. “If they believe, as I do, that man was created by God, then I think they should decide what and how their children should be taught concerning evolution.”

Of those polled, 51% of respondents said parents should have “a great deal of influence” over the subject of sex education, the poll showed. Three-fourths of respondents said students should learn about contraception and the dangers of diseases during sex education, while nearly one-fourth said the dangers of diseases and abstinence until marriage should be taught.

Republicans, born-again Christians and respondents 65 and older were the most likely to say parents should have the greatest influence on their children’s sex education, according to the poll results. Additionally, forty percent of respondents said health teachers should also have “a great deal of influence” in sex education.

“Because government departments of education don’t care about students. Parents should be teaching them about safety along with health teachers and professionals,” a 28-year-old Democratic Hispanic man from New York said, according to survey.

Over the course of the pandemic, as school boards have fielded complaints from parents over topics like COVID-19 policies and Critical Race Theory (CRT), multiple state legislatures and governors have proposed legislation and put forth executive orders that would give parents more say and provide more transparency about what their children are taught in public schools. Critics, including many educators and progressives, argue that GOP-proposed legislation censors teachers and restricts how they teach.

The maximum margin of error for the “Mood of the Nation” survey is 3.7 points.

COLUMN BY

KENDALL TIETZ

Education reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Connecticut students told to use pizza toppings as metaphors for sex

University ‘Sex Week’ Encourages Students To ‘Thank Abortion Providers’

New York Reportedly Dropping Mask Mandates For Businesses, But Not Yet Schoolchildren

CNN Medical Analyst Says Mask Mandate Should End Because ‘Science Has Changed.’ But Has It?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The Surveillance State of the Olympics

Everyone at the Beijing Winter Olympics is expected to download an app to track their health. What else is it tracking?


On this date, Feb. 6 of 1936, the Winter Olympics opened in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bavaria — the last time both the Winter and Summer Olympics were held in the same country in the same year.

The Olympics that year attracted some controversy in the US because of the nature of the German political regime under Chancellor Adolf Hitler, who had by then been in power only three years.  But the argument that sports should be independent of politics won out, and so the US went on to participate in both sets of Olympic games.

Diplomatic boycott

Last Wednesday, the 2022 Winter Olympics kicked off in the Peoples’ Republic of China. The US is once again participating, although the Biden administration has enforced a diplomatic boycott of the event in protest of  “the PRC’s ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other human rights abuses.”

Britain, Australia, and Canada joined the US in the diplomatic boycott, which does not prevent athletes of those countries from participating in the games.  Chinese government representatives fired back that the US was taking actions that “politicise sports, create divisions and provoke confrontation,” according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Data insecurity

If you are an athlete or anyone else attending the games, the Chinese government is requiring you to download an app to your smartphone called “My 2022”, two weeks before your arrival, and make daily reports of the state of your health.

Ostensibly, the app is supposed to help the government achieve a 100% COVID-free event.  But when computer scientists examined the app, they found serious security flaws in it that can allow not only the Beijing government but random hackers to gain entry to your phone.

It’s no surprise to Chinese citizens that the My 2022 app is full of holes.  The Chinese government explicitly reserves the right to access any information stored on an electronic device.  My 2022 just makes it easier for them to do so.

According to the University of Toronto’s cybersecurity group Citizen Lab, the app can transmit confidential information such as passport and travel data with encryption that can be “trivially sidestepped.”  So even before leaving the US, Olympic athletes and anyone else attending will be subject to the Chinese national security apparatus.

Unavoidable issue

Some people may not be bothered by this.  After all, there is some weight to the argument that sporting events shouldn’t be politicised.  But it seems to me that the only way to completely divorce politics from sports is to have all competitors hail from the same political entity.

Victor Cha, writing on the Center for Strategic and International Studies website about the U. S. diplomatic boycott, quotes famed anti-totalitarian author George Orwell as saying, “sport is war minus the shooting.”  Any time you have competition, you’re going to have partisan cheering, even at the most humble level of small-town sporting events like the Ponca City Wildcats playing against the Enid Plainsmen in the wilds of northern Oklahoma.

So at the basic level of identification, all sporting events are politicised.  What Beijing objects to is not mere identification with the participants, however, but any action that singles China out as being a less worthy player on the international political stage.

Are they?  Consider the fact that for the last decade or more, China has been busily constructing a surveillance state that goes beyond the wildest dreams of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Big Brother is watching

One of the most chilling aspects of that book, which came out in 1949, was the omnipresence of “telescreens” which simultaneously broadcast state propaganda from “Big Brother” and spied on people.  Back then, readers reassured themselves that this was rank science fiction, because no regime could possibly afford to hire half the population to spy on the other half, and so most of the time, nobody was watching on the other end.

That was before the Internet and the advent of artificial-intelligence (AI) systems that can recognise faces, voices, and certain words, such as the 2,422 terms in the “illegalwords.txt” file bundled with the My 2022 app.  In it are phrases such as “Tiananmen Riot” and “Dalai Lama.” Woe unto anyone who uses those words at the Olympics this winter.

Scorecards

China‘s goal is to use any information it can get to establish social-credit scores that determine the degree of freedom allotted to each citizen.  People who behave well, according to standards set by the government, can travel, hold jobs, visit certain places, and behave almost like free citizens.

Those lacking a high social-credit score find that their privileges are suddenly withdrawn, and may feel some sympathy with the Uighur people of Xinjiang Province, many of whom have disappeared into “reeducation camps” for no other reason than their identity.

If anyone happens to download this blog onto their My-2022-equipped phone, I will not be held responsible for the consequences.  But it doesn’t matter, because the truth about the Beijing regime isn’t affected by what I say about it, or by what anybody else says or doesn’t say about it.

The Chinese surveillance state has to be one of the grandest violations of human rights, extended over time and space, that the world has ever seen.  Because it has been put in place gradually and folded into the other routine malfeasances and wrongdoings of the regime, it hasn’t attracted that many headlines, and billions of people in China manage to go about their business without being seriously inconvenienced by it.

But it’s like living in a house with four-foot ceilings.  Nobody would want to live there if the ceilings were dropped all in a day, but if they were moved down three inches a year, you might be able to get used to it.  But it still wouldn’t be a good thing.

I can’t help but wonder what the endgame will be in China.  Germany overreached its hand, and in 1936 the thousand-year reich actually had less than a decade of future left.  China clearly covets world domination, and in some measures it is well on the way to achieving it.

But a world in which true freedom is vanquished by an AI-enhanced surveillance regime and every action is monitored and evaluated, is not a world I would care to live in, given a choice.  So far, we still have a choice.  Let’s learn from our experience with things like My 2022 that the choice is worth preserving.

Republished with permission from the Engineering Ethics blog.

COLUMN BY

Karl D. Stephan

Karl D. Stephan received the B. S. in Engineering from the California Institute of Technology in 1976. Following a year of graduate study at Cornell, he received the Master of Engineering degree in 1977… More by Karl D. Stephan

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

IN JUST THE LAST WEEK: Crime Up 60% in NYC

When Democrats rule. G-d help us.

Crime up 60 percent citywide in the past week, NYPD stats show

By Larry Celona and Jorge Fitz-Gibbon, NY Post, February 7, 2022:

Crime in the Big Apple continues to spike, with a nearly 60 percent hike in the past week alone compared to the same period last year — even amid frigid temps, according to NYPD figures released Monday.

“Near-zero temperatures can’t keep the criminals away,” a Bronx cop told The Post. “It will only get worse as it gets warmer.”

The biggest jump for the week ending Sunday came in reported car thefts, with 255 for the week compared to 118 in 2021 — an increase of more than 116 percent, the stats show.

Grand larceny soared by more than 93 percent, with 908 reports compared to 470 for the same week last year, and reported rapes jumped by nearly 67 percent, to 35 from 21 last year.

Transit crimes have also gone up over the past week, with 34 this year compared to 18 for the same period in 2021, a nearly 89 percent leap.

Since the start of the year, overall crime has gone up by nearly 42 percent in the five boroughs, according to the numbers.

Car thefts have gone up by more than 96 percent, grand larceny by nearly 62 percent, rapes by more than 35 percent, and robberies by nearly 35 percent over the same period last year, the statistics show.

The year-to-date numbers also show that transit crimes have increased to 227 compared to 130 over this time last year, a spike of nearly 75 percent.

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden’s first year in office saw 73 police officers killed — most deaths since 1995

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

University of Michigan Professor Claims ‘Islamophobia’ Bigger Threat Than Islamic Terrorism

My latest in PJ Media:

Juan Cole, a professor at the University of Michigan, proved once again Thursday something that everyone who has been paying attention knows by now: you don’t go to an American university to get an education but to be indoctrinated into Leftist dogma and recruited for Antifa. Cole, who has written a hagiographical and whitewashed biography of Muhammad and is a Leftist go-to authority on Islamic issues, published an article in Foreign Policy In Focus entitled “Islam Wasn’t the Threat — Islamophobia Was.” If this sounds like nonsense, that’s only because it is, but that’s what sells on the Left these days.

Concern for Islamic terrorism, in Cole’s view, has been greatly exaggerated, in part for “racist” reasons (of course), while the rampant terror threat of “white supremacy” has been downplayed or ignored outright. Those who have suffered the most from this lack of focus, he insists, have been Muslims in America, who have borne the brunt of “Islamophobia” in America’s misguided quest to protect itself from a largely nonexistent threat of jihad terrorism.

All this is designed to inculcate the hatred and contempt for the United States that the Left is working to instill everywhere these days, and of course, Cole’s chief targets are conservatives. He begins his ridiculous piece by whining that “Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson excused one of the leaders of the extremist Oath Keepers organization implicated in the January 6th insurrection by describing him as ‘a devout Christian.’ It’s safe to surmise that he wouldn’t have offered a similar defense for a Muslim American.” Aside from denigrating Tucker Carlson, Cole’s point here is that the Jan. 6 “insurrection” was a manifestation of “Christian terrorism,” equivalent to the Islamic terrorism we saw on 9/11.

To drive this point home, Cole has to ignore numerous inconvenient facts, including these: that no one has been charged with insurrection in connection with Jan. 6, the protestors were unarmed, the police opened the doors of the Capitol and invited them in, and no one was killed except one of the protestors, by a rogue cop who has faced no punishment, since he is safely anti-Trump.

Cole also has to ignore the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by Islamic jihad terrorists on 9/11 and that those attacks were just one day’s worth, with 40,000 more jihad attacks coming worldwide since then. He sees 9/11 solely as the impetus for the victimization of Muslims in the United States: “Since September 11th, and even before that ominous date, Muslim Americans have suffered bitterly from discrimination and hate crimes in this country, while their religion has been demonized. During the first year of the Trump administration, about half of Muslim Americans polled said that they had personally experienced some type of discrimination.”

There is more. Read the rest here.

COLUMN BY

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamic Movement calls ‘resistance’ a ‘religious war’ and vows ‘all of the Jews will be evicted from Palestine’

‘Spencer’s The Palestinian Delusion counters the sham Amnesty Report with truth’

Colorado: Muslim sets fire to his house because ‘Allah told him to,’ to destroy his sister’s ‘idols’ (dolls)

Germany: Muslim migrant arrested with gun at train station, said he ‘wanted to kill as many people as possible’

Germany: Muslim enters church during service, throws himself on the ground while screaming about Allah

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

COVID Nazi Parallels Too Close for Comfort

There’s a growing disconnect between the easing of the COVID pandemic and the fervent determination of COVID Nazis to make the rest of us miserable.  The pandemic is easing, but the COVID Nazis are going full Trudeau.

statistic I’ve used consistently from the beginning of the pandemic is the percentage of emergency room visits for COVID-19 in the U.S.  That figure peaked at 14.2 percent on January 9th, and has fallen to 4.8 percent and was still falling as of a few days ago, the latest numbers show.  Previous peaks were around 8 percent and the percentage between previous spikes was below 2 percent.  So hospitalizations were relatively high during the omicron round, but not as bad as may first appear.  This is because the average hospital stay for omicron is shorter than for previous variants.  Another indication the pandemic is easing is the sharp decline in the number of COVID cases and hospitalizations.  They’re off more than half from their peak on January 15th, according to CDC numbers for February 2nd.

But don’t expect the COVID Nazis to follow the science.  They’d rather follow pseudo-science, just like Hitler’s gang followed the pseudo-science of racialism before them.

The staff at a California high school barricaded students protesting a mask mandate in the gym and turned down the thermostat to freeze them out.  The students were questioning why they should have to wear masks after Governor Gavin Göring was caught not wearing a mask again in public.

A doctor in Maine was suspended from practice after prescribing Ivermectin for patients, a drug shown to be safe and effective against COVID.  To add insult to injury, the COVID Nazis there ordered her to undergo a psych exam for daring to speak out against the official party line on COVID.  Medical boards in 12 states have disciplined doctors for COVID ‘misinformation’, although the ‘misinformation’ is never defined.  It’s enough, just like Hitler’s criminal code, to allege the doctors criticized the regime. History will not remember these medical boards any more kindly than it remembers Joseph Mengele.

The Virginia State Senate Democrat SS blocked a bill that would have allowed doctors and hospitals to prescribe Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, another safe and effective drug, to patients.  The Democrats shut down public comments and ordered the police to throw citizens out of the room.

The Oregon Health Authority issued a permanent school mask mandate in all K-12 schools.  State public health officials can lift the mandate if they feel like it, but there are no metrics.

newspaper in Salt Lake City called on the Governor to use storm troopers to keep unvaccinated people from going outside their homes.  That doesn’t go nearly far enough, a lawmaker in Washington state evidently believes.  A bill introduced there would allow state health authorities at their discretion to take unvaccinated people – including children as young as 5 years old – to concentration camps for refusing to get vaccinated.

Store employees ordered a man to leave after he lowered his mask to smell a scented candle.

A bill has been introduced in Congress to have the federal government track the COVID vaccination status of all Americans.

 Which brings us to the book How Do You Kill 11 Million People? about Nazi Germany.  You do it by lying to them.  The Nazis told the Jews they needed to be moved to a safer place as the Allies approached in order to get the Jews to board the trains to the death camps voluntarily.  Public health authorities have told us all kinds of lies about COVID, as I have documented in previous commentaries, including the lie that the vaccines are safe.  COVID vaccines are now associated with the deaths of more than 23,000 Americans.   But before the Nazis could kill all the Jews, they had to tabulate and track them with IBM Hollerith machines.  Am I saying the lawmaker who introduced the COVID tracking bill in Congress is a Nazi who wants to kill 11 million people?  No, but I am saying there are enough parallels to Nazi Germany here not to ever want to go down that road.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Should we pay reparations to the families of the 3.5 million men who fought in the Civil War?

Reparations: Compensation for historical crimes and wrongdoings with the aim of remedying injustices and helping specific groups of people or populations to prosper. 


We read with interest a February 2nd, 2022 USA TODAY article by Orlando Mayorquin titled, “Will California become the first state to pay Black people reparations?” Mayorquin wrote:

Supporters of a federal effort to study reparations for Black Americans are closely watching an ongoing debate in California over how to address the wrongs of history and dismantle racist structures.

California is the first state in the nation to seriously consider some form of reparations for Black Americans. The California Reparations Task Force is made up of academics, lawyers, civil rights leaders, lawmakers and other experts convened by Gov. Gavin Newsom and is tasked with studying the state’s role in perpetuating the legacy of slavery. The task force is expected to recommend proposals to the Legislature by next year.

California was admitted to the Union on September 9, 1850 and lost 500 men during to the Civil War.

Are the descendants of these 500 men being considered by the task force?

QUESTION: Why aren’t we studying paying reparations to the families of the 3.5 million men who fought in the Civil War?

The Civil War Battlefield 

World Population Review reports:

According to the American Battlefield Trust, of the 3.5 million men who fought in the war, there were 1.5 million casualties, 620,000 of which were deaths, making the Civil War the bloodiest in American history. More men’s lives were lost in the Civil War than World War I and World War II combined. The Battle of Gettysburg alone had 51,000 casualties. Additionally, there were 476,000 wounded and 400,000 captured or missing.

Of the Confederate states, Virginia and North Carolina had the highest number of military deaths, with approximately 31,000 each. Alabama had the second-highest with about 27,000 deaths. Of the Union states, New York has the highest number of military deaths of approximately 39,000, followed by Ohio and Illinois with about 31,000 each. California and Colorado had the lowest number of deaths of any state, given their location to the war’s battles. Military deaths were a combination of both combat deaths and disease deaths. In the table below are the estimated deaths for each state.

Here are the 10 states with the highest Civil War casualties:

  1. New York (39,000)
  2. Illinois (31,000)
  3. North Carolina (31,000)
  4. Ohio (31,000)
  5. Virginia (31,000)
  6. Alabama (27,000)
  7. Pennsylvania (27,000)
  8. Indiana (24,000)
  9. South Carolina (18,000)
  10. Michigan (13,000)
State Estimated Casualties 
New York 39,000
Virginia 31,000
Ohio 31,000
North Carolina 31,000
Illinois 31,000
Pennsylvania 27,000
Alabama 27,000
Indiana 24,000
South Carolina 18,000
Missouri 13,000
Michigan 13,000
Iowa 12,000
Wisconsin 11,000
Kentucky 9,000
Mississippi 8,000
Maine 8,000
Georgia 7,000
Arkansas 7,000
New Jersey 5,000
Vermont 4,000
New Hampshire 4,000
Louisiana 4,000
West Virginia 3,000
Texas 3,000
Tennessee 3,000
Minnesota 3,000
Kansas 3,000
Maryland 2,000
Rhode Island 1,000
Florida 1,000
Delaware 1,000
Colorado 500
California 500
Wyoming
Washington
Utah
South Dakota
Oregon
Oklahoma
North Dakota
New Mexico
Nevada
Nebraska
Montana
Massachusetts
Idaho
Hawaii
Connecticut
Arizona
Alaska

The Bottom Line

Men fought and died fighting the Civil War. Men of all races, creeds and colors. Don’t forget that 40,000 black soldiers, out of 178,000 who participated in the Civil War, died. Don’t their families deserve reparations too?

War isn’t a black or white issue. War is a national policy issue. In the case of the Civil War the issue was to reunite a divided nation. Yes, the issue at hand was in part slavery but in the greater part it was about an armed insurrection.

Perhaps we need to rethink this myth of reparations.

Those who fought in the Civil War set the stage for the end of slavery in America.

It is time to stop this push for reigniting another racial divide.

It has been 157 years since the end of the Civil War.

Isn’t it time to move on and begin with the most important social issue: that we judge people by the content of their characters rather than the color of their skins?

And this ends this lesson on equal justice under the law.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

IRS Decides It Won’t Make You Take A Selfie To Access Your Taxes After Fierce Backlash

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will no longer force taxpayers to submit a scan of their face to access their taxes online.

The agency had previously announced plans to require users to sign into the IRS website through third-party identity verification firm ID.me and provide a government identification document alongside a selfie. The IRS said the move would provide users with greater security and accessibility to their tax information.

However, the agency announced Monday it would be scrapping its plans to implement the verification system.

“The IRS takes taxpayer privacy and security seriously, and we understand the concerns that have been raised,” IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig said in the statement. “Everyone should feel comfortable with how their personal information is secured, and we are quickly pursuing short-term options that do not involve facial recognition.”

The decision to transition away from facial recognition technology follows fierce criticism from voices across the political spectrum as well as privacy advocates. Republican Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker sent a letter to Rettig on Friday asking how the agency arrived at the decision to compel taxpayers to submit selfies, while The Washington Post editorial board slammed the move as posing “serious concerns about privacy.”

Democratic Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden called on the IRS to abandon its plans to implement facial recognition technology on Monday morning, just hours before the agency’s announcement.

“The Treasury Department has made the smart decision to direct the IRS to transition away from using the controversial ID.me verification service, as I requested earlier today” Wyden said in a statement. “I understand the transition process may take time, but I appreciate that the administration recognizes that privacy and security are not mutually exclusive and no one should be forced to submit to facial recognition to access critical government services.”

COLUMN BY

AILAN EVANS

Tech reporter. Follow Ailan on Twitter @AilanHEvans

RELATED ARTICLE: Australia’s Home Quarantine App Uses Facial Recognition Technology To Make Sure You Haven’t Left Your House

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

MASS MURDER: A Medical System That Has Lost Its Direction and Soul

“People were dying, [yet] all of my ideas were getting shouted down. My superiors were showing up [to my clinical meetings] and getting me to stand down, because I was entertaining the idea that we should do this, that and the other thing, and they didn’t want anything to be done.” – Dr. Pierre Kory

“This is a war on cheap repurposed drugs.” –  Dr. Paul Marik before testifying on NH Bill that would make Ivermectin available OTC in NH.

“I never thought I’d see the day where doctors are censored, and patients are kept from care.” –  Dr. Peter McCullough

“An epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause…say…10 million excess deaths.” –  Bill Gates – 2017


Were we lied to about the number of deaths from Covid?  Yes!  Were the tests run at cycles too high to purposely show false positives? Yes!  Could someone pass the virus if asymptomatic? No!  Was social distancing valid?  No!  Were masks beneficial? No!  Was the lockdown effective in stopping the viral spread?  No!

Have nearly half of small businesses been destroyed? Yes!  Has the economy tanked?  Yes!  Have the big box stores benefitted? Yes! Has domestic abuse risen?  Yes!  Has drug addiction climbed?  Yes!  Have suicide rates escalated? Yes!  Have mental and physical problems risen?  Yes!  Have children lost IQ from the masking? Yes!  Are children disabled via speech impediments and learning disabilities because of the lockdowns and masking?  Yes!

Have the AMA, CDC, FDA, NIH protocols saved patients?  Hell no!  They have purposely murdered hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, who could have been saved.  The dissident doctors, scientists and healthcare workers know there are repurposed drugs (inexpensive and available) that could have saved up to 86% of those who perished.  Have those same stakeholders lied about Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin?  Yes, even Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine lied.

Have we been sold a lie via fear mongering and media propaganda?  Yes! Has the government enacted mandates that are unconstitutional?  Yes!  Has the Bill of Rights been violated?  Yes!

Are the COVID jabs dangerous to your health and wellbeing? Very!  Are the actuarial tables showing a rise in deaths of young people who had the jab?  Yes!  Are our soldiers being disabled by the jab? Yes! Have we been lied to from day one about the creation of this Wuhan virus and who is responsible?  Yes!

Was the CIA involved in planning this pandemic?  Yes!  Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci, states that there were over 20 “pandemic” simulations beginning in 2000, and Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci and the CIA were involved in every one of them. “The CIA wrote the script, high-level CIA officials participated in every one of those pandemic simulations.”

Kennedy states, “So they practiced again and again and again: How to use the pandemic as a pretext for imposing totalitarian controls and for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet.”

This was all part of a decades-old globalist-devised blueprint for the future.

“New World System”

The previous two nightmare years were engineered decades ago and exposed in the 1960s.  Dr. Vernon Coleman’s short 17-minute video explains what the globalist architects were up to back then and where we are today…frighteningly close to completion!  He mentioned a dystopian lecture by Dr. Richard Day.

In March 1969, Dr. Richard Day, Professor of Pediatrics at Mt. Sinai Medical School in New York gave a chilling lecture about the “New World System.” Previously he had served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.  He told of future plans, whether as a forewarning or to unburden himself.  He spoke as though he had colluded with the blueprint designers.  His warnings for the future were uncannily accurate.

Dr. Lawrence Dunegan attended Dr. Day’s lecture. The audience was told not to take notes, but he later recorded his recollections of what was said by Dr. Day. Two of the three tapes made by Dr. Dunegan were transcribed and can be accessed at this website.  It’s all there, and we’re experiencing everything Dr. Day told the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society 53 years ago.  I urge you to fully peruse the website it as it contains vital information not included in this article.

Dr. Coleman exposed the highlights of Dr. Day’s lecture.  Day warned that in the future, the elderly would be eliminated by making it more difficult for them to access medical care.  He stated that social chaos would be promoted, travel would be restricted, hospitals would become jails, private medicine would be eliminated, the incidence of heart attacks would be deliberately increased, the world population would be reduced, information would be controlled, fake science would be used to promote the myth of global warming, there would be cameras everywhere, sports will become unisex, ID cards will be implanted, food supplies would be controlled, the weather would be controlled, and the people would be controlled.

He also warned that books would be banned and removed from libraries if they were considered dangerous.  Professor Day also stated that television sets would be able to watch the people who watch them and that new diseases would be deliberately introduced.

Dr. Coleman mentioned we were warned in the 80s that everyone would be affected by AIDS, and by the 2000s, medical organizations were constantly producing unsubstantiated scare stories.  Today the beat goes on…

Our Soulless Medical System

Dr. Dunegan was shocked when Dr. Day stated, “Some of you will think I’m talking about Communism. Well, what I’m talking about is much bigger than Communism!”

Of the over 40 topics discussed in the transcribed two tapes, I’ve included only a few of Dr. Dunegan’s statements, those that pertain to the medical industry.  My comments are in italics.

  • Limiting access to affordable medical care.

A big item that was elaborated on at some length was the cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time. Unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting family, they would just have to do without care. And the idea was that if everybody says, “Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain the old people,” then the young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. Then the example was – there could be a nice farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and Dad had done a good job. Then after the party is over, they take the “demise pill.”

  • Planning the control over medicine.

There would be profound changes in the practice of medicine. Overall, medicine would be much more tightly controlled.  Insurance is the racket they’ve been using to control what you are allowed and not allowed.

This has already been exacerbated by Obama’s euphemistically named, “Affordable Care Act.”  The cost of insurance and thus medical care has risen exponentially, along with the cost of prescription medications.  More at the Link.

  • Elimination of private doctors.

The image of the doctor would change. No longer would he be seen as an individual professional in service to individual patients.  The doctor would be gradually recognized as a highly skilled technician – and his job would change. The job is to include things like executions by lethal injection.

Healthcare providers in other countries ravaged by COVID have decided that age 60 is the cut off age for life or for use of resources that can benefit younger patients.

Last December, New Zealand okayed euthanasia for COVID patients.

Nine states (CA, CO, HI, ME, NJ, NM, OR, VT, and WA) and DC legalized physician-assisted suicide via legislation.  One state, (MT) has legal physician-assisted suicide via court ruling.

The image of the doctor being a powerful, independent person would have to be changed. Dr. Richard Day went on to say, “Doctors are making entirely too much money. They should advertise like any other product.” Lawyers would be advertising too.

Lawyers already are advertising, and very few physicians still have single practices.  All of them are working for an employer in a group practice, which can advertise. 

Keep in mind, this was an audience of doctors; being addressed by a doctor. And it was interesting that he would make some rather insulting statements to his audience without fear of antagonizing us. The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past.

They have.

A few die-hards might try to hold out, but most doctors would be employed by an institution of one kind or another. Group practice would be encouraged, corporations would be encouraged, and then once the corporate image of medical care gradually became more and more acceptable, doctors would more and more become employees rather than independent contractors. Along with that, of course, unstated but necessary, is the employee serves his employer, not his patient.

  • New difficult to diagnose and untreatable diseases.

The next heading to talk about is Health and Disease. Day said there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. They would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable – at least for a long time. No elaboration was made on this, but I remember, not long after hearing this presentation, when I had a puzzling diagnosis to make, I would be wondering, “Is this a case of what he was talking about?” Some years later AIDS developed. I think AIDS was at least one example of what he was talking about. I now think that AIDS probably was a manufactured disease.

Covid has never been isolated, neither have any of the so-called “variants.”

  • Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control.

Cancer. He said, “We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever decided that it should be released. But consider – if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as of something else.”  Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward cure. There was some statement that ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.

And there’s all the money made from those stricken with the disease.

  • Inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination.

Another very interesting thing was heart attacks. Day said, “There is now a way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a means of assassination.” Only a very skilled pathologist who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could distinguish this from the real thing. I thought that was a very surprising and shocking thing to hear from this particular man at that particular time. This, and the business of the cancer cure, really still stand out sharply in my memory, because they were so shocking and, at that time, seemed to me out of character.

He then went on to talk about nutrition and exercise sort of in the same framework. People would have to eat right and exercise right to live as long as before. Most won’t. In retrospect, I tend to think he meant high salt diets and high fat diets would predispose toward high blood pressure and premature arteriosclerotic heart disease. And that if people who were too dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should, then their circulating fats go up and predispose to disease.

Dr. Day also said something about diet information would be widely available, but most people, particularly stupid people, who had no right to continue living anyway, would ignore the advice and just go on and eat what was convenient and tasted good. There were some other unpleasant things said about food. I just can’t recall what they were. But I do remember having reflections about wanting to plant a garden in the backyard to get around whatever these contaminated foods would be. I regret I don’t remember the details about nutrition and hazardous nutrition.

Researchers are now putting COVID mRNA vaccines in lettuce, spinach and edible plants to vaccinate the unvaxxed.

Anybody who was lazy enough to want convenience foods rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then he didn’t deserve to live very long.

This was all presented as sort of a moral judgement about people and what they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise right are better people – and the kind you want to live longer.

Look at the rise in heart attacks with the COVID vax, not to mention a shortened life because of myocarditis, pericarditis, and a destroyed immune system.

Professor Day also mentioned the need for more jails, and using hospitals as jails.  Hospitals could serve as jails. Some new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable to jail-like use.

Haven’t we already seen this very thing happen to many elderly patients and only by the grace of God have families and attorneys gotten them out of these new COVID-death prisons.  Attorneys Report Spike in Calls for Help from Families of Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

All of this was forecast in 1969, and nearly everything Dr. Day lectured about has already happened…and at an increasingly accelerated rate.  Today, medical care for the un-jabbed is being denied, social credits are being introduced, and the mandatory childhood jabs are on their way to kill or sterilize our children.  Babies and toddlers are next.

What has occurred in the last two years is a culmination of these plans. The hospital protocols for COVID are a death sentence and the unvaxxed “pure bloods” are also paying a hefty price.

Vax Mandates

A three year old boy was denied heart surgery in Germany, the UK and Israel because his parents weren’t “vaccinated.”  Finally, he was flown to Greece where the surgery was performed.

A Boston hospital refused a 31-year-old man a heart transplant because he did not want to be inoculated with C-19 jabs.  One look at the myocarditis and pericarditis stats after these vax injections would deter anyone, yet medical personnel, who are supposed to stay informed, either know nothing, or continue to protect themselves rather than their patients.  They follow their employers’ mandates.

Cleveland Clinic has made it mandatory for anyone receiving a transplant to be Covid jabbed.  A kidney transplant became available for Mike Ganim via a friend of the family.  But then devastating news was dropped on them when Cleveland Clinic said the donor had to have the C-19 vax in order to “protect” everyone.  The donor had religious reasons, including freedom, for her refusal of this inoculation.

The U.S. Navy is violating a court order by allegedly blocking treatment for a traumatic brain injury and inflicting other forms of punishment on SEALs who requested religious exemptions to the coronavirus “vaccine,” according to a new legal complaint.

Adverse Effects and Fatalities

The military’s mandated injections resulted in a high rate of disorders, ailments and death, as well as the onset of COVID-19, influenza, pneumonia, and over 100 other conditions.

The findings of the Department of Defense (DOD) whistleblowers, as told to attorney Thomas Renz, are consistent with remarks from OneAmerica CEO J. Scott Davison, who stated during a call hosted by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce and the Indiana Hospital Association that “working age people (18 to 64) are dying at a rate that is 40% higher than pre-pandemic rates.”

Healthy young sports figures are dying because of the vax; 108 FIFA footballers and over 400 athletes dead from heart failure in six months.

Journalist and commentator Daniel Horowitz, who spoke with attorney Renz before Senator Ron Johnson’s panel discussion, explained in an article published January 26th that the doctors “queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average.”

An alarming increase in cancer, miscarriages and myocarditis was found in addition to many other diseases (as outlined in Senator Ron Johnson’s letter to DOD Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III).

  • Hypertension — 2,181% increase
  • Diseases of the nervous system — 1,048% increase
  • Malignant neoplasms of esophagus — 894% increase
  • Multiple sclerosis — 680% increase
  • Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs — 624% increase
  • Guillain-Barre syndrome — 551% increase
  • Breast cancer — 487% increase
  • Demyelinating — 487% increase
  • Malignant neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands — 474% increase
  • Female infertility — 472% increase
  • Pulmonary embolism— 468% increase
  • Migraines — 452% increase
  • Ovarian dysfunction — 437% increase
  • Testicular cancer — 369% increase
  • Tachycardia — 302% increase

Medical Propaganda

There are hundreds of thousands of incidences of hospital protocols for COVID patients and those who received the jabs resulting in death.  COVID fatalities are kept high despite available repurposed drugs and OTC supplements. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and supplements are cheap, can be used at home, will keep you out of hospital and are on the WHO’s Model List of Essential Medicines.  These effective medications have purposely been maligned, not only by the media, the snakeholders and the majority of medical caregivers, but by The Lancet medical journal and the New England Journal of Medicine.

Robert Kennedy Jr. states, “Somebody at the very pinnacle of the medical cartel had twisted arms, kicked groins, and stoved in kneecaps to force these periodicals to abandon their policies, shred their ethics, and spend down their centuries of hard-won credibility in a desperate bid to torpedo HCQ.  To date, neither the authors of the false anti-HCQ claims, nor the journals, have explained who induced them to coauthor and publish the most momentous fraud in the history of scientific publishing.”

The globalist goals were always pointed at a “vaccine,” where billions would funnel into the pockets of Gates, Fauci, and their friends in Big Pharma.  Thus, the maligning of repurposed wonder drugs, and the murder of millions was accomplished to fill the coffers of the depopulation enemies of freedom and complete the Great Reset.

Conclusion

There can be only one conclusion.  Mass Murder was planned and we are the prey.

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.